The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, January 28, 2000, Page 5, Image 5
Quote, Unquote
“Tonight let us take our long look ahead and set
great goals for our nation.”
President Bill Clinton
i
Whc (Bamcock
I Serving the Carolina Community since 1Q08
Editorial Board
Kenley Young • Editor in Chief
Brad Walters • Managing Editor
Brock Vergakis • Viewpoints Editor
Peter Johnson • Assistant Viewpoints Editor
Sara Ladenheim • Editorial Contributor
Emily Streyer • Editorial Contributor
UGA tramples on
»First Amendment
A student at the Univeristy of Georgia was expelled from
school Tuesday for incidents including writing a check to
the university’s parking services with anti-semitic remarks
on it.
The student drew a Nazi swastika and wrote “Jews” on the
check. Employees at UGA’s parking services said the student’s
voice was raised when he came in to complain about being charged
for a car towing that never occurred, and he crossed the line by
drawing the swastika and writing “Jews” on the check. Employees
said it made them feel uncomfortable, leaving them no option but
to transfer the issue to UGA’s Office of Judicial Programs.
According to UGA’s judicial office, the student “did infringe
upon the rights of the clerk in Parking Services and all other indi
* viduals to whom the check would pass.”
Even though the remarks on his check might have been offen
sive to the employees at parking services, it’s no excuse to expell
a student from school. The university’s office of judicial programs
overreacted and endangered the student’s future with such a harsh
punishment.
This sets a dangerous precedent at UGA that any student can be
expelled for saying or writing remarks that make others feel “un
comfortable.” UGA has trampled all over the First Amendment by
expelling this student. If they can expel a student for remarks
written on a check, what guarantee is there that they won’t try to
expel students who work at UGA’s student newspaper The Red
and Black anytime a member of its opinion page writes an
unpopular editorial or column?
We don’t always agree with what people say, but it’s an ab
solute necessity td defend their right to say it.
I
Safety at USC still
needs improvement
Che area on Greene Street between the Russell House and
Five Points is notoriously dangerous at night. Last semester,
Student Government, USC’s administration and the city of
Columbia pledged to make Greene Street and the rest of campus a
safer place.
So far, there is little to show for their efforts.
I Lighting on Greene Street remains a concern for students who
have evening classes or those who walk to Five Points at night to
avoid driving drunk. Some students even elect not to take evening
classes, and others simply don’t go to Five Points for fear of what
might happen to them while walking.
Student Government proposed a safe-ride program that would
have given students a ride on one of the shuttlecocks to avoid
walking around campus late at night. This program is still yet to
be approved, and most likely never will be.
It’s time for students to see something tangible in the way of
campus safety. If nothing is done, we’ll be held hostage by the
night on our own campus. USC, the city of Columbia and SG
must work together so incidents like last semester’s armed rob
beries and kidnapping will never happen again.
i -*<----—
About Us
The Gamecock is the student newspaper of The University of South Carolina and is published Monday. Wednesday and
Friday during the fall and spring semesters and nine times during the summer with the exception of university holidays and exam
periods. Opinions expressed in The Gamecock are those of the editors or author and not those of The University of South Carolina.
The Board of Student Publications and Communications is the publisher of The Gamecock. The Department of Student Media is
the newspaper's parent organization. The Gamecock is supported in part by student activities fees.
