The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, August 23, 1999, Page 6, Image 6
Quote, Unquote
‘There should be more green space, but there
should also be more parking.’
Lynette Thompson, political science sophomore
Monday, August 23,1999
Whc (Smccock
Serving the Carolina Community since 1Q08 *
Editorial Board
Sara Ladenheim • Editor in Chief
Kenley Yqung • Managing Editor
Emily Streyer • Viewpoints Editor
Brad Walters • Editorial Contributor
G.W. Bush needs to
admit past mistakes
When the brave journalist from The Dallas Morning News
broached the topic of background checks to probable
presidential candidate George W. Bush, no one knew
whether the rumors of past “recreational” drug use were true.
While the hype surrounding the possible Republican Party
nominee’s past drug use has mostly been limited to the Washington
rumor mill, this single question put the issue onto the national
news circuit. Although he initially chose not to answer the ques
don, Bush later said he would pass any background check that
would be required of any potential employee in his White House.
That response put him between a rock and a hard place.
Before, Bush explained that any admission of guilt or inno
cence would reflect negatively on his daughters, whom he wants
to protect. Before the News question, Bush countered questions
regarding his past with the response, “I do not want to itemize my
mistakes for my kids,” or said he would not dignify such a question
with an answer.
A thorough Washington Post investigation has yielded no con
crete evidence pointing to Bush’s alleged drug use, but his refusal
to admit or deny his own participation continues to haunt him at
every press junket. Answering the question now would benefit his
run for the office more than waiting until the primary season be
gins.
The standard of today’s candidates is to expect these types of
questions regarding their pasts. In earlier political times, candi
dates could expect journalists to leave personal skeletons in the
closet. For Bush to have entered the race with the expectation
that he could avoid the subject of what he did 30 years ago is unre
alistic and naive. Unfortunately, closet-doors-open is the way a
major national race is run nowadays - and locked closet doors im
ply guilt. The sooner Bush realizes this, the better for him and
those who support his candidacy.
More can be done
to help disabled
nother semester has started, and handicapped access at USC
is still as awkward and ineffectual as it’s always been. Hand
icapped parking (much like campus parking of any kind) is
getting harder to find, many of the wheelchair ramps are in disre
pair and are too narrow for maneuvering, and the automatic doors
on campus rarely work properly and open too slowly.
Columbia, with all of its hills, dips and valleys, is a geographi
cally daunting city for anyone to navigate. And now that classes
are underway, handicapped access must compete with other stu
dent concerns for administrative attention, even though USC’s
parking lots, ramps and doorways will be more congested than
ever with pedestrian traffic.
USC repaved the Vulture Lot this summer to make it safer for
pedestrian use, according to Director of Student Life Jerry Brewer,
and that might temporarily help reduce access and congestion
problems. But university officials must follow up this progress by
addressing other campus access issues and showing that USC cares
enough to go out of its way to provide for the safety and conve
nience of its students.
USC needs to improve the conditions of its handicapped-access
facilities, not only for the handicapped, but also for any person
who needs a helping hand.
About Us
The Gamecock is the student newspaper of The University of South Carolina and is published Monday, Wednesday and
Friday during the fall and spring semesters and nine times during the summer with the exception of university holidays and exam
periods.
Opinions expressed in The Gamecock are those of the editors or author and not those of The University of South Carolina.
The Board of Student Publications.and Communications is the publisher of The Gamecock. The Department of Student Media is
the newspaper's parent organization. The Gamecock is supported in part by student activities fees.
Adoress The Gamecock
The Gamecock Sara Ladenheim Will Gillaspy
1400 Greene Street Editor in Chief Online Editor
Columbia, SC 29208 Kenley Young Corey Ford
Offices on third floor of the Russell House. Managing Editor Asst.Viewpoints
Emily Streyer Editor
Student Media Area code 803 Viewpoints Editor Ann Marie Miani
Advertising 777-3888 Kevin Langston Asst. Etc. Editor
Classified 777-1184 Brock Vergakis Jared Kelowitz
Fax 777-6482 News Editors Chris Yoder
Office 777-3888 Clayton Kale Asst. Sports Editor
Gamecock Area code 803 Assoc,ate News Editor Case, Williams
c... , . 777 -aoi a Kristin Freestate Asst.On-Une Editor
Editor gcked0sc.edu 777-3914
News gcknews0sc.edu 777-7726 “"“‘j
Viewpoints gckv,ews0sc.edu 777-7181 «**el Helwig TaZ l
Etc gcketc0sc.edu 777-3913 Brad Walters
Sports icksports0sc.edu 777-7182 Todd Money C^,cs Copy Editor.
