The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, June 05, 1991, Page 2, Image 2
Justice
Holderman got what he deserved,
no matter what USC officials say
Former USC President James Holderman was sentenced last
week to five year's probation and 500 hours of community service :
ana was oraerea to pay back taxes because he broke the law.
Board of Trustees Chairman Michael Mungo also appeared at
court and claimed Holderman was the victim of South Carolina
politics. He said Holdeiman was encouraged to break the law by
the actions of the community, Board of Trustees and politicians.
He also said Holderman should not be punished severely because
of the former President's work at USC and that the only
reason Holderman was there was because of an anxious press.
Shame on you, Mr. Mungo.
Holderman broke the lawl He could have saved the world from
environmental dangers, but he still would have had to face the
courts. Just because you improve a university should not mean
you are above the law.
If that's the case, then this whole justice thing means nothing.
Mr. Mungo, our forefathers fought so justice would be blind and
non-partial. What would they think of you now?
Also, Mr. Mungo, the press did not drag Holderman to court.
Holderman put himself in court. Holderman broke the law; the
press did not make him break any laws. We just reported how he
was breaking it.
The objectives of the press is to inform the public and sell
newspapers. Just because Holderman gave the press something to
inform and sell newspapers does not mean they're at fault. The
reporters did their job by looking into records and uncovering one
of the mysteries.
Instead of babbling in the courtroom Mr. Mungo, you should
take lessons in justice.
, 1
Gripe of the Week
WIS-TV's Children's Miracle Network telethon made NBA
fans miss the pregame, halftime and part of the third period of
Game One of the NBA Finals between the Lakers and Bulls.
Good cause, awful timing.
"THEY CAN'T SW THIS APM/fJISTKATtON HASMT
PONE ANYTHING JO PROMOTE EQUALITY" 1
BOAMECOCK1
News: 777-7726 Advertising: 777-4249
David Bowden
Editor in Chief
Tige Watts Aaron Sheinin
News Editor Carolina Life Editor
Rich Taylor Daniel Barabas
Sports Editor Graphics Editor
Tf T? Tl V 1^*.T
j ujlj.il duuuiuuuuim
Photo Editor
Jennifer Jablonski
Copy Desk Chief
Ed Bonza Erik Collins
Director of Student Media Faculty Adviser
Laura S.Day Ray Burgos
Production Manager Assistant Production Manager
Renee Gibson Carolyn Griffin
Advertising Manager Business Manager
Letters Policy: The Gamecock will try to print all letters received. Letters should be, at
maximum, 250 to 300 words long. The writer must include full name, professional title if
a USC employee or South Carolina resident, or year and major if a student. An address
and phone number are required with all letters sent. The Gamecock reserves the right
to edit letters for style, possible libel or in case of space limitations. The newspaper will
not withhold names under any circumstance.
, thcagfifowe
/
- V
'//
Z/yy//
Carolinian Cr
The press has been inundated with reports
ibout "political correctness," the effort to equalize
ill cultures, races and genders by emphasizing nonrVestem
history and culture. The belief that Westerr
eulture needs to be de-emphasized has left Americar
ligher education emasculated. However, this
column is not a diatribe against Western-bashing
educational trends in general. My criticism is more
ipecific.
T TSICc Parnlinn CrPf.H sppttiq lilrp a nirp iHp.5? tc
emind the university of the high-minded goals sei
)y its administration. The humanistic beliefs
emphasized in the Creed are not the problem. Why
loes USC need a Creed in the first place? Is the
iniversity defending itself against hypothetica]
eharges of racism by demonstrating its lack ol
jrejudice?
Every college and university in the United
I tatesshouldbe pro-individualism and anti-bigotry
rhe recent "creed-mania" sweeping American
chools is an overreaction to the fringe groups thai
lemand that all prejudice, real and imagined, be
>urged from American schools through a change in
he academic program. Now that the Creed is in
>lace, I don't think it needs to be removed, but I dc
vish the Creed's egalitarian values were actually
Animal tests
As a representative of the Physicians Com
mittee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM),
would like to respond to Francis Abel s columi
of March 29. Unfortunately, he misses the mail
point ? that animals are suffering tremend
qusly and in very large numbers in labs acros
the country. And by relying heavily on anima
experiments instead of more modem methods
we are being led farther and farther away fron
addressing serious concerns about humai
health.
The many advances that have been made us
ing non-animal methods demonstrate that then
are a myriad of alternatives available. It is j
cruel lie to suggest to people affected by serioui
illness that experiments on animals will lead t<
a cure for their conditions in the foreseeabh
future.
If our concern is for the well-being of ou
fellow humans, then animal experimentation i:
always on the wrong species. We have seei
many cases in which extrapolation of result:
from animals to humans proved to be extremeb
detrimental to human health.
