The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, September 09, 1983, Page 10, Image 10
Everything by Hollywood
DrntoonAr
8 1
' "J '- !"';.v : : /'
V^SjL 7 . . ... .
t > /,. ip!:
B$ '' '.:"-:':^v
I saSSfe' 4.|:- '
i - ' ' ^gtllSsE.'
UfiHLi; v
fflHMBHHHBk. I
: ms.
' M W l\ .
Not just a professor
Benjamin Dunlap teaches English at USC and is currentl
'Cujo' barks of
By Doug Bell via
"Cujo" is an adequate but undistinguish- knc
ed suspense thriller starring a rabid saint qui
bernard.
Adapted from Stephen King's best seller, /
"Cujo" tells, for the most part, a dull, sue
unoriginal tale about a young married couple aut
(Dee Wallace and Daniel-Hugh Kelly) and yar
their young son Tad (Danny Pintauro). Dad wa
is an advertising man in danger of losing a
big account. Mom is an attractive housewife j
engaged in an adulterous affair with the fre
village gigolo (Christoper Stone). Tad is a wa
cute kid, afraid of the dark and all the unseen in
demons that hide therein.
The film is easier to understand if divided j
in half. The first half introduces the I
characters and sets them about their humdrum
activities, which serves little purpose
except to pass the time until the second half
? which is really the meat of the movie ?
begins.
THE ONLY pertinent scenes in this
laborious waiting room introduction are the
ones that reveal Tad's horror of unseen
monsters ? ominous low-angled, slow mo- i
tion shots that are cliche, but at least serve
some thematic purpose.
Also important is the scene introducing the i |
Camber family. Camber (Ed Laurter) is a
surly, rural mechanic who fixes cars and
owns Cujo, the saint bernard who is bitten by
bats while the opening credits are still rolling. S?jjjl|
Cujo, unnoticed by his owner, undergoes a I*
gradual metamorphosis,changing from a
playful, cub-like pet into a foaming, ?iw|
frothing, rabid killer.
The second half begins when Mom and
Tad drive up in the mechanic's yard for serr ,. (!C
pioneers
-v?' :
. - -V -; ; ' v >.
fSSgg ' ;- p. ... s,
' wHjjBfiK
y HMmSK
. j jmmmwmBE
'1^^B1B0R^^
;f ..-. v. .;<>;
If ' '
* / '' ^>^^:liifl^H^^^Hfl^H ...
aB
9 |pWM|iS|H m
I ^j
^^9HRHMBHEH9BBSHDBS9HHBHSHBSHhmBP^^^^
Phnfn hu Maru Ann Unllio
y devoted to a 'southern' film project.
cheap scan
i on their near-dead engine. They don't
)\v it, but Cujo has disposed of his master
te violently, and is now the sole host.
intense, terrifying, exhausting siege ens:
Mother and child are trapped in a dead
omobile in the middle of a sun-baked
d with a canine killer avidly circling,
iting for the moment to nounce.
^
\part from the obvious shock value of the
quent attacks, the siege is disturbing in the
y it forces the child to crystallize his fears
broad daylight in the face of a real
)ther Stephen King thriller
lijo' JjpKs 9 strong stflry,, yM, Am ?W!"
inmenT
total 'sou
By Glenn German
"One of the main differences between
Michelangelo's work on the Sistine Chapel
and what we are attempting is that he knew his
scaffolding was secure."
Benjamin Dunlap, a USC English professor,
laughs at his analogy, adding he
doesn't exDect the feature film he is writing
and producing for public television to have
quite the artistic impact of Michelangelo's
"The Creation."
However, his analogy does relate the
tremendous pressure and uncertainty involved
in feature filmmaking.
ONE CAN quickly be caught up in the enthusiasm
Dunlap exudes when talking about
film. His humble office is without the usual
self-laudatory awards, degrees and plaques.
In their places are such memorablia as a
larger photograph of Italian film director
Roberto Rosselini mounted on a Columbian
blue background, a souvenir from Spoleto
'81, examples of past students' work and
film posters. Next to a one-sheet of Ingmar
Bergman's "Face to Face" is a constructionpaper
butterfly, which could only be the
work of a young daughter.
