The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, April 20, 1979, Page Page 10, Image 10
Cheeve
I I I v-AO
By Lehman Stiles f
i
TTx StofWs of John Clmm Alfred A. (
Knopf. $15 00
C
John Cheever's Pulitzer-Prize- f
winning collection of short stories c
is a mystery. c
Cheever has scored successes t
with such novels as Bullet Park t
and Falconer, and his short stories c
might be expected to be the
traditional radical departure from c
nis successiui sme. uesiseiiing v
authors as a rule publish short r
story or poetry collections to prove c
that they are appropriately v
literary. t
But Cheever's storvwriting style c
is relentlessly adherent to his novel e
style ? a solid ambiguity, a stark, s
violent imagery and a sense of o
moral despair shaped by society.
These stories are benchmarks t]
for a literary age. Unflinchingly p
realistic, they reflect the stern s
realism of everyday life; the blood a
of these stories runs cold and fast, l;
They are touched only occasionally d
with humor, in the way that it fi
touches Shakespearean tragedy, e
and they seem to demand a future n
in which they can exist. This could tJ
t>e a description of modern life. c
John Cheever has shown in the
past that he is one of those authors b
cursed to constantly searching for c
the underside of morality, and his t
stories are no exception. In t
"Christmas is a Sad Season for the t
Poor," Charlie, an elevator-man in s
a posh New York apartment house, a
MM imiMi i
I Some of the fun eve
? Beer can roll
? 70 yd. dash \
! j ? 70 yd. empty
13 ? Th ree person
; J ? Feature even
1 BUDWEISER
r's story co
A- ! /
^erpiece ot
inds himself inundated with gifts
ind meals after he voices the
romplaint of the title to residents
>i uie Duiiaing, taDncating ap>ropriate
lies about his life to
Iramatize the plea. In the end, it
omes out that "we are bound, one
o another, in licentious
>enevolence, for only a single
. . .
Cheever's view of morality is
ihilling to say the least. Obsessed
vith the servant-master class
elationship, he embroils his
haracters in dilemmas from
khich their morals cannot save
hem. Codes of existence clash as
?1 i- *1 -
ciasn; mere seems 10 De no
xit from a barren moral landcape
when human relationships
verpower moral sense.
In The Stories of John Cheever.
he author's greatest success is his
erfect fusion o? style anci subtance.
His lexicon and grammar
re the quiet, matter-of-fact
anguage of daily existence, nearly
evoid of simile and metaphor,
ind when the shattering
xistential upheavals that end
lost of the stories are related in
his style, the effect is bonehilling:
"In the stillness, the child Anne
>egan to shriek. Her arm had got
aught in the frayed rope; she had
een thrown to the ground and was
>eing dragged brutally up the hill
oward the iron wheel . . . Her
creams were hoarse and terrible,
ind the more she stni00lp>H tn frtm
! Jhidw e i s er K
? T
? /
E 1ST ANNUAL Gl
FRIDAY,
Id "E" (in front of Bate
Sponsoi
nts include:
with your nose (20 yd
/vith "6-pack" between
keg relay (team even
pyramid run
t of the day
an building contest (2-|
HE FABULOUS
\ HOT AIR BALLOC
Ilection
style
herself from the rope, the mor
violently it threw her to th
ground. Space and the cold seeme
to reduce the voices ? even th
anguish in the voices ? of th
people who were calling to stop th
tow, but the girl's cries wer
piercing until her neck was broke
on the iron wheel."
Cheever's style entices th
icduci uy seiung mm aown in m
middle of the action he i
describing but placing a glass wal
between observer and observed
We become part of the actioi
without affecting it; we recognizi
ourselves as somehow belonging ii
the midst of things while, all th<
time, we are watching them.
Cheever is a master at almos
every facet of storytelling art. Ii
"Characters that Will Not Ap
pear," he presents a list ? num
bered. even ? of annarpn
? - - ~rr?
character sketches from som<
cluttered notebook and turns then
into as clear and insightful i
picture of American life evei
achieved in short form. Because
the stories are arranget
chronologically, the reader see;
Cheever's development from <
young writer intrigued by th<
world around him to a mature
author able to express that work
effectively in fiction.
Despite all this, there is <
question as to whether the bool
really deserves the Pulitzer
William Wharton's Birdy and Johi
\NNOUNCIN<
ENERAL STUDIES I
APRIL 27 (READI
s House) Open to th<
ed by Budweiser of (
$1,85000 ii
given cbwi
legs All procee
t) College oi
S|gn up in
Person) Noon - 3;|
>N
Hg|>|
d a iLMW jHBRl
1SR, Jf
e BWf^P VBmmk
^P?*1 *W f
c/IH
t
r
; Irving's The World According to
i Garp both eclipse Cheever's
> stories in terms of fictional art,
i and given the Pulitzer's
i predilection for well-known
? authors, the awaixl might have
1 been given a bit hastily. Unfortunately,
Cheever's plots are
often as bare as his style, and when
i he relates the necessary details of
c a story in this barren style, the
final effect teeters on the edge of
i boredom.
\
s
DECATHLON EVENT!
ING DAY)
s entire U.S.C. communis
Columbia
n Budweiser merchandis
ay to individual and tear
ds from refreshments go
f General Studies Scholar
person at Russell House
30 p.m. April 24, 25, 24
Sign up early
First come, first sc
r f I J
i \j i II nui III U I
1 .
But The Stories of John Cheever
is a book deserving of being read;
it brings a unique focus upon the
way that morality interacts with
daily life. Although the result is
sometimes almost depressing, the
overall atmosphere is essentially
iragic. Uheever's characters
personify the hauntings of fear that
mere existence imposes upon us.
His stories echo the constantly
troubled but constantly
exhilirating workings of humanity.
w "HI
S l
e to be |lfi
n event winners. 'H: I
ship Fund. j i
patio !.'? I
ton call 777-2760 M
mm* "