The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, March 24, 2000, Page 2, Image 2
__Carolina News
rr~h
ortJ
lpiled by
J Patrick Rathbun
March 18
• Disorderly conduct Greene and Lau
rens streets. Several young ladies wavee
down an officer on patrol and advisee
UUU UiW JUUf/U YYOO
asleep in his car on
the railroad tracks
at the incident lo
cation. Upon arrival,
the officer witnessed
the vehicle to be on
the railroad tracks.
After approaching
the vehicle the offi
cer noticed a strong
odor of alcohol
The subject slurred his speech and was
unsteady on his feet. The subject was
then placed under arrest and booked at
USC Police Department headquarters;
He was then transported to Richland
County Department of Corrections.
• Attempted larceny of a bicycle, pos
session of tools of a crime, disorderly
conduct Columbia Hall. Witness ob
served two subjects attempt to re
move a secured black Huffy Santa Fe
bike, which was secured to a bike rack
in front of the incident location. Sub
ject two was seen with a tire, which he
hid in the bushes. Subject one then be
gan to use a pair of red bolt cutters to
remove the chain securing the bike. Sub
ject two watched subject one attempt
to remove the bicycle. As the officers
moved in, a short foot chase ensued, and
both subjects were arrested. Both sub
jects smelled of alcohol and were bel
1!_A C* 1_A
ugci cm.
one admitted to
the officers that he
was attempting
to take the bike to
help fund his crack
problem. Both
subjects were
handcuffed and
booked at USCPD
headquarters. The
subjects were
RCDC. The bolt cutters and bike tire
were taken into evidence and secured
in the gun locker.
March 15
• Disorderly conduct Capstone. Com
plainant said the subject, while visiting
his girlfriend after visitation hours, used
the restroom the complainant shares
with the subject’s girlfriend and exposed
himself to victims one and two. The sub
ject was intoxicated at the point in time
while urinating in the complainant’s
sink. The incident was reported to the
resident advisor and USCPD was con
tacted. Both victims had written state
ments. Victim impact statements were
issued to both victims. The victims wish
to press chaiges.
Utah official declares
Christian group must
open doors to gays
College Press
Excahnge
Orem, Utah - Utah’s assistant state
attorney general has told members of
a Christian organization at Utah Val
ley State College that they must open
their club to gay students — and all
students, for that matter — if they
want to get a campus charter.
Kendra Ruzicka, president of the cam
pus’ Eagle Forum Collegians, applied for
the charter status, which guarantees fi
nancial support from student fees and free
access to campus facilities, but objected
J to a clause prohibiting discrimination based
J on sexual orientation.
“We feel the school doesn’t have a
* right to dictate who our membership
* should be,” Ruzicka, a sophomore, told
* The Chronicle of Higher Education. “I
2 don’t have anything against a homosex
; ual student joining our club. But we up
#• * ■
F > * ...
hold basic Christian moral principles set
forth in our scriptures, and if someone
doesn’t agree to uphold those standards,
I want the right to expel them from the
club or not allow them to join.”
But if the group wants financial sup
port from all students, it should be pre
pared to admit all students, David C. Jones,
an assistant state attorney general, said
in a letter addressing Ruzicka’s concerns.
“UVSC believes there is no reason
for clubs to be exclusive, discrimintory,
cliquish or limited to a few privileged or
select number of individuals,” he wrote.
“Such exclusion would defeat the pur
poses of providing a forum for clubs on
the UVSC campus.”
However, Jones did state that the ap
plication forms will be changed so that
it no longer specifies anti-discrimination
criteria, such as sexual orientation. It will
simply read “Membership must be open
to ail college students.”
K
m
V
w
■
*
■
#*
- - ■■■ - ..
Hu.
Undergraduate Position Available
.
r Student wanted for part-time position in on-campus office.
? Must have excellent communication skills and strong
r experience in Microsoft Office ‘97 (Word, Access, Excel,
& PowerPoint) and Adobe Pagemaker 6.5. Salary
commensurate with experience.
^Contact A. Dawn Ward at (803) 777-0311
.... for more information.
£| EPSCoR
! I The University of South Carolina is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer.
*-l[ - — ■ .
Cheaper than Tuition
more fun than Body Piercing
Special Student Airfares
Great Travel Products
Adventure Holidays
Beds on a Budget
Travel Insurance
Eurail Passes
Contiki Tours
Student ID's
800-777-0112
| |TRAVEL|
WE’VE BEEN THERE.
Court rules student fees can
fund controversial groups
by Jan Crawford
College Press Exchange
Washington — In order to encourage
the “free and open exchange of ideas,” the
Supreme Court Wednesday said public
universities can collect mandatory stu
dent fees to fund a variety of campus groups
— from Amnesty International to the Pro
Life League—even if some students ob
ject to the oiganizations.
