The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, February 04, 2000, Page A5, Image 5
"T T# • , Quote, Unquote
"I think students take our leadership for granted
because they don't see what we do every day.'
Malik Husser, student body president
r Wat (Bamcock
Serving the Carolina Community since 1Q08
Editorial Board
Kenley Young • Editor in Chief
Brad Walters • Managing Editor
Brock Vergakis • Viewpoints Editor
Peter Johnson • Assistant Viewpoints Editor
Emily Streyer • Editorial Contributor
N.H. results show
power of the voters
epublican presidential candidate John McCain is riding high
hr after a 19-point victory in Tuesday’s New Hampshire prima
\ry. Whether McCain will ride this surprising victory all the
way to the White House remains to be seen, but Tuesday’s primary
proved one thing: When people get out and vote, even the most
unexpected can happen.
Despite the fact that polls on the last day before the primary
projected a’ virtual dead heat between George W. Bush and Mc
Cain, the Texas governor’s supporters seem to have thought their
candidate had it in the bag. McCain’s supporters, on the other
hand, showed up at the polls, taking nothing for granted.
This turn of events can serve as a lesson, not only for those of
us voting in the South Carolina primary Feb. 19, but also for
everyone else. When people come out en masse and cast their
vote, even the most scientific of polls can be proven wrong - and
when people work together as one, almost anything can happen.
The day after winning the primary, McCain expressed his ela
tion at receiving more than $500 thousand in donations on his Web
site alone. McCain’s campaign does not have the financial backing
that Bush’s does. Character sometimes can make the difference.
McCain proved his character was strong at his rally at the
Swearingen Engineering center Wednesday evening.
The results of the New Hampshire primary have led to another
dead heat between Bush and McCain - this time in South Carolina,
a place where Bush has led since the outset of the campaign.
, One thing is for sure: Bush’s South Carolina supporters won’t
be sitting at home on Feb. 9.
Business school shows
fiscal irresponsibility
The Darla Moore School of Business finds itself in a laige fi
nancial hole after an overestimation of the number of gradu
ate students who would enroll led to a decrease in revenue.
Particularly disheartening about this debt is the fact that the
school received commitments of more than $45 million in dona
tions in the past two years alone.
The school’s blatant lack of fiscal responsibility will hamper
further efforts by fund-raisers to secure laige donations.
Provost Jerry Odom said USC needs more state funding to be
come a major research university. However, if USC has difficulty
securing funding from either private or public sources, it has only
itself to blame.
We’d be surprised to see anyone who wanted to donate to a
business school that can’t manage funds properly. And it definitely
gives prospective students something to think about when deciding
which school to attend, as well.
The way to enhance a school’s reputation is to prosper academ
ically and financially. The financial debacle the school has gotten
itself into has scared away prospective students and donors. The
business school has just received an “F” in recruiting and, ironical
I fT-nough, economics.
The Gamecock is the student newspaper of The University of South Carolina and is published Monday, Wednesday and
Friday during the fall and spring semesters and nine times during the summer with the exception of university holidays and exam
periods. Opinions expressed in The Gamecock are those of the editors or author and not those of The University of South Carolina.
The Board of Student Publications and Communications is the publisher of The Gamecock. The Department of Student Media is
the newspaper’s parent organization. The Gamecock is supported in part by student activities fees.
