The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, December 08, 2000, Page 4, Image 4
% ^
Quote, Unquote
‘It was just a simple joke that went too far.’
Michael Berger, Sigma Chi president, concerning
assault and battery allegations against fraternity members
Page 4
Zhc 0aimcock
Serving the Carolina Community since 1 QOS
Editorial Board
Brock Vergakis • Editor in Chief
Kevin Langston • Viewpoints Editor
Nathan White • Asst. Viewpoints Editor
Patrick Rathbun • Editorial Contributor
Brad Walters • Editorial Contributor
Martha Wright • Editorial Contributor
Holding Reading Day
on Saturday is absurd
On Saturday, students should be sure to use their time
wisely and study for their upcoming exams — because
it is, after all, Reading Day.
Yes, Saturday has been labeled USC’s Reading Day. This is
supposed to be a courteous gesture extended by the universi
ty, so students should be thankful the university has allotted a
day during the weekend to prepare for finals.
How many students will use Saturday for finals prepara
tion? Some students might abuse this invitation by goofing off
and sleeping late, but others do use reading day for its intend
ed purposes. But realistically, we can only assume few, if any,
students will use this semester’s weekend Reading Day for its
intended purpose. Either way, it’s the personal choice of the
student.
In fact, this year’s Reading Day falls on a day when the
university has no authority to declare it as such. Some classes
do meet on Saturdays, and some professors reserve the right
to hold classes on Saturdays to make up missed sessions, but
does the university have the right to give the students the
right to study on that day? We are forced to wonder whether
next semester’s or next year’s Reading Day will fall on a Sun
day.
These queries should have been considered by the univer
sity before it decided to declare Saturday as Reading Day. The
university must not think of Reading Day as useful or impor
tant; otherwise they would have made Reading Day fall dur
ing the regular school week. Many other universities provide
students with several days for preparation, not counting the
weekend. While Friday might not have been much of an im
provement, some studying could be expected, and this is not
the case for this semester’s Reading Day.
Letters
Reader finds
column derogatory
To the Editor
Since when does having a title like
sports editor give a person the right to
make derogatory statements about some
one else? In Wednesday’s issue of The
Gamecock, sports editor Jared Kelowil/.
used his final column to take cheap shots
at the NBA. This isn’t alarming because
that’s what most writers with too much
free time do, but all the issues he raised
focused heavily on the African-Americans
in the league. He discussed comrows, tat
toos, baggy shorts, headbands and rapping.
His terminology was shallow, using words
like “hoods” and “you guys.” The way he
discussed the issues lead me to believe that
little Jared has a much bigger problem than
even he recognizes.
What these players decide to do
with their hair, skin and free time is their
business. Jared should be reminded that
he is nothing more than an amateur sports
writer, who, from the look of that column,
doesn’t seem very open-minded to diver
sity. If he really wants to write a column
on the NR\, he should report on those fat
necks in the skyboxcs that make all the
money off these so-called “hoods.” Then
again, he might not have a problem with
that system since that’s how it’s always
been in “the land of the free and the home
of the brave.”
I ’ ve never really been too fond of this
newspaper, and my feelingsgel worse every
time someone like Kclowiiz gets a col
umn published. Where do you all find these
writers? 1 realize now that we haven’t
made as much progress in this country as
we have been led to believe. We arc far
from the day when we learn to respect dif
ferences in other people. We arc even far
ther away from ridding our society of bad
apples, because they frequently hide be
hind job titles like sports editor.
Edrin C. Williams
African-American Studies Junior
About Us
The Gamecock is the student newspaper of The University ot South Carolina and is published Monday, Wednesday and Fnday
during the fall and spring semesters and nine times during the summer with the exception of university holidays and exam periods.
Opinions expressed in The Gamecock are those of the editors or author and not those of The University of South Carolina. The
Board of Student Publications and Communications is the publisher of The Gamecock. The Department of Student Media is the
newsnaner's oarent crsanaation. The Gamecock is supported in part by student activities fees.
Address
The Gamecock
1400 Greene Street
Columbia. SC 29208
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
Student Media Area code 803
Advertising 777-3888
Classified 777-1184
Fax 777-6482
Office 777-3888
Gamecock Area code 803-777-7726
Editor in Chief gamecockeditor@hotmail.com
University Desk gamecockudesk@hotmail.com
City/State Desk gamecockcitydesk@hotmail.com
Viewpoi nts gamecockviewpoi nts@hot ma i I. com
Spotlight gamecockspotlight@hotmail.com
Sports gamecocksports@hotmail.com
SuBM&stON Policy
Letters to the editor or guest columns are welcome
from all members of the Carolina community. Letters
should be 250-300 words. Guest columns should be an
opinion piece of about 600 words.
