The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 07, 1988, Page 3, Image 3
Student trustee
Executive Committee illegally
comprised, USC asks for change
A university committee came up with a proposal to send to the
state legislature.
It seems the Board of Trustees' Executive Committee has been
composed of six members for the longest time, at least, as one
,mlvorc,'tu ?ffi?a1 said, since 1089 R,,t ctatP la?, mcnHatP* the
""""~ ,lulv urn..
committee be comprised of five members.
The problem is the board has made a point of allowing the
chairman emeritus of the Board of Trustees to sit on the board.
State law doesn't say that.
So basically, the committee has been illegally comprised since
at least 1982. And so the Board of Trustees is planning to ask the
state legislature to rewrite the statute to allow the current composition
of the committee to become "legal."
There's no real problem here. Somehow, almost magically,
the Executive Committee, like the board itself, almost always
votes unanimously on just about everything the board acts on.
So it really doesn t matter if five people unanimously voted on
such and such a proposal or six people unanimously voted on
such and such a proposal.
But what is disheartening to The Gamecock is the response
students got when they asked for the board's support in helping
get a voting student on the Board of Trustees. Basically the attitude
of the administration was there's nothing the university or
the board could do to change the situation. The makeup of the
board is comprised by state law and the university can't do
anything about that, they said.
And yet, here sits the board, which will soon try to correct ?
after the fact ? the illegal composition of its executive committee
by making a request to a legislature it earlier said it couldn't
affect.
So this is put up or shut up time for the university. The
students want a voting student on the board. It is the only way
^1? i 1 T4- irt rvnK; \\m\r wrck
we can get itui icpicisciuaiioii on me ooaru. n is mv ?v
can find out what goes in the seemingly endless streams of closed
sessions held by the board and its many committees, and to find
out what effect these have on students.
So when the secretary to the board drafts the letter to the
education committees of the S.C. House of Representatives and
the S.C. Senate, it would please the students of this university to
have the voting student on the board of trustees added to the
board's request. As much as the board and the university
have been willing to ignore the students in the past, maybe now
is a time for that to change.
If the board can request that state law be changed to cover
itself, than it can also request change to add something that
would cover the students and protect their interests.
Left By The Wayside
| ^ vA
The Gamecock
Best Non-daily Collegiate Newspaper, Southeastern Region
Society of Professional Journalists, 1987-88
Editor in Chief Datebook Editor
STEPHEN GUILFOYLE JENNY SHARPE
Managing Editor Graphics Editor
SON HA MICHAEL SHARP
Copy Desk Chief Comics Editor
WAYNE YANG TRACY MIXSON
Assistant Copy Desk Chief Adviser
KATHY BLACKWELL PAT MCNEELY
News Editor Graduate Assistant
HAL M1LLAKU PHILLIP MCKLNZIL
Assistant News Editors Director of Student Media
STEVE PRADARELLI ED fiONZA
MARY PEARSON Advertising Manager
Features Editor MARGARET MICHELS
SUSAN NESBIT1 Production Manager
Assistant Features Editor LAURA DAY
TOM JOYNER Assistant Production Manager
Sports Editor RAY BURGOS
KFVIN ADAMS
Assistant Sports Editor Mamg"
CHRIS SILVESTRI BARBARA BROWN
Photography Editors
BRIAN SAULS
TEDDY LEPP
Letters Policy: The Gamecock will In lit print I tilers received. I.cllers should he, at u maximum. 250 lo .100
words long. Luesl editorials should not exceed 500 words. We reserve the right lo edit letters for slvle or possible
libel. The Gamecock will not withhold names under am circumstance.
SRP waste cc
There's a bomb plant here?
Go west on 1-20, take a left on Highway 1, and
you'll run dead into it ? a 300-square mile chunk
of South Carolina's soil devoted to the production
of nuclear weaponry.
More commonly referred to as Savannah River
Plant (SRP), this federally owned nuclear production
reactor is the sole manufacturer of plutonium
and tritium in the United States. Savannah River
Plant's only purpose is to produce nuclear
weapons; and you thought it was a power plant!
While it is true that a large percentage of South
Carolina's power is nuclear, these power reactors
are owned independently from SRP. The goal of a
power reactor is to make steam which turns turbines
which generate electricity. The goal of a pro
auction reactor is to maice tritium ana piutomum
which turn the wheels of the U.S. nuclear war
machine.
