The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, September 07, 1995, Page 2, Image 2

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

1 2 * ~ IBafilcock Serving USC Since 190S Wendy Hudson, Editor in Chief Matt Pruitt, Viewpoints Editor Editorial Board Lucy Arnold, Jamie Clark, Erin Galloway, Stephanie Sonnenfeld, Allison Williams, Larry Williams, Ryan Wilson Governor deals blow to USC Once again, the current Republican government of South Carolina has done its best to hinder the growth of education in our state. Governor Beasley in his infinite wisdom has declined additional funding for African-American Studies at USC and the USC Law School. The Governor's refusal probably comes as no surprise to those who are familiar with his politics. After all, the same man came within inches of cutting a few million dollars from the USC budget only last year (not to mention the millions he proposed to cut from other institutions of higher learning). The cut could have been a detrimental blow to a school already suffering from limited state funding. Beasleys statement implied that if USC wants to prioritize AfricanAmerican Studies then money should be drawn from internal sources to fund them This statement is similar in nature to last Year's suggestion that USC make internal cutbacks and "trim fat" within the institution in order to survive the budget cut. Beasley and his regime are quick to place the responsibility on institutions of higher learning instead of making a stand for education. The current Republican leaders would much rather get behind a more worthy cause, such as making minimal reductions in property tax (while the state's education system suffers). Should we send a letter to the State House reminding the Congress that USC is still a "state institution," even though the minimal support received from the state makes this term laughable? Can lightning strike twice? Last year's student outcry made an impact. Anyone for another round? Summerton deers, doves watch out for hunters This Saturday was the biggest T^uTctciuadt day of the year in Summerton Uncw olcWAHl (pop.975). No, George Jones did not Columnist crane to town. Nor did Laurence Man- L_ ning Academy play Charleston Hall home due to the more than obvious in football. Folks, Saturday was the difference in I.Q. between the deer first day of the hunting season in ^ ^ Rimini locals> Clarendon County. Hunters are some of the most 1 here won t be sate deer or doves u^que people in the world. Whole anywhere near Summerton Eveiy Uves center around the first Saturmatem the entire county will be wak- day in September so the weekly liting up at the crack of dawn from now ual can begin until January to put his shotgun to The ritual begins about 5:30 in practice. the morning. The hunter puts on his I love to hunt However, I am not atrire of choice, usually camouflage obsessed with it like many other ^ mture ^ huDter ^ icka huntere are. I know some guys back W8 tru3t fi usually named home who would rather hunt than .Qr Bets/ or ?Jethr ? md ^ f } one (W "ho missed his Us pickup truck and heads t0 the first child being born becmise the fjgfd doves were flying good Believe it or not, there is a big Many a relationship has been , . , , ,. 1 , , j , , ,. T difference between deer hunting and broken up due to hunting season. I , , ,. wouldn't be surprised if Eve had dovehuntmg. somethingtosaytoAdamaboutit. , ^ order to hunt deer, you have Hunting in general is a positive ?s quiet as the preacher's son thing, except where the deer and chu"L ADdetc^plck,up SOUIld doves are concerned. I would rather fafr Pafkwuood UP f; be a piece of chocolate at a Weight ^es.You ^ve * be<*reful Watchers meeting than game in to rover your Kent, or else the deer Clarendon County. I believe ifs safer "D catch wind of your B.O. to hitchhike through Miami wear- However, a dove shoot is more ing brand new Nike shoes than it is i^f a Party' ^en congregate in the s._ i j . c field like old ladies at a sewine cir lu ut; a utrer i uiiiin in near ouiiiiiicr- " ton on a Saturday morning. de'md usuaUy discuss footbaH and If God ever decides to get back at tell dirty jokes, me, he can bring me back as a dove. A11 to ,m e. , g^ering more More doves die in Clarendon Coun- exciting, there is always someone ty each year than cans of beer get who drives around the fields in a consumed at Tally Ho. pickup truck with a cooler full of beer. I have more sympathy for deer The afternoon usually ends with than I do doves. At least deer try to afew arguments over who shot the avoid being killed. Doves rank right most doves. It's amazing how draup there with horses and Clemson matically the numbers given decrease fans on the intelligence ladder. 88 the local game warden drives up. A dove will fly right across the For the next few weeks, I'll be field in front of you while you sit there waiting like a buck waits for soywith something that can end his life beans for Saturday to roll around, in a split second. And the thing is, At that time, I will be hitting the seeing most of his friends die does- fields of Clarendon County, knocknt thwart him. Telling a dove to stay ing a big hole in the deer and dove out of a hunting field is like telling population, a dog to quit drinking out of a toilet. D.S. Joke of the Week: Q) Why On the other hand, deer will out- does Columbia have stifling heat and navigate you through the woods. On mosquitoes while Berkley, Califormore than one occasion, deer have nia, has liberals and hippies? A) South outsmarted humans. Some of the Carolina had first pick, world's oldest deer call Rimini, SC, I News: 777*7726 El3T \ Wrrrnn? Advertising: 777-4249 Ryan Sims VL/Ul I ItUlllV FAX: 777-6482 online Editor Student Media Russell House-USO Columbia, SC 29208 D^Jo'rd Wendy Hudson Lucy Arnold Martha Hotop Laura Day Editor in Chief Stephanie Tina Morgan Creative Director Matt Pruitt Sonnenfeld Asst. News