Dunlap's keen interest in film was fostered
in his undergraduate school days at the
University of the South at Sewanee, Tennessee.
In the mid-50s, it was just a gothic
building on top of a hill with nothing
around, he said.
"Once you had finished studying," he
said, "you could do one of three things. You
could go to church all the time, you could
drink beer all the time or you could go to the
movies all the time. For what it's worth, I
chose the latter of the three."
What time wasn't spent in a darkened
theater scrutinizing the likes of Eisenstein's
"Battleship Potemkin," he must have spent
reading the likes of Shakespeare and Dante,
for in 1959, he attended Wadham College,
Oxford, as a Rhodes Scholar.
WHILE AT Oxford, Dunlap spent a lot of
time in Paris. It was then the New Wave, led
by Andre Bazin and his "Cahiers du
Cinema," was getting started. This movement
had a great affect on his interest in
film, he said.
It was in the Oxford University Film Society
that he got his first hands-on experience at
filmmaking. Dunlap and a group of about 20
is. lackluster
monster. The ending is cheap and
unsatisfying.
Directed by Lewis Teague from a
screenplay by Don Carlos Dunaway, the film
has little structural cohesiveness. Loosely
scattered bits and pieces lead up to a mammoth
setpiece.
The acting is adequate. Dee Wallace has
the most demanding role, which she fills
credibly and capably. Cujo himself is a deadlv
hf'li/'vaKIp i/illian Vi /-? 11 rr Vi 1 I ~ ?
pccurrerr
pathos in his unsought-for destiny might
have been more thoughtfully handled.
moment?.?n m r??? mj.h t^i?in i i! '?i
m I f r-1
inern mm
other ambitious students made a film, which
eventually was shown in the Edinburough
Film Festival. "I was assistant director, production
secretary and all-purpose extra," he
said.
Dunlap returned to the United States
where he graduated from Harvard University
in 1965 with a doctorate in literature. He
turned down a position at Harvard to move
back to his native Columbia, where he knew
there was a quality television facility and a
good chance that he might break into production
at some level, he said.
That chance came when Dunlap convinced
the South Carolina Educational Television
network to film a pilot for a series he had
planned. "Cinematic Eye," which ran for
two years, was a tremendous artistic success,
he said.
It earned him several awards and garnered
an Emmy nomination for Outstanding Program
Achievement. But more importantly,
his foot was in the door, Dunlap said.
SINCE THE series, he has been involved
in more than 120 S.C. ETV productions, but
it was just last year that the chance for which
he had always been waiting was handed to
him in a way that now seems a minor
miracle, he said.
As Dunlap began to talk about his current
project, he bent forward with an earnestness
and vitality that betrays his credentials. On
paper, he surely seems the type of English
professor who dons oversized herringbone
jackets, bow ties, smokes a pipe and speaks
in hushed Victorian tones. In fact, Dunlap is
quite the opposite. Dressed in a white Adidas
shirt, khaki slacks and jogging shoes, his attire
is a pleasant paradox.
The film he is writing and producing,
"Tales of the Unknown South," has
everything a Hollywood picture has except
Hollywood, he said.
A major production about the South ?
South Carolina in particular ? by
southerners, will answer whether a feature
film for prime-time television can be produced
using only local resources, he said.
TTVio p;i~, ...:n : .1 j:
i Ilk mill Will IIILUI pui die II1ICC UlVCIhC
stories by talented southern authors that
have been written over the past 60 years,
showing the evolution of interaction between
the white European culture and the black
African culture found in the Gullah speaking
sea islands of South Carolina, Dunlap said.
See "Dunlap," page 11
story
Still, this reviewer would recommend "Cujo"
only to those die-hard seekers of cheap
scares.
A FEW WORDS about movies on and
near campus this weekend. Alan J. Pakula's
version of William Styron's "Sophie's
Choice" is playing at Russell House. Old
fashioned, highly romantic and deeply
tragic, the film surmounts its flaws with an
exquisite performance by Meryl Streep (who
won 1982's Best Actress Oscar for the film).
"Sophie's Choice" is an extremely rewarding
movie.
1 ' '.' r .!.' ii i??! J <i.:' if i J.! ii i* J J J i. , j j . ? , ; _ , . . ,. . ;