Online www.gamecock.sc.edu 777-2833 Sports Editor Editorial Contributor
Sean Ravford MacKenzie Craven
Submission Policy Photo Editor David Cloninger
Letters to the editor or guest columns are wel- R°b Lindsey j**J*'jP ®M^1#
come from all members of the Carolina community. Encore Editor Cha »e a e
Letters should be 250-300 words. Cues, columns Sen,or Water,
should be an opinion piece of about 600-700 words. ^ '
Both must include name, phone number, profes- T™0^*7 MEOiA
sional title or year and major, if a student. Handwritten JJJ" Par*>ns J'S .
submissions must be personally delivered to Russell Sludent Medi3 Creative Services
House room 333. E-mail submissions mus. include ^ phipp5 Sherry Holmes
telephone number for confirmation. Advertising Manager Classified Manager
The Gamecock reserves the right to edit for libel. Susan Kjng Carolyn Griffin
style and space. Anonymous letters will not be pub- Creative Services Business Manager
lished. Photos are required for guest columnist and can Director Erik Collins
be provided by the submitter. Betsy Martin Faculty Advisor
Call 777-7726 for more information. Julie Burnett
College Press Exchange
/ wiws,\
PROPERTY
. HS&&N
fcDC®FE6H)RE
ITHINK
, YOULL
APPRECIfiJE,
nennyork
REAUY
National Issues
Sex sells even unsexy things
Sex. After how
ever many
centuries of
human history, it
remains the ulti
mate marketing
strategy for the cor
porate world. And
why the hell not?
After all, it’s an in
tegral part of the
consumer world’s
oldest profession.
For the past half
century, it’s been
used to sell every
thing from beer to
bras to shampoo to,
crvft HrinL'c Anri af.
ter almost 20 years of my own history, I’ve
accepted it, and I’ve even learned to love
it.
Calvin Klein’s attempt to sell cologne
and underwear by photographing a naked
girl on a swing was a stroke of sheer ad
vertising genius. And if 1 thought for one
minute that drinking a certain type of beer
would make me appealing to the Swedish
Bikini Team, I’d drink that beer. And let’s
face it: The “Victoria’s Secret” periodical
has become as important for some men
as it has for most women. It’s as reveal
ing as the swimsuit edition of Sports Illus
trated, and both are equally packed with
pictures of a scantily-clad Heidi Klum.
There are days when I wish my life
were a Pantene Pro-V commercial, or even
a Lady Foot Locker commercial, a world
in which I could frolic on the beaches with
Jennifer Lopez, Heather Locklear and Halle
Berry as they impulsively toss their gor
geous locks in super-slow motion and say,
“You’re worth it, baby.”
But the times, they are a-changin’.
Something’s been happening in the latter
half of this decade. As we languidly extend
our reach toward the new millennium, the
ad world is spinning perilously close to the
edge, out of control and drunk behind the
wheel on its own hormones, with a poor
ly mixed margarita of testosterone and es
trogen clinched firmly between its
thumb and its forefinger.
That’s right. It’s not just lingerie and
laeer anymore; ad folks are using sex to sell
everything. You name it, they shame it.
Credit card companies have pretty girls
shaking their booties and carrying credit
cards in their back pockets, as loud music
plays; car companies have pretty girls ma
neuvering sedans and station wagons around
obstacle courses, as loud music plays; pota
to chip companies have pretty girls shak
ing their booties and banging on fake drums,
as loud music plays; even long distance
companies have pretty girls shaking their
booties as they walk down the street, also
while loud music plays.
I mean, I always kind of understood
that perfume was sensuous. I assumed it
was a given. But food products and non
perishable items have never done anything
for my libido.
Now, I’m sure that Visa, Volkswagen,
Pringles and Sprint are sexy companies in
their own ways. And if they want to use
beautiful women in tight shirts and/or biki
nis to sell their products, I say, “hell yeah.”
But when advertisers have to use sex to
sell Uncle Ben’s rice, well, it’s safe to
say that things have gotten a bit ridiculous.
You heard me. Rice. According to the
new Uncle Ben’s commercial, even though
their rice can be made in about six min
utes, you can still have time for a quickie
before the microwave bell goes off.
Is nothing sacred? There’s nothing sexy,
nothing remotely erotic at all, about old
Uncle Ben and his crappy instant rice. Rice
does not make me homy, baby, and noth
ing the Uncle Ben’s ad team says about it
can make me change my mind - not even
the part'about quickies.
