The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, February 07, 1983, Page 10, Image 10
A clown on stilts towers above his fellow
performers during a production number.
Susan Selky (Kate Nelligan) bundles up her
off to disappear in "Without a Trace."
it
Mix of tradition
r.irni is tr
By John Vaughan
Crushed popcorn boxes, spilled soda an
torn posters were all that remained lat
Sunday night, as The Greatest Show o
Earth pulled out of town.
The 112th edition of Ringling Bros, an
Barnum & Bailey Circus, in Carolin
Coliseum for six performances during th
weekend, was a mix of tradition and trial.
The circus pleased its audiences with th
familiar sights of elephants, clowns, traine
animals and exciting acrobats. It als
watched for reaction to new acts and to it
increased emphasis on the Spectacular, th
choreographed production number tha
closes the first half of the circus routine.
THE "SPEC," as it's called by its pei
formers, is sheer showmanship, wit
colorful costuming and plenty of singing an
dancing.
This year's production centered on a Wil
West themfe. Set in a huge "dance hall" tha
covers the three circus rings, the show i
played to the entire arena.
Choreographers Bill Bradley and Jerr
Fries, with costumer Don Foote, reportedl;
worked on the show for a year. "Instead c
more parading, though, we concentrated o
more uancing, saia tsraaiey.
The kids in the crowd seemed duly awe<
by all the sights and sounds, far too broai
for them to see all at once. Older circu
buffs, however, seemed puzzled by the ne^
accent, though it was impossible to judg
whether the reaction was positive o
negative. The applause acknowledged a
least the feeling that all the hullabaloo wa
well-rehearsed and a fine effort.
ONE OF THE circus' highlights thi
season is the presence of 18-year-old M
guel Vasquez of The Flying Vasquez. Th
young acrobat is the first man ever t
successfully complete a quadruple son
ersault on the flying trapeze.
Vasquez, unfortunately, missed hi
mark at the second show Saturday a
ternoon and landed in the safety ne
This reporter can only guess as t
^ whether he made it during th
otner periormances.
One daredevil that made goc
was Elvin Bale, who thrilled th
audience with defiance of grav
ty in the wildly spinning "Whe<
of Death." Circus titles are s
dramatic; Bale is known as th
"Phantom of Balance."
rt Alex (Daniel CorkiH) for school, and sends hin
, trial
eats Coliseunr
V
Famed tiger trainer Charly Baumann is a crowd
circus, as he toys with the big cats.
s
f- Charly Baumann's trained tiger act and
t. Axel Gautier's performing elephants were
;o shows rooted in circus tradition, and the
ie crowd loved them, cheering wildly at
Baumann's bravery anH at r.antim-'g in.
d credible command of his ponderous
le pachyderms.
i
r1 THE CIRCUS sets up with one end of the
;o arena as an entrance, which means the
le people with seats on that end sometimes feel
"behind" the action.
Producer's direci
suffers from pre
By Doug Bell
"Without a Trace" marks the directorial
j| debut of Stanley Jaffe, the Academy Award
3 winning producer of such films as "Kramer
vs. Kramer" and "Taps."
Those films reveal a concern for youth
and the tensions of tender years. "Without a
Trace" is another example of the "Kramer"
formula, appealing to those among us with
soft hearts ? and perhaps even softer
heads.
Based on the novel "Still Missing" by
Beth Gutcheon (who wrote the screenplay
as well), "Without a Trace" concerns an
independent mother's determined search to
find her six-year-old son, who vanishes one
morning on his way to school.
SUSAN SELKY (Kate Nelligan) wakes up
her blond-haired boy Alex (Daniel Corkill),
s/?nlrfo him tjontIn ff l: ? ' * ' *
mi gvniijr iui itxuiug ins oreaKtcist
to the dog and waves goodbye to him at the
street crossing.
When her son doesn't return that evening,
Selky calls the police. Within hours, her
apartment is swarming with people:
reporters, busybodies, friends, policemen,
her ex-husband (David Dukes) and most
prominently, detective A1 Menetti (Judd
Hirsh, from "Ordinary People" and
television's "Taxi").
Menetti is thorough, sensitive and
dedicated, but after weeks of investigation,
he fails to come up with any definite leads
concerning the boy's disappearance. He
continues the search largely because he is
cn m nuA/i 1 *
ow ...v?vtu vjy ocii\y s orave, neadstrong
persistence, which seems unquenchable.
As this synopsis suggests, the plot lacks
substance. It's interesting enough to a point,
I Ul Uvvllo
avorito in Ringling Bros, and Barnum& Bailey
The 15 miles of rope and cable
necessary to set up the circus were
necessarily strung all over Carolina
Coliseum. A circus official commented on
the smaliness of the Coliseum, citing
several "near misses" that escaped the
audience's attention.
That was as it should be, though. At the
circus, the only things the audience should
focus on are the things that make it fun, and
the crushed popcorn boxes, spilled soda and
torn posters certainly attest to that idea.
torial debut
film review
but that point is passed halfway into the
movie, rne turn's subject and scope would
have been better suited to television.
MOST OF the story's dramatic details are
well directed ? again, up to a point. The
restrained, authentic, unsentimental
quality of the first scenes are admirable. A
lesser director would have oversweetened
the episodes before the kid's disappearance
in order to "intensify" the feeling of loss.
But Jaffe keeps a lid on it ? only to spill it
in the end. The final scene pours on a
truckload of sap, sickeningly sweet and
nauseating.
The film is almost redeemed by Nelligan's
performance as the mother. Nelligan, who
was lauded in 1980's "Eye of the Needle," is
an intelligent actress, playing in this case an
intelligent woman, a professor of English at
Columbia University.
Not a great beauty, Nelligan possesses a
radiant, cheeky sensuality, somewhat like
an Irish Ingrid Bergman. She is remarkably
adept at conveying emotional trauma; the
viewer senses Selky's natural qualities of
cleverness, sensitivity, practicality and
obstinance all raging against fear within
her.
"Without a Trace" is a harmless lit tip
movie in which good actors enliven a
mawkish, meager story. It is obviously
intended to be significant, inspiring, etc.,
but this reviewer's only response as the
credits rolled up was "so what?''