Both must include name, phone number, profes
sional title or year and major, if a student. Handwritten
submissions must be personally delivered to Russell
House room 333. E-mail submissions must include tele
phone number for confirmation and should be sent to
gamecockviewpomts@hotmail.com.
The Gamecock reserves the right to edit for libel,
style and space. Anonymous letters will not be pub
lished. Photos are required for guest columnists and can
be provided by the submitter.
Call 777-7726 for more information.
The Gamecock
Brock Vergakis
Editor in Chief
Brandon Larrabee
University Editor
John Huiett
City/State Editor
Kevin Langston
Viewpoints Editor
Jared Kelowitz
Day Sports Editor
Kyle Almond
Night Sports Editor
Mackenzie Clements
Jason Harmon
Ashley Melton
Brad Walters
Martha Wright
Copy Editors
Student Media
Erik Collins
Faculty Adviser
Ellen Parsons
Director of
Student Media
Susan King
Creative Director
Sean De Luna
Todd Hooks
Melanie Hutto
Emilie Moca
Martin Salisbury
Creative Services
MacKenzie Craven
Spotlight Editor
Travis Lynn
Sean Rayford
Photo Editors
Charles Prashaw
Amanda Silva
Asst. University Editors
John Bailey
p Asst City/State Editor
Nathan White
Asst. Viewpoints Editor
Aubrey Fitzloff
Miranda LaLonde
Ann Marie Miani
Jennie Moore
Katie Smith
Page Designers
Carolyn Griffin
Business Manager
Jannell Deyo
Robyn Gombar
Kera Khalil
Denise Levereaux
Brantley Roper
Nicole Russell
Advertising Staff
Jonathan Dunagin
Interim Ad Manager
Sherry F. Holmes
Classified Manager
i:iie (SamecocR
College Press Exchange
■
—
\awpm fo me
lAtesr exUPWi,
60% TKlNK YOU \^ZZ^S\
$#m pwvC^'yE7
k i ■» el / A.
Mankind
Time to start killing people
* Please un
derstand that Mr.
Langston is not en
couraging you to
set off on your own
killing spree. He is
not planning on
killing anyone, ei
ther. He is a paci
fist, OK? If you
feel inspired to start
killing after read
ing this column,
you arc giving him
too much credit
and should be ex
amined as soon as
humanly, possible.
Besides, you
wouldn ’t be that
stupid, would you?
Kevin Langston
is a senior
journalism major.
This is his last
contribution as a
staff member of
The Gamecock.
He can be reached
at gamecockview
points©
hotmail.com.
Chere you arc, standing in a crowd
ed elevator with seven strangers.
You do your best to avoid eye con
tact because, let’s face it, people do not
like making eye contact in such tight
spaces.
All of you will transfix on the ceiling
or the flashing light that tells you what
floor you’re on. No one will say anything.
There is an awful lot of trust being ex
hibited in this scene, don’t you think?
Who’s to say one of you doesn’t pull out
a knife and start thrashing the other peo
ple in the elevator? There would be no
warning or explanation, but isn’t this how
most murders go down? No one hovers
over your trembling frame and politely
tells you they’re about to kill you. They
won’t give you that satisfaction.
Have you ever really given thought
to why someone can reach a point where
killing a person isn’t a real problem for
them? Sorry to close out my career as a
staff member of The Gamecock with such
a grim topic, but in my twisted psyche,
this is a fitting and proper “so long.” I’ll
save the sentimental banter for a spring
guest column, when I am next in line to
bow out gracefully. Until then, this will
have to suffice. Besides, I have something
important to say.
rou see, i came 10 me siarr. lean/a
tion that the only thing that really pre
vents one man from killing another is
restraint. I believe that mankind can be a
very savage species. While we might con
sider ourselves to be the most enlightened,
I challenge you with this statement: “I
used to think the brain was the most com
plex and sophisticated mechanism in the
known universe until I realized the source
of this epiphany.”
Of course, we’re going to say we’re
the most intellectual creatures crawling
on this planet. We’re egotistical. But 1 eas
ily sec our species being as, if not more,
savage than our brothers and sisters in the
animal kingdom,
Why more savage? Because we ap
parently have the ability to realize we
could be the higher order of species, yet
we act no better at times.
An opposing thumb doesn’t make us
divine.
Have you ever listened to a live record
ing of a rock show? Have you ever been
to a concert, a sporting event or any so
cial gathering? Next time you’re in this
environment, listen. Just listen. Listen out
for what I consider tribal noises: clapping,
shouting, hooting, hollering, chanting,
booing, hissing, sneering, yelling, whistling
and stomping. These noises clearly indi
cate something primal and savage in our
species.These are involuntary, for the
most part, when you consider that we re
ally don’t give these noises much thought
when we make them. But 1 am not bas
ing my aigument on a couple of noises.
