The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, January 13, 1997, Garnet and Black, Image 6
A look inside USC's clo
Justic
UDt'-S
By Cece von Kolnitz
Editor
Not even Brian Steward's parents t
know he became a case number in c
USC's judicial system last year. g
Steward, a junior, was charged c
with smoking mariiuana in his c
dorm room after being accused by a c
residence hall director. He confessed
to the charge, and as a result
of his judicial board hearing, he was
kicked out of campus housing.
Steward's hearing, like all of
USC's judicial board hearings, was
closed to the" public, despite the
fact that the Freedom of
Information Act requires groups
supported by public funds to hold
open meetings.
Steward said during his hearing,
he didn't feel like he was really
being judged by an unbiased board
of his peers.
"They basically had their minds
made up before I walked in that
room," he said.
Questions about fairness and
meetings held behind closed doors
are surrounding campus judicial
systems across the country.
Meanwhile, Congress and news
organizations are putting pressure
on universities to be more open
about their judicial systems.
Fairness and
fVio nrnnaaa
l/i |7i wuorj ^
USC judicial board members say
the process here is fair.
"Since it's a board of peers, I ^
think we're very fair. I think if they ^
[students who are found guilty] t
thought we weren't fair they could
at least see our logic [in coming up
with sanctions]," Neel Shah, a
junior and president of the judicial
board, said. r
Shah said charged students are
not presumed innocent until they
are proven guilty nor are they auto- j.
matically presumed guilty. ?
"It's neither," Shah said. t
The board's standard of evidence
is not as high as a state or federal ^
court's. Hearsay is admissible.
Nicole Moen, a senior and stu- j.
dent member of the judicial board, e
said the statements of university
employees including administrators ^
and residence hall directors are
assumed by the board to be true in s
order to "uphold the authority of
the people like residence hall direcrr
. i
tors in an ettort to empower tnem j,
in their positions. c
"What's the point of having an c
RHD if their opinion has no r
valuer I
A student is judged guilty if the
sed judicial system
>e
itvle
w
>oard finds that it is "reasonably
:ertain the student or student
[roup is responsible for the offense
harged." Students can appeal their
ases all the way up to the president
>f the university.
The highest punishment USC's
udicial board can pass down is sus- I
>ension.
Moen said "We agonize over our
anctions. We spend hours coming
jp with what we think should be
he most educational program. It's
iot really a punishment. We try to
nake it a learning experience." Is
Even though they spend hours p,
rn their decisions, judicial board
nembers have very little time to
eview each case before hearings.
Shah said they review the written .
naterial involved in the case for
lalf an hour to an hour before each
rearing. I
"The only reason we review it is
:o know what questions to ask,"
Shah said.
He said the short time is another
eason why the board is able to be
o unbiased.
"I don't see how we could be that
biased. We find out about the case
ind shortly thereafter we have the
rearing."
Moen said one way the board
nsures objectivity is to require
>oard members to speak up if they
enow a student involved in a case.
ITre board is so objective, Moen
aid, that she's not concerned about
vhat public opinion might be if the tj.
rearings were open to the public,
hough she advocates their closure ^
o protect student privacy. S1
1 m not so much concerned ^
ibout how [the public] views us. I'm
'ery pleased with the unbiased
rature of our board," Moen said. tj.
But Steward doesn't agree. In his ^
dosing statement at the end of his
rearing Steward told the board, p
You already had your minds made w
ip."
He said, "I've always been told
ou get rewarded if you admit your
nistakes. It's supposed to be easier," p
le said. "They didn't make it any p
It
asier. tc
5VTiv its closed K
Room 104 in the back of USC's V]
tudent discipline office is not a f
ourtroom. ^
But on days when the judicial re
oard is in session, witnesses fill the
onference room's chairs, "alleged ^
iffenders" make closing statements t
o a board of their peers and in rb*> tr
nd, that board decides whether
Jeel Shah, president of the judicial board, said he fee
eers, I think we're very fair. I think if [students] thoi
- i . said FERPA
Students at the legislation c
to deal with
University of Georgia didn t think
doing when
. Wedlock
can use their campus responding
schools givir
newspaper to chal- students to <
ents.
