The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, November 05, 1979, Image 1
%
i I i ? v *- '
g Monday
Volume LXX, No. 30 University of South Carolina, Columbia, S.C. Nov. 5, 19~79
Edwai
By Teresa Weaver
G*mccock 8t?H Wrtt?r
Former S.C. Gov. Ja
Edwards said he would h?
just as the current govern
drastically cutting the an
nuclear waste coming i
state for burial.
"I think it was a go<
Knowing all the facts, I (
would have acted just <
Riley did/' Edwards said.
Edwards' comments cai
Gov. Riley announced Oct
"f^ '-^BK0^\. :':;
BI^Hk^^^?^bh9
Former Governor J
move to limit nucfeai
idea."
'W' Gn
mem
The Student Senate A<
a member of the Facull
the "W" grading systerc
Ryan said the major <
in which k student can c
francnrint fn nna waat
?? mim/v* w viav tt vvr
drop/add period."
One of the major reasi
were "shopping arounc
reason was that "manj
they could drop one, ?
couldn't get in," he addc
| A STUDENT SHOU1
sophomore year becai
avoid/' Kyan said. Mo
derclassmen, he added.
There are two reason!
are failing, and becausc
into another field of stuc
i Sen. Matt Ward, a me
students drop a cours
because they are explor
Members of the stud*
over the fact that many
tl_. ^.44. ft Aft
reauy gei 10 Know ine pi
requirements. The gen<
be nice for one week."
THE STUDENT CO
from the committee
vestigating the "W" sy
and the main reason wc
the faculty committee.'
The academic comn
have a place on the facu
The move from a six
reaction" by the facult]
one week was too far th<
Ward also expressec
change of the one-week
become too ingrained.1
graduate, and new stu
% i i i
/ , ' *
dsback
the storage site at Bar
handles 80 percent of t
mes B. nuclear waste in the ra
tve done the volume it accepts b
or did in The move by Ri
nount of followed the closings
into the other commercial
Washington and Nev
have a strong imp
)d idea, federal government's
jrobably nuclear waste, Edv
as Gov. "Gov. Riley and se
governors have put
down, and it's going
ne after federal government U
. 31 that . action/'he added.
v mr[ _
amds B. Edwards said Gov. I
r- waste fn South Carolines
ndirta svs\
is discuss<
By Ronda Temptoton
Osimcock Staff Wrtt?r
cademics Committee met with Ja
t.. u_t _t_ t. J: IL
ly ocuaic, msi wwk iu UlSClUtti U1
I.
consideration in limiting the amo
Irop a course without receiving a
c was to "tie the 'W' system ii
ons for the new regulations was th
I" for an easy course, Ryan sai
r people were taking on an extra
and people who really needed
>d.
LD NOT have to drop classes
ise by then "they know what t
st of the students dropping cour
i for a student to drop a course; be
5 tney are taking tne course as an <
ly, according to Ryan.
mber of the committee, said the n
e is because they are failing,
ing other fields of learning.
;nt academics committee express
students feel one week is not eno
ofessor, his grading system or the
era! consensus was that "any tee
MMITTEE recommended a rep
be a part of the faculty comi
stem. Ryan said "this would not i
>uld be that there are already two
?
littee voted to propose one of it
ilty committee.
-week to a one-week drop date m
f, Ward said. "Six weeks was too i
b other wayhe added.
! concern over the necessity of
[ drop date. If .we don't change it
People who are aware of the old i
dents won't know there was a bt
s Riley o;
nwell which As a former cha
he low-level Subcommittee on Ni
ition will cut of the National Go
y one-half. ference, Edwards S?
iley, which a strong supporte
of the two energy for years. 1
dumps in nuclear industry
ada, should economic important
act on the but it's time for
position on government to take
yards said, create a place for it.
veral other
their foot Edwards said h<
to force the that the federal gc
j take some formulate a policy <
, transporting and
waste, which he se
problems of nuclear
"What we neec
government to rid<
transporting of the
handle it nicely o
here," he said. "Tr
packaging must be
professional mann
added.
A solution to the
problem which mi
the national gov
cording to Edwards
of several regional
went on record ;
regional repositoric
' and low-level nuclc
said.
citizen, Edwards i
appear before th<
committee on Ener
ssrr"*"
es a good
Edwards said h<
tern
ed API
E
Several questio
seph Ryan, ployment applica
e merits of cording to Ec
guidelines.
unt of time The USC emplo;
"W" on his employees for da
11 with the national origin. El
nwiiMt siifh Hntn
at students The guidelines
d. Another taining to age are
t course so antj ajj inquiries ii
the course intends to becon
j discriminatory. Ir
after their questions pertaini
eachers to asked on employnr
ses are un
.. 'Basic,
icause they .
experiment QnytnMQ
lain reason ^ HOt CI
nnH rnrolv
i While the EEOC
ugh time to an(j regulations a
S?5-a Joe Smalls of the
could sai^ "Basically,
employees anythii
resentative some questions t
mission in- guidelines." Appli
go too well, if they can prove
students on were used, he add<
, The USC non-ed
3 members asks prospective
EEOiV guidelines i
is an "over for proof of age aft
liberal, and position.