Jeff A. Breaux Viewpoints Editor Features Editors Ben Pillow An Director Chris Winston Larry Williams Chris Dixon Gregory Perez Copy Desk Chief Rvan Wikon *"*' lUreS Design Edllor Erin Galloway KimCddo Allison Williams lamie Clark Asst. Sports Asst. Advertising Manager News Editors To,o Editor Jason Jeffers Erik Collins Keith Boudreaux Cartoon*, Facuity Advisor Circulation Manager Letter# Policy The Gamecock is the student newspaper of the University of _ . ... .... , *mih Carolina and is published daily during the fall and Thc Gamecock will try to print all letters received, spring semesters, with the exception of university holidays Letters should be 200-250 words and must include full awl exam periods. name, professional title or year and major if a student. Opinions expressed in The Gamecock are those of the editors Letters must be personally delivered by the author to or author and not those of the University of South Carolina. The Gamecock newsroom in Russell House room 333. The Board of Student Publications and Communications is _ , . , , the publisher of The Gamecock. The Department of Student T1* Gamecock reserves the nght to edit all letters for Media is its parent organization style, possible libel or space limitations. Names will not be withheld under any circumstances, -t ? ? yiEWPQ dsak fgfceBRel< ^>i "^*V^o*t V Jf^?< | ?fi? f i V SIGNE PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS Phiadapne USA Ml will pay for your I F MTV hides biased aj Beginning a new school year, and a new fall, it is appropriate to get things started off on the right foot. So I'll begin by saying something that is long past due - the MTV generation sucks. It might be a little blunt, but the aforementioned is the sentiment of many people other than myself. Disgusting, non-realistic shows and obvious one-sided political agendas have reduced MTVs credibility to zero, and there appears to be no end in sight as we head into cyberspace, a corporate world, and the next century. MTV is likely the most popular, and easily the most revolutionary, telemachine in the world. Spanning the globe, MTV is watched by millions. One could come to the conclusion that, with such a mass of viewers (primarily young), MTV would have quite a bit of control over the thoughts, beliefs, and opinions of a large segment of society. The problem is, MTV has exercised more than their share of control over young people who have yet t o develop their own sense or perception of the world. MTV, with their liberal agenda and biased "news," has indoctrinated viewers with a one-sided viewpoint which proves that the music television monster itself epitomizes the term "narrow-minded" - a term that they often pin on others whose views don't necessarily correspond with their own. First off, don't write this off as just another conservative, right wing perspective - if MTV bombarded viewers with right-wing bombast, this assault would still be on. The point is that MTV, with their so called "American" ways, represent a totally un-American side to television media and programming. In the 1992 presidential campaign, MTV became a key player in the race for presidency between Republican George Bush and Democrat Bill Clinton. With the slogans "Choose or Lose" and "Rode the Vote," Government shou Americans may have more opinions about family values than any other major theme. Everyone is concerned about how America's children are being reared. In fact, people look to blame someone when a dysfunctional person commits some heinous crime. The people that are blamed, more often than not, are the parents that raised that deviant person. Many states have laws on the books that restrict marriages to heterosexuals only. The idea here is that somehow homosexuals are not capable of raising children in a functional, healthy environment that fosters growth. Many presume that homosexuals would raise their children to be homosexual as well. Of course, what most people fail to realize is that gays and lesbians have have been in existence on this earth since the dawn of the human species. And every homosexual person was born from the union of two heterosexuals?until now. Nevertheless, the state should promote family configurations that provide a healthy environment for children. Or, if a family is childless, the state should promote relationships built on a mutual agreement between the two parties involved. As Dr. Mary Ann Mason states in The De-regulation of Family Law,". .. individual freedom, rather than legal regulation, could be the governing principle in childless relationships. It might be useful to rename the laws that govern these relationships, and carve out a new legal area called something like 'relationship law' to distinguish it from situations where there are children." When speaking about a healthy environment for children, the term healthy is obviously a subjective one. It would be more effective if the state dealt with unhealthy families on a case-by-case basis rather than attempting to place rigid definitions on what "healthy" The definition of marriage used in this column so far has implied the unification of two parties. However, as Shulamith Firestone questions in The Case for Feminist Revolution, perhaps the unification of more than two people for the purpose of raising children should be considered. Firestone suggests the inclusion of so-called "households." Her definition of this family unit is as follows: "Households, however, connotes only a large grouping of people living together for an unspecified time, and with no specified set of interpersonal relations If the household replaces marriage perhaps we would at first legalize it in the same way?if this is necessary at all. A group of ten or so [NTS B X^tme Gutss. You v#r / A ftDEKAUY" fiiNDEP 3?B *jf\ HOPING AMERICANS^ GtTgWekNMWT JQ YjK\ Off THElP f-T y 4'?T V backs' Mfy lunch In the Russell House. Go In and eat I 