The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, September 11, 1978, Image 1
y
Volume LXIX, No. 59 University of South Carolina, Columbia, S.C. Sept. 11,1978
Em]
Low pay mar ha
jl
By Tom Travis
Oam acock Staff Writar
Former Concessions Director for the USC athletic department, Ross
Broom Jr., pleaded guilty Sept. 7 to embezzlement of more than $96,000
from concessions revenues.
Broom was sentenced to three years in prison and his assistant,
James Clark was sentenced to a one-year term. The conviction resulted
from an extensive investigation by the State Law Enforcement
Division.
A source close to the investigation said Broom had filed a complaint
with the athletic department in 1974. Former Assistant Athletic Director
Ralph Floyd said Broom complained to him that he "was barely making
enough money."
Assistant Athletic Director John Moore said his department received
no complaint from Broom concerning concessions or his income.
SLED BEGAN an inquiry June 28 into the concession and souvenir
operations at football games and spring sports events. This probe
followed an audit of the USC athletic department in May. The audit was
requested by Athletic Director Jim Carlen and Moore.
Moore said the inquiry was prompted by outstanding bills which
Broom owed to Cromer's Peanut Shop and the Coca-Cola Bottling
Company of Columbia. Broom bought most of his concession supplies
from these two firms.
"Coach Carlen and I felt that an audit was the only thing we could do.
We do things the right way, regardless of who is involved," said Moore.
Broom had been in charge of concessions at Carolina sports events for
91 UQOt>C
sjx J V/W i a.
J.D. Cromer, owner and operator of Cromer's Peanut Shop, said the
allegations against Broom came as a "total surprise" to him. He said he
had dealt with Broom on a "straight business" basis while Broom was
in charge of concessions at USC. Cromer said his firm had been paid the
full amount owed by the athletic department since Broom's firing in
June.
BUDDY BROOM, marketing director for Coca-Cola, refused to
comment on the issue.
The SLED investigation covered the period from September. 1974 to
November, 1977. During this time, it was discovered that Broom had
embezzled $96,785.60 from concession and souvenir sales.
Hugh E. Munn, SLED information director, said his department
compared sales reports from concession stand operators with the
figures turned in to the athletic department by Broom. Broom's sales
figures had been grossly lowered, Munn said.The adjustments in sales
figures were made by James Clark, who was Broom's top assistant,
said Munn.
Munn said all sales reports the athletic department received were in
the same handwriting, later identified as Clark's. SLED reports indicated
that Clark was in charge of bookkeeping and had altered figures
under Broom's direction. According to Munn, the money was probably
taken during post-game counting procedures.
SLED also investigated football souvenir sales and discovered that
these profits had been skimmed in much the same way.
ACCORDING TO SLED and audit reports, Broom's books were $4,290
1AFI4 T? ~--l 4. 11 " **
suun in ivit. in suusequem years, uroom s laxe increased steadily,
reaching a peak of $39,342.28 in 1977.
In regard to spring sports, SLED found a report on sales for the 1976
NCAA baseball tournament held at USC. Regular season concession
sales records for 1976 were never discovered, said Munn. Also, a fictitious
rpnnrt wns fminH fnr th?? 1077 hoooKall aaaonn
. ?rw. ?V? vaav *V. MWUVMWII UVMOVII. A/Ui lllg 11ICOC LVYU
years Broom took $8,000 from baseball concessions. "I think the key to
the investigation was two-pronged," said Munn. "There was a determined
administration at USC to get to the bottom of the problem and a
darned good agent on the case." Robert Stewart, the agent in charge of
the SLED concessions probe, was not available for comment.
MUNN ALSO praised the state and USC auditors for their assistance
in the case, saying "we couldn't have done a thing without them."
Broom was not committed to a written contract during his stay at
Carolina. Athletic department officials said it was not uncommon for
anyone to have a verbal contract
Ross Broom, according to his verbal contract with USC received
$1,500, or 30 percent of net sales per event, whichever was the lesser
amount. Also, USC paid him 10 percent of gross sales from concessions
at football games. This financial arrangement was initiated in 1974.
according to SLED reports.
James Clark received $15(' per event acting as Broom's top assistant
( "lark's fee was illegally increased to $1,500 per game during the actual
embezzlement of funds, said Munn. Clark admitted to falsification of all
sales reports and concession forms.
Concessions at USC sports events are presently handled by
ARASERVE, Inc., of Pittsburgh, Pa.
bezzlemen
ve led concessions he
.\ ' ' * >* ' ife'"
?A?L
\ ^
?Nn*"n
N
/ ' \
it
V *
? . ' . ,,
ix & : . -
". y /
. '$* V' ' ... .K'VwM':
s \ * V'v 1
: '^jattAfc^.
t
ad astray
' .. luftv S^^SSSk,'*i.
>. V ... .