No; 1 am my own specimen. Please,
read on.
So what am 1 getting at? When some
one strays from the ideal of normalcy and
decent behavior (Columbine, Oklahoma
City, Waco), we like to find a source or
reason for the problem. Maybe the point
ing of fingers is overlooking the simple
fact that we might not be as advanced as
we thought we were. Maybe people kill
other people because they want to.
1 discovered the frightening fact that
I hate stupid people. Now, I am not talk
ing about the mentally handicapped and
challenged, I am referring to those who
lack common sense. As ashamed as I am
to admit it, 1 despise the type of person
who, when you’re in the elevator at the
top floor of a building, they ask you if
you’re going down.
Do we really need this type of per
son?
Some cynics would say we need these
people to perform the most meager and
simple tasks for the better of our civi
lization, and I would tell them to build a
robot or machine to handle that stuff. Call
me crazy, but 1 have actually plotted out
a nationwide killing spree in my spare
limn
Care to talk a wall/, inside the head of
a potential madman?
You see, I was eating dinner in a Ryan’s
Family Steak House one evening with a
friend (now an undeniable accomplice),
and I took a staggering look around me.
In conversation, I toyed with the notion
of blowing up all the Ryan’s in the coun
try to see if our overall IQ level would in
crease instantly. From there, 1 was on a
slippery slope of bad ideas. It started with
Ryan’s and fans ofTed Nugent, and it was
all downhill from there. 1 envisioned this
scheme where 1 would set out across the
nation, killing people whom I deemed stu
pid and unimportant to the advance
ment of our society. Trim the fat, if you
will.
To show you I’m serious, I’d even
start with a family member. It’s pretty
scary, but I know which one 1 ’d start with,
loo. (No one in the immediate family,
though. I’m not a monster.)
In the interest of keeping things brand
new and interesting, I’d even have a Web
site that would be updated periodically.
On this site, you’d find stunning anecdotes
of where I’ve been and what I’ve been up
to. It would be complete with a detailed
map that shows my path of homicidal de
struction. Hell, I’d even keep a current
list of the people I’ve killed just to make
sure you weren’t related to, or friends
with, one of them (because stupid iscon
tagious, people).
I’d even send press releases, complete
with photographs and contact informa
tion, to nationwide newspapers, giving
them all the details and information
they would ever need. I might even give
them a preview of my next stop so they
could possibly cover it. Why keep
things hidden? Why leave room for spec
illation? I’d tell the world why I did it,
and then no one else could get blamed for
it, right?
Don’t get me wrong, folks. I would
n’t be a complete animal. If, while I’m
preparing to mercilessly torture you un
til you die, you can convince me that you
deserve another chance, I just might take
you up on it. Instead of doing something
really terrible, 1 might only lake a limb or
an opposing thumb as collateral.
Then, after an unnamed period of time,
if you have proven your worth, I’d send
the part back to you, complete with enough
money to get it reattached. It would be
perfectly preserved — don’t you worry
about that.
But I am sure some or you are won
dering where I’d get the money for all
these suigical reattachments. Well, I’d
have a sponsor, of course. Raid would prob
ably crawl all over this deal. I’d simply
ask them for transportation, the financing
of the surgeries and enough money for
food and lodging. In return, it would be
“The Raid Killing Spree of Moral, So
cial and Ethical Cleansing.”
If this fell through, the book and movie
deals and exclusive interviews and tele
vision spots would fund some portion of
this tour de force. Ask me if I haven’t
thought things through. If you were a stu
pid person, I’d make you think twice about
having kids, because I would have to leave
nn Qlnno i mill mod
Bui 1 know you. I know that you will
look for someone lo blame. Whai music
have I been listening lo? What movies do
I like watching? What do I do in my spare
lime? What books do I read? Who are my
idols? Well, I’m here to tell you that I
blame it on one person. Thai’s right, there
is a single soul to lay all the blame on. It
doesn’t have anything to do with society
pr the hand it has dealt me. I blame ene
person and one person alone: me.
When I’m on the witness stand, and
the tail end of my reign of terror, I will
not plead insanity, nor will I try to lay it
on an unknown and intangible aspect. Hell,
someone save this column and present it
to the authorities as my manifesto, just lo
keep me honest. But when 1 am on the
witness stand, I will declare that my in
tentions were lo better this savage soci
ety through savagery. Plain and simple.