Sex and commerce have always been
bedfellows, so to speak, but the affair’s nev
er been this public. It’s gotten so bad, in
fact, that I have something that very close
ly resembles admiration for people like
Hugh Hefner and Larry Flynt, dirty old
men who are nevertheless honest enough
to use sex to sell only sex and nothing more.
Plus, Hefner at least gets quality interviews
with quality stars, and Flynt helps expose
congressional perverts. Yep. I could almost
admire those guys.
But things are only going to get more
sexually saturated. We’re lumbering to
ward the very apex of the Information Age,
and, through the power of the almighty In
ternet, computer geeks and Web weirdos
everywhere are already starting to incul
cate relatively fresh advertising methods
such as push technology (junk e-mail) in
to the corporate advertising agenda. Pret
ty soon, you’ll be getting e-mails asking
you to try www.UncleBens.com - “Eat
it in the afterglow.”
Yes, corporate America, sex sells. And
yes, consumer America, we’re buying. I,
for one, am grateful for it. How else am I
going to know what shampoo to use?
Kenley Young
is a weekly
columnist. He
can be reached
by via The
Gamecock at:
gckviews@sc.edu
Letters
Anti-NRA column cites
misleading statistics
To the Editor
Mr. Paul Blake’s highly biased opin
ions of the NRA [“NRA offers solution
to roommate problems,” Aug. 19] are un
acceptable. In addition to this, Mr.
Blake displays a profound lack of knowl
edge of what he calls “Gun Facts”.
Mr. Blake fails to realize that the Na
tional Rifle Association mostly comprises
good-hearted, law-abiding citizens, and is
more than just an organization that fights
to preserve the Constitutional right to keep
and bear arms.
The NRA has donated millions of dol
lars and countless man hours to teach the
children of our nation the important les
son of dealing with firearms. The Eddie
Eagle Program specifically teaches them
that if they find a gun, 1) Stop! 2) Don’t
touch! 3) Leave the room! 4) Go tell
an adult!
Mr. Blake also fails to point out that
the NRA gives scholarships, as well as low
interest loans, to students who are in need
of financial aid. The NRA also fights many
hard battles to keep violent offenders in
prison
If I may be so bold to ask, what has Mr.
Blake done for this nation of ours?
Now, on to Mr. Blake’s so-called
“facts.” HiS first “fact” brings up the “43
times as likely to kill a family member than
an assailant” misnomer of Dr. Arthur
Kellerman. kellerman’s studies are based
on reverse causation and have been proven
flawed so many times that Congress slashed
the budget of the Center for Disease Con
trol by millions of dollars for using such
fallacious data.
Mr. Blake’s statement of the NRA op
posing legislation to automatic weapons is
--i ■
also full of holes. First of all, Mr. Blake
must realize that there are already 26,000+
firearms restriction laws in this nation.
Adding more redundant, useless laws is just
a waste of taxpayers’ money. Mr. Blake
also fails to realize that there has not been
a single incident in the last 30+ years where
a lawfully owned, fully automatic weapon
was used in the commission of a crime.
All such fully automatic weapons that were
used were those smuggled in the U.S. by
illegal arms dealers.
The statement of NRA members hav
ing guns while riding in airplanes is also
quite flawed. In case Mr. Blake did not
know, for a passenger to have a firearm on
the plane, it must be in a locked contain
er in a locked suitcase, and stored in the
cargo hold area. Secondly, the only ones
who are exempt from this policy are cer
tain law enforcement agents, such as a U.S.
Marshall. I honestly hope that Mr.
Blake does not try to make any such wise
cracks in an airport, as he can be arrested
and detained for a significant time.
Mr. Blake should do some research on
this subject that he appears to know very
little about, as he is relying on outdated,
not to mention debunked, research and
flat-out prevarications.
RonaldS. Shin
Chemistry and Biochemistry
Graduate Student
To the Editor
I read Paul Blake’s column with in
terest, digust and horror.
If he had bothered to do any research,
then he would have learned that the study
that says that “people who keep guns are
43 times more likely to kill family mem
bers” was not conducted in the scientific
method.
♦
It has been proven scientifically that
concealed, carried weapon laws reduce
crime.