Un. i..airi?l knnrrl , Res,pond"
? cie aDout c
Dennis Gre
decisions. Association
Affairs, said
open becaus
- Crystal Paulk, former judiciary ble"tohold
~A/ ing a porti
reporter for UGAs student record. Th<
newspaper hearings, he
ble and illeg;
the accused
But Wedl
le accused is guilty or not. does not in<
The student who is charged may dent wantei
e accused of theft or drug posses- hearing, acc<
on. He may be accused of rape. One Information
ring never changes: no one but admitted,
lose directly involved in the hear- The probl
lg, the members of the board and says, is enfor
le office's administrators know that act has tradi
e's there or why he's there. inal punishn
And as Moen said, "Not even But the sti
resident Palms knows beforehand know that tl
hat happens." hearing goir
Administrators at universities not publicb
:ross the country have traditionally meetings,
sed the part of the Family Crystal F
ducational Rights and Privacy Act Georgia stud
lown as the Buckley Amendment reporter for
) defend the closing of judicial UGA's indej
Dard hearings. per, said sin
The Buckley Amendment pro- hearings wei
des for the withholding of federal Georgia's si
mds for public institutions which UGA studei
jrmit the release ot educational or cases t
cords." At USC, "educational dis- "Judicial Wj
plinary records" include everything appeals,
om residence hall incident reports Paulk said
> university police department appeal their
ansfers. pies of the 01
USC law professor Eldon Wedlock challenge so
I
>Lw.< I
1
"' '"^iiitfTfft / ^1
i|
Ilk :
Robert Walton/Garnet & Black
Is (JSC's judicial board hearings are fair. "Since it's a board of
ught we weren't fair they could at least see our logic."
is "one of those pieces of sions.
Congress passes in order "How do you know you're being
an outrage. They really treated fairly as a student unless you
through what they were can compare your experience to how
they passed the laws." other students have been treated T'
said Congress was Paulk said,
to concerns about .
\g out information about A C3?S6 ICM* ClOSVirC
outsiders and not to par- Jerry Crotty, associate student discipline
director, said even if no laws
\g to a U Magazine arti- were involved, he would want USC's
:ollege judicial boards, hearings to be closed.
:gory, president of the "I argue for the benefits of confiof
Student Judicial dentiality," Crotty said. "1 would
hearings should not be want it (the judicial process) to be
e it would be "impossi- private even if there wasn't a law
hearings without includ- addressed in the question."
on of an educational Moen said she believes one of the
;refore, to open such main reasons both hearings and
said, would be "impossi- records should be closed is to protect
il without the consent of- the individual student's privacy. She
student." said she thinks allowing public
ock said the law itself access to hearings would open a
dude hearings. If a stu- charged student's life up to unnecesd
to attend a specific sary public scrutiny,
arding to the Freedom of "My only problem with that
Act, he should be [media attention] is it stigmatizes the
charged student as being guilty
em with FOIA, Wedlock whether he is or not," Moen said,
cement. Violation of the But Crotty said most student who
tionally carried no crim- are referred to the the discipline
rents. office either accept responsibility or
jdent would have to first are found guilty by the board,
here was even a specific "We don't pick these names out of
ig on. USC's board does a hat," Crotty said.
/ post notice of their Shah said another possible effect
of open hearings might be backlash
'aulk, a University of from students who are allowed to
lent and former judiciary attend who may be unhappy about
The Red and Black, the outcome of a charged friend's
)endent student newspa- case.
ce UGA's campus court "You don't know how disruptive
re open by the state ot they could get towards you (it the
lpreme court in 1993, hearings were open)." Shah said. "A
nts have used examples lot of it is for pur own protection."
rom the newspaper's Administrators and judicial board
itch" columns for their members say the process a charged
student goes through is supposed to
1 students who want to be an educational one.
cases can use the exam- "I think of my function as much
itcomes of other cases to more of an educational encounter
me of the court's deci- rather than a judicial encounter,"