The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, March 03, 2000, Page 5, Image 5
Quote, Unquote
‘Over half of [Judicial Council’s] budget was
blank pages.’
Sally Ballentine, Senate Finance Committe Chairwoman
Page 5
. ... ■ ,-r=r*j%K • Vf 'V - . v,r ... >.-: .-r-*7^7~ ; v'
Whe (Bmecock
Serving the Carolina Community since 1Q08
Editorial Board
Kenley Young • Editor in Chief
Brad Walters • Managing Editor
Brock Vergakis • Viewpoints Editor
Peter Johnson • Assistant Viewpoints Editor
Emily Streyer • Editorial Contributor
Expedience necessary in
colleges' dean searches
* * fter much fruitless searching, seven of USC’s colleges are
/\ still without deans. Interim deans have been running the
1.VSchool of Music, the College of Education, the Darla
Moore School of Business, the College of Hospitality, Retail and
Sport Management, and the College of Engineering and Informa
tion Technology for several months now.
And when Judy VanSlyke Thrk resigned as dean of USC’s Col
lege of Journalism and Mass Communications earlier this semester,
it brought that total to six. What does Provost Jerome Odom have
to say about this alarming trend and the progress of these dean
searches? Only that “we are moving on all fronts with our search
es.” Could he be more vague?
During the faculty senate meeting Wednesday, Odom men
tioned no specific dean candidates by name. In fact, it appears as if
^dean searches for these colleges haven’t even moved past the pre
liminary stages yet, as most are still awaiting the recommendations
of search committees.
The College of Engineering, whose latest dean was indicted on
embezzlement charges this past summer, has been searching for a
replacement for about eight months. But Odom says they’re “get
ting very close to narrowing that search down.” Whew. What a re
lief.
The Darla Moore School of Business represents perhaps the
most severe problem. Even the home of one of the world’s best
MIBS programs can’t find a dean and might face accreditation
problems because of it. Six of USC’s 19 academic colleges have no
deans. Something’s seriously wrong with that picture, and the
search committees need to get on the ball before it costs these col
leges their accreditation, their enrollment numbers or, quite possi
bly, their reputations.
* Pharmacy allocations
unfair to other students
Student Senate passed its 2000-2001 budget on Wednesday, and
it looks similar to previous years’ budgets except for one ma
jor difference: The College of Pharmacy’s student oiganiza
tions are receiving almost $4,000 of the fees allocated for under
graduate clubs and organizations - $2,000 more than last year. The
reason? A controversial bill was passed by senate three weeks ago
that placed the College of Pharmacy on the same level as the
schools of law and medicine in terms of funding, allowing the Col
0 lege of Pharmacy to receive more money.
As the new budget figures show, passing that bill was a mistake.
By doing so, Senate effectively agreed that the College of Pharma
cy is a professional school, yet the school’s new funding - now a
set percentage - came out of the same pool as other undeigraduate
student organizations’. As a result, every undergraduate organiza
tion who applied for funding suffered a little bit this year.
Hardest hit was the New Clubs Fund, which lost around two
thirds of its 1999-2000 funding. The New Clubs Fund provides
monies for organizations whose members come from all areas of
the university - not just pharmacy.
While pharmacy organizations obviously deserve funding, next
year’s Finance Committee should explore the possibility of chang
ing the current system of funding for those clubs.
* About Us
The Gamecock is the student newspaper of The University of South Carolina and is published Monday, Wednesday and
Friday during the fall and spring semesters and nine times during the summer with the exception of university holidays and exam
periods Opinions expressed in The Gamecock are those of the editors or author and not those of The University of South Carolina.
The Board of Student Publications and Communications is the publisher of The Gamecock. The Department of Student Media is
the newspaper’s parent organization. The Gamecock is supported in part by student activities fees.