In a unanimous decision, the court
ruled against a group of conservative stu
dents from the University of Wisconsin
at Madison, who had sued to stop their
activity fees from going to oiganizations
they found objectionable. They maintained
that forcing them to support the groups
violated their constitutional rights.
But the court, in an opinion by Jus
tice Anthony Kennedy, said an important
purpose of any university is to “facili
tate a wide range of speech.” The justices
concluded that the university was enti
tled to collect the mandatory student fees,
just as it has during its 151-year history,
as long as it doled them out neutrally, with
out discriminating against groups based
on their viewpoints.
“The university may determine that
its mission is well served if students
have the means to engage in dynamic dis
cussions of philosophical, religious, sci
entific, social and political subjects in their
extracurricular campus life outside the
lecture hall,” the court said. “If the uni
versity reaches this conclusion, it is en
titled to impose a mandatory fee to sus
tain an open dialogue to these ends.”
The objecting students can’t complain
about those fees, the court said, as long as
the school does not “prefer some view
points to others.” Wednesday’s decision
reversed a ruling by the U.S. Court of Ap
peals for the 7th Circuit in Chicago.
Civil rights groups hailed the ruling
as a significant free speech decision for
college students nationwide. Ruth Har
low, managing attorney for the Lambda
Legal Defense & Education Fund, which
filed a brief in the case, called the ruling
a “great victory” for students in the mi
nority.
Harlow and other civil rights lawyers
said a contrary result, allowing students
to opt out of funding oiganizations they
oppose, would have dealt a devastating
blow to minority groups, such as lesbians
and gays. And on liberal campuses, they
noted, conservative oiganizations, too,
could have been shut out.
“If the university had lost this case, it
would have meant the ability to form stu
dent groups on campus would have de
pended on majority approval,” said Matt
Coles, director of the Lesbian and Gay
Rights Project for the American Civil Lib
erties Union. “You could create a group
and be part of the ongoing debate on uni
versity campuses if the majority approved,
but not otherwise.”
Wisconsin Atty. Gen. James Doyle,
whose office defended the university’s fee
structure, said the ruling was a “total vic
tory for the 1st Amendment,” because it
allows students to “have the opportuni
ty to hear from many different viewpoints
and to be able to express the views that
they hold important.”
In the opinion, Kennedy acknowl
edged that “it is all but inevitable” that
collecting mandatory student fees will re
sult in subsidies to groups that “some stu
dents find objectionable and offensive to
their personal beliefs.” A university could,
if it chose, allow students to opt out of
funding those groups, the court said, but
the Constitution did not require it.
But the court acknowledged what the
university had asserted from the begin
ning: Requiring colleges to allow students
to opt out “could be so disruptive and ex
pensive that the program to support ex
tracurricular speech would be ineffective.”
In reaching its decision, the court had
to grapple with two different views of the
first Amendment, which protects a per
son’s right to speak freely, as well as his
right not to speak.
For example, a state can’t force a stu
dent to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.
The court also has ruled that teachers and
lawyers, who must pay mandatory dues
to unions and bar associations, can object
to their fees going toward political ex
pression that falls outside the groups’ mis
sion.
The students had urged the court to
approach the case in a similar way, since
they, too, are being required to pay fees
which subsidize speech they find objec
tionable.
But the court said those decisions are
“neither applicable nor workable in the
context of extracurricular student speech
at a university,” largely because of the
“important and substantial purposes of the
university, which seeks to facilitate a wide
range of speech.”
“It is not for the court to say what is
or is not germane to the ideas to be pur
sued in an institution of higher learning,”
the court said.
Instead, to protect students’ 1st
Amendment rights, the universities must
ensure that funding decisions are made on
a neutral basis, regardless of the group’s
viewpoint. It referred to a 1995 case, in
which it held a student newspaper at the
University of Virginia could not be denied
funding because of its religious viewpoints.
The school must administer the funds
neutrally, the court said then.
The court found “symmetry” in that
holding and in its decision in the Wisconsin
case, it said.
“When a university requires its stu
dents to pay fees to support the ex
tracurricular speech of other students, all
in the inte^st of open discussion, it may
not prefer some viewpoints to others,”
the court said.
Justice David Souter, joined by Jus
tices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John
Paul Stevens, did not agree with the court’s
rationale. Though agreeing with the out
come, the concurring justices said they
believed the university was entitled to
collect the fees, just as it is able to make
other funding decisions, such as selecting
classes and inviting speakers.
But, still, the unanimity of the out
come was unusual from a court that
generally is closely divided and often
thought to be conservative. In ruling for
the university, it sided with traditional lib
eral organizations, suggesting that, as the
ACLU’s Coles said, “We have a consen
sus across ideological and political lines
about what the 1st Amendment protects.”