The Second Amendment reads, “A
well-regulated militia.” [sic] Now, if he
talked to a Constitutional scholar, he would
leant that the “militia” does not refer to
the National Guard or Reserve Forces of
the U.S. military, but to the gun-owning
citizens. Early in American history, be
fore we had a Constitution and were sim
ply a confederacy of states, we also had no
standing army. So the militia was called
every time the government needed fire
power. This milita consisted of gun-own
ing males. It is from that that the term
“well-regulated militia” comes.
Mr. Blake states that foreign cities have
much lower crime rates. There are three
reasons why their crime rates (in mur
der) are lower.
One: American culture is about vio
lence. That is not so in Europe.
Two: The police in every Western Eu
ropean state have the right to enter any
dwelling and search any vehicle, or detain
any person that might be criminally active.
Three: Most of Europe has mandato
ry military service. This means that the
population is more disciplined and more
schooled in the following of laws, orders
and regulations.
America has a spirit of rebellion. It is
what made us free, and it is what has kept
us that way. Mr. Blake’s ignorant, simply
not tnte and absolutely undefendable com
ments, suggestions and statements have
forever smeared The Gamecock with his
reputation.
Shame on him for trying to destroy
what makes us free.
Thomas Ebyl
Criminal Justice Freshman
Global Issues
Humans
pests in
own ways
Wear it!
Wear it!
Wear it!”
These were my
words as I smashed
a bold cockroach
into a pestilent
pate. The sheer au
dacity of that
cockroach! It flew . ,
right into the TV
. DtPresso
screen, recovered
and then crawled 's a biweekly
around on top of columnist. He
the television. can be reached
With an eye on via The
the bug and anoth- Gamecock at:
er on the tube, my gckviews@sc.edu
hands blindly
groped for a proper smashing utensil. Af
ter grasping socks, a fork, my coffee mug
and the remote control, I finally got my
paws on a shoe. Slowly rising to my feet
so as not to alarm the precocious insect, I
made my way to the set. The little bugger
managed to give a good run, but it was
sole smear in the end.
As the harsh judgment of my shoe
came down like the gavel of a Texan
judge, I thought to myself, “If the shoe
fits...” and then let forth my “wear it!”
chant. When the buglust was through, I
wiped the goo off with a paper towel.
While wiping, I tried to figure out exactly
what made me react so zealously at the
sight of the bug. I came to a revelation,
one so amazing that I smiled with titilla
tion: I know what sharks are thinking.
Imagine it - you’re swimming to
your kitchen: the beach. You aren’t ex
actly sure what you’d like. Maybe a seal
would do, or perhaps fish. Maybe, if
you’re lucky, you’ll run into that arthritic
dolphin you’ve heard about. Instead, you
get there and find the place swarming
with disgusting little creatures with more
digits than any sea creature has a right to
have. At the sight of you, they all scurry
away to places you can’t reach. You
leave, disgusted. After all, even if there is
any food around, they’ve probably be
fouled it.
With the beach option eliminated,
you decide to go out to eat. Heading for
the open waters of the ocean, you keep
an eye out for something that interests
you. Unfortunately, the sea is teeming
with floating nests today. They leave a
trail of oily filth, polluting the water you
breathe. The water is fouled, and you no
tice that they’re dumping trash and ani
mal parts, as well. Living space that once
was prime becomes unbearable with the
pests’ filth. Even worse, they’re overrun
ning your kind. Why is this happening?
You’re bigger, faster, stronger and have
other superiorities such as electromagnet
ic sensory organs and immunity to can
cer. This doesn’t matter, though, because
they’re increasing at a greater rate and are
getting the better of sharks everywhere.
The shark you mated with last week was
dragged into one of their floating nests
and tossed back out frnless and slowly
bleeding to death. It’s a hopeless struggle.
In despair, you bite the first swimming
primate you see, filling the water (and
your mouth) with its rank blood. It’s a fu
tile gesture because there is no way you
could wipe them all out. You just have
to face the fact that, one day, they’ll scut
tle over your corpse without a care.
With the pesticidal act finished and
the unsavory cleanup nearing completion,
my head dizzied. Not only did I come to
know what goes through the heads of
sharks, but I also saw that I was no differ
ent from that pulp being wiped from the
bottom of my shoe. I’m a buzzing little
animal - pest to many, companion and
consort to some, consumer of the spoils
of the Earth. We all are. My idea isn’t a
new one; it’s not profound, and I must
admit that it’s a bit silly. It is, however, a
good thought to cycle through your head
when you find yourself futilely raising
your arm in anger at any passing arthro
pods.
I-1
Think your opinion
needs to be heard?
Send us a guest column.
Call 777-7726 or come by
Russell House 333 for
more information.