The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, January 23, 1980, Image 1
t .......
, .
I
The South Carolina Library
_______ < - r Campus
jg& i | ayn
Volume LXX, No. AQ University of South Carolina, Columbia, S.C. Jan. 23, 1980
Ardaiolo's practice ruled invalid
IIS
Frank Ardaiolo associate <
By Ronda Templeton
Gamecock Staff Writer
Associate Dean of Student Affairs
Frank Ardaiolo has tried
several students in their absence,
however members of the Student
Government Judiciary Committee
maintain he had no right to do so.
In a student Supreme Court
opinion released today, the rule
under which Ardaiolo tried
students in their absence was
declared invalid. Ardaiolo
maintains he tried students under
rule-B-5 of the Carolina Community
but the regulation was
declared invalid because it was not
approved by proper procedures.
THE CORRECT procedure for a
new regulation is that it must be
signed by the Student Senate,
Faculty Senate and the president
of the university. The student's
case will be re-tried.
Ardaiolo claims a verbal
decision was made in 1977 with the
Chinese Ai
calls for i
opposition
By Lisa Frucht
Gamecock Staff Writer
"The Soviet invasion of
Afghanistan poses a threat to the
DeoDle of the world, and it also
poses a threat to China," Chai
Zemin, ambassador to the United
States from the Peoples Republic
of China said at a press conference
at USC Tuesday.
"I think the people of the world
should unite to oppose the Soviet
nation and to make them withdraw
from Afghanistan as quickly as
possible," Zemin said.
He said China and the United
Ctatoc cVinnlri
UVHIVII tlllVUIU V,VAIJ/V1 an, Willi cavil
other and coordinate their actions
concerning the current Soviet
expansion and aggression.
' IN ORDER to oppose our
common enemy I think we could
take measures of various kinds in
our efforts to deal with the Soviet
expansion/' Zemin said.
In reference to the possible U.S.
boycott of the 1980 summer
!_ w ?
v/ijriii|jic? in raoscuw, z?enun saia,
"We support the United States
POHlNOn (ft
games, but it would alsfr depend on
joint action tak?n by all countries
VntlMiworU "
ents tri
Barry Newman ?GAMECOCK
iean of student affairs
Judiciary Committee to try a
student in his absence if he did not
respond to disciplinary charges,
but two former chairmen of the
committee disagree
The verbal decision was made
because students were not
responding to disciplinary charges
against them, Ardaiolo said. He
said he can recall "two or three"
cases in which a student was tried
in his' absence but the system
became questionable because "the
contention is that the procedure
was not passed properly in 1977,"
he said.
The Judiciary Committee did not
pass any rules that students could
be tried in absentia in 1978, according
to Dana Morris, who was
Judiciary Committee chairman at
that time. There was no mention of
the system in previous
codifications, either, he said.
Ardaiolo's desciplinary decisions
on cases without student consent
are not in accordance with the
nbassador
vorldwide
to Soviets
The ambassador said that both
the Chinese and American people
desire normalization of relations.
Those who ODDOse normalization
"fail to perceive the world
situation and fail to see where the
fundamental interests of the
Chinese and American people lie,"
he said.
ZEMIN SAID that China is
willing to initate a student exchange
program with USC. "We
would be happy to establish these
kinds of ties with South Carolina. If
USC is willing to accept our
scholars, we will be happy to seed
them here," he said. In turn the
ambassador welcomed USC to
exchange students to visit and
study in China.
Currently China has over 700
visiting scholars in about 30 states
in the U.S.
Zemin said that the prospects for
trade between South Carolina and
China are good. He said South
Carolina is "an agricultural state
and it is very rich in cptton,
soybean and corn," and is
developed in the textile industry.
Since China imports cotton and
chemical fibers, Zemin said there
ed in tin
Student Government Constitution,
Morris said. According to the
constitution, Ardaiolo may only
make a decision on a student's
case at the request of that student
at a pre-trial interview.
STUDENTS CHARGED with
disciplinary violations are sent two
letters instructing them to respond
to charges made against them,
Ardaiolo said. The first letter instructs
a student to make an appointment
with Ardaiolo for a
discussion of the charges and the
second advises him that a decision
will be made on his case if he does
not respond.
The decision to make a
judgement on a student's case in
his absence was made before
Ardaiolo became associate dean of
Case decisi
are definitely j
codifications.
student affairs, he said. Ardaiolo
maintains he was just following the
same procedure the previous
associate dean of student affairs,
Marsha Duncan, followed.
