The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, December 02, 1992, Page 3, Image 3
A
Yeltsin
Russian leader discovers
rliffiriiltid?? nf rlpmnrrntir rule
/ U y t^vi i fvy v # */ f c r v
More than a year ago Boris Yeltsin came into power on the heels
of a popular revolt against the old hardline multi-national communist
state. He is now finding leadership in a newly-democratizec
state difficult, to say the least.
His attempts to bring the behemoth-sized economy toward t
capitalist system have been slow and tentative, and he is noi
receiving any financial support from the U.S.
The main thrust of Yeltsin's reform thus far has been to dismantle
the communist party structure. He began by cutting off tht
head, Gorbachev, but was then faced with an organization heading
underground.
In a ruling made Monday, the highest court in Russia rulec
Yeltsin had the right to dismantle the centralized Communist part)
structure, allowing him also to effectively cut the many heads 01
the hydra left after Gorbachev's downfall. But the local parties arc
a different story. The court ruled Yeltsin could not interfere or try
to dismantle these organizations, and he had to return confiscatec
property.
Yeltsin, while claiming a mild victory, is left with politica
opposition at the grassroots level. The state of the economy anc
the inability of the government to provide basic necessities, whicl
were available even in the time of Brezhnev, will be Yeltsin';
undoing. This is already apparent in the number of protests
People who once stood with Yeltsin at the Russian parliament arc
now beating on its doors.
Dire economic circumstances breed radical politics, and i
Yeltsin doesn't make sweeping free-market reforms immediately
he could be faced with a radical shift back to hard-line commu
nism. The people are angry, and the tide may be turning agains
Vpltcin anH hie rpfnrmc It mav hp nnccihlp tr? malrp thp rpfnrmi
X V1UJ1I1 U11U MMLMKJ 1 V1V/1 11 111UJ l/V J/VUUll/*V iv 111U1W UIV 1 V1V1 lilt
stick with a little help from the U.S., but where would the mone>
come from? Any money from the U.S. could only ease the situa
tion. It would not solve any of the problems that have endured ii
Russia for centuries.
In the Nov. 18th edition of The Gamecock, Andy Hill's letter was edited
for size. A paragraph was removed which made the letter incoherent.
The Viewpoints editor and The Gamecock regret the error.
i
In the Nov. 23rd edition of The Gamecock, Sheldon Leigh Jeter's letter
contained several errors. First, a line was omitted. The letter should
have read "In addition, one cannot fathom the hundreds of hours that
debaters occupy in the library in order to prepare for tournaments in
which we represent USC (and the department) quite favorably."
Secondly, in the same paragraph, the word "except" should have been
"expect." The Viewpoints Editor and The Gamecock regret the errors.
15a lit cock
Editor in Chief Greg Rickabaugh
Managing Editor Patrick Villegas
Copy Desk Chief Jay King
News Editors Chad Bray
J.T. Wagenheim
Viewpoints Editor Jack Dunn
Features Editor Lee Clontz
Sports Editors Nancy Salomonsky
Tim Thorsen
Photo Editor Stephanie Newlin
Graphics Editor Kristin Buehlman
Cartoonist Paul Jon
Asst. News Editor Melissa Tennen
Asst. Viewpoints Editor C.E. Holman
Asst. Features Editor Jennifer Fuller
Asst. Sports Editor Rob Rodusky
Asst. Photo Editor Lea Clayton
Asst. Graphics Editors Gregory Perez
Chris Muldrow
Asst. Copy Desk Editor Brian Garland
Student Media Coordinator Jim McKellar
Production Manager Laura Day
Asst. Production Manager Jim Green
r-~? .u., i? _!i- - in
rciuuny /auvioui CNK irOiuns
Advertising Manager Renee Gibson
Graduate Asst Brian McGuire
Darkroom Technicians Erin Galloway
Rika Hashimoto
The Gamecock will try to print all letters received. Letters should be no more
than 250 words. Full name and professional title, or year and major if a student,
must be included along with address and phone number. The Gamecock
reserves the right to edit letters. The Gamecock is the student newspaper of the
University of South Carolina and is published three times a week on Mondays,
Wednesdays, and Fridays during the fall and spring semesters and weekly during
both summer sessions, with the exception of university holidays and examination
periods.
Opinions expressed in The Gamecock are those of the editors or author and not
those of the University of South Carolina.
The Board of Student Publications and Communications is the publisher of The
Gamecock. The Student Media Department is the parent organization of The
Gamecock.
Change of address forms, subscriptions, requests and other correspondence
should be sent to The Gamecock, P.O. Box 85131, The University of South
Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208..
Subscription rates are $46 a year. First class postage paid at Columbia, SC.
The Gamecock is a registered student organization of the University of South
Carolina and is partially funded by student activity fees.
