The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 25, 1989, Page 3, Image 3
Mistake
USC's administration, Dixon
should have courted Stones
If it's not bad enough that Gemson is a perrenial powerhouse in
football, has a national championship under its belt and is always
ranked higher than USC ? now the Tigers have the Rolling
Stones to hold over our heads.
Yesterday, "Gemson announced the Rolling Stones would be
playing a concert in Death Valley on Nov. 26. This comes just
two months after USC's athletic department denied a request for
the Stones to play Williams-Brice Stadium. Athletic Director King
Dixon said the stadium shouldn't be used for anything but football
and the timing was wrong ? as the Sept. 30 date would have
come right in the middle of football season (when the team was
out of town).
USC ignored all the prestige that would have rained over Columbia
with the greatest rock'n'roll band playing here, the esti
mated $250,000 that could have been used to supplement a budget
President James Holdeiman says is strapped, the amount of money
the city could have grabbed because of it and the excitement and
publicity that would have been generated.
USC could have been the school to collect the brass ring for
having a band like that play. USC could have been the center of
conversation in the rock world. And USC could have boasted that
Clcmson never gets anything like USC does.
But no. Dixon and Holdeiman, for whatever reason, decided
they didn't want that rowdy band to play here because they feared
it would open the door to tractor pulls or something like that.
The cold facts are that USC and the students could have benefited
tremendously from the money and publicity. They could
have said "look how progressive we are that we can have an event
like this." They could have made use of a beautiful stadium that
would be unused otherwise.
And they could have boasted over Clemson, which is as important
to Gamecocks as breathing.
USC messed up. The administration and athletic department had
a chance for glory and gold, but blew it. USC sent a big, juicy
present to the enemy and hurt its students in the process.
"THEY PUTME/N HERE SEVEN YEARS A60 FOR
CRITICIZING BREZHNEV^ PREDICTING THAT WE'D
BE ABLE TO VOTE FOR SAKHAR0V llV AN ELECTION.
AND WlANPVtolllDTEAM UP WITH SOtlMOST
The Gamecock
Editor in Chief Assistant Photography Editor
WAYNE WASHINGTON JULIE BOUCHILLON
Managing Editor Viewpoint Editor
T-TAT \rn t ann n'im crmmtrcntrnv
jcrr aniuinoDUK.1
Copy Desk Chief Datebook Editor
kathy black well jan phillips
Assistant Copy Desk Chief Coinics/Graphics Editor
robyn thompson rob lane
News Editor Graduate Assistant
kelly c. thomas kristin francis
Assistant News Editor Gamecock Adviser
jeff wilson erik collins
Carolina Life Editor Director of Student Media
robert thomas ed rqnza
Assistant Carolina Life Editor Production Manager
lynn gibson laura s. day
Sports Editor Assistant Production Manager
chris silvestri ray burgos
Assistant Sports Editor Assistant Advertising Manager
brant long jeffrey b. thompson
Photography Editor
teddy lepp
Letters Policy: The Gamecock will try to print *11 letters received. Letters should be, at a maximum, 250 to
1 300 words long. The writer should include full name, professional title if an employee with USC or Columbia I
resident, or year and major if a student. An address and phone number are required with all letters sent. Guest I
editorials should not exceed 500 words. We reserve the right to edit letters for style or possible libel. The I
Gamecock will not withhold names under any circumstance. I
| TOKERS C
; '-$1 I " /i
' x' ''xiv
k//' T" ^
Former A.D. ]
Yes, Bob Marcum,
you should have been
this past summer at a
ence put cm by local
^As th
server, I was assigned Wavne
to cover the reception. f
I had no idea Marcum Washington
would be there.
The Barons were
still in the organizational phase of their existence,
and I had a hunch that Marcum's presence
at the reception might have been more
than a social call. If that turned out to be the
case, I had more than just a reception story.
So, I approached him.
"Excuse me, Mr. Marcum," I said. "My nam?
is Wayne Washington. I'm a senior at the University
of South Carolina, and I'm a reporter foi
The Charlotte Observer. I didn't expect to see
Letters to the <
Blacks need ?ldt!
i a a a co-foui
own identity *(>?*?
^ Thepc
To the editor f1001*01
I am writing in reference to the :ovc 10
letter Randy Chapman wrote in the harmon)
Wednesday, Oct 4 issue. Randy, I Pas*?.
must commend you for being sin- P aiT
cere. I also must tell you that you !
are sincerely wrong. You ask why beautitu
there should be Black News, BET C0I"P ?n
and NAACP. . .well, here's your vas; cl
answer. . "f*Al
For too long my African- ^ 1 c?
American brothers and sisters have """
walked these lands stricken with
iniquity, without an identity. I
stress African-American because it
gives our people an identity, a JjQ
sense of our culture. In order to
know where you are going, you Ftp 1*1
must know whence you've come. UC1I
So, for all people to come together
as one entity, the individual units To the
must be in tact. These sources and This It
others give us a chance to see the one, bui
array of accomplishments within Wayne A
our culture. It is g<
You ask why? Why is there usu- tening t<
ally only one chapter relating to hiding b
African-Americans, usually on book. I a
slavery, in the "American" history may be a
books? Why were so many ideas the Bib!
and concepts stolen from our peo- men whc
pic? Why don't most people know On lh<
that Beethoven was black? Why is espcciall
the color black associated with rent, I ai
hatred, hostility, evil and harm? people i
On the other hand, white is asso- from the
ciated with pure, clean, divine, judgmer
etc .... I think it is you that times, pc
needs to put things in proper literally,
perspective. Stop j
Yes, today we have the you don'
NAACP. We have had the you to in
NAACP for 80 years. Today, we I am 1
also have tne KIGC and skinheads, decision.