Adohess The Gamecock
The Gamecock Kenley Youn* Amy Goulding
1400 Greene Street Editor m Chief Travis Lynn
Columbia. SC 29208 Brad Wa,tm Photo Editors
... . Managing Editor Will Gillaspy
Offices on third floor of the Russell House. Brock Vergakis Online Editor
STUDENT Media Area code 803 Viewpoints Editor Peter Johnson
Advertising 777-3888 Clayton Kale Asst. Viewpoints Editor
Classified 777-1184 News Editor Kelly Haggerty
pax 777-6482 Brandon Larrabee Patrick Rathbun
Office 777-3888 Associate News Editor Asst. News Editors
Rebecca Cronican MacKenzie Craven
Gamecock Area code 803 Ann Marie Miani Asst. EtCetera Editor
Editor gckedOsc.edu 777-3914 EtCetera Editors Shannon Rooke
News gcknewsOsc.edu 777-7726 David Cloninger Asst. Sports Editor
Viewpoints gckviewsOsc.edu 777-7181 Jeff Romig Bob Fleming
Etc. gcketcOsc.edu 777-3913 Sports Editors Asst. Encore Editor
Encore! gamecockencoreOhotmail.com 777-3913 Kristin Freestate Charles Prashaw
Sports gcksportsOsc.edu 777-7182 Copy Desk Chief Shawn Singleton
Online www.gamecock.sc.edu 777-2833 Renee Oligny Charlie Wallace
1 ^Lrrr^r“'“ico- ss.'sr
"on' all members of the Carolina community. Letters _
should be 250-300 words. Guest columns should be an Siudoit Media
opinion piece of about 600-700words ““ "
Both must include name, phone number, profes- SuMn King Classified Manager
sional title or year and major, if a student. Handwritten Craaf/ve 0/rector Erik Collins
submissions must be personally delivered to Russell Kris Black Faculty Advisei
House room 333. E-mail submissions must include Julie Burnett Jonathan Dunagin
telephone number for confirmation. Todd Hooks Graduate Assistant
The Gamecock reserves the right to edit for libel, Robyn Gombar
... . _. „ . . Kathy Van Nostrand Gina McKelvey
style and space. Anonymous letters will not be pub- Creative Services Melissa Millen
lished. Photos are required for guest columnist and can Kenton Watt Brantley Roper
be provided by the submitter. Advertising Manager Nicole Russell
Call 777-7726 for more information. Carolyn Griffin Advertising Staff
College Press Exchange
"OF COURSE, IF I WERE IN A TEMPLE WHERE
THEV WAU7EP 70 CONTRIWH: POllTCAI. fUNP?,
rPA$KM5El£ Wl MV BWHA VOV
oOCIETAL ISSUES
'Yankee's' thoughts on rednecks
Let me
start off
by saying
that I love it
here in South
Carolina. I have
been here for al
most four years
now and it has
been a wonder
ful experience.
I love the
weather. I love
how the major
ity of people are
friendly. I love
getting a smile
from a passing
stranger. I love
Palmetto trees
and flowers and all those happy things.
Most southerners couldn’t be more
pleasant to be around. But there is a small
group of misfits. There are those who’ve
perfected their rebel yell. They drive around
in their pick-em-up truck with a giant con
federate flag sticker in the back window.
They remain insistent that on the eighth
day God really did make sweet tea.
Yes, they are called rednecks. Before
you crucify me, hear me out. I am NOT
generalizing that all southerners are red
necks. Honestly, I can estimate that only
about 10 percent of the student popula
tion here at USC could be considered red
necks.
But that number could stand to be whit
tled down a bit more. There are rednecks,
and there are ignant rednecks. If we sep
arate the two, that leaves, well, lets see,
about 9.9 percent of our campus to be ig
nant rednecks. Yes, there is such a thing as
an intelligent redneck. They just know
how to hide their intelligence until you
get to know them well enough.
First of all (because I KNOW you’re
getting pissed off and putting words in my
mouth as you readers LOVE to do to us
columnists), it’s not the drawl that per
turbs me, it’s the closed-mindedness of
these people.
The main symptom of redneckism is
being ignorant...just in case I didn’t make
that clear. The definition of “ignorant” is
a) lacking knowledge or experience, 2) un
informed, and/or d) ill-mannered or un
couth.
Most of my friends were bom and
raised in the South. There’s nothing wrong
with that at all. They are all pleasant
people. Some of them call me a “yankee”
sometimes, but it doesn’t bother me be
cause of the context in which they use it.
They don’t hold me in contempt. They
are not bitter and angry at me because I
am from above the Mason-Dixon line, on
the side of those bastard yankees that “beat”
them in a war which truly had no winner
140 years ago. That mindset would be
ridiculous, yet some southerners still feel
that way.
To some southerners, the Civil War
is a very touchy subject. I’m not going to
get into who was fighting for what, because
my mailbox isn’t big enough. But I will
say that some people need to get over
the fact that their great great grandfather’s
blood was spilled in a “losing effort” Every
body lost. Soldiers died on both sides. Lots
of blood was spilled. What makes the blood
of one side more sacred than the blood of
another? Every life is precious, no matter
what “side” they fought for.
