The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, August 30, 1978, SECTION B, Page Page 21B, Image 57
Journali
By Brian Duncan
OtiMMCk Staff Writer
Reorganization in the College of
Journalism will enable students to
gain a more complete understanding
of employment areas
in journalism and mass com
munications, according to Dean
Albert T. Scroggins.
The reorganization primarily
concerns a separation of the
college into an upper and lower
division, Scroggins said. The lower
division is to emphasize basic
education requirements as well as
journalism core courses "so they
(the students) can move smoothly
into the upper division/' he said.
The upper division, which begins
upon completion of 60 hours,
mainly involves required sequence
courses. Scroggins said an internal
re-evaluation of programs by a
faculty and student committee last
year led to creation of the division
and accompanying structural and
academic changes.
THE MAJOR reason for the
division was to accomplish a more
effective advisement program,
and therefore better meet the
needs encountered by graduates,
according to Scroggins.
a in. on uviui c ui uic acvjuciice*
oriented programs prompted a
Press fr
By Mark J. Lundfp
Editor In CM*
Freedom of the mass media
danger.
Two recent Supreme Court dec
questions about the strength and s*
Amendment to the Constitution of
The latest decision, involving th
the famed "seven dirty words/
Federal Communications Commii
stations for "exposure of childrei
- J fl 9 - A * - - ? ?
aescrioes in terms patently offer
by contemporary community s
broadcast medium, sexual or ei
and organs, at times of the day
reasonable risk that children
audience."
Justice John Paul Stevens sai
administer that medicine to pre
patently offensive sexual and e:
and such speech is "at the p<
Amendment concern."
but, sikvkns also contends
must remain neutral in the mark
How can the government rema
Stevens said, there is a "hierarch
ment values" for judging the 1
speech.
Stevens, who spoke for the cou
contradicted himself and the dec
While it cannot be disputed that c
nave to be subjected to abusive 1;
certain time periods should possifc
programs free of strong language
that the court has limited free e
First Amendment.
If broadcasters plan on using
HltHnrf fKail* MmMammiMtHM 1
uu. I?g uevil pi v/51 CUIUIIUI({ IlUUi B, J
also let them make such policy pi
the seven dirty words be spoken.
AN FCC SOURCE was quoted t
Post by writer Tom Shales as s,
commission does not out a hitfh nri
elimination of nasty language. V
FCC has more regard for the First
the Supreme Court has and does
ment (Ml hma lira ?t4?p? whn vi
morality as the Supreme Court see
sm schoc
number . of complaints from
students that they felt uncomfortable
about taking different
sequence courses, Scroggins said.
He added that the advisement
" A number of students
who graduate from a
particular sequence are
not always able to find
employment in that
specialized area.99
program itself tended to be a bit
SPnilPtlPIMtPtanfaH D? ?
?^.?.w viiviimai. MJjr U311IJJ Uie
faculty members most interested
and best equipped for advisement,
Scroggins said, the college hopes to
improve this.
eedom i
en Another r
put a lid on
press. In t
in America is in enforcement
forming unc
isions have raised newspaper i
scurity of the First and photogr
the United States. The case
e broadcast use of dependent i
'* Ofafo/I fVlof -
umi?VU UMI> U1C 3CQI CI1CU UM
ssion can penalize find photogi
1 to language that identified d
sive as measured policemen i
tandards for the hospital,
[cretory activities
when there is a IN EEC
may be in the newspapers
in an attem
d "We decline to officials. Ob
?rVe the vigor of now the cod
ccretory speech," Justice B;
eriphery of First opinion of tt
"that confid
the press w
that 4'government warranted s
etplace of ideas." White is p
in neutral if, as In the best i
y of First Amend- doubtful tha
'social value" of controversy
search hang
rt's majority, has
ision of the court. BUT, THI
-1 1 J --A *1 A. -
;iwuicii auuuiu iiui ursi concius
uiguage, and that fight for tl
ily be reserved for disseminata
, the fact remains always read
xpression and the often persor
releasing ini
strong language them for not
Ui iL. J. t a. i i I
ici urciu uu so, uui trend Keeps
iblicly known. Let their identit
Jack D. L
mittee for Fi
n The Washington said, refer
aying the present organization
ority rating on the protect thei
et's hope that the government
: Amendment than freedom of <
not inflict punisholate
the public WHILE "|
ms to define it. decries the i
)1 split ii
Because the field of mass
communications is quickly and
continually changing, Scroggins
said, definite, clear-cut job lines
are becoming blurred. He cited as
examples Multimedia of Greenville
and Columbia Newspapers,
Inc., two South Carolina mpdin
ownerships which control between
them at least 30 daily and weekly
newspapers, eight television and
seven radio stations. Therefore,
they offer a variety of career opportunities
not only in news but
also in advertising, broadcasting,
and public relations.
ACCORDING TO Scroggins, "a
number nf uiIia
?- ...ovumi miv giauuaic
from a particular sequence are not
always able to find employment in
that specialized area. Thus when
they seek or take employment in
an allied area, they aren't always
as comfortable with their
professional skills as they might be
with a broader curriculum
background."