South Carolina has recently attracted national
attention for being chosen over Hanford, Wash, as
the new production reactor site. The New Production
Reactor (NPR) would replace much of the
workload of the existing five reactors at SRP. Of
these five, three operate at reduced levels, one is a
"stand by" because of cracks in the reactor vessel
that have resisted welding, and a fifth one was shut
down in 1964; today its parts serve as repair parts
for the other reactors. The NPR will continue producing
tritium and plutonium in order to squelch
congressional fears of a future shortage.
However, these fears are groundless. A shortage
of plutonium is highly unlikely because plutonium
essentially lasts forever. It never needs to be replaced.
The current number of U.S. warheads (23,000
plus) can be maintained by recycling the plutonium
from old warheads into new ones. In recent
testimony to Congress, Energy Secretary Harrington
even admitted, "the nation is awash in
plutonium."
Tritium, on the other hand, must be replaced
every 13 years. Independent experts estimate that
five kilograms of tritium a year would maintain
our current nuclear arsenal. The annual output of
one SRP reactor operating at 50 percent capacity is
five kilograms. Despite this figure, the Department
of Energy states it needs to produce almost 10
kilograms per year to build future warheads.
It is not as if alternatives to a new reactor don't
exist. The Energy Research Foundation, located in
Columbia and headed by Frances Close Hart, has
Letters to the
T nnl/ nf miann queen usu.
JLjavn U1 UUVVU color.
9 In addil
coverage racist ^
one, I thir
To the editor: those thins
Homecoming at Carolina is a USC stud
festivity that is looked upon as a time that The
for celebrating. During this time, the refrain fr
students, alumni and Gamecock fans judiceness
look forward to the crowning of the amount ol
queen. In the past, this has been an issues invc
occassion that has received an enormous
amount of coverage by The
Gamecock. However, this was not
the case during Homecoming '88.
In getting to the point, I would like r I 'Kn
to say that I am very displeased with
the small write-up on the crowning of
Miss Homecoming '88, Nanette mus
Graham. Actually, there was no
write-up at all. There was only a picture,
which was a nice shot of Presi- To the edii
dent Holderman's arm and an exten- I am 8(
i pmnfinnal
31V^ tapuun. 1 111111 N niai
Graham, Miss Homecoming '88, 1 was cirivii
deserves more publicity than what Charlotte,
she has received. After all, she was Columbia
elected by the students. Therefore, I favorite, F
believe that 1 speak for everyone in after a fe\
saying that an article on the crowning Columbia'
of Miss Graham should receive station, W
precedence over an article on The thought. B
Last Temptation or an article on the music. Su
"Five Points Shuttle." In other thought I \
words, she deserves front page station. Ye
coverage. It seems to me that this is a 8?t, the cl
racial issue. In my opinion, Nanette my horror
Graham, Miss Homcoming '88, has said- "yoi
been cut short of the glory, which the Hot 95."
mtaminates So
offered some possibilities:
1) Use weapons designs which require less
tritium but which would not require
testing; .
2) Use existing inventory more efficiently;
3) Promptly retire obsolete warheads that
contain tritium for recycling;
4) Eliminate existing "neutron" warheads
and recycle the tritium;
5) Use the tritium in tactical or battlefield
weapons to replenish strategic weapons.
Aside from the obvious disadvantage of production
reactors ? that they supply the ingredients
for a nuclear war/holocaust ? other paramount
concerns arise, namely doubts about the production
reactor's safety and the environmental problems
it creates. 1
Savannah River Plant boasts of an outstanding
safety record for construction and operation; never
has there been a plant related death. There is,
however, an abundance of problems and increasingly
severe criticism of the Department of i
Energy's reactor safety program. The most recent
blunder involved an aborted restart during which i
operators increased power without understanding
what was happening inside the reactor. Experts nationwide
have paralleled the procedural crisis to the
1986 nuclear accident in Chernobyl. Luckily, no
serious damage resulted, except to the credibility of
SRP.
The dangers of nuclear power are also
manifested in serious environmental problems. To
begin with, millions of gallons of water run
through the reactors daily to cool them. This thermal
water is often dumped into natural ponds,
scalding, boiling and destroying all forms of
wildlife. Low level radiation has been buried incorrectly,
and some of the underground high level
editor
illy receives because of her I thought it must be a
Monday and Tuesday it wai
tion, I would like to say thing, R&B and soul mus
Gamecock is the school wondering what was going
, and, in functioning as favorite station that opera
ik that it should report on Batesburg. A hostile takei
;s that are of importance to terrorist group perhaps?
ents. Furthermore, I feel discovered the truth that I
Gamecock staff should of WKWQ, formerly K'
om allowing their pre- changed the station's pro;
from determining the . format. And he lives in
' publicity that is given to Va.!!!
