The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, February 22, 1982, Page Page 8, Image 8
fiAMTtinon
Founded 1908
Mark Platte, Editor-in-Chief
Jerrv Ft rower Clf>nornl Mnnn per
Linda S. Haines, Advertising Mario
Jean Hatchell, Business Manage
9
Mark McEwan, Production Manage
Everyone'
UbC otficials decided some time
ago that they wouldn't lobby for
more university money from the
state. That decision came from an
agreement between Gov. Dick
Riley and state university
presidents that if the student
surcharge was passed, no lobbying
would be done.
Now, it seems, students are on
their own. It is only they who will
lobby and it is they who will seek to
influence legislators. The student
surcharge is history. There is no
way the surcharge will be refunded.
Not only do students have to pay
out more and more each year for
tuition but now there is nobody
willing to go to bat for them. If they
want something done, they will
have to do it themselves.
In the fiscal year 1979-80,
residents of this state had to pay
$890 per semester. Out-of-state
students had to pay $2,000. Compared
with in-state figures for eight
area campuses, that $890 was
expensive three years ago, more
than $100 higher than the average
for the area colleges. Out-of-state,
the cost was cheaper than the
_ r T rn /NI w -r-m. -r ^
average 01 uau, uiemson, ui\uChapel
Hill, N.C. State, Georgia,
Virginia, Tennessee, and
Maryland.
During fiscal year 1980-81, while
. ii.
omer campuses were Keeping instate
tuition down, USC increased
by 17 percent tuition for South
Carolina residents. With the ex
V.CJJL1U11 U1 V^1CU15>UI1 tlllU UlllVCI<y
of Virginia, all the other schools
barely raised tuition at all. USC
could now make the claim that out
of these eight schools, it had the
thirH hi(jhoct in.ctata hiifmn urltila
v% 1/ 111 iJVU tv tui I/1V/11J W 1111V/
keeping the second lowest out-ofstate
tuition.
Fiscal year 1981-82 brought no
better luck. USC's in-state tuition
made the rise from $1,040 to.
$1,1170, putting the university
second behind Clemson out of the
eight schools for most expensive instate
tuition. Carolina also advanced
in out-of-state tuition, from
$2,220 to $2,450. That gave USC the
distinction of having the second
lowest out-of-state tuition the year
Kr?fr\r*o onrl K*?incf fhp fmirth hinhoct
v """ "V1,,b "" ,"b"V/kM'
in fiscal year 1981-82.
Tom Coyne, News Editor
TT David Tallcy, Sports Editor
John Vaiighan, Entertainment Editor
Beth Sundrla, Copydesk Chief
Mike Fisher, Graphics Editor
Lezlie Wallace, Editorial Page Editor
Patty McCarthy, Asst. News Editor
lggr Johnny Boggs, Asst. Sports Editor
Mike Lough, Intramurals Editor
r I
Fletcher Johnson, Graduate Assistant
r Mark Ethridge Jr., Adviser
To Blame
Those are the figures. Who is
responsible? A good share of the
blame goes to the State Budget and
Control Board, which, in 1977,
decided that state agencies, such
as USC, pay employee salaries
from any category other than
general appropriations.
That simply meant that student
? r 1 i l _ r
ctuuvii-y ices nau tu uear inure ui
the burden for salaries. According
to statistics USC puts out, student
activity fees increased 77 percent
from fiscal year 1976-77 to 1981-82.
And officials speculate that as long
as activity fees are needed to offset
salaries, the increases will continue.
The tuition hike is also the fault
of USC. No matter how much this
university complains about state
controls and financial
mismanagement, there is no doubt
that money can be used from other
areas to off-set a tution increase.
For instance, how can the state of
North Carolina keep in-state tuition
so low? At UNC-Chapel Hill, North
Carolina residents pay $599 per
semester. At N.C. State, it costs
$670 for a resident per semester to
attend school.
The final part of the blame
should be placed with the students
themselves. Students at California
State in Northridge, California pay
no tuition at all. Their fees total
$200, just a fraction of what
f'nrnlirin ctnHpntc nnv
Students at California StateNorthridge
actively lobby each
year in Washington in order to
request no tuition. They bombard
1/^rfiol rif rvir^fi ?i??
icgioiaiuio wii/ii fNJ&WJcll U?> Slclllllg
their opposition to tuition but that's
only the beginning.
One of the reasons students at
California State don't pay tuition is
the same reason many students in
New York State had free city
college to attend. In California,
tax is six nprnpnt Tn Npw
York, the tax is eight percent.
South Carolina not only needs
additional monies from added sales
tax but needs to tap all resources in
order to avoid escalating tuition.
That takes the efforts of the state,
USC and its students to make it
11 t/wl/ Maii; ic f Vin timn f/-v itlf Arm
vvui rv. ivvjw khj 111^/ tiiiiv/ tu nuui 111
and be informed.
&> ?2*
^ ^ w
HOWARD, IN All NN YEARS OF E)
TWO TEAMS PIW. Off A TRADE
Letters To Tin
Atwater's Methods C
TO THE EDITOR
Your profile of Lee Atwater (Feb. 15) coven
can fault his won-lost record, especially recei
Question.
