The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, September 29, 1982, Page 8, Image 8
-opinion
Responsibility vital
for drinking drivers
Social life at USC has never been boring. Dorm
parties, fraternity parties and local bars provide
an active social calendar for all interested
students.
No excuses are needed for Carolina students to
have a party. The only requirement is there must
be plenty to drink.
As with most parties, alcoholic beverages are
the drawing card for the event and the highlight
of the evening. What drink is being served is
often as important as what to wear.
Parties are fun, but drinking and then driving
? i- - f A.' i? A J
iicivt ueuume aspects 01 parties mat are coo
important to ignore. Too many people feel they
can't go anywhere without drinking.
Alcohol-related traffic accidents are major
killers today. Drunk drivers kill themselves.
Drunk drivers kill others.
The story is sad, but critical. As college
students, we must be able to do something to
change the statistics.
The laws are fairly lenient regarding drunk
drivers when one considers the harm these
drivers are capable of committing.
Laws vary from state to state. Some states
suspend the offender's driver's license for six
months and charge a minimal fine, while other
states immediately throw a drunk driver into jail
for months.
This is not an area where leniency should be
practiced. Anyone caught drunk driving should
Ktv n..( r ~ 1: J A
uc put ui jaxi. i_juaa ui ci uriver s uceiibtj aues not
make up for the loss of a life.
Parties will continue to be a major part of
student life, as will drinking, but there are
several options to the death wish situations
frequently experienced in the past.
First and foremost, students must learn to
drink responsibly. All of us should be mature
enough to realize when we've had too much to
drink and know how to quit. If not, perhaps we
don't need to be drinking in the first place.
Breathalizers are adequate tools for determining
drunkenness. One would be surprised at
the small amount of alcohol in the bloodstream
that can make one legally drunk. Although the
most tell-tale signs of drunkenness, such as
staggering, blurred speech and vision and
irrational behavior, may not be recognized, after
a few drinks a person's coordination and control
arp olparlv altprpri
Judgement and alert reaction are affected
after one 12-ounce beer. Put someone behind the
wheel of a car after a six-pack and he's a killer.
Students must look out for each other. There
should be enough care and concern to prevent
someone from driving if he has had too much to
drink. Take the keys away. The drunk person
may hate you for it then, but he'll thank you the
next morning.
Positive peer pressure is the best solution.
Giving keys to an intoxicated driver is like giving
a gun to a criminal.
No party is worth a funeral. Remember that
thought the next time you're winning the
chugging contest or playing your best game of
"quarters."
If you drink, don't drive. And don't let your
friend drive, either.
I ?Gamecock ???>
Kdi tor-in-Chief
Richard Meyers
Copy Desk Chief David DeWitt Opinion Page Kditor . Vicbi Jinnette
News Kditor John Braun Wire Kditor Sydne Waller
Asst. News Kditor JeffDraine Photo Kditor Mike Fisher
Asst. News Kditor. . . Forrest Drown (General Manager Ron Emler
Knt. Kditor John Vaughan Adviser Mark F.thridge, Jr.
Asst. Knt. Kditor Chris Handal Ad Manager Linda S. Haines
Sports Kditor Johnny Hoggs Business Manager .. . Jean Hatchell
Asst. Sports Kditor. Dennis Switzer Production Manager Mark McEwan
Newsroom 717 1181 Advertising 111 4249
Business Office 111 3888 Production 777-2833
The Gamecock welcomes letters and guest editorials. All letters and guest
editorials must be typewritten, triple-spaced on a 65-spacelinc.
Letters should be no longer than 300 words and guest editorials should be
limited to one newsworthy subject no longer than four typed pages. Letters
and guest editorials MUST be signed with the writer's name, telephone
number, mailing address, class standing or faculty position and major.
Pseudonyms are unacceptable, but the writer's name may be withheld upon
request if the circumstances warrant.
We reserve the right to edit guest editorials and letters.
Address letters and columns to: Opinion Page Editor, Gamecock. Drawer
A, USC, Columbia, S C. 29208.
?letters
Foreign investrm
Rlf Inffrou C A man
m y wum vj u. m pail
Foreign investment plays an important
role in South Carolina's
economy. From less than $80 million
in 1960, foreign direct investment
(FDI) in the state now totals more
than $3 billion, and during the 1970s
averaged 25 percent of all new industrial
investments in the state.
Investors from more than 15
countries currently employ 9 percent
of the state's manufacturing labor
force, and South Carolina ranks
second of all 50 states in the amount of
foreign direct investment per person,
ninth in total value and twelfth in total
employment.