'resident John Palms on the "free lunch projed *enda behind shallow LARRY WILLIAMS Guest columnist MTV ran daily updates on the race and provided their own version of insight into the race. The primary element in MTVs angle was choice, and it wasn't a coincidence that one key difference between Republican George Bush and Democrat Bill Clinton was the issue of abortion. While the consensus among Republicans was "Pro-life," Democrats focused on the element of choice when referring to the issue. MTV used this to their advantage as a clearly ambiguous term. As election day neared, MTVs Tabitha Soren had candidate Bill Clinton inside MTV studios where he would answer prepared questions from the audience. Soren was extremely cordial and the only questions and responses aired by MTV seemed to be very easy ones that portrayed the liberal point of view. MTVs equivalent to this "Town Meeting" was an interview by Soren with Bush. The five-minute cross examination was done on the caboose of Bush's campaign train and stressed the negative side of Bush's four years in office. Soren was extremely curt with the President, unlike her role with good ole boy Clinton. Later, after winning the presidency, Clinton recalled that his MTV appearance was a key in the victory. Fairness? Equality? Choice? I think not. As for as programming is concerned, MTV has taken a turn for the worst since their birth in the early 8ffs, when they were the self proclaimed "24 hour music video station." Nowadays, MTV is just another television station, airing sitcoms with a few videos sandwiched in between. In an attempt to provide a glimpse of how people function in the real world, MTV began a few years id put child first KEN TRAUM Columnist consenting adults of varying ages could apply for a license as a group in much the same way as a young couple today applies for a marriage license, perhaps even undergoing some form of ritual ceremony and then might proceed in the same way to set up house. The household license would, however, apply only for a given period, perhaps seven to ten years, or whatever was decided on as the minimal time to grow up? but probably a much shorter period than we now imagine. If at the end of this period the group decided to stay together, it could always get a renewal. However, no single individual would be contracted to stay after this period, and perhaps some members of the unit might transfer out, or new members come in. Or, the unit could disban altogether." Shulamith contends that her idea of a "household" would offer many advantages to a young child growing up. She claims that these units would be stable? although they only last for about a decade. This seems to be problematic. A child is always going to be the product of at least one parent?a mother and, according to the mother's perception, the child will most likely hold great responsibility in her life. So it is possible that a woman who carried a baby for nine months may not be ecstatic about the idea of relinquishing control over her child. Even if this problem is overcome, ten years does not seem like a long enough time to raise a child. - - - - - - 1 n 4-V\ r? 4- 4-V\ rv /|V\ il/1'n V?1 uues r lrcstuiit; meaxi wj suggest uiat uic uuiu o uiological parents can choose to transfer out of the group? What happens after the group disbands? This so-called household may seem like a good idea,but one can easily see that it would be fraught with problems. Group dynamics with ten or so people could get to be very tricky, and the situation could lend to more tension, confiision, and frustration than a traditional two-person. Sexual preference should not be a factor when considering whom to give marriage licenses to. The state's main concern is the child in relationships which involve children. And when examining alternative marriages such as Firestone's group marriage model, the state must always ask the question, "What is best for the children?" and not "What is best for the state?" Thursday, September 7,1995 / f / ?.... ?i ? ?r fc te< ? ? p. CP1?,? ^6 ~ I I ^.j)U?w '. unch with students. r r facade of diversity ago a show aptly entitled "The Real World." Amazingly popular and still in existence, "The Real World" should instead be called "MTV World." Sorry, folks, but if this show were truly representative of a real-life scenario, then MTV wouldn't hand pick their "actors" out of a pool of millions of people. Which is more real? Our world, our problems, or seven people living togetner witn ajmion cameras catcmng their eveiymove? Get real. When MTV does get around to playing music videos, the music that is aired is a result of MTVs own censoring process. The term "Alternative" is used shamefully, with bands such as Dave Matthews being referred to as alternative. Alternative music on MTV is a self-defeating concept. Alternative music refers to something other than the mainstream and, the last time I checked, MTV was still mainstream. I don't think that the term "sellout" was a word before the birth of MTV. Band after band chooses to relinquish their basis for music and values in exchange for the pop fame that MTV provides. This is, of course, attributed to the bands' lack of fortitude, but think for a moment: If MTV had any concept of variety in their choice of programming, then wouldn't there be a wider variety of "successful" artists, in turn meaning that there would be fewer bands compromising their integrity for money and "fame"? Lefsfaceit: MTV is a joke. The word "Music" in their title should be removed forever, as their proparron^Q onrl roninrr nf mnoiPiana fomiokna fVin mfnrrri_ gcuiua cuiu lading ui mmjiviui iij uaxxiioii^o uic uibcgii" ty and spontaneity which the very word music actually entails. Television has more control than you think, and worse, it feeds on ignorance. MTV is the leader of the pack, and the others are not too far behind. Kill your television. A closer look KATO t