The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, July 28, 1993, Page 6, Image 6
EDITORIAL
Motherhood
Unwed mothers deserve
support, not criticism
I T?I T n 1850, Nathaniel
A Hawthorne published
"The Scarlet Letter," which
\ details the story of a Puritan
\ woman scorned by society
?I II for having an illegitimate
child. As a single mother,
Hester Prynne was mocked, harassed and mentally
tormented for her "crime."
Three hundred years have passed since those
Puritanical days, and yet the puritanical ideals
dominate the American culture.
When former Vice President Dan Quayle criticized
the fictional character Murphy Brown for
deciding to become an unwed mother, Americans
inArn r r\ 1 < # rvr? tka am < A \ if I I rvn p n mnnrln/4
wtlt d^lll UU lilt IddUt. iVlllUUUd du[ijpui ICU
Quayle, while millions more derided him.
Religious leaders supported Quayle for
upholding the puritanical banner of "family values,"
while feminists argued Quayle did not realize
that a greater proportion of single women
were having children.
Long after the election and the rhetoric of socalled
"family values," the dust has settled, but
the heart of the argument still exists. Is single
motherhood a social aberration, or is it a social
norm?
Census Bureau statistics released two weeks
ago seem to suggest the latter. The percentage of
single American mothers under 44 jumped from
IS rvrppnf to 9S nprppnt r\\;pr 1H vpore fVvntrarv/
J/Vl will 11/ J'l/I Will l/TVI X\J JVlUil. V.V/1IU (U J
to stereotype, these numbers cross all societal
lines: racial, ethnic, religious, class, income, profession.
Two sets of numbers have some bearing on
USC. One of the sharpest increases was among
college-educated women, rising from 3.1 percent
to 8.2 percent; South Carolina, with the exception
of Mississippi, leads the nation in nevermarried
mothers.
While neither set of numbers are directly related,
they may point to a possible corollary. If a
link exists between them, then it is likely there
1 ~ *i i -r r I- T too 1
win uc a iu>e 111 uie nuiiioei ui lemaie ujl grauuates
rearing children alone successfully.
With a college degree, women are better able
to battle discrimination in the workplace. It
allows them to break through the glass ceiling,
enter the board rooms and be able to provide a
better life for themselves and their children.
This growing trend towards more single mothers
may seem frightening to some, but consider
that in most dysfunctional families, the child only
KAnHc urilK rvnn Crv mran in n tm/\ nm*Ant
ia/iiuo wiui uuw poitiii. ju, vvtii in a iwirpaiuu
household, the dynamics of a one-parent household
prevail.
While politicians and preachers debate singlemotherhood's
morality, single mother's must
deal with the daily struggles of holding a steady
job, rearing children and maintaining a stable
household. Even the world's greatest jugglers
must envy those single mothers who are able to
balance home and career successfully.
' i 1
Magazines w
As I grudgingly walked through the fitness
center door yesterday, I knew a little
motivation would be necessary in order for
me to survive 30 minutes on the
Stairmonster.,.1 mean Stairmaster. Honine
1 c
to successfully kill the next half hour, I
selected a popular women's magazine
from a display rack.
After about five minutes of reading, I |
found myself more frustrated than before, I!
and I hadn't even set a foot on the torture
machine yet.
Maybe it's just me, but I'm not so sure '
what women these so-called women's \
magazines are written for. Now, I am not
bashing all of these magazines; some of '
them do justice for women such as myself '
who enjoy a healthy balance of good fiction,
fashion, fitness and, of course, food. 1
But I'm not finding many magazines <
that aim for conservative twentysomething :
females such as myself. Perhaps it is J
because I am stuck in one of these "in- 1
between stages or life, having passed J
through my teen-age years and looking <
forward to a career and marriage within a
few years, that I can't find a good maga- i
zine. s
Call me crazy, but I'm not interested in i
what I should wear with my bell bottoms, i
How much intelligence does it take to fig- f
ure out that platform shoes are the obvious t
choice? 2
I have had enough of these sex surveys.
If something that intimate can't remain j
personal, then we are all nothing more that f
Women's magazi
I'm the type of person who likes to read. I"
I'll read just about anything that's lying
around. I read the cereal box at breakfast,
the Lance Choc-o-lunch package at lunch
and all of the McDonald's wrappers at dinner.
I read pamphlets when I'm waiting for
the doctor, and I read CD liner notes while
I'm listening to the music.
Most of the stuff I read is pretty boring,
especially the liner notes that just list the L
band members' names and the fan club's
address. Occasionally, however, I'll strike c
*i *i -i i _ _ c i: * l .i r
ujc mouicriuue 01 reauing material, uie v
epitome of fine literature, the cream of the
printed crop. Yes, every now and then, I c
read one of my mother's women's maga- r
zines. r
You know the breed: Family Circle,
Woman's Day, Good Housekeeping. i]
These magazines are a conglomeration of c
gossip, advice, household tips and a
women's fiction. They've always fascinated
me; predictability in anything intrigues
me. 11
mosi women s magazines seem to nave 1
a rather set pattern. Every magazine must I
have at least 20 columns offering advice e
on everything from manners to childcare 1
to medical problems to sex. Each column 11
takes readers' questions and uses experts e
in the field to solve the problem.
