The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, July 25, 1990, Page 3, Image 3
Use votes
State House scandal can be
redeemed through democracy
The Robert Arial cartoon in the State Tuesday said it all. It p
tured the State House dome, with the three flags replaced by dol
bills. The sign to the left of the dome read "For Sale-Cheap!"
That pretty much says it all right there.
U/JtV. n?^/lnn .l ... .1 ? _r o .1- n.
yv lui uic &uuuui i^aiiz-auuii uiiil UlC puiiuvaaiis U1 dUUUl <
olina are succeptible to the temptations of illicit campaign cont
butions, the faith of the state in its senators and representatives h
been eliminated. It shows that yes, just about everyone in politi
is for sale in one way or another, and there's very little that t
common citizen can do about it.
Except vote, that is.
Yes, it seems as if it's been a while since the vote was a ve
useful tool in American politics, but in South Carolina's case,
can be both revenge and redemption. Not only would the corruj
able candidates be gone, but new and hopefully more honest on
would be installed. At least one could hope that they might ha
learned from the lessons of their predecessors.
"SENPIM6 BIRTH-CONTROL MATTOIVOUI
?E IMMORAL*
l^cta^W FASTER...^
^ v~ '^^ ^
The Gamecock
Scott pruden robyn Thompson
Editor-in-Chief Managing Editor, Copy Desk Chief
Ron Baker Dennis Shealy
News Editor Carolina Life Editor
Fred Gonzalez Nick Leoncavallo
Sports Editor Photo Editor
Kristin Francis Erik Collins
Graduate Assistant Faculty Adviser
Ed bonza Laura S. Day
Director of Student Media Production Manager
Ray Burgos Renee Gibson
Assistant Production Manager Advertising Manager
Kyle berry Carolyn Griffin
Assistant Advertising Manager Business Manager
Letters Policy: The Gamecock will try to print all letters received. Letters should
be, at maximum, 250 to 300 words long. The writer must include full name, pro
fessional title if a USC employee or South Carolina resident, or year and major if
a student. An address and phone number are required with all letters sent. The
Gamecock reserves the right to edit letters for style, possible libel or in case of
space limitations. The newspaper will not withhold names under any
circumstance.
flj^mjChic^TnW
he r?-^^5BE__Sa^
r^witTf
> y- .r -?" >
I
la
I
Myrtle Beach
Let's take it for granted that Myrtle Beach
and its surrounding beach suburbs are South
Carolina institutions. After all, the area has
been immortalized in such film classics as Shag
(Look Pudge, there's a shag contest!) and home
to national game show goddess Vanna White,
so there can be absolutely no one who could
walk up to me and dispute its institutional
status.
Still, there are some things about the Grand
Strand that really get on my nerves.
After many, many years of being both a local
and a tourist, I've decided that being a local is
much easier. Somehow, South Carolina drivers
just don't treat you the same way when you're
sporting Delaware license tags. Those "You've
seen our beach .. . now leave" bumperstickers
seem to cut just a little bit deeper.
Of course, being a once and future local also
gives me a unique perspective when it comes to
the particularly obnoxious brands of tourists,
those naturally being Canadians. People cruising
down from the great white north give new
meaning to the words "obnoxious Yankee."
You just can't get much more northern than 75
degrees above the equator.
And let's face it. French just doesn't carry
well in South Carolina.
Actually, after a few weekends in CanadianB
saturated Myrtle Beach, I've decided that if it
f becomes Cana
scon Pruden
^jj^
manages to secede, Quebec will he moving to
somewhere around Cherry Grove, where the
new manditory dress will be topless for the ladies
(in the true Euro-Canadian show-us-justhow-uelv-vour-bodv-is
stvlel and the tiniest of
G-strings for the men. From my point of view,
the topless thing wouldn't be so unbearable,
women having a more pleasing overall design.
The G-string part though . . . well, let's just
picture a few hundred protrusive Canadian men
strolling around in eensy-weensy gold lamee
marble bags and being generally over-impressed
with themselves. I think you get my drift.
And* speaking of topless women .... A
while back Myrtle Beach's wise city fathers decided
to ban the wearing of what are commonly
known as "thong" bathing suits. These consist
of an average suing bikini top, the usual triangle
of material covering thn naughty bits in the
front, and the cheeks of ue fanny left completely
exposed. Personally, I couldn't see what
& r*r .a
?
t
idian haven
#
l
the problem was, but maybe the big boys at city;
hall were worried that there would be a rash,
(get it) of sandy fannies or embarrassing sand I
flea bites.
Anyway, thongs are now a finable offense.',
So why are there still postcards that say "Having
an ass-load of fun in Myrtle Beach" that
feature the prominantly thonged behinds of
young ladies who probably have never been to
South Carolina?
Sounds like a wee bit of false advertising to
me, fellas.
The truth is, if my friend sends me a postcard
sporting the Myrtle Beach name and women in
thongs, I expect to go there and find some
nekkid fannies. If I don't, I might feel like I
haven't gotten my money's worth. Would the
Myrtle Beach Chamber of Commerce give me a
refund if I wasn't completely satisfied?
I doubt it.
So to compensate for their immense lack of
judgement, I think the ruling bodies of Myrtle
Beach should be sentenced to one month travels
ing along 1-95 in a huge Winnebago motor
home, eating and sleeping with at least 15 unattractive
militant male Quebec liberationists who
wear nothing but spandex Canadian maple leaf
print G-strings.
That'll teach 'em.