I have relatives who live in the South
today, and I had relatives who died fight
ing for the South in the Civil War.
Maybe if I was bom and raised here, I would
be brainwashed by the same system which
still holds hard feelings.
Say whatever you want to about New
York or the North. I’ll welcome comments.
They don’t faze me one bit. People call
it a dump, a wasteland of degenerates, etc.
Maybe it WOULD upset me if I were called
a degenerate low life. Maybe being called
“yankee scum” would be hurtful, but on
ly if I knew it was true. Only if I fit the
mold.
Those of you who are offended by this
should give me a piece of your mind. If
you feel you’ve been insulted, then I en
courage you. More power to you. The Frrst
Amendment says that we, as Americans,
are entitled to freedom of speech. It is the
most important thing that our country is
based on.
I laughed at John Rocker’s comments
about New York. You know what? In a
very primitive sense, he is right. What
Rocker was trying to say is that New York
is a very diverse place. The problem was
with how he expressed himself - through
hatred and racial slurs. He fits the “igno
rant redneck” prototype this column is
based around, simply because of what he
said and the manner in which he said-it.
And just what is “Southern by the grace
of God”? Grace means ‘goodwill’ or ‘fa
vor.’ Granted, the South is a wonderful
place to live, but don’t brag about how
much nicer it is in the South than where
those bastard yankees come from in the
cold, polluted wasteland known as the
North.
Dare I ask, but are you still angry or
frustrated about something? Note that I
am asking you, not telling you. I am not
southern by the grace of God, so I have
trouble understanding these things.
What if downtrodden refugees from
Somalia claimed that they were “Somali
by the grace of God?” I bet those of you
who thrive on your southern pride
would probably scoff and laugh at them.
They have as much of a right to be proud
of who they are as you do.
Don’t take your pride too far, you
should know that it is one of the seven
deadly sins. If you have to say that it is
God’s grace to which you owe your an
cestry, then so does everyone else.
If there are some of you who believe
that God made you a better person simply
because you are southern, then you are
taking away from what makes the South a
beautiful place to live.
I’ll tell you flat out that there are more
pleasant South Carolinians than New Yotk
ers. But it’s those of you who insist upon
it who make it unpleasant. You are
cheating yourselves out of being pleasant
through your arrogance.
I know plenty of you wilfhate me for
writing this, but it is just a testament to
what I am trying to prove. If you didn’t
feel that you fit the mold of the “igno
rant redneck,” what I’m saying here would
n’t bother you, because it wouldn’t apply.
One final note: Please don’t wear your
heritage on your sleeve. Keep it sacred and
keep it to yourself. It’s just as annoying as
that guy or girl who knows EVERY an
swer in class. Yeah, you know those peo
ple and you make fun of them just like the
rest of us. Admit it.
Pete Johnson
is a journalism
senior. He Can be
•reached at.
gamecockvlew- Jf
po!nts®hotmail.c ■
om
Societal Issues
'No vacancy7
policy
unfair and
outrageous
at
my family her
itage, many proud
memories of my
Irish roots
emeige. My
great-grandfather
moved from
county Kerry Ire
land to America
in the early 20th
century, but be
fore he did, he
planted an oak
tree. Today, that
oak tree is among
the largest trees in
all of County Kern
I think back on that, and I am proud.
I am proud of who I am and of where I
come from. I am also proud that I can
call myself an American. America is
country that for so many years has
opened its arms to the rest of the world.
To think that my great-grandfather at a
young age just picked upandlefthis
homeland to pursue a better life in
America is a beautiful image for me to
behold. I am certain that many of you
share similiar feelings toward your ances
try and their coming to this country.
I couldn’t imagine looking back on
that moment and hearing that he was
turned away and that the borders of
America were no longer open to the.
people of the world. Future generations
might see such a story if certain people
have their way. When riding on Huger
street, I see a billboard that more or less
urges Americans to take a stand against
immigration. The billboard uses a “scare”
tactic, making it seem like this country
will be a terrible and overpopulated
place for our children if we continue to
allow immigration. My first question is,
who are we to say when we can shut
down the borders of this country? I
would say that only Native Americans
have a rightful claim to this continent,
but even a Native American colleague of
mine admits that his people came to this
continent from a land bridge from Asia.
