The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, August 27, 1980, Image 1
r
The ooutli Carolina Library
Campus
Wednesday^
| Volume LXX? No. 1 University of South Carolina, Columbia, S C- August 2"7, 1980
I Arise
$250,00C
1UI II lILlCll
a
By L?roy WWHams
Staff Writer
The state Budget and
Control Board has allocated
$250,000 for the initial architectural
planning of
USC's proposed $40 million
fine arts center.
Gov. Dick Riley, who has
opposed funding tne center
during the recession, persuaded
the board in July to
delay its decision while he
gathered more information
about the project.
Riley has said almost
every institution in the state
could make a justified
request for an arts center
and feels that the facility
If an additional t
the Township wot
see spending the
to duplicate what
should be made statewide.
"We don't want to spend the
whole $250,000 for a fixed
arts center," he said.
"It is my understanding
that this request offers
enough flexibility and
leeway so that the $250,000
could be spent for planning
and work to be done with a
possible facility in mind and
not with a fixed plan," Riley
said before the board's
decision.
RILEY AND Iiolderman
met before the meeting and
\ agreed not to set definite
R> l 1 $2
?'?&' /^IIPHr/-:^' ^@K<r ' \^E
The Carolina Arts Co,
and Control Board appn
Williams/
',6^^
1 aiiULL^U
planning
plans on the building but to
work out a "reasonable
proposal" to be considered
in housing the Movietonews
films. Those films were
donated to USC on the
condition that a building be
provided to house them.
Riley suggested USC
explore the use of existing
auditoriums, including the
Township Auditorium for
theater and other performing
arts instead of the
six that are planned for the
center.
David Rinker, vice
president for facilities
planning, said the next step
acility were built,
u/d suffer. I can't
taxpayers' money
we already have.'
-Candy Waites
of the project is to hav
architects "identify specifi
types of spaces and facilitie
needed."
The project was propose
in 1973, but it fizzled in 19?
when a fiscal crisis force
S.C. officials to reclaim a
appropriated money fo
other state developments.
IN 1973, $11 million wa
authorized for the center.
After USC spent $3.5 millioi
the remaining money ws
returned during the budgi
crisis. Some of the plar
developed in 1973 will t
- - - ? my or r " Tr r WwMi ' nr r. ?i
nter may be built at this s
yved funding for the projec
\
gets o
gampr
fe ?': >Jp ' <WK-?' ^p'ZOtiyV.Vi? W
USC President James t
Board hearings. (Photo b
e used for the proposed
c facility, Rinker said.
s Rinker said two branch art
centers at the USC regional
d campuses at Aiken and
'5 Conway are also being
d planned. The Aiken campus
II ic cM>lrinc <1 1 millinrt in
M.M 4JVVUtll^ ^>V<V laiAIllVll 111
ir addition to a private gift of
$1.25 million. The Conway
project will be funded
s through pri va te donation.
Columbia and Richland
n, County officials favored the
is board's decision, but some
et were concerned the center
is might hurt business at the
>e Township Auditorium.
^^gBSgyg;:- ^SL i^K
,ite on the Congaree River in
't's first phase at its Aug. 1
i boost
mm
7---Q ,
fofr. . .' vis ' ">/. x---??K
". ' j 4 " Jgm' X, i',4S:
yt-X' A'. -v^sj
T^a^gc-:-fC : :.f. '|V, r^Sftgg*
f. Hoiderman leads a parade ol
yXyle Holland) * ~
Columbia Mayor Kirkman (
Finlay said he favored the
hnarH's Hm>ision tn ftinri tho <
planning. He said a center i
for the media and per- i
forming arts is needed in s
Columbia and shouldn't i
romnetp with i
facilities. He also said USC
had an advantage in having
already selected a site for
the center.
"THE FACT that a site
has been chosen gives the
university some flexibility,"
Finlaysaid. "If construction
-(on the center) is delayed, a
site will already have been
. '. \ :. ' - ,; v. '." V ' ' ' ; ~:Y-.-~--\. ;": . . | : ;.-i
Columbia. The state Budget
9 meeting. {Photo by Tony
* .iiiffffr ~7
9
^^MK&ry S::: :>" ' -1:: _
^sk isr I Sgi
P M 9 M - M -
frowning ractts ar ino a
i"* "l' ' %
:hosen."
Jimmy Bales, Richland
bounty Council chairman,
laid he was pleased with tlie
arts center proposal. "We
should have had it several
/ears ago," he said. "The
:enter is a badly needed
isset for the state and
Tarnlirsfl "
"I think it is tremendous,"
;aid John Camp, a County
Council member. "I'm glad
he state is looking in that
lirection." He said he
loesn't believe the proposed
:enter will compete with the
nty's two main facilities,
Jarolina Coliseum ana tne
rownship.
Judy Stringer, executive
director of the Downtown
\ction Council of the
Columbia Chamber of
Commerce said the decision
will positively affect
downtown and river-front
developments.
14It will promote the state
and thp Smith as a ner
Forming arts center," she
said. The new arts center
will boost Columbia to
Atlanta's status as a major
cultural center, Stringer
said.
There was also some
negative reaction to the
funding decision, stemming
from concern that the center
would hurt the Township's
business.
"IF AN ADDITIONAL
facility were built, the
Township would suffer,"
council member Candy
Waites said. "I can't see
spending the taxpayers'
money to duplicate what we
already have."
Council member James
Barber III agreed, 'if they
want to hold other events
there it could cause some
problems. It might take
needed shows and money
from the Township."
Those who favor the arts
center say it would not
r* 0 *+ I
izaio ouagei ana %*onzrui
? "
compete with the Township
or Carolina Coliseum
because the existing
facilities could still schedule
concerts, while arts such as
i li.i ? i
opera or oauei couia oe
exhibited in the center.
Representatives of the
Township wouldn't comment
on the board's funding
decision, but this year is
projected to be the
auditorium s Dest, witn more
than 220 shows already
under contract.
Robert Horning, Carolina
Coliseum director, said a
new center will have no
effect on the 12,000 - seat
arena.