/iewpo
I Jailhouse la
On Monday, Nov. 16, the S.C. Supreme
1 Court ruled prisoners who confess their
crimes to jailhouse lawyers can have those
1 confessions used against them during a trial. P
j The article reporting this high court decision |
immediately captured my attention. I am a
1 journalism major who plans to attend law
s school upon graduation. I am also a fanatic _
supporter of an individual's civil rights, so the
; decision naturally compelled me to determine
my thoughts on the matter.
f Alvin Owens murdered businessman Ernest '
Vereen several years ago. After being convicted
^ of both kidnapping and murdering Mr. Vereen, '
Mr. Owens was granted a new trial on each
t charge. He was subsequently convicted again on ^
5 the kidnapping charge. After being incarcerated
j for fhic primp Mr Ou/pn? hpoan rnncnltino an
- unnamed jailhouse lawyer for legal advice '
i regarding his upcoming murder trial.
According to Margaret N. O'Shea, a senior
writer for The State newspaper, a jailhouse '
lawyer is "an inmate whose legal education usually
comes from personal experience in court ]{
I and extensive use of the prison, law library."
Sadly, the majority of all prisoners are woefully
under-educated; but, in this particular situation, '
_ a jailhouse lawyer had ascertained a certain
knowledge of the state law. Granted, this is by '
Medical inform
On Monday former Senator and
Presidential candidate Paul Tsongas reluctantly
came forward to confirm reports he is
again ill. But he admitted he "mishandled
questions about his health during the campaign."
Tsongas has been diagnosed with abdominal
cancer. In 1983 Tsongas successfully bat- ?
tied lymphoma, and in 1986 received a bone
marrow transplant that helped him fight his illnpc?
Rut hp suffprprt a rplansp nnp vpar Infpr 1
Tsongas' health had become an issue early in 1
the campaign. The public wondered if he might (
get sick again. In response to questions about
his health, Tsongas responded that he was 1
"cured" and never mentioned his relapse.
However, members of the press followed up on
his claim, and accused the Tsongas camp of trying
to cover up his health problems.
Tsongas then urged me to form a committee {
that would decide how much information a can- (
didate should release about their health.
The. fliiestinn <ihnnlHn't he whether or nnt a 1
-J - "
candidate must release deeply private information
without having to worry whether the press 5
will uncover their "dark secrets." c
The question is this: where in the First 1
Amendment does it guarantee the press the right 1
to know about the health of private or public
individuals? J
As a liberal member of society and a staunch supporter
of free speech, I find myself strug- 1
gling with this issue. Under the Freedom of *
wBL wr'*'
Replace polls drubbed Nc
with playoffs ?5 ??
yet the Huskii
To the editor: ^ Brigham \
In the absence of a tournament ?^nn f7"^
in which teams can prove them- ?nn 1S
selves, the fans (and players) of
many teams must content them- tv'en wors
selves with comparing poll rank- heal only onc
ings. Voters watch only a few rcconJ Rl
games per week at most. With little j^cn 8? boy
information about most teams and beat four V
games, how can they really judge ^e,aaw,hll<
who is better or worse? Since the ranke" behinc
media strongly influences who gets them and hav
ranked where, teams from small ''
media markets, from the West and No'
from less established programs are acc ,in" 1
at an automatic disadvantage; and nation s tot
some of the rankings do not make rankecl below
any sense even when that is taken though lliey d
into account. same rfcordHere
are a few nuggets from this ?n 1 head
week's illogical CNN/USA Today anylhing 10 d
Top 25 Poll: thls season 1
ever just h<
ints
<" \
M4 6oSH, Sort,'! CArt'T
BEUE.VE. qoU'RE WAItHlrtG ,
J Such a violent program ///
^ WHAT IS IT ?//? ^
f
TME \
t?J V/
iwyers trick
iff
COLUMNIST
no means an equal comparison to a degree
obtained from an accredited school of law, but
hic inmota ottomntoH tn hottor oHu/^ota himcolf
uliio iiiniciiv- aiicinpivu iv/ i/viivi vuuvaiv iiiiiiovii,
and it was well-known throughout the facility
that he offered legal advice to other prisoners.
Mr. Owens was convicted again of murdering
Mr. Vereen, this time based on the testimony of
the jailhouse lawyer who prepared his legal
papers. It seems Mr. Owens admitted to his
counsel that he had indeed murdered Mr.
Vereen. In its ruling, the S.C. Supreme Court
partially glossed over the jailhouse lawyer situation
and ruled that other evidence besides the
inmate testimony would h^ve convicted Mr.
Owens.
The state Supreme Court has no jurisdiction
t)ver constitutional issues involved in a case, and
all the high court can do is judge the facts of a
case as they were presented in a lower court.
ation off limits
P*vi
PRESIDENT-ELECT I N-'Okl
Information Act, medical records are considered
protected documents, therefore free from any
press intrusion. However, I condemn members
~c a! ' 1 r l :* 4^ i_ l i_
ji uie press who leei 11 is necessary 10 puonsn
this highly private information. Quite bluntly, it
is none of their business.