Duncan said the Judicial Advisory
Board may review and
make recommendations on any
proposal affecting the judicial
system. When the Judicial Advisory
Board reviews proposals,
any recommendations will be
forwarded to the president of the
university for approval, she said.
DUNCAN SAID these
procedures were followed when it
was decided to try a student on
disciplinary charges in his absence
? if he ignored requests to face
charges. "I don't know why it's a
problem now. I'm convinced we
followed procedures stipulated in
the judicial system," she said.
The student Supreme Court was
looking into whether the Judicial
Chinese Ambassador Chi
are "fruitful prospects in the
development of trade."
He said his trip to a Greenville
textile mill will be informative
because the United States has
more advanced techniques than
China.
| + t f f | f % % ^ + 4 4 | ^ | |" | 4 /
leir abs
Committee had the right to
determine that a student could be
tried in his absence, Ardaiolo said.
4The contention is that the Judicial
Committee can only pass a
recommendation, not initiate new
ruies, neaaaea.
The Judicial Committee thought
they were operating under proper
procedures, Ardaiolo said, but '"no
one is quite sure what proper
judiciary procedures are.
Everything is open to interpretation,"
Ardaiolo said.
The situation was brought to the
attention of the Supreme Court last
semester when a student appealed
a case on the grounds that proper
judiciary procedure was violated,
Ardaiolo said. A case decision was
made in the student's absence
4 'of tor' nnmnrAiic o ftnm rvfr p r\ rtnf
U1VVI UUlllVi UUO ULVVlIipiO iw
oris without a student
lot part of the Judiciar\
Judiciary Commi
him to come in and talk about it,"
Ardaiolo said. The iudgement was
appealed through a student advocate
and the student will be retried.
A DISCIPLINARY case decision
can be appealed on three grounds,
Ardaiolo said. Students may appeal
if they think a decision was
contrary to the facts, procedures
were violated or sanctions were too
severe.
Sentencing a student without his
presence is not a Judiciary
Committee rule, committee
chirman David Clegg said. "If it
were a Judiciary Committee policy
it would have to be renewed each
year," he said.
Case decisions without a
student's attendance are definitely
not part of the Judiciary Committee's
codifications, Clegg said.
"I knew it happened but I assumed
it was the associate dean of student
?/ Zemin speaks at a press confet
ZEMIN SAID his visit to USC
will contribute greatly to his
? i- J- * *? a u ->?t?
fuiuwicoge 01 me soumern united
States, and the fact that South
Carolina is an agricultural state
makes "my visit even more
meaningful," he added.
ence
affair's policy," he said.
A letter is sent with the
disciplinary charges against each
student informing him that student
advocates are willing to represent
him at his pre-trial hearing, Clegg
said. The advocate goes with the
student to see Ardaiolo and decides
whether to be tried or plead guilty
in order to let Ardaiolo make a
decision on the case. Making a
disciplinary decision in a student's
absence is definitely not a
judiciary committee policy, he
said.
THE CAMPUS COURT has sole
jurisdiction in disciplinary cases,
Morris said. Unless a student goes
A. _ A r J i
10 nruaioio ior a aecision on me
case, "Ardaiolo is not supposed to
say anything," he said.
's attendance
f Committee's
David Clegg
ittee chairman
Ardaiolos contention that a
verbal decision was made in 1977
with the Judiciary Committee on
how cases would be handled if a ,
student did not respond to
disciplinary charges is worthless,
Morris said. He said Ardaiolo may
get his license to decide the outcome
of a disciplinary case from
the Administrative Action section
of the constitution but "it's up to
the court to decide how things are
io, :?4 ?A ?i ?
iu uc iiucrpreieu.
Ardaiolo was already passing
judgements in students' absences
when Morris became chairman of
the Judiciary Committee, Morris
~ said. "I always thought it was just
his policy," he added.
Morris maintains that Ardaiolo
is wrong to make case decisions in
student's request. According to
Ardaiolo, he was merely following
a precedent set by Duncan and
authorized by the Judiciary
lomimuee.
' ' 'iMb?Hffig8B
7J^^t V
^
RusmN P*c? - GAMECOCK
once at Capstone Tuesday.
Zemin, who is making his first
visit to an American college, will
meet with USC students and
faculty members and discuss
possible trade relations between
South Carolina and China with
industrial leaders.