The Gamecock
^5S . Kenley Young Amy Goulding
1400 Greme Street B^ttelf Pht SL
Columbia. SC 29208 Vanaging Edlt„ Will Gillaspy
Offices on third floor ot the Russell House. Brock Vergakis Online Edita
Student Media Area code 803 VieerpooUs Editor Peter Johnson
Advertising 777-3888 Clayton Kale Asst. V,ewpo£s Eddor
Classified 777-1184 News.Ed,to, KeHy H«gertff
F 777-6482 Brandon Larrabee Patrick Rathbun
a? 777-3888 Associate News Editor Asst. News Editors
Rebecca Cronican MacKenzie Craven
GAMECOCK Area code 803 Ann Marie Miani Asst. EtCetera Editor
Editor gcked@sc.edu 777-3914 EtCetera Editors Shannon Rooke
News gcknews@sc.edu 777-7726 David Cloninger Asst. Sports Editor
Viewpoints gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com Jeff Romig Robert Fleming
Etc. gcketc@sc.edu 777-3913 Sports Editors Asst. Encore Editor
Encore! gamecockencore@hotmail.com 777-3913 Kristin Freestate Charles Prashaw
Sports gcksports@sc.edu 777-7182 Copy Desk Chief Shawn Singleton
Online www.gamecock.sc.edu 777-2833 Renee Oligny Charlie Wallace
Submission policy 4 Fmii*
•Utters to the editor or guest columns are welcome Editorial Contributor
It members ol the Carolina community Letters SnJO£MT Medw
be 250-300 words. Guest columns should be an _
, u ♦ crvwnn^Hc Ellen Parsons Business Manager
opinion piece of about 600-700 words. Director Sherry Holmes
Both must include name, phone number, profes- Susan King Classified Manager
sional title or year and major, if a student. Handwritten Creative Director Erik Collins
submissions must be personally delivered to Russell Kris Black Faculty Adviser
House room 333 E-mail submissions must include Julie Burnett Jonathan Dunagin
telephone number lor confirmation. Todd Hooks Graduate Assistant
The Gamecock reserves the right jp edit for I,bel, Ka|h' Van Ndftrand Gina McKelve,
style aid space. Anonymous letters wWnot be pub- Creative Series Melissa Millen
lished. Photos are required lor guest columnist and can Kenton Watt Brantley Roper
be provided by the submitter. Advertising Manager Nicole Russell
Call 777-7726 for more information. Carolyn Griffin Advertising Staff
COLLEGE PRESS EXCHANGE
/HW1UIS
corner^.
(3ennN(3
cc^iuc^?^
1 EX- I
NFL '!
COMBS. '<
Campus Issues
Restroom advertising perplexes
Guys,
have
you ever
taken notice of
■the “solicita
tions” written
on the walls of
the bathroom
stalls? Girls, I’d
ask you the
same question,
but obvious ig
norance leaves
me to believe
that you don’t
have such “so
licitations.”
Anyway,
whether you
write or read
these bathroom ciassineas, tney nave been
a part of my bathroom-going experiences
since I knew what most of those requests
actually called for. Now, my curiosity
has gotten the better of me, and I want to
know what kind of people write these “calls
to arms.”
Do people respond? And more im
portantly, do they work? Now while I’m
curious, I will never try to satisfy this cu
riosity first hand. I’m just going on hypo
thetical speculation here. First of all, be it
heterosexual or homosexual, if you are try
ing to find a partner by writing your name,
number, “statistics” and preferences in
bathroom stalls, you’re looking for love in
all the wrong places (pardon the horrible
pun).
Would you not be worried about the
type of people to respond, or is that why
your criteria are so strict and well tapered?
I saw one today that asked for “men be
tween the ages of 18 and 35 only.” Sorry
to all the guys who don’t meet this de
mographic. I guess you’ll have to look for
your action in the next stall. Have you ever
been one of these guys slimmed down by
the horrible scrutiny of the requesting par
ty? You’ve got feelings too, dammit. I’d
say screw him (not literally) and foiget
about it altogether. Another point would
be the question of monetary income. Are
you so stripped for cash that you can’t do
proper advertising in proper publications?
Is it that bad, people? Can you not scrounge
up enough money? I am sorry to hear it,
but if I’m the interested party, I already
know that this guy couldn’t support me in
the long run.
I’d go looking elsewhere for possibil
ities. I’m worth more than that, and so are
you. Other advertisements call for specif
ic meeting times and places. I want to know
if these “showdowns” actually material
ize. Do you drop by the third-floor bath
rooms in the library to meet the stranger
on the other side of the pencil lead? Talk
about your awkward first impressions.
There you are, meeting for the first time
(I assume... How awkward would it be for
you to see someone you know?), and you’re
there for one thing and one thing only.
What if you’re the person who wrote the
request and you aren’t satisfied with the
interested party? What if he didn’t follow
your scrutiny and decided to show up any
way? And what if you’re the guy getting
rejected? How bad will you feel when a
complete stranger turns you away?