Animal testing is dangerous business. Dr
Abel refers to the dangers of "untested" drugs
However, many drugs that were "safely" teste<
on animals have been found to be harmful tc
humans. Everyone knows the story of the birtl
defects caused by thalidomide, and this dru^
was deemed safe for pregnant women after test
ing on animals.
More recently in this country, Oraflex (an ar
thritis drug) was given to primates at sevei
times the recommended human dosage. The;
showed no harmful side effects, but many sub
sequent human recipients of the drug develope<
AMp^.A^weer
?fi TUB ENORMOUS A
=^5 1c?pAV? ECONOMIC
' - X MOPE "MAT l&U wil
r<M i/v^unNft EOR
eed doesn't refli
; David bowden
reflected in the real USC. Students at USC are
segregated in a hundred different ways, into majors,
) GPA categories, etc. Some of this is good and some
t is bad, but it certainly contradicts the Creed* s stated
s goals.
r For example, South Carolina College, USC's
* Honors College, adopts a higher standard of
I admittance than USC requires for "regular" students,
f The Honors College fosters elitism by making a
special group within the student body that
I supposedly receives the best teachers and best
classroom instruction. This seems to contradict the
i Carolinian Creed call for the "dignity of all persons."
t Instead of raising the educational standards of
> a few, why not make the effort to raise the standards
i of all? It stands to reason that the "regular" students
i would benefit more from the best teachers than the
"smarter" Honors kids who already do well in
r school. To "demonstrate concern for others" and
not necessary fi
; MELISSA B. GOLDMAN
[1
? Guest Column
tl
?, ?
1
n incurable liver problems and died. There are
numerous other examples, including the swine
flu vaccine; it sailed through the animal tests
- only to cause paralysis in human recipients.
? 4 _ 4 ^ _ J 4 4 _ 1
s ^eaerai approval 01 a arug oasea on animai exi
periments should by no means be equated with
s its safety.
3 In the area of cancer research, many re3
searchers are trading in their rodents for more
sophisticated testing of cancer-fighting drugs,
r Tests on hundreds of different strains of human
s cancer cells growing in test tubes are much fasi
ter and less expensive than the tests on rodents,
s David Korn, chairman of the National Cancer
/ Institute's advisory board, admitted in the September
17, 1990 issue of Time, "Maybe we've
. been using the wrong system (mice) as the
screening device."
1
) In contrast to what the March 29 editorial imi
plied, the vast majority of medical research
I does not involve animals at all; numerous ad
vances have been made using non-animal
methods. Advances in medicine without animals
- include:
i The discovery of the relationship between
i cholesterol and heart disease, the number one
- cause of death for Americans.
i Discovery of the relationships between
jy
4## ">/
OUT TO FACE
ULEN6ES OF
:.REAUTlES,
ultwimkofme.. pi
A POSITION M^?UF... IJfp
tstt
set real USC
"support their work and development" would be
more in line with the Creed.
Another example is the effort by some to raise
admission standards atUSC. Being apublic school,
USC should be open to all students who are able to
do college-level work. As President Palms himself
has noted, USC will never be on par with Harvard
and Stanford, so why try by isolating some of the
best students or rejecting students the university
would once have accepted?
Y et another example of USC elitism is the way
in which the university's main branch treats the
branch campuses as lesser schools. Classes taken at
a branch campus do not easily transfer to USCColumbia,
the implication being that the branch
courses are inferior. The branch campuses have a
lot to recommend them; they shouldn't be thought
of as the vassals of the main campus.
These observations are sure to upset some
members of the administration, but that is not my
goal. I am trying to reconcile the huge gap between
the idealistic vision of the Carolinian Creed and the
way our school really operates. I want to go to a
University of South Carolina that practices what it
preaches.
jr research
smoking and cancer and nutrition and cancer,
the number two cause of death in Americans.
Development of a vaccine against yellow
fever.
Development of anti-depressant and antipsychotic
drugs.
Discovery of the mechanism of AIDS
transmission.
Dr. Abel does not address the problems associated
with using animals taken from pounds in
research experiments. It is very difficult to trust
the results from such experiments when the history
of these animals is almost always
unknown.
The r.nn found in cr effects of disease, ace and
differing life histories create a significant lack
of experimental control. Any human study that
was this poorly controlled would be rejected
from the outset. In addition, the docile, wellsocialized
animals that researchers look for are
also the animals most likely to be adopted from
the pound.
Certainly the few approaches mentioned here
are not viable options in all areas of research.
Development of alternatives in other areas depends
largely upon the willingness of experimenters
to reduce and eventually eliminate animal
use. Scientists and researchers must realize
that these animals are not volunteering to be
"sacrificed" in painful experiments. Much valuable
time is wasted on these cruel and outdated
methods of research, and in the process, we deplete
funds that would be better spent on more
sophisticated technologies.
Melissa B. Goldman is the director of public
affairs for the Physicians Committee for Responsible
Medicine, P.O. Box 6322, Washington,
D.C., 20015.