Thus, no one has a legitimate claim to
this land except for the animals.
So why do these people take on a
“finders keepers, losers weepers” attitude
about this country? When did we reach
the “cut oft” point? When did we say it
was too much? Since the first English
settlement, Americans have always tram
pled on the foot of someone else, when it
comes to this country. We never apolo
gized for this, so we never made it right.
Nevertheless, we insist this land is ours,
or more so than anyone else’s. It wasn’t
ours to begin with, yet these people
don’t see a contradiction or double stan
dard here. I cannot fathom how these
people see their daim as being justified.
I like to think that there is still an
“American Dream” that still draws peo
ple to this country. Sure, immigrants
need to create their own opportunities to
be successful, but how can they if we
close off the country to them? As Ameri
cans, we should see this mentality is
wrong, and as former Irishmen, English
men, Germans, or whatever, we should
not be denying people this glorious op
portunity. No one denied us.
Langston
is a journalism
junior and encore
editor. He can be
reached at game*
cockviepoints@ho
tmaii.com
Hunters aren’t
criminals with guns
Well, I’m just writing to comment or
Wednesday’s column “Drinking, gun ages
reversed,” but the real reason for writing is
to let you know a little truth about whal
you say about our gun laws.
To start off an M-16, Uzi and bazooka
are all illegal, and no one is allowed to buy
them.
I’m not sure where you are from, bul
I guess you know everything there is about
guns. So that’s why it is okay for you to tell
us what the laws should be concerning them.
My family owns guns, and we have nev
er shot anyone or had anyone shot in our
family. You make it sound like it is only we
Southerners who hunt.
I personally hunt with people who live
in New York, Maine, Maryland and Rhode
Island. And these people aren’t the trash
that you might think own a gun.
Then you go talking about the Con
federate flag like it has any reason for
people owning guns. I’m tired of everyone
bitching about the flag. Why can’t people
just let it be?
Plus, do you think most of the guns used
in crimes are the same guns used in hunt
ing?
Most criminals own illegal guns, and if
they’re illegal, how can you possibly get
them off the streets? Hell, half the cops in
this world are nothing but a bunch of crooks
themselves, so it wouldn’t do any good by
leaving them with guns.
About the drinking age I don’t have a
whole lot of opinions on it, but I think it
is freaking ridiculous that you have to bring
the people in the world who hunt into your
article to voice your opinions.
Ashley Varner
Engineering Junior
*
Pornography should not
be allowed at libraries
On Monday Jan. 31, a Gamecock edi
torial commented on proposed legislation
that would censor Internet content avail
able at South Carolina’s public libraries.
The editorial stated that requiring all
pornography to be eliminated from the sys
tems of every public library in South Car
olina is ridiculous, and the limitations on
what is and what isn’t pornography
should be left up to the individual.
The Gamecock goes on to decry that
lawmakers are blatantly infringing on li
brary patrons’ rights to free speech. This
free speech argument has consistently baf
fled me. Consider your local public library
before the advent of the Internet.
If you looked in the card catalog .would
you have found entries for Playboy and
Penthouse? Obviously not, because they
are inappropriate, given community stan
dards.
I suspect that you also would have
had difficulty finding books like Nabokov’s
Lolita or Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
We have always engaged in some form
of censorship at our public libraries. Why
should we treat content on the Internet any
differently? Admittedly, it is much more
difficult to censor content on the Internet
than it is to censor what goes into a library’s
hardcopy collections. Internet censorship
will almost always restrict access to some
benign sites containing suspect terms like
Gamecock or breast cancer.
I would much prefer some level of cen
sorship. The obvious reason is because many
library patrons are children.
I want to be able to encourage my child
to access all of the resources at his public
library, without the concern that he will
encounter material that is obviously inap
propriate for his age. How would you feel
about your future children?
Eric Powers
Assistant Professor of finance
Darla Moore School of Business