With a convincing enough argument, I
think I could get off I really do. After all,
how could an entire society of savages
persecute an individual savage for being
a part of the whole? What does this say
about all of us if I, a relatively normal fel
low, can have these thoughts (but suppress
them)?
So, the next time you see me in an el
evator, think it about it. Mussolini, Marx
... these people started off as journalists,
and look at what they did. The world is
undeniably different because of these guys,
and who’s to say I couldn’t measure up?
Surely I won’t reach their notoriety, but
I could revolutionize the way people look
at their species. Or I could just make an
awful mess. This society is almost begging
for the type of mayhem 1 would bring, and
I might have to succumb to my inner rage.
So if you’re stupid, you might want to lay
low for a while.
You never know — I just might start
a nationwide killing spree.
Those interested in writing columns for Viewpoints next semester
should e-mail: gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com
Friday, December 8,2000
Millenniausm
The end of
the world
is at hand
Exactly 343
days ago, the
world was in
the midst of a cele
bration. People were
in the streets party
ing like it was 1999,
because it was, and
the new millennium
hung just around the
bend. Y2K had been
averted, and all was
safe in the world,
right?
Wrong. Much
like USC’s error in
celebrating its 200th
anniversary on its
196th, the world cel
ebrated the millenni
um a year early.
Jonathan
Dunagin
is a mass
communications
graduate student.
He can be
reached at game
cockviewpoints
©hotmail.com
So what s that have to do with you/ Well,
it depends on who you are. It is the belief of
some apocalyptic theorists, among others,
that the beginning of the new millennium
will mark the end of the world.
Even depending on which religious schol
ars you consult, a formula has been devel
oped, based on religious text, that also marks
this dale on the calendar with a big red X.
So whether you buy into all this deter
mines what the upcoming year will repre
sent. To me, it’ll just serve to show how peo- '
pie are false-hearted and gullible.
Believe it or not, I remember people
were truly starting to panic less than a year
ago. Street-comer prophets demanded at
tention from anyone with an ear, and the me
dia reported on the impending Y2K disas
Ipr
Even television shows began pointing to
society and religious text and started mak
ing connections. Now, I don’t know all of
them, but I definitely remember mentions
of war in the Middle East, frequent natural
disasters and a falling away from Christian
faith, all of which have arguably been pre
dicted in religious text and occur today.
However, this year there has been no
mention of an impending apocalypse. In fact,
the debate over what to name this decade
is hotter. (I’m going with USC student Ryan
Guerra’s idea to call it the “Unies.”)
My point is that some people are false
hearted, and others are gullible. I’m not sure
if I made up the word “false-hearted,” but if
so, I’m trademarking it. It could be defined i
as one who is a hypocrite, but “hypocrite” '
doesn’t have the same effect.
I want to know why people are only
strongly into religion when it serves them.
When people feared the inevitable would
occur, they started paying attention in church,
listening to Gospel 95.3 and entertaining
every discussion involving heaven and
hell. But once last year’s “millennium” dis
aster was avoided, it was back to sleeping in
on Sunday, talking about football and lis
tening to WUSC.
Mmif I’m nnt tho nrvdor frnli
-- ^ r---- ,
gion, and 1 dofiT claim to be, but what tru
ly annoys me are these people who only i
adopt religion when it stands to serve them.
Especially those fair-weather hypocritical
Biblc-thumpers who one day can talk about ,
hell atjd damnation, and the next day enjoy
its companionship.
Why is it I haven’t seen them of late?
Why is it when the millennium is truly com
ing to an end, they arc not on their pedestals,
as they were last year, proclaiming mankind
to be doomed?
Because they are false-hearted (there’s
that word again). They don’t practice what
they preach, and don’t even believe it; they
just like to gamer attention.
These are people who look to the pub
lic, sec how to manipulate them and take ad
vantage. And as the public, we arc the gullible. -
Now, I don’t mean to dishearten anyone,
but face it, society on the whole dictates
everything we are. We are susceptible to
even the slightest amount of influence, and
that’s what these false oroDhcls see and use
to their advantage.
That’s also why you haven’t heard word
from them yet this year. To the public, the
millennium has already changed over, so why
be worried about apocalyptic predictions?
And these false-hearted individuals see
that, and choose not to stand up on their
pedestals, because after all, they don’t actu
ally believe what they preach, they just like
being in the spotlight.
Now, I'm not saying that there won’t be
an evangelistic group that decides to
spread messages of armageddon. In fact, I
could safely bet that some cult religious group
will lake part in a mass suicide, but no one
has stepped up on the soapbox yet.
And until they do, the public will ignore
the fact that the millennium is upon us, and
instead focus their attention on avoiding el
evators that have psychotic Gamecock
columnists lerking in them.