Although the sequences and
course requirements will remain
as before, Scroggins said the
college is "de-emphasizing the
sequence to give the student a
broader base in his journalistic
training." He said he hopes
"I
m enaa
ecent Supreme Court decision
the First Amendment as it inv<
nis case, the Court ruled tl
t officials are not prohibited fi
announced searches, with a wai
lies when looking for notes, do
aphs relating to criminal activ
involved The Stanford Daily
imivorfitKi noMfonoiw
uciropa|ici. ruuuc
i files of the newspaper in 1971 (
raphs and negatives which m.
lemons trators who had injur
it a demonstration at the uni
:ENT YEARS, many Ai
have closed their libraries to tt
pt to avoid such harrassment 1
viously, this action didn't work,
is can get in anyway.
yron R. White wrote, in the i
le case, that the court is not c<
lential sources will disappear i
ill suppress news because of
earches."
robably right on the second coi
tradition of American journalii
t many newspapers will cease
tl news even though the thrc
is over their heads.
C HONORABLE justice is wron
linn While nMuananaco uttll /iav
n.w*. V V aMJiV fta%#WO|fU|/VIO ff U1
ieir freedoms in the collect
m of news, confidential sources
y to take up the fight. These sou
is who could Jeopardize thema
formation to the media. Who ca
wanting the police, the state, ax
going, the police-state from i
ies.
andau. director of the Rpnnrt?
reedom of the Press was correct
ring to the decision, "Th<
i, its reporters and editors are he
Ir information from seizure
Sound like government interv<
expression and private Drooert
rHE UNITED STATES govi
trials of dissidents in the Swie
ntn twn r\
.jl w %/ vj
students will be encouraged to
explore other sequence areas with
free electives for additional
professional skills.
The academic requirements
accompanying the division,
adopted March 23, 1977 by the
college, remain virtually the same,
according to Scroggins, who said a
year or so was needed to study how
it would effect a student's
program. He added the changes
are to be implemented this fall.
STROnniMS BAin
?MHIA1/ jUUi llOlldlll
majors must, upon reaching 60
attemptted hours, maintain an
overall GPR of 2.0 to remain in
good standing with the college.
Those students who have less
than a 2.0 at completion of the
lower division or who fail to
maintain a similar average in the
upper division will be required by
the school to withdraw as a journalism
major until a GPR of 2.0 is
again attained, he said.
Dr. Henry Price has been ap
pointed director of the new upper
academic division while Dr. L.W.
Brown is to direct the lower. Ralph
Morgan has been appointed
chairman of the advertising-public
relations sequence and Patricia G.
McNeely is the new head of the
news-editorial program.
,ngered
has also here it is infringing up
)lves the and press to say what
lat law- the Stanford case and
t>m per- The Russians should
cumente Nazis, with police pi
ities rally in Chicago, but tl
an in- expression limited. Bj
' officers American history
trying to no* more sympathetic
ay have cause of journalism, b
ed nine uus f
versity's The media must fig]
of the freedom of <
sources. Several nev
nerican National Association <
? Pjjblic rehearing of the Stan
by these
beCaUSe IN A "FBIEND t
majority organizations state th
.j j nnrt nnnW nrooo nwtoi
jnvincea ?~ ?*" *"* |:*VM" V1?
and that entire spectrum of p
fears of unanimous in conden
striking at the very 1
ic lus ion. press.'
sm, it is The question that mi
printing the free press. By em
iat of a does not seem that \
American press that
rt The people of the
ftinueto ashamed that the high
lar^and such restrictions.
are not* The common refere
rces are recent years is, of c
elves by should have also com
n blame nened if Richard Nix
.J I# At- - ?
ran uus obtained warrants to
knowing office.
rs Com- The Supreme Court
when he not take it upon iti
b news court needs anoth
lpless to supporter like former
ention of P??P^e ^ ^
v? it ia ^ government of the
'of the three equal bra
ernment ^ ^
t Union, democracy?
v %
livisions
Scroggins
species
on the rights of its own citizens
t they like. This applies to both
the "seven dirty words" case,
blast us for hypocricy.
rotection. have been allowed to
ye press has had its freedom of
r the nature of the Constitution
the government is certainly
to the cause of Nazis than the
ut why don't they demonstrate
tit this trend toward restriction
expression and protection of
re organizations, led by The
>f Broadcasters, are seeking a
At A
iuiuiu uute.
>F THE COURT* brief, the
at "newspapers, broadcasters
lizations ? ranging across the
olitical opinion ? have been
ruling the court's decision as
foundations of freedom of the
list hp raiftArf nnu; i? hnw froa id
- ? ? WW aswr Aft W itj
mination of these two cases, it
he Supreme Court wants an
is substantially free.
! United States should feel
test court in the land condones
nee noint for nmas ?
r WU *ft WVVII1 ill
ourse, Watergate. The court
lidered what would have hapon's
Justice Department had
search The Washington Post
should leave the press alone
self to amend the Constitution,
er hard-line First Amendment
' Justice William H TVuinloa
. WM^MXOa
nited States put their trust in
t United States. Why can't one
inches of that government put
basic premises of American