I've always wondered where the editors ?
get experts in fields such as sink and bath- d
room care or foot odor, but they always i1
seem to dig up someone with impressive 11
sounding credentials. Also, where do the
sex columnists go to get trained, and why F
written for wi
?7 j~ : :
Reading
guess it s true mat it you want sometmng
jone right...
My greatest concern is the image these
nagazines are giving to teen-age girls
;uch as my younger sister. She already has
t drilled into her head that sex before mariage
is OK, that superskinny is the only
"igure that guys are attracted to, in addiion
to a variety of other widespread
issumptions.
What irks me are those models! Isn't it
ust a bit hypocritical to print articles on
low it's OK to be yourself and that 110
ines provide hoi
Readina
| ? * v
lidn't my adviser tell me about those
ourses?
Mnet u/omAn'c mono7iimc Korw o cr\P.
" V/11IVII O UlU^U^illlWO 11UVV u opv
:ial fiction excerpt from a famous
omance novel. All of the stories are
equired to have a dashing, handsome
awn worker who happens to be embroiled
n a sweaty, steamy affair with the glamorous
businesswoman who is married to
n obese, inattentive, chauvinistic
andowning redneck.
Usually, the stories have at least one
tiurder, two hostile takeovers and one darng,
deep kiss behind a curtain.
Jnfortunately, the stories are only
xcerpts. Do you think that by cutting
hese selections down to fill a magazine
hat the editors have removed an essential
lement from the author's meaning?
Every magazine must include at least
>ne passionate article insisting women's
loctors are only out to rip their patients
nsides into tiny shreds so the doctors can
nake a couple of bucks.
These articles usually detail a particular
irocedure that is usually unnecessary but
. . . 4 ... .
voyeurs. Whether it is an interview with
^naron Mone discussing her next movie,
or reading some of that trashy romance
"literature," these magazines are far too
concerned with the same thing. Don't we
tiave better things to do or discuss?
I don't consider myself a fanatical feminist,
and I'm tired of these magazine writers
thinking that I am. It's not that I can't
appreciate their efforts to reach a certain
audience, but I'm ready for someone to
write for me, which is what I'm doing. I
i
rong people
pounds is not a realistic weight for a lot of
us, and then have full-page layouts of ^
ervmp onpmir,_lAnlrinft prpoturp T tKinlr rhn
JV/lltV UIIVIIIIV IWIVIII^ VIVUIU1V. X U1111IV dliw
is there just to make me feel F-A-T!
Swimsuit season is the worst. One
recent article featured a layout of suits for
less than perfect bodies but had the same
tiny anemic model wearing each suit.
I was jealous! I had to face the reality
that my body will never, ever look like
that image. I'm not sure what factory they
built her at, but for the sake of women
everywhere, could someone please find at
least one woman that a swimsuit actually
makes a difference on?
The time has come for real models and
real writers. A trend has been developing
toward more athletically-built women in
some magazines, and this is a welcome
fashion trend.
I'm ready for a return to beauty that
starts from the inside and is less concerned
with my bustline. Let's focus on the best
career opportunities for future graduates, a
realistic weight loss plan and great fiction
from new writers. I'm sure that somewhere
between Cosmopolitan and flood
Housekeeping there is a happy medium.
I'm ready for a magazine with my generation
in mind. I need some refreshing
reading while I'm struggling to get my
body ready for beach appearance.
Tanya Stroman is a columnist
for The Gamecock
irs of laughter
is performed anyway. The articles then
imply the doctors are in cahoots with pharmaceutical
companies, medical insurance
companies, malpractice lawyers, auto
mechanics, refrigerator repairmen and the
men who killed John Kennedy.
Finally, every woman's magazine must
have at least one special issue devoted to
the British royal family, particularly
Princess Di. This special issue must come
out at least once a year and must detail
every outfit Di has worn since marrying
Sir Chuck of the Elephant Ear Clan.
In times of marital difficulty, the magazines
suspend regular reporting activities
in order to leave room for special flash Di
and Chuck reports, including every juicy
bit of gossip from the ever-vigilant British
press and every emergency wardrobe
change Di undergoes.
Now that the two have fallen on hard
times, the magazines all saw it necessary
to remind us of Di's stunning life and
wardrobe before she married into that
inbred mush of genetic soup we call Your
Majesties.
It's probably not normal for a guy to be
reading women's magazines all the time,
but the entertainment level they provide is
unbeatable. Anyway, how do you expect
me to know what's next for all the little
princes if I don't keep up with Blondie and
the Earmeister?
Chris Muldrow is a columnist
for The Gamecock
i * ? < ' ?
. . ^ y