)F THE M/CRLD,!
L ?i?
Vfarcum obsessI
you here."
Sp^way^-te^d^'otte Motor j
c?chail. Tfow are uSJgj ^u!o? P his
I votes. Sp? '"te a Politician, campaigning for -
I point 01 judging people, wno is gay now uian ui
y those who may be diffe- fore this "Coming Out
m really sick and tired of even bet that they have
using the Bible to hide Blue Jeans day again tl
ir prejudices and to place they REALLY wanted
it on others. Too many one to know who the;
*>ple take the Bible far too they were REALLY pro
they are, they would j
judging other people that other clothing. Almost e
t know. Who the heck are campus wears blue jeans
idge anyone? wear something like bri
leteroscxual and that is my bell-bouom pants and {
, If someone chooses to be shirts with a barber-sh
"Just fine," I said, deciding to probe. "I was
wondering, Mr. Marcum, what your connection
to the Barons is. Why are you here?"
"Oh no, no connection," he said quickly. "I
just came out because I got an invitation, and I
wanted to show my support"
With that answer, I was satisfied. Even if
there was a connection of some sort, I wasn't
going to find out what it was this night.
But 1 wanted to explain this brief encounter
with Marcum to make a point: USC's former
I athletic director has always been, and apparently
will always be, a businessman first.
Marcum appeared cool, unapproachable and
insincere. Did the athletes who played for
coaches who worked under him get the same
impression? And why, why was it so hard for
USC's players to stay on the right side of the
i law?
My opinion, based in part on my meeting
r with Marcum and on the stories I wrote as the
sports editor of The Gamecock, is that USC's
editor
nil mi ni I II II I Hill III inn II Ml III nun II Ml Mill? in
by the way, if you were to homosexual, then that is I
i NAAWP, you would be sion. It is up to the ii
ider ? one already exists non-ignorant people to s
te of Washington. the ignorance and prej
>int of this letter is not to others in this world. We ;
ur ideology down, I would this planet, and if we are
see this world in perfect further, or expand on on
r. You can't forget the then we need to stop
past is why we are in the others and concentrate c
lent we are today. What I ourselves better peoi
see is one big spectrum of whole.
1 colors, all living and For the good of humar
aenting each other. Our being anti-human and sta
tic existence is what could positive and lunctional p
nerica the beautiful coun- HUMAN RACE (that
>uld be. You're welcome, people of different colors
k; you. nationalities, different
Willie Lewis and even those with diff
Political science junior ual preferences).
Too bad ignorance isn
not hide ??
ind Bible Gays must
:ttcr'is addressed to every- What they
t especially sophomore
Laron. To the editor:
suing to be a real pain lis- This year, as last, th<
3 "Bible belting" pjeople Lesbian Student Assoc
iehind the words in that sisted on having a "Cc
im not doubting that there Day." And yet again it v
i god, but words written in Is it really coming out il
e were those of ordinary leave a WHOLE name?
) had spiritual feelings. one on campus has any
" - " * t - - ~?
I ^
ed with profit
athletic department became obsessed with turning
a profit.
Businessmen can better afford to be consumed
with profit; athletic directors should care
about players, coaches, fans, and yes, a stable,
money-making department.
I believe Marcum did play a significant role
in pushing USC sports to prominence. But it
was a no-holds-baried, reckless push.
I believe Marcum did want a drug-free program.
But people in hell want cold water. Want
isn't work. And it takes work and caring to
have a clean department.
In part, I believe Marcum was a scapegoat
when USC officials finally decided to clean up
the department's mess. The athletic director's
duties are many. It would be impossible for that
person to know the drug problems of a particular
athlete. Coaches, however, should. Thus,
Morrison, too, should have been shown the
door.
While it was Marcum's job to help the department
make money, it was also his responsibility
to oversee coaches. The latter, as the steroids
trials showed, is where Marcum failed
miserably.
And so, yes, Mr. Marcum, you should have
been fired.
their deci- tie. Then we would know who
ltclligent, they are for sure,
top all of As you may have gathered, I reudices
of ally dislike homosexuals, but it
all live on burns me up when they claim to be
to go any of the Christian faith as some of
ir dreams, them did in the personals. In the
i judging Holy Bible it is plainly stated in
in making Romans 1:26 & 27 that homosexu)le,
as a als cannot be Christians:
26 ? For this cause God gave
ikind, stop them up into vile affections: for
irt being a even their women did change the
>art of the natural use into that which against
includes nature:
,, different 27 ? And likewise also the
rc lgions meri) leaving the natural use of the
erent sex- womarlt burned in their lust one
. f . toward another; men with men
MT I h working that which is unseemly,
c. a.e and receiving in themselves that
>ry junior recompense of the error which was
- met.
] QO When the Pope came to the United
States, he made an appearance
nny in San Francisco and was approached
by a large group of gays
A ir*C u/Ka qcItaH him if thpu
TTIU1 / miu uoivvu lUlll *JL UIVJ
could be saved. He refused them
5 Gay and saying that what they did was
nation in- against the will of God. So, God
>ming Out did NOT "make you gay" at all, he
/as a farce, made you straight and you went
' you don't against his will.
I mean, no
better idea I leave you with another quote
ey did be- from the Bible and the knowledge
Day." I'll that I am heterosexual and proud
planned a of it (my ENTIRE name will aptis
year. If pear at the bottom of this letter):
for every- Romans 1:32 ? Who knowing
y were, if the judgment of God, that they
ud of what
pick some which commit such things are
veryone on worthy of death, not only do the
>. Let them same, but have pleasure in them
ght orange that do them,
green plaid Samuel Edward Dunham
op striped Art studio sophomore