The Gamecock
^f0?688 . Ken ley Young Amy Gould ing
The Gamecock Editor in Chief Travis Lynn
Brad Walters Pho,o Ed,tors
Columbia, SC 29208 Managing Editor Will Gillaspy
Offices on third floor of the Russell House. Brock Vergakis Online Editor
frr C0" S0777 3888 % Te^nts Editor
777-6482 Brandon Larrabee Patrick Rathbun
* 777-3888 Associate News Editor Asst. News Editors
Rebecca Cronican MacKenzie Craven
GAMECOCK Area code 803 Ann Marie Miani Asst. EtCetera Editor
Editor gcked@sc.edu 777-3914 EtCetera Editors Elizabeth Rod
News gcknews@sc.edu 777-7726 David Cioninger Asst. Sports Editor
Viewpoints gckviews@sc.edu 777-7181 Shannon Rooke Rob Fleming
Etc. gcketc@sc.edu 777-3913 Sports Editors . Asst. Encore Editor
Encore! gamecockencore@hotmail.com 777-3913 Kristin Freestate Charles Prashaw
Sports gcksports@sc.edu 777-7182 Copy Desk Chief Shawn Singleton
Online www.gamecock.sc.edu 777-2833 Renee Oligny Charlie Wallace
Submission Policy Copy Editor oenror writers
SUBMISSION ROUCV Kevin Langston Emily Streyer
Letters to the editor or guest columns are welcome &cofe Mto(. Editorial Contributor
^ Irom all members of the Carolina community. Letters Student Media
*9* be 250-300 words. Guest columns should be an E||en parsons Business Manager
opinion piece of about 600-700 words. Director Sherry Holmes
Both must include name, phone number, profes Susan Kjog Classified Manager
sional title or year and major, if a student Handwritten Creative Director Erik Collins
submissions must be personally delivered to Russell Kris Black Faculty Adviser
House room 333. E-mail submissions must include Julie Burnett Jonathan Dunagin
. , . , Todd Hooks Graduate Assistant
telephone number tor confirmation „ . r„h,,
K i i Betsy Martin Robyn Gombar
The Gamecock reserves the right to edit for libel, Kathy Van Nostrand Gina McKelvey
style and space. Anonymous letters will not be pub- Creative Services Melissa Millen
lished Photos are required for guest columnists and Kenton Watt Brantley Roper
can provided by the submitter Advertising Manager Nicole Russell
tell 777-7726 for more informal >n Carolyn Griffif' Advertising Staft
College Press Exchange
Letters
Sports columnist
wrong about Carter
On March 1, David Cloninger finally
did it. I know I don’t stand alone in my
outrage over his column that rips Vince
Carter for not being a good basketball play
er. Are you ignorant? Carter is the one
good thing the NEA has to offer right now.
How many guys can score 51 points and
shoot "better than 50 percent?
1 mean, are you telling me that Michael
Jordan is even more of a “no talent hack”
because he scored 40 points on 14-31 shoot
ing? Or better yet, for you, Dave, your
beloved Gamecocks, and their former star
B. J. McKie.
Is he a “no-Uilent hack,” too, for scor
ing 28 on 9-26 shooting? C’mon man,
wake up. Vince Carter scored the most
points in a game this season by playing
within the Raptors’ offense, and taking ad
vantage of his strengths.
Now that was bad enough, but then
you had to go insult my Tar Heels, too. Do
some research next time. Coach Guthiidge
didn’t recruit Julius Peppers. He plays
football, and walked onto the basketball
team because of numerous injuries. Did
you see his line from Wednesday night’s
game? 6-7 from the floor, 2-3 from the
line, 14 points, not bad for a football play
er. If USC had half as many “no-talent
hacks” as UNC, maybe they wouldn’t have
lost in the first round of the NCAA tour
nament to the team from my hometown,
the Richmond Spiders!
So, Mr. Cloninger, I say go convince
coach Fogler to take his team up to Chapel
Hill one time, and we’ll see who the
“no-talent hacks” are, and who the REAL
Carolina is. They bleed Tar Heel blue!
Chris Bennett
Sport Administration Sophomore
Carter a class act
In response to David Cloninger’s high
ly opinionated and inappropriate column
entitled “Raptors’ Outer nothing but a ‘no
talent hack,”’ (March 1), we here at Pro
fessional Management, and PMI Sports
Marketing, are highly upset. Professional
Management Inc. is Outer’s sports agency
and management company. As part of
the PMI staff, and as a USC student, I am
highly disappointed in Cloninger and his
column.
One of the first points Cloninger ad
dresses is Carter’s athletic skills. Carter
ranks fifth in the NBA in scoring with 25.3
points a game, ranks ahead of All-Star 3
Point Shootout runner-up.Dirk Nowit/.ki
in field goal percentage, and also ranks
ahead of three-point threats Glen Rice and
Gary Payton in 3-point percentage.
Carter’s game speaks for itself.
That’s why he led the league in All-Star
votes and amassed a total second to only
Michael Jordan all time. Not only was he
the first Toronto Raptor to be named to the
starting lineup of an All-Star team, but
looks destined to lead his team to the
first playoff birth in franchise history.
The next and most important point
that Cloninger addresses is Outer’s char
acter by using the term “no-talent hack”
;uid “thug.” What is the literal definition
of the word “hack”? To be honest, 1 am re
ally not interested in the definition, just
the basis of Cloningcr's no-class remark.
