The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, July 26, 1979, Page Page 6, Image 6
Union sei
-?
cited as pr
Bv Kannv Pnlnrh
Chairman. Cinematic Arts Committee.
Russell House University Union
This past week's editorial entitled "University Union
needs organization" was indeed observant and direct
tl?.. *1 l: * 1
vv/ me jwini, nuwcvcr, iiic euuuriai errs in lis implication
of where the disorganization exists.
There is a distinct difference between the two major
divisions of the Ilussell House University Union:
programming and services. The lack of organization to
which the Gamecock referred exists in the services
area of thp lininn nnt in fht? nrnorammino
THE BASIC GOAL of programming is to provide
programs which students may attend to diversify their
interests and relieve the boredom of the traditional
classroom experience. Examples of these include
concerts, films, lectures and cultural series events.
Aside from providing interesting and entertaining
programs on a large scale, the union provides a double
educative function. (Contrary to popular opinion, a
good portion of a student's learning experience takes
places outside the classroom). For the programmers,
the students actually involved in the planning and
nnoratinn nf nrnrtrnmo thn nninn * ~
ui pi uf,iunio, un, uiuuii j^i uviuro uic ctuuiiy lu
use their creative forces and receive practical exj
perience in planning, management, budgets and
| operations.
| In executing their responsibilities to the student
oody, tne union programming area utilizes the largest
budget of all student organizations. This money is
funded through Student Government's Student
Allocations Commission (by way of student activity
On lettere ?&&&*&
The (Jamecotk welcomes letters from its
necoc?s
readers. Letters should be a maximum of 300 :
words and must be signed with the writer's xxlB^Hw
correct name, telephone, mailing address, x\
class standing and major Pseudonyms are
, unacceptable, but the writer's name may be
withheld by request if circumstances warrant.
We reserve the right to edit letters for space.
Fran George Production Manager
Sam McKoe Business Manager
Sole reproduction rights granted to the ^5^ - ' ^
Associated Press All other material contained A8S' jfi&r 1 .** r
herein may not be reprinted without the Ska IkI ?~f f'
? Guest Column ??
rviV.PS not nrncrrs
A ^ y AX vy v/ A. y/y^jL v
'oblem by union c
ietss;, ana me programs are administered by the
Russell House University Union Executive Council.
*
The council consists of nine student chairpersons and
four student officers as voting members. The director
of the union, the business director, the assistant
director of programming, the program coordinator
and graduate assistants serve as ex-officio and nonvoting
members. Although it is not the only
programming organisation dn campus, the executive
council provides the major force and overall direction
of campus programming.
ON THE OTHER HAND, and auite a different storv
* a " ~ '
is the services area of the union. The primary purpose
of union services is to provide essential services to
students. A place to eat, study, relax, and make major
and minor purchases. These services are provided by
the various departments of the union; the Union
Station, the Golden Spur, the Gameroom, the Print
Shop, etc.
Department heads are responsible for the direction
of a large number of student and non-student employees
as well as the daily operation of union services.
In addition, department heads are directly responsible
to either the union director or business director,
depending on the department.
The Gamecock's assertion that the union needs
overall organization should be directed toward services
and not programming. But the assertions are
completely true and nave been evident for quite some
time. The problem has been that until this point, the
question of inadequate services and mismanagement
has remained within Russell House itself.
iTrimmer
:hairman
HOWEVER, within the past two months there has
been a growing awareness among persons outside
Russell House that services are not what they should
be.
The point of the matter is that we are a major college
union and the time has come for us to begin functioning
as such. The practice within the upper levels of the
union to hold back authority from the department
mariQOorc lonrac omnln?r/vn? ^ 'J - ? *
...u>auBv> -J ivu V vo tiiipiujCTO WI HI IIU U1I tX'HUII.
A manager without authority is virtually equivalent
to no manager at all and contributes to the weak
leadership syndrome. This in turn affects the services
that students receive as well as the reputation of the j
union as a whole.
THE TIME has come for the replacement of weak
1 1 u:_ i -i - -
icdueisuip uy a strong program 01 overall direction for
Russell House University Union. It is absurd that no
long-range financial plan exists for a union that j
generates enormous revenues. It is even more absurd
that those employees who desire direction and exhibit
a willingness to work hard, are allowed to waste away
with no management and no direction. And it is !
downright shameful that the morale of the union has
been allowed to sink to the lowest level in years.
The union services division stands at a crossroads. It
is time for competent leadership, instead of worthless
indecision Thincfs must phancrp cnnn r\r- nntiro !
union, including our expanding program area, will j
become a joke.
WEAK LEADERSHIP of the union services area j
should change immediately or be forced to justify its j
existence.
hh^xi^now' ititw