The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, November 03, 2000, A Gamecock Extra: 80's Weekend, Page 5, Image 15
Viewpoints
Friday, November 3, 2000 tOlC 03MCOCK Page 5
October 23,1981 - Staff Editorial
Gamecock needs
alumni funding
Without money to grease
the ever-winding cogs of the
media, the business would grind
to a halt while the broadcast
word and televised event evapo
rated - leaving only printed fos
sils to fade and flake away.
Journalism is a free enter
prise which attracts and refines
individual skills, thus perpetuat
ing the media within the free
state. It's a business in which
competition necessitates accura
cy and depth in reporting.
On the USC campus, The
Gamecock is the students' news
papers. We also need to attract
individuals whose skills will
improve your paper.
Recently, however, Student
_*_1_I_
'JU* C/1 illUC-m IVAlUVCAi V/UI
chances of bringing fresh talent
to the newsroom. But before we
yield to the designs of outsiders
who intentionally or uninten
tionally apply financial pressure,
we will exhaust all possibilities
of independent survival.
The Gamecock, although by
no means in serious financial
trouble, is faced with a situation
grave enough to adversely affect
the quality of material printed
on our pages. We are preparing
to exhaust yet another possibility
to improve our situation.
When USC president
Holderman signed the Student
Government allocations bill Oct.
14, The Gamecock newspaper
realized its on-campus fight to
pay reporters and photographers
was over.
"Other students in other
organizations don’t get paid;
Why should they?" That was the
argument put forth by Student
Senate Finance Committee
members and the argument that
most likely ran through
Holderman's mind when he
O.K.'d Gamecock allocations.
The problem is not that we
didn't get enough money: The
Gamecock was allocated
$56,768. But we were refused
money to pay reporters and pho
tographers. Instead, the Senate
Finance Committee saw fit to
direct about $20,000 of the total
allocation toward purchasing and
installing three video display ter
minals. These machines, once
installed, will allow us to type a
story directly into a computer
ized printer, thereby saving time
and money by eliminating two
state-paid production jobs.
Yet, because of Student
Government's good, though mis
guided, intention, The
Gamecock is forced to slow its
progress. Although experience is
an excellent incentive for jour
nalism majors and those who
wish to write and shoot pictures,
it is unrealistic to believe stu
dents will work long hours with
no pay.
Although The Gamecock's
editors and assistant editors
receive stipends, set salaries, we
have always managed to pay
reporters $5 per story and pho
tographers $2.50 per picture. We
always managed without three
VTYT'c Hnu/wor m/o aro nnt
allowed in any way to transfer
the allotted funds to reporters
and photographers.
The Gamecock in its alloca
tions fight tried the various cam
pus channels searching for a
solution to our problem. As it
has happened so often in the
past, we found closed doors and
closed minds. The staff at one
point voted to strike. The
motion was defeated 21-6.
Now we only hope to pro
cure the funds we need from off
campus sources. In this editorial,
The Gamecock staff openly
requests financial aid from con
cerned USC alumni. It is hoped
this plea for help from a crippled
institution will not be confused
with the ravings of dissatisfied
students.
With the money needed to
pay reporters and photographers
the quality of the paper will not
suffer and this student newspaper
can once again wash its hands of
the mess caused by ignorant
interlopers.
Editor’s note: In 1981, The
Gamecock increased its publica
tion to four days a week. Most
of the staff quit after the first
semester of the year once their
workload increased, and staff
decreased. Only three members
of the original fall staff remained
at the end of the academic year.
The very next school year, The
Gamecock reduced its publica
tion to three times a week. Still,
nearly 20 years later and with a
larger newspaper, no staff writer
or staffphotographer of The
Gamecock is paid
November 4,1988
Continue tradition
wear black to game
Well,
I’m going
to do my
"voice in
the wilder-,
ness" thing
and try to
do what I
did last
year at the
Clemson
game.
reckoned with.
And we did it on national
TV, just like this weekend, so
it’s kind of like a tradition,
don’t you think?
Back then, we had a neat
system on offense — use Aller
Mitchell at quarterback until
he got tired, hurt or screw up,
then put in USC’s sparkplug —
Mike Hold. Hold was an excil
ing quarterback. He played
exciting, risky football, and he
got excited by the plays him
self.
And maybe you didn’t
notice the way the gamecocks
played against N.C. State last
weekend, but they're all getting
excited these days. They play
professionally most of the time
without too much emotion.
But Saturday, they were all
fired up, it seemed.
Even Todd Ellis, the most
professional of all our players,
started using his fingers to
shoot at the N.C. State sideline
"I guess I just got excited," he
said Monday in the Gambrell
Hall Lobby.
And there’s nothing wron|
with that. I would rather watcl
an excited team than a profes
sional team play on any Friday,
Saturday, Sunday or Monday
night. And these guys are both
But we can add some
excitement ourselves, if we
were to wear black. All over.
Think of the wave. Were it all
black, what would they say on
television.
"The fans are starting the
wave, here, and it looks like a
black tidal wave all over the
stadium. Yes, these fans are
certainly a big part of this
game."
"You ’re right, Kevin. I
talked to Coach Bobby
Bowden and he said he hates to
play in Williams-Brice. They
try to prepare for the noise
level, but he said ‘Even playing
Spinal Tap on level 11 on the
stadium’s loudspeakers is use
less. ’ These are some loud,
rowdy, actively involved fans."
And it’s all true. They
can’t prepare for us. Especially
; the student sections. I once
talked to a guy who played for
, Georgia a few years back, and
he said he hated Williatn-Brice,
but especially the South Stands,
where the students and the
band are.
Get with the program
guys'. Wear black. You won’t
regret it.
Oh, my prediction —USC
by 2 points. I’m thinking
Bobby Bowden will twice try a
; two-point conversion and fail
both times. Or, with the new
rule, we’ll deflect a field goal
attempt and return it for two
points. And win.
And everyone be aware —
Coach Bowden is going for the
win, anyway he can.
It should be a good game.
It should be an exciting
game.
I would really like to see
black at Saturday’s game.
Loads of it. From sea to
shinning sea, from the West
Upper to the non-visiting sec
tions of the East Upper.
You know, a black mass
sprinkled with some of the red
and yellow/gold of the
Seminoles is just what we need.
But just a few sprinkles
USC fans, students and
non-students, went all out in
black only once before. I
mean, once where it was really
kinda intimidating.
it was in 1^84 tor a tele
vised football game. Seems
that the then undefeated
Gamecocks, coming out of
nowhere to become something
of a national sensation that
year, were going to take on
some boys from Tallahassee.
Yup, you guessed, it was
the Florida State game, one of
the biggest wins in USC histo
ry. It, and the earlier defeat of
Georgia that same season, sig
naled to the nation that the
Gamecocks were a force to be
Stephen
GuiKoyle
„ntent *»£ 2?'\
con‘P''Jonathan Dun**"' \
Ua'-°nde‘ \