The next classless remark I’d like to
address is the association with individuals
like Dennis Rodman ;uid LatrcII Sprewell,
who have noticeably been under the me
dia’s microscope of negativity. Outer, win
ner of the 1999 NM Sportsmanship Award
for the Eastern Conference, founded Em
bassy of Hope, one of the most highly ac
tive community service programs among
athletes.
Carter has not, is not, and never will
be a “thug.” His upbringing is far superi
or than most. First-class guys such as Grant
Hill are more commonly heard associated
with the likes of Carter. Never before now
have I seen the names Carter and Rodman
associated with one another. Much like his
on the court performances, Carter’s class
and character speak for themselves.
Anyone who sees otherwise is simply
clueless. As far as your assumption of “any
idiot can dunk a basketball,” Mr. Cloninger,
that is far from valid. Need 1 remind you
that I’ve seen your vertical, thus proving
the point that every “idiot” cannot dunk a
basketball. I am highly disappointed in you
and your work.
Scott Shealy
Professional Management, Inc.
Sport Administration Sophomore
Minorities can’t
be racist
1 read the column, “SG funding
NAACP unjust.” I thought this column
was worth replying to. The first thing I
must ask is whether Mr. Gaskins knows
the real meaning behind NAACP. In the
column, he does tell the meaning of
NAACP which is the National Associa
tion for the Advancement of Colored Peo
ple. This column seems to be focused on
the “black communities” in the United
States and that “black” people are the fo
cus of the NAACP. The organization that
involves all colored people. Black people
are not the only people who are consid
ered colored. How does Mr. Gaskins know
what “black” people experience when it
comes to education and the legal system?
The whole reason behind political issues
in the NAACP is to better the lives of all
colored people in the United States. You
act as if racist times are gone in the Unit
ed States.
Another reason I thought to reply to
this was the comment on the NAACP be
ing racist. How can races that are subor
dinate in this society be racist? Do you
know the definition of RACISM? Appar
ently not. Our founding fathers you quote
so well were owners of slaves; what does
that say to you when you think about free
dom. My founding fathers are the same as
yours, but they do not hold any kind of im
portance to me. Their words were fdled
with hypocritical remarks. Why do you
think minorities have to have groups such
as this to try and help people who are not
the privileged races in America. Do not
get me wrong; I do believe that “white"
people have been subjected to prejudice,
but please do not compare that lo ihe “mi
nority” experience. Open your eyes; please,
and see what really is going on.
Myleata Eldridge
Freshman, College of Science and Math
USCs ‘Cock’ is
highly offensive
As is unfortunately usual for The Game
cock, your editorial on the suspension of
an eigth-gradc student in Ohio for wear
ing a “Cocks” hat was utterly lacking in
aucful thought. In aisc you hadn’t noticed,
the word “cocks” printed on a hat or a T
shirt is actually quite offensive. Words like
“Morchcad,” which would have lobe scru
tinized for sexual innuendo, do not com
pare to the word “cocks” printed on a hat
or shirt, especially ifira place so far removed
from the context of USC sports.
While suspending the student might
have been a little harsh, 1 certainly think
that he should be prohibited from wearing
the hat to school. And if I were the prin
cipal, and the student tried to talk nfe out
of my decision by using examples like the
ones you used in your editorial" 1 would
suspend him in less than a minute for us
ing such poor critical thinking skills.
Anna Bk 'kmon Moore
M.FA Candidate, Creative Writing
’Cock a proud
symbol of USC
Kyle Hutchinson, an 8th grader at New
ton High School in Pleasant Hill, Ohio,
was given a three-day suspension for wear
ing a USC baseball hat to a school bas
ketball game that was held at the Univer
sity of Dayton Arena. The hat was
emblazoned with the word “Cocks” in bold
with USC’s initials in lowercase under
neath. It was also autographed by USC run
ning back Ryan Brewer, who attended near
by Troy High School. The school’s principal,
Steve Brandeberry, justified this action by
saying that Webster's HI International Dic
tionary cites the word “cock” as “vulgar.”
He apparently missed the following
definition found in Webster’s New Col
legiate Dictionary: the adult male of the
domestic fowl, which is obviously the con
text in which the hat was created.
This is the worst type of First Amend
ment violation, one that distorts the con
text of speech in order to substantiate dra
conian control. I have mailed several USC
bumper stickers to the principal, along with
a letter expressing my disgust over this
abominable display of politically correct
word mongering.
If you feel the same way, you should
support your university and its mascot by
addressing your correspondence to the fol
lowing location:
Principal SteVe Brandeberry
Newton High School
201 North Long Street
Pleasant Hill, Ohio 45359
Jacob McCormick
Educational Doctoral Student
NAACP column
shines light on truth
Bravo, Mr. Gaskins, in regard to his
column about the funding of the NAACP.