The significant amount of foreign
direct investment in South Carolina
occasionally raises several questions
related to its desirability from a
citizen's viewpoint. Is South Carolina
being "sold," constrained, built, or
otherwise changed via FDI? Is it
worth the money being spent (or the
tax revenues foregone) to attract it?
In short, is South Carolina better off
with or without it?
WHILE THERE is no precise,
unassailable method of answering
these questions, on balance the
evidence suggests that the state is
better off because of FDI, and that the
related costs are less than the
resulting benefits.
One way to examine it is
economically. Foreign direct investment
provides direct employment
and income for more than 36,000 South
Carolina manufacturing workers, and
indirectly for thousands of others who
supply material and services to the
firms.
In addition, the income created
directly and indirectly provides jobs
and income to thousands of other
South Carolinians whose consumer
products and services are paid for by
the FDI-generated income. Because
most of the foreign direct investment
has entered by building new plants,
the South Carolina construction in
dustry also has benefited. In addition,
the personal and corporate income
created by foreign direct investment
adds to the tax collections of the state,
and ultimately benefits many statesupported
agencies and activities.
THE FOREIGN investors tend to
pay slightly higher than average
wages in their communities, and
because of their high levels of
technology, usually upgrade skills of
the local workforce. Foreign investors
Wi HI 7%k r - -:-r-"
jnt important to:
guest editorial
also have helped diversify the state's
industrial base, and diversification
generally results in greater economic
and employment stability for the state
(for example, Michelin brought tire
manuiaciuring, Miisui Drougni
aluminum extrusion and Sony brings
TV manufacturing).
Other foreign investments have
strengthened existing industries in
the state. For example, West German
investments in man-made fibers and
the Europeans' investments in textile
machinery have helped the competitiveness
of South Carolina's own
textile and apparel industries.
On the other hand, most foreign
investors have received special tax
incentives which allow them certain
exemptions. In addition, the State
Development Board spends a considerable
amount of money to
promote and attract foreign direct
investment to the state. Also, some of
the corporate earnings are sent to
parent companies out of state, and
hence are not spent in South Carolina.
FINALLY, THE international
competitiveness of the foreign investors
may adversely affect some
local S.C. firms by bidding up wage
rates, land prices, or even putting
some competitor firms out of
business.
However, these results and most of
the state expenditures ? as well as
the benefits ? would occur from any
out-of-state investment coming in, be
it f mm .Tannn n*?rnriar??7
-- ? V4VAAIIUIIJ, A
sylvania or Ohio.
In other words, from a purely
economic viewpoint, there is not
much difference between out-of-state
and out-of-country investment coming
in except in a few areas. One of these
areas is international business activities
and skills.
Foreign investors are more actively
involved in international transactions
...u:?l 11-- i- -?? - ?
wiih.ii generally neips siaoilize tne
state's economy. Their international
activities also enhance international
business skills for the South
Carolinians who work for them, and
for many of the industries who serve
them (accountants, lawyers, bankers,
iMiiwwui! imi'ii wmmB&miaMnamKB)
r tON'T KNOW, nwv
IT WAS MORKIKG FINE
, ALLDWYBTWj
state's economy
etc.).
ANOTHER WAY way to look at the
desirability of foreign direct investment
is its cultural impact, both
in the factory and in the community.
Most foreign investors bring some
foreign employees and their families
to South Carolina, particularly during
the start-up phase of operations. They
often bring with them different experiences,
perceptions, attitudes and
lifestyles.
On the positive side, these differences
can enrich a community by
exposing South Carolina residents to
them, and widening and deepening
South Carolinians' knowledge of both
themselves and the world outside
South Carolina.
On the negative side, such cultural
differences may not be welcomed, or
at least initially cause some anxiety,
misunderstanding, confusion or other
problems of cross-cultural in
teraction.
In looking at the S.C. communities
that have received the largest concentration
of foreign investment
(Greenville, Spartanburg, Anderson,
Columbia and the Charleston area), it
appears that the foreign investors on
balance have contributed positively to
the communities and have been well
received.
SOME GROUPS within these
communities have developed cultural
adjustment assistance programs, and
the communities appear to be proud
of their foreign investors and continue
to seek additional ones.
In sum, the state and people of
South Carolina are changing. South
Carolina is becoming more populated,
increasingly industrialized and more
connected with the rest of the United
States and world economy and
populace. Foreign investment has
played a major role in bringing about
these changes and is projected to
continue to do so for at least the rest of
the decade, if not the rest of the
century.
If you like these changes, then you
should like and welcome foreign investment
in South Carolina.
The author is professor of international
business and director of
the Center for Industrial Policy and
Strategy in USC's College of Business
Administration.