The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, June 21, 2000, Page 5, Image 5
Viewpoints
Campus Issues
False alarms are a
dangerous prank
Picture this:
It’s 4 a.m„
and a 19
year-old girl is ly
ing asleep peace
fully in her bed.
She has just fall
en asleep, after
talking on the
phone with her
best friend. Sud
denly, something
awakes her out of
a sound sleep. It
is a loud piercing
noise that makes
her feel as if her
eardrums are go
ing to explode. In her groggy state, she
wonders for a moment what the noise
is, and then she remembers. She lives
in a dorm, and this would be the night
ly fire alarm that has woken her up so
many times before.
If you are wondering, the girl is me,
and the story is true. I know there are
many of you out there who know ex
actly what I’m talking about. It’s the
middle of the night, and you have class
the next morning, and the last thing you
want to be doing is getting out of bed
to stand outside for 20 minutes.
UKay, inis is wnai i uon i unaer
stand. Who would take pleasure in
pulling a fire alarm, evacuating an en
tire building (in forcing them to leave
too) and then stand outside until the
police and fire tucks come to shut the
damn alarm off.
Wfell, I can think of about 7 million
better things to do right off the top of
my head. And I assure you none of them
involve evacuating a building.
I have lived on campus for two and
a half years now, and I can no longer
stand being woken up in the middle of
the night by a fire alarm. 1 would un
derstand if there was a real fire, but what
1 can’t stand is the fact that they are
not. I am seriously going to move off
campus in the fall. I can’t stand the
thought of living on this campus an
other minute with their stupid visita
tion rules and fire drills. 1 mean, for
cryin’ out loud I’m nearly 20 years old.
I don’t think I should be told who can
or cannot visit me. But I digress.
Back to the subject at hand. Not only
do these alarms cause an inconvenience
to students, but they can also be dan
gerous, even life threathening.
Here are a few examples of the pos
sible dangers of pulling a false alarm:
On the morning of January 20,
2000, at Seton Hall University, there
was a fire that killed three students and
injured more than 50. The reason be
hind the lack of attention to the siren
was the fact that Boland Hall had many
false alarms in the prior weeks. People
died and were hurt because they thought
it was "just a false alarm."
On April 29,2000, there was a fire
in Columbia Hall. Luckily, no one was
hurt, but there were some students who
didn’t evacuate the building right away
because they thought it was "just a false
alarm."
i mean reauy, aon t people team.'
After all that has happened, why do
people continue to put other’s lives
in danger? Personally, 1 think twice be
fore leaving for a "fire drill".
Now, for you fire-alarm pullers who
are reading this: So you are thinking
“you know what, I don’t give a damn
about my fellow students or their safe
ty. I am just going to keep on pulling
those alarms because it’s fun.”
Fine, so you don’t care about your
fellow students. Well, what about the
firemen? Do you enjoy waking up those
men at 4 a.m. so you can have your fun
and games? Huh, do ya?
So the next time you want to pull
an alarm, just think about the people
who you are endangering by your “fun.”
Ann Marie Miani
is a journalism
junior and man
aging editor. She
can be reached
at gamecock
viewpointsOhot
mail.com
Got a beef with us?
You wanna make
something of it?
E-mail us at
Gamecockviewpoints
@hotmail.com
Letters
Journalism ;^Jtts get
ample experience in class
This is in response to your recent edi
torial, “USC J-school students lack ambi
tion, drive,” in which you deplore the short
age of staff members on The Gamecock.
1 understand your concern. Most folks
who have ever been campus editors will
identify with the problem of trying to pro
duce a newspaper on deadline with only a
relative handful of student volunteers to help.
Wfe in the College of Journalism and Mass
Communications encourage our students to
participate fully in student media, and over
the years a great many of them have done
so.
Where I must disagree with you, how
ever, is your assertion: “Sure, the (journal
ism) students have made it through their re
quired journalism classes, but they lack the
real-world experience that is needed to
survive within their field experience that is
available through Student Media”
The fact is that all journalism majors in
our College undeigo rigorous “real world”
preparation. Our print journalism seniors
produce an award-winning, professional
quality newspaper, The Carolina Reporter,
both in print and on-line editions. Our broad
cast journalism seniors produce a daily
half-hour professional newscast as well as
daily radio reports broadcast state-wide on
public radio. These are done under the su
pervision of the faculty who have long years
of solid professional experience behind them
We are very proud of what our students
do-and proud, too, that our job placement
record, contrary to what you intimated in
your editorial, is very nearly lOOpercentand
certainly one of the best in the country.
This year, as is often the case, we
could place twice as many of our journalism
graduates, if we had them, in professional
media jobs. Moreover, USC’s journalism
graduates have gone on in their careers to
win just about every type of award our in
dustry confers, including Pulitzer prizes.
So we must be doing something right.
student media are just tnat-student me
dia-and we in the journalism school have no
more business operatingThe Gamecock than
the Political Science department has in op
erating the Student Senate. Students who
wish to participate in these activities, and we
admire those who do, properly come from
across the campus, regardless of their major.