Mr. Gaskins has a wonderful insight on the
presence of the NAACP and what this or
ganization represents. In fact, I am quite
surprised that the University of South Car
olina even allowed this article to be pub
lished, considering that USC (board of
trustees, President, etc...) in its judgment
appears to speak for till students on the ba
sis of racism (or outside the point of your
article — the Confederate flag).
All the NAACP has accomplished widi
its economic boycott is to take money away
from the hard-working black population
of South Carolina, who work the majori
ty of the tourism jobs in the state. But with
a shroud of cloth (the flag) the NAACP
has blinded everyone to this fact, by bang
ing on the racist drum. Again, congratu
lations on a wonderful column.
Darrell Fraley
History/ Geography Senior
Editor’s note: The Editor in Chief, not the
University of South Carolina, deter
mines the content o/The G;tmcct>ck.
Campus Issues
Greeks
need to get
a hobby
I’d like to wish
everybody a
wonderful
spring break. Have
a relaxing week
in whatever you
do. I’d also like to
remind you that
break is a time for
excess, not success,
as it is every day for
some.
Why is that,
anyway? Why is it
that people don’t
strive to better
themselves like
they used to? It
seems 10 me mat our priorities are out oi
■ whack. Too many of us are too con
cerned with Playstation and beer to see
through these simple college traps to the
real world going on around us.
Take my first two years at USC, for ex
ample. They were spent in one of four ways
— drinking beer, playing Playstation, lis
tening to CDs or looking at girls around
campus. Granted, these were two of the
best years of my life, but I didn't really ac
complish much and. in reality, 1 wasn’t very
happy. If you know me well and have since
I arrived at college, you’ve probably no
ticed quite a change.
This is not to say I ve matured very
mucli on the surface, but I’ve cut down on
a few of these pastimes significantlyand
picked up a few more productive hobbies.
After I’m graduated, I can honestly believe
that I did something with my college ex
perience.
Freshman year put me in a new place
full of new people and a new way of life.
It takes awhile for it all to set in, but it’s
too easy to become complacent and remain
that way for all four years of school. Be
fore you know it, you’ll be interviewing
for jobs and handing in a blank resume. Too
many students find themselves with too
much time and not enough motivation to
do anything productive.
College is supposed to be the greatest
time of our lives. I find it despicable how
many people become ‘active’ by joyfully
spending their time in a drunken haze, think
ing that flirting with scantily clad women
and extending their keg stand record time
makes their lives better.
Too many good people get sucked in
to the Greek system and lose their sense
of self. It’s no surprise that joining an or
ganization based around superficialities can
kill one’s sensitivity and humanity.
You are all asking for it. I have walked
around this campus and overheard too many
vulgar conversations about “some bitch”
at a party from the weekend before, and it
makes me sick. Most of these guys were
all dorks in high school who wanted to rein
vent themselves when they got to college.
Well, chances are you probably did. You
are officially cool now that you proudly
strut around with those letters on your
chest. You can be as loud and vulgar and
unproductive as you want to be because of
the 40 bodyguards you paid to get your
back and be your friend. Well, I have the
answer: I think most of you need to get a
hobby.
Oh yeah, sorority girls piss me off, too.
Every time I hear a group of you simulta
neously shreiking “Hi y’all!” and “Bye
| y’all!” I want to strangle someone. Not
to generalize, but the majority of you think
J that you’re better than the rest of the free
world because your daddy is rich and you’ve
always been his little princess. Little does
he know (gasp!) you've done the walk of
shame.
I know plenty of nice Greeks who have
managed to stay true to themselves, and I
admire their resistance to the system.
Too many take their new-found cool
ness too far and think they’re better than
the rest of us simply because of those let
ters. There was a time that this attitude re
ally got to me, but I now find it somewhat
comical. Those letters might “represent”
brother or sisterhood, but in reality, peo
ple join to get friends, drink beer and hook
up. It’s the whole “I watched ‘Animal
House’ one too many times in high school,
and now I think Greeks really have that
much Tun at zero consequence” syndrome.
Do you really maintain such lofty as
pirations as managing a hotel bar or being
a cheerleader Tor a company whose prod
ucts will have no bearing on any oT our
lives? Or is going to class just something
to do until the bars open? The choice is
yours. Just remember that life really be
gins after college. We haven’t even been
bom yet. / .
Pete Johnson
is a journalism
senior. He can be
reached at •
gamecock
viewpoints®
hotmail.com