There are still a few of us who are appalled;
"Posturing" is the Madison Avenue term for t
words smear, half-truth, and character assass
a pioneer of this sort of negative campaign
responsible for its introduction in the Southeast
As one who believes that real issues should I
chagrined when that focus is misdirected at th
witness to the 1980 First Congressional Distri<
tack mounted on Charles Ravenel's personal ii
was a campaign that could have, and should 1
issues. But Lee Atwater, with his jugular sens(
instead to embark on a course of character ass;
Perhaps one should not be surprised. Lee's d<
of the success rates of "posturing" campaign
acceDtance of such taotirs hut also thf?ir nnnar
could be expected from someone who learne<
Dent's role in the Nixon administration-one Ji
of dirty tricks."
I suggest that one way to "clean up" politi
proach that may not appeal to students of Ma
courage issue-related electoral decisions, anc
people who might otherwise decide to offer fc
that seems to be an integral part of Lee Atwate
Inadequate Publicatic
TO THE EDITOR they are not int
| In your editorial of Feb. 15 if they believe
entitled "Not Interested", interests have
you pointed out that the fectively "shut
(ilinn .11; C 1 i If
Aiiuig ucuuuiic iui btuut.llt uicjr iiiudiicci 11
government offices was not Inadequate
adequately publicized. In has a bad effect;
fact, the cutoff date arrived representation,
before many people had good represent;
realized that the election in lack of partic
season was upon us. Many leads to a vicioi
conscientious students are so perpetuates itse
preoccupied with their year.
j studies that they should be We strongly
forgiven if they happened the way to breal
not to see some obscure make a con
n Af i nA a 4- Y\ /V 1 I w A nvrtlnin 4/\
uuiiv,^ rtuuui tilt: ill III g IU CAjiiaiu tu 1
deadline. This does not mean students just
oMaaNBanaMBaHnHBMBmMnnnBannMNaBBaMaMMBHnMMSBBHMMHMaMMUMCMMaMai
GAMECOCK
Business Office: 77
Sole reproduction rights granted to the Associated
Press. All other material contained herein may not be
reproduced without the permission of the editor.
Opinions expressed in the Gamecock are those, if
sinned, of the writer and, if unsigned, of the editor.
The Gamecock welcomes letters and columns. All
letters and columns must he typewritten, triple spaced
on a 65 space-line.
I c chnultl ?w. ll o/?.
1?..?,? .... > . i.i.i ,im\> wurus, ana
columns should be limited to one newsworthy subject no
longer than four typed panes. Letters and columns MUST
be sinned with the writer's correct name, telephone
1/r
__
imeme m mm seen ?
rnmsr,..
e Editor
)n^>n Tn n.
'1M. w
sd only one side of the story. While no one
ltly, Lee's methods are certainly open to
at the campaign tactics of the New Right. ^
i i* ! l i tit i_ it. _
iieir auverusing lecnniques, aunougn ine
ination also come to mind. Lee Atwater is
ing. More than any other person, he is
ae the focus of a political campaign, I am
le personal attributes of a candidate. Any
:t campaign may recall the merciless atltegrity
and fitness for public office. Here
lave, been won on political and economic
i for what wins political campaigns, chose
assination.
octoral dissertation is an exhaustive study ~
is; it shows not only the spreading public
my effectiveness. And besides, what more
i from Harry Dent? Let's not forget Mr.
>hn Connally characterized as the "doctor
ics is to clean up political tactics--an apchiavellian
ethics, but one that would en1
would not frighten away the many fine
>r office, were it not for the mud-slinging
r's campaigns.
DIXON ROBERTSON
Law student ^
>n Has Bad Effects
erested. But student government is.
i that their extend the deadline so
been ef- that a wide variety of
out," then students may have a chance
ustrated. to run for offices.
e aHvorfico thp pamnaiCn
^UUiltdllUU ?w,v. wui, W.~ J ?
; lack of good philosophies of the can- i?
And lack of didates.
ation results loudly proclaim that
ipation. This election time is here.
is circle that After all, either student
(If year after government is a vital institution
that will attract
believe that informed persons or else it is
r Jo ?.. n nnintloQc sham that should
^ WUt I O IU , M v?a??v
certed effort be scrapped. Isn't that the
lew and old issue? j^CK CROSSCOPE
what their SHAHIN GOLSHAN
Engineering Majors ^
249 Newsroom: 177 7181
7-3888 Production: 777-2833
number, mailing address, class standing or faculty
position and major. Pseudonyms are unacceptable, but
the writer's name may be withheld on letter, upon
request, if the circumstances warrant it.
?rv UM17VI' ifu* rignt 10 cdii columns ana lencrs jw
space and style, and we reserve the righI to reject any
column for any reason if
Address letters and columns to: Editorial Pane Editor.
Gamecock. Drawer A. USC. Columbia. S C. 29208.
il\t> Jo ? I; J J *
. r, III niniM'U suKii'rn ur^unnun"" "i
the University of South Carolina and receives funding
from student activity fees