living minority students. What the hell is this? Do
bia not have enough R&
Arethia B. Hyatt stations? Are there not r
Criminal Justice junior you can count on one hand
the Big DM 101.3, B96, 10:
rjni/ iUp 106.7, and the list goes onI-IIC
newest member being Hot
? orroinct RQOlll
IP QjPg In fact, if it weren't for tl
we wouldn't have the grea
Ray Charles, Marvin Gaye
tor: Brothers and the Motown g
jing through an extreme enough is enough; do we n
trauma. Sunday afternoon K95 was the only station
ng back from a weekend in stantly played great rock
and I began picking up my Yes, Fox 102 plays classii
radio stations. My second roll, but you won't h
ox 102, came in first, and Osbourne on there mu
v more miles, I tuned in though I enjoy classical 1
s only real rock 'n' roll jazz now, my roots are pre*
KWQ K95 Rock, or so I ly rock 'n' roll,
lut what I heard was soul
rely, not K95 Rock. I And now I have been d<
vas picking up a Charlotte my only escape to the worl
t, the closer to Columbia I And what about those pc
earer it became. Then to who work at K95? What
the DJ came on the air and Boerke, who not only is/w
Tre listening to the new K95 but also one of the p<
helped give a new
uth Carolina
waste storage tanks have leaked, releasing radiaiition
directly into the environment. These 51
storage tanks were not well planned for. In the
event of an earthquake the tanks could crack, emitting
enough high level plutonium to make 50
bombs! I
These are only some of the KNOWN problems
that have plagued SRP. Ambiguous claims and
faulty statistics that are released by SRP spokespersons
make it extremely difficult for individuals and
organizations outside of the plant to uncover
operational truths. Andre Carothers of Greenpeace
magazine reports of a former manager of the
plant's burial ground, Bill Lawless, who exposed
the illegal burial practice of dumping low level;
waste in regular cardboard boxes. In a matter of
hours after burial, this waste was slowly burning a
trail to South Carolina's water supply.
Mr. Lawless also described the practice of keeping
two sets of statistics ? the confidential one that
revealed water table contamination, and the fals?
one which heralded the absence ol ground water
poisoning. The condidential set of statistics was
obtained after Lawless's testimony. Among the
things it cited were that people in Aiken and other
surrounding areas were receiving radiation doses
50 times greater than the amount DuPont said they
were receiving.
Despite these nuclear horrors, many elected state
officials enthusiastically support the NPR and hail
it as a godsend for South Carolina's economy.
Both Republicans and Democrats support the new
reactor because of the economic boom it would bring
to the state. It would take 10 years to build, and
construction alone would bring 4,000 jobs.
But these 4,000 construction jobs will be about
the only jobs created, and once the plant is completed,
there will be 4,000 unemployed construction
workers. Also, a reshuffling of employees and.
a drastic employee cut will probably result from the;
new reactor taking the place of the existing three
reactors. While it is a fact that the reactor will
create an econonic boom, it will only last 10 years.South
Carolina won't solve any economic pro-'
blems with a short-sighted solution.
As many critics of NPR have suggested, the'
wisest thing to do is to use the $6 billion it would,
take to build the reactor and channel it towards
cleaning up the existing damage to our environment.
People could then be employed for decades
and decades cleaning up the mistakes of our past.
joke; yet, Kockateilas' this summer: how
> the same would you like to work in a place that.
;ic. I was totally went opposite of what it was?
on at my Students and lovers of rock 'n' roll, 1
tes out of urge you, please call, write or do
Dver by a anything to get our station back.
Then I Send letters to K95 or call. There has
:he owner to be something we can do to stop
95 Rock, this nightmare. Maybe K95, like
gramming Rockafellas, can be reborn through
Norfolk, our efforts. We have to show the new
Hot 95 that we want to rock 'n'|
es Colum- roll!!!
B/Top 40
nore than Todd (.ariand '
? We have Media Arts junior'
J.l, 104.7,
- with it's
and'fUn^ Movie slanders:
tat music, w ^9
:rrsf Jesus Christ
rroofc Rllt
eed more? To the editor:
that con- I feel there is nothing wrong with,
'n' roll. as The Gamecock puts it, "freely ex:
rock 'n' changing controversial ideas," accorear
Ozzy ding to the First Amendment. !
ch. Even However, when these "ideas" are
nusic and contrived perversions of the history
dominant- of an individual, slander has taken
place. The movie The Last Tempta- ;
tion of Christ not only offends the ?
jprived of faith of millions of Christians, it
d of rock. commits slander against the person i
or people Jesus Christ,
about Art
as a DJ at Bill Haulbrook
;ople who Chemical Engineering and
birth to South Carolina College senior