His luck must be bad in the first
place or he wouldn’t be looking for love
through the bathroom market, and now
he’s sending you off in the cold world of
rejection and reality. Let’s flip the coin
here. What if the interested party rejects
you, the writer? What if he takes one look
at you and scoffs? Your reputation and cre
dentials are shot to hell. That would be
horrible. Now what if you’re neither the
interested party nor the requester? What
if you’re some poor kid who walks into
the bathroom and has to bear witness to
this “engagement”?
This sight will forever scar your life.
No rubber room would ever be able to hold
you. You will live the rest of your life with
that image burnt into your memory.
You walked in there just to wash your
hands or something, but now you’re bur
dened with knowing things like this actu
ally happen. These people are getting in
credible kicks from things you’ll never
know ... and right in the men’s room too.
Finally, do these advertisements work?
To the people who write these requests,
do you get a healthy response, and are they
the demographic you’re looking for? If so,
let this be a lesson to all advertising ma
jors who will need an unorthodox method
of improving the profits of your client:
bathroom advertising. Hire people to write
little messages in the stalls of men’s and
women’s bathrooms.
This could be a steady job, as custo
dians will probably wipe them off every
few days or so. How would you like to
be “doing your business” and see an ad?
“Wacky Wally’s is having a giant liquida
tion sale. We’re wiping the prices on all
our stock. You’ll go nuts for our prices.
Call me corny, but penny pinchers will
think we’re wacky when they see our sale.
Come one, come all.”
People are always more logical in the
bathroom anyway. Hell, I’ve had some
prize-winning ideas whilst spending some
“quality time” with the john. People are
bound to respond to these ads. It’s a sure
success.
A-nd if this doesn’t pan out, simply
write down all the numbers of the bath
room-stall pimps and try to offer them
proper representation. Either that, or con
struct a book on all the real funny “solic
itations.” That would be a sure-fire best
seller.
I can see it now. “The Dow was down
a few points today, and the Nasdaq held
firm. In other news, topping The New York
Times' Best-Seller list this week was ‘Pot
ty Talk.’ It has held onto the spot for
four weeks now.”
Would it not be worth it to see Tom
Brokaw or Dan Rather say “Potty Talk”
on national television?
Now I think this whole bathroom mar
ket could prove fulfilling if people just use
their imaginations and keep an open mind
about the whole thing. ,
After all, I’ve always said love finds
you, you don’t find love. If you meet the
man of your dreams through “potty talk,”
it was meant to be.
Kevin Langston
is a journalism
junior and
Encore editor. He
can be reached
via at gamecock
viewpoints@hot
mail.com
Letters
Carolina for Kids
Kick-Off a success
Thank you very much for your article
about the Carolina for Kids Kick-Off ral
ly and program Jan. 19 and 20. The infor
mation was very receptive and informa
tive for the students. Our Kick-Off was a
success and we obtained a laige number of
volunteers for our program. Again, thank
you for your article, and we look for
ward to your assistance in the fall.
Phyllis Davis
Carolina for Kids
Kick off Chairwoman
Palms shows
terrible leadership
John Palms failed the students, facul
ty and staff of the university for his failure
to take decisive action regarding the win
ter weaker. No one can fault the admin
istration for its slow reaction Monday
because the storm was a surprise to every
one. However, the glacier-like response
on Tuesday was intolerable, reckless and
irresponsible. The obvious dodge was that
it was Gov. Hodges, and not Palms, who
was responsible for the about-face Tues
day morning. However, I hold Palms at
fault for the mess than many of us en
countered Tuesday.
1 live in Shandon, and I really did not
want to drive into campus until it was
obvious that I had to. I left early knowing
that parking would be an even bigger
headache than normal. By the time I parked
and walked to the law school, classes were
canceled.
Palms, both in last spring’s winter
weather and Tuesday, has shown a com
plete lack of regard for the safety of
commuting students, faculty and staff. It
was obvious Monday night that the weath
er situation was not going to be resolved
by Tuesday morning.
Instead of waiting on the governor, Dr.
Palms should have went ahead and can
celled class. He camelled class in antici
pation of Hurricane Floyd without wait
ing for the governor to order the closing
of state offices. Why couldn t he do the
same for Tuesday class?
The university, led by Palms, needs to
come up with a better way of handling win
ter weather. Even if class had not been can
celed, the sidewalks around USC were in
horrible condition.