Also Wednesday, the court heard ar
guments in a Massachusetts case that could
determine how far states can go to en
courage changes in foreign policy. At is
sue is a state law that prohibits companies
which do business in Myanmar, once
known as Burma, from getting state con
tracts unless their bids are 10 percent be
low the next lowest bid.
The law is similar to dozens of others
that states and municipalities have passed
in recent years to express their moral out
rage at human rights abuses in various
countries. The trend began in the 1980s,
when many states passed laws to divest
pension funds of stocks of those compa
nies doing business in South Africa.
Massachusetts passed its Burma law
in 1996 to condemn the repressive mili
tary regime in the South Asian nation. A
lower court ruled that the state improp
erly injected itself into matters of foreign
commerce and affairs.
Clean Carolina
from page 1
were assigned around the Russell House,”
SG Student Services Committee Chair
woman Melissa Fletcher said.
“That gives 76 organizations a chance
to get involved,” SG Director of Special
Projects Timothy Clardy said at the kick
off, which was held on Greene Street.
Clarify said Clean Carolina came from
the idea that most of the trash on campus
came from students.
“It just makes sense to have students
clean up the trash,” Clardy said.
Over 280 organizations were notified
about Clean Carolina, according to Fletch
er. Not all of these organizations were stu
dent organizations.
Fletcher said the School of Public
Health, the School of the Environment
and the Payroll Office have expressed in
terest in participating in Clean Carolina.
The Student Services Committee has
been working closely with the office of
Facilities Management since the fall to
create Clean Carolina, Fletcher said.
“[The office of] Facilities Manage
ment will pay for making the signs,” she
said. “They also gave us trash bags and
supplied us with drinks today.”
Fletcher said the trash being picked
up won’t be recycled.
“The bigger things that can be recy
cled are already put into recycling bins,
or put into the regular trashcan,” she said.
She said most of what will be picked
up are “small pieces of paper and ciga
rette butts.”
Thursday’s event was held to create
public awareness of Clean Carolina, Fletch
er said. But, there were many groups that
expressed inerest in the Kickoff.
“A lot of organizations see it as an easy
way to do community service,” she said.
“But hopefully it [community ser
vice] will increase students’ pride in the
campus.”
Fletcher said Clean Carolina will con
tinue throughout the year and begin of
ficially in the fall.
- V
Rising Sophomores & Juniors:
consider thi$ equation!
The Goldwater Scholarship offers up to $7,500 to students pursuing
research-based graduate degrees in natural sciences, mathematics, or
engineering who plan on a career in research, and/or college-level
teaching. If interested, plan to attend:
Goldwater Scholarship Workshop
TYiesday, March 28 at 4 p.m.
Gressette Room, Harper College
For mong information, call the Fellowships Office at 777-0958.
Deans
from page 1
of Liberal Arts, will head up the search.
Also on the search committee is the
president and publisher of the
Charleston Post and Courier, Ivan
derson.
At the College of Education, Fred
Medway has been interim dean for
four years. Medway said he only agreed
to the position as interim dean because
he was told he wouldn’t just be a care
taker.
“I haven’t had to go run to the ad
ministration every time a decision was
needed to be made,” Medway said.
“Since I’ve been interim dean, I
have pushed hard for grants and re
search.”
According to Medway, the school
has received $4.8 million in grants this
fiscal year. The school has never bro
ken the $4 million mark.
Also, the College of Education
won a Title II grant from the U.S. De
partment of Education, a grant that
only 25 educational training college
received in the nation.
Medway said he wouldn’t be con
tent on just signing papers while he
was interim dean, and he said he want
ed to be an aggressive leader of the
college.
Medway wouldn’t say if he had
been offered the position as perma
nent dean, or whether he would ac
cept it if the job were made available
to him.
“Whoever the next dean is, they
will face a unique challenge becau^
15 percent of the college is retiring*
the following years,” Medway said.
Inauguration
from page 1
ment that in encouraging SG offi
cials to try to accomplish change on
campus.
‘“I simply dream of things that
never were and ask, “Why not?”’“
Ford quoted Kennedy as saying. “That
question is still with us today.”
Treasurer Ricky Shah said honesty,
loyalty and trust were necessary to
achieve unity.
“Without these three element
we can’t be one,” Shah said. w
And, like Ford and Eaddy, Shah
said SG should serve its constituents.
“We must keep in mind that we
were elected to serve the student body,
not ourselves,” he said.
Shah also said many students don’t
recognize the importance of SG.
“Many don’t realize this, but the
future of the university is in our hands,”
Shah said.
At the same time, he said that
SG should set reasonable goals.
“Realistic change is what we strive
for,” he said.
The inauguration marks the be
ginning of the 2000-2001 SG term.
Applications for Cabinet positi^
are due today in the Student Govern
ment office. Eaddy will begin inter
viewing candidates Monday. The in
terviews will last all next week, and
Eaddy plans to announce her ap
pointments April 4.
The first meeting of the new stu
dent senate will be held Wednesday.