Inquiries as to v
immediate become U.S. citiz<
now, it will by the EEOC, I
system will plicants' heritage,
rtter way." [ includes questions
employees'native
n nuclear \
irman of the vGov. Riley will be facc
nclear Energy pressure from the
pernors' Con- government because ol
lid he has been stand. "I would hopi
r nf niirlpnr rVanoi4mon( ftf XTnowtv
m w- JL/VpUI VallVAIV VI Mllvi
Hte said, "The closely with the govern
is of great more permanent soli
ie to the state, wards said. "There
the federal requirements concerr
a position and transport and storage,
no enforcement."
; is confident A significantly larg<
vernment will than the amount of <
concerning the waste coming into the
packaging of "staggering" amount
es as the real BMBunw; :
energy.
I is for the BfPSSfE^S " 1 't *
e herd on the
waste. We can !/"$ /
rice we get it |j %
ansporting and
ist come from
'ernment, ac,
is the creation
repositories. I
*.a V ?i ?
federal nuclear
Edwards is schet
i doesn't think committee on Ener
May be discri
plications
ly Ronda Temptoton J
Gamecock Staff Writer gtti
ns on the USC non-academic em- son
ition may be discriminatory, ac- anc
|ual Employment Opportunity tak
Am
VIU
yrment application asks prospective aft
ta concerning age, citizenship and pli<
EOC guidelines claim agencies that ad<
may be discriminatory. 1
indicate that any questions per- wo
discriminatory inquiries and "any Jai
ito whether the applicant is now or cit
le a U.S. citizen" may also be mc
i addition, the EEOC recommends qu<
ng to national origin should not be vis
lent applications. dis
ally, an agency can a
' they want, but it is unwis
imply with EEOC guideiint
' regulations are not law, the rules 1
re often supported by the courts. ag<
S.C. Human Affairs Commission us<
an asencv can ask orosDective Mc
ig they want, but it is unwise to ask "A
that do not comply with EEOC ap]
cants refused positions can file suit wa
discriminatory hiring procedures ad<
sd. 1
taxational employment application apj
employees for their date of birth, or
~A _ A. - 4L 1 A-l-1- 5 4aM,
siate u?e oniy accepiaoie inquiry is iyj
er the applicant has been granted a unl
the
vhether applicants are or intend to att
ens are considered discriminatory >
is are questions concerning ap- coi
. The USC employment application the
\ about citizenship and prospective del
country. do
waste si
id with any nuclear waste w!
national from the produc
I his recent from atomic 1
e that the said.
would work
or to find a The material ii
ition," Eld- form, which evei
are new won't accept. /
ling waste wards, the state'
but there's included $3 or \
conversion of
glassified brique
er problem buried. The
commercial ministration, ho\
state is the amount from the
of military S?
c'^TSS:T ?^E|^K-?9|^9K& :
'
fufed to testify before th
gy next week.
minatory
quesuu
ane Jameson of USC personnel
tement saying forms associal
mel/budget/payroll system ar
i updated. The statement said
en to revise the application
ployment so that the date of bir
er hire." Native country will n
cants who are not U.S. citize
J l
leu.
'he statement did not mention \
uld be asked if they were citiw
meson said "we are required b
izenship." Jameson said she b
;nt of labor required applicai
estions concerning citizenship
as." The EEOC said such inqui
criminatory.
isk prospective ei
re to ask some quest
is.'
* i'Ji
- . v
rhere is nothing wrong with ask!
e, citizenship and native countr
?s the answers in a discriminai
>rton of the S.C. Human Affairs
comoanv can ask anvthins tl
plication, but if someone files
s discriminated against there c
ded.
Ptw? RRnr fftiiHolinoc ctaf-A that
plicant's religion, race, color, t
ancestry, sex, marital status,
>e and date of military discharg
less the information can be shov
? job in question. It is illegal to
ach a picture to his application I
Vhile questions about physic*
isidered discriminatory by the;
s law to deny employment bee
feet where the reasonable derm
not require such a distinction.
i ..y*
:and
hich was left over
tion of plutonium
x>mbs, Edwards
j now in liquid salt
i the Barnwell site
According to Eds
budget last year
M billion for the
the liquid into
ts which could be
present advpvpr
HoWivi th*?
budget, he said.
? Edwards page 3
MsiF
e Senate Sub
ned
I services issued a
ted with the pere
being reviewed
! "steps are being
for non-academic
th is required only
ot be asked of apns,
the statement
vhether applicants
ms of the U.S., but
>y law to ask about
1 ii J a.
eneveu me aeparints
to answer the
because of "work
ries are considered
np/oyees
tions that
_ _
w omaus
11.1 n
ing questions about
y unless the agency
ory fashion, Larry
s Commission said,
hey want to on an
suit and proves he
:an be trouble," he
questions about an
ige, national origin
family plans and
e should be avoided
m to be pertinent to
ask an applicant to
Form.
il defects are not
EEOC, it is against
ause of a physical
inds of the position