The university needs to come up with
a more efficient way of notifying students
of potential problems. For example, the
university could use WUSC-FM 90.5 to
broadcast weather-related closing infor
mation and let it be the “olficial” source
of information.
The university also needs to make a
policy decision such as automatically clos
ing if local school districts close because
of the weather fornontraditional students
who might have children.
A friend from law school was killed
in a car wreck a year and a half ago because
she was trying to get to class in in
clement weather. I think that was intoler
able. Let’s err on the side of caution and
not let that ever happen again.
Brian Gambrell
Law Student
Campus Issues
Snowfall
shows
ugly side
It’s a mad, mad,
mad, mad
world. 1 have
seen more snow
fall in Columbia in
the past year than
I have seen over
four Christmas
breaks at hpme in
New York.
What is it
about the sight of
snow that brings
out .the kid in all of
L us? At the sight of
snow, people either
run outside and
play in it or sit in
side and pout, just
like children.
Mixed reac
tions greeted the snow. From joy to anger,
from childlike giddiness to panic. Emotions
ran rampant when the flakes started to fall.
The two most prominent student reactions
to the white stuff were rather different.
Group 1 - You complained about how
much you hate the snow and how you don’t
like walking around in wet socks. You wor
ried about driving in it and then ran down
to the supermarket as quickly as possible
to buy bread and milk (Why do people do
that anyway? Are we worried about get
ting snowed in?). You cursed toward the
sky and shook your fist because your day
didn’t go as smoothly as you had planned
when you rolled out of bed in the morn
ing.
Group 2 - You went outside and en
joyed the snow while it lasted. You threw
snowballs. You built snowmen. You made
snow angels. You went sledding on the hill
next to the Bull Street parking garage us
ing those garnet lunch trays from the Grand
Market Place as a vessel. You laughed cru
elly as your friends fell down time and again
on slippery ground. You wandered around
with your tongues hanging out of your
mouths collecting flakes.
Too many of us spent Monday pouting
rather than enjoying the afternoon. We
don’t get snow in Columbia very frequently.
A day like Monday should be one to re
member.
I saw one student near the Towers
yelling at the top of his lungs about just
how much he hated the snow. I scooped
up a handfull and packed it tightly, but my
better half stopped me from throwing it.
As encouraging as it was that I had been
pelting strangers with snowballs earlier in
the day, this one obviously didn’t have the
spirit and probably would have kicked my
ass.
v_naiu.es are v_oiumoia won v see a
snowstorm as large for many years. If you
spent Monday complaining and worry
ing, the only person you ruined the expe
rience for was yourself.
Despite the whiners, it was the most
alive I’ve seen this campus in my four years
here. I saw more smiling faces on Monday
than on any other single occasion on cam
pus since I first arrived as a wide-eyed fresh
man.
Students who didn’t even know one
another seemed to revel in sharing the snow
with whomever they could, literally. I shared
some snow with a few unsuspecting stu
dents with a snowball in the leg or the chest.
That brings me to the art of the spo
radic snowball fight. The rules are simply
(a) no rocks or ice into your snowball, (b)
every person for himself, c) no mercy for
the weak, and d) no time outs.
Several other Gamecock staff
members and myself had the pleasure of
a spur-of-the-moment snowball fight in
front of the Russell House on Monday af
ternoon. Despite being strategically trapped
on the ramp leading to the front of the build
ing, my side (consisting of our illustrious
editor-in-chief, managing editor and view
points editor) outnumbered Gamecock
sports by 4 to 3 and subsequently defeat
ed the undermanned squad. It was a hard
fought battle and they put up a good
fight, but in my estimation, we won.
Only in a war or a snowball fight can
brother be pitted against brotlier, friend
against friend. Hell, if I was armed with a
snowball, I’d probably be likely to pelt my
own mother if she stood near me, unsus
pecting. You might think this is cruel and
evil, but all’s fair in snow and war.
I hope you all had as much fun as I
did and took lots of pictures, because a day
like Monday probabty won't happen ag;iin
in Columbia for a lOTg time.
Pete Johnson
is a journalism
senior and assis
tant Viewpoints
editor. He can
be reached at
gamecockview
points@hotmail.c
om