Just before the election, the Republicans tried
to force the issue of Clinton's recurring throat
problem. Under pressure to quell the media,
Clinton underwent a physical, and had his docor
release a report stating his condition was
)kay. The "health issue" could have cost
Clinton the election. But, since I won, in the end
t didn't matter.
The health of the president has always been a
ierious issue. Whether it is Reagan's colon can:er,
or Bush's heart murmurs, the American
)ublic is afraid of dealing with a president's
lemise or deterioration.
The case of Arthur Ashe is really sad. The
)ress overstepped its boundaries. How would
/ou feel if a reporter called you in the middle of
he morning and asked you to confirm if you
tad AIDS or not, and then tell you he was going
Washington (9-2) encourage teams to run up
). 10 Nebraska (8-2) in order to get more vc
year and has a better really fair that fans ant
t a stronger schedule, judge the success of th<
5S are ranked lower. based on the contorted
oung (8-4) hammered poorly informed voters?
I a few weeks ago, yet playoffs would allow u
o. 21 and BYU is No. teams to prove themselv<
field.
;e, the Nittany Lions
: team with a winning Albert
ltgers, which did not
Uing ? while BYU
I'ncT 25 Hawaii is JUgg^r
1 BYU despite beating *v'i 1*/"1 11
ing a better record (9- ** U.11I vfl U U.
outhern Cal, which, entertain
o NCAA, had the ^
. . ... lo the editor:
ighest schedule, is ? .. . ,
Zrn ' Reading the letters two
No. 22 Arizona even e.. , ?
of the debate team wrote I
eat them and have the . ,XT .
tor (Nov. 23 issue
t? . Gamecock) upset me a c
-to-head games mean v ?
le voters? Finally, Has the world lost its
llustrated better than humor? Is it a crime to
dw much the polls these days? The perform
WlM t>orJ"r 1
/j/fj Hi: MOU
mm just
ill si hate
S^Saut
1531^1 SASEP
ItaScI^ SHOWS?
; prisoners
Judging only the merits of the case, the court
decided that Mr. Owens would have been
convicted without his jailhouse lawyer's testimony
used against him. But what about an
inmate's, or, for that matter, any other individual's,
absolute privilege of having all conversations
with an attorney kept confidential?
Are there any instances where client information
given to a jailhouse lawyer can be considered
protected? I am by no means a constitu
tional expert, but there must be a federal issue
lurking somewhere that will give Mr. Owens the
opportunity to appeal his conviction in federal
court.
Traditionally, by privilege only, attorneys,
physicians, clergy and spouses have not had
information or confessions spoken to them by
clients, patients, confessors and husbands or
wives mentioned at all in courts of law. This bit
of common law should be transcribed into
statute law, but, first, a state supreme court or a
federal court must decide what role a jailhouse
lawyer plays in the attorney-client privilege.
Recognized attorneys should never be compelled
to testify against their clients. Hopefully,
jailhouse lawyers will be allowed more room to
function in the future.
to journalists
to run the story? I'd be frightened to death.
Would you feel comfortable with a huge
headline publicizing your medical misfortunes?
I know I wouldn't.
How would a woman feel if it was revealed
on the front page that she had an abortion? Is
it fair to subject anyone to this level of unwarranted
scrutiny?
Is it any of our business to know about their
problems? Why should someone's battle with
bourbon become the entertainment and fodder
for the front page?
So I think Tsongas, in addition to all citizens,
deserves the right to privacy in regard to their
medical records. Perhaps the press should learn
when to behave. It seems we can't regulate ourselves,
and because of it I feel we cannot stand
upon a pedestal and claim it is the public's
"right to know."
Issues like this, and the press's outlandish
behavior, are what make the public think we are
adversarial, headline-groping maggots. I pray
that in the future that the press can control itself,
otherwise it will be open to more governmental
restrictions.
As President, I refuse to allow the press to
gain control over the agenda. My own medical
history is my business, not the presses. I will
assure my supporters I have the constitution of
an iron horse (even after passing that kidney
stone).
the score Hartwig and Jeter criticized was
?tes. Is it not, in my opinion, the least bit
1 players embarrassing or degrading to the
eir teams theater and speech department. I
logic of shared a class last semester with the
At least sophomore football player they
nderrated mentioned, and I think he is a talent
es on the and a bright spot in the department.
He performed a couple of great performances
in our class, and I
L. Allred thought his juggling act was one of
MIBS the funniest things I have ever seen!
I guess you would have to be a theater
and speech major to understand
the full range of what our departcj
ment consists of and represents.
5 Reading a great speech could in no
I rj way fully show people what speech
majors learn in class. Lighten up
people, and take a load off! Laugh
members and the world laughs with you!
o the edi
o f Th e Tracee McDowell
;reat deal. Theater senior
sense of
be funny
lance that