(This post year’s student body president, Ma
lik Husser, is a journalism major, the editor
of The Gamecock is not)
There isaprice to be paid, of course, for
the freedom accorded student media on col
lege campuses. The writing is sometimes in
accurate and the editing is sometimes slop
py and the overall quality is sometimes
embarrassingly bad. But whatever problems
exist with The Gamecock and its sister cam
pus papers everywhere, censorship or fac
ulty control is not the answer. Wfe in the Col
lege of Journalism and Mass Communica
tions applaud you for your energy and ded
ication in tackling the difficult job of producing
a newspaper. In a very real sense, we wish
you well. And certainly we would defend
your freedom, even your freedom to write
dubious editorials about our students.
Ronald T. Farrar
Interim Dean, College of Journalism and
Mass Communications
NRA not about killing,
about protection
Apparently, ftte Johnson does not know
what the NRA stands for, nor does he even
care to find out the truth. Rx someone whose
job is to report the tnith, it is quite evident
that he does not care about doing so.
The National Rifle Association does not
defend the criminal use qf firearms. In
feet, the NRA works constantly to gather sig
natures to petition to keep violent oflenders
behind bars by denying them early release.
The NRA also donates millions of dollars
to give scholarships based on either need or
merit, to those deserving college students,
and also fights to preserve land where en
dangered wildlife live. In addition to this,
countless volunteer man-hours are donated
to teach elementary school children the all
important message, that if they 9ee a firearm,
they should 1) STOP! 2) Don’t Touch! 3)
Leave the room! 4) Tell an adult. Some
how, the things that the National Rifle As
sociation provides simply do not go hand
in hand with Mr. Johnson’s misguided, prej
udicial notions.
i ne National Kme Association tights tor
the “right of the people to keep and bear
arms.” This is a right that an 80 year old la
dy may use to protect herself against a 25
year old, 250 pound thug high on crack. This
is a right that allows a woman to use a firearm
to defend herself against a stalking ex
boyfriend. This is also a right was used by
many a Korean store owner during the 1992
LA. riots, to stop Molotov Cocktail-wield
ing thugs bent on torching buildings with
people inside them. Finally, the petiole keep
ing and bearing arms is what allowed the
brave Colonists to fight against King Geoige
Hi’s imperialistic army, despite some very
long odds, indeed.
Nowhere in the entire history of the
NRA has there ever been, as Pete Johnson
calls it, the attempt to promote killing.
The feet remains, that the NRA is devoted
to the preservation of the lives of the law
abiding citizen, and the Constitution of the
United States of America
Also, it is quite apparent that Mr. John
son has no idea of what the sport of hunt
ing really does. Hunters can obtain tasty
meat, free of the hormones and chemicals
normally used in terms of raising livestock.
Also, if hunters were not around to control
the population of a deer herd, then the re
sult would be that the deer would overpop
ulate, exhaust the land’s resources, and would
die off from sickness and famine. In addi
tion, overpopulation of deer (or several oth
er game animals for that matter) results in
more of them running out on the road, caus
ing vehicular accidents that claim the lives
of innocent human beings. If Mr. Johnson
really does think that hunting is “senseless
killing of animals,” then he should not eat
meat, nor should he wear leather shoes. Af
ter all, animals are still being killed in a sim
ilar manner at the slaughterhouse.
All of my concerns here are especially
focused towards Mr. Johnson’s last state
ment, in that he displays a level of hypocrisy
equalled only by Bill Clinton. He claims
to be against killing of all kinds, yet states that
he would like to see hunters getting shot at.
If I may be so bold to ask, what makes Mr.
Johnson believe that it is OK to kill hunters,
and not animals?
i can omy nope mat inr. jonnson nas
learned that it is wrong to juc%je people based
on what their races, colors, a beliefs or with
out knowing who they are on the inside.
This is something that Dr. Martin Luther
King Jr. fought so hard for us to one day try
to realize. Mr. Johnson should not dishon
or his memory by spouting off untrue, ma
licious statements about a group of people
of whom Mr. Johnson has no inkling of
understanding.
Ronald Shin
Dept, of Chemistry
Columnist doesn’t have
parking facts straight
As a Journalism mgor, you should know
that some research is needed when you write
a paper or article. Obviously, you did not do
yours.
1. Perimeter parking is at the Colise
um and the Bates House (not the Wfellness
Center) - which neither have meters. Most
of the metered spaces are located within the
heart of the cantpus.
2. Capstone and Columbia Hall area -
there are 67 metered spaces between Cap
stone and Columbia Hall for visitors and Co
lumbia Hall has 92 Resident Student spaces
for students living in those dorms. Plus two
other lots (90 spaces) off Pendleton Street
for Resident Students.
i. As tor paying in the garages-Bull
Street is the ONLY garage where you can
pull in and get a ticket. If you stay in Bull
Street for 24 hours, not 12, it will cost you
$12.00 and if you do not leave after that you
may possibly get a $ 15.00 ticket for being
over the 24 horns limit.
Next time you have an article, please
take more time to do your research. Hope
this will help clear up some misinfomiatioa
Kaye Coble
Dept, of Parking Services