Historical Newspapers of South Carolina

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

Bakk Same Veivnr-iXIV N,, S> Bakke case inc 11 r" " '" "11 '' " ' f? I IS? MHnPlHpv l Bpi-p^ w f imw | T ' * nUIVTPTriTf-^' ^ e ^^3^gg^?j"? > * * i?*?k HOHHi^BS&^Mt<+ * -* +*+ I pYr^ww^pSSfesgi^^BB^^^^1* ? V'i " *> v -v> ;? . ^j^jlwy *< %** *- -Ml BTB i *" **2LL^^r * ***?-" '* ^ IgS^ja'gMi.i^!^ ?j*g?*** *?*? <.. * * PgPP|^J^BMPP99KP!<^' * "* **> -N *-> yw^v^ : '* ^ ** iBBBswiwSi^ <** ** ^ | J x v J Stories on these tw Athletic c New post '01 By Bi Gamec Dr. James A. Morris, interim Monday he is "comfortable" wit! USC President James B. Holder Morris, who will be replaced a July 15, spoke before the Univers "We are pretty much on scl development of vice-president* i well as for the regional campu MORRIS SAID the vice presi( athletic activities excluding re< WUVI ICO "The vice president acts for t said, "essentially in a financial a Morris said the vice presiden siderations for regional campus 10 percent of the Columbia camp ACCORDING TO Morris, athl in South Carolina. He added he sports programs be approved i nmcmims Questioned about the recent t athletic hierarchy, Morris said4 with all involved parties." Football coach Jim Carlen i paperwork requested by the prei it is." Carlen added he foresee* taking duties away from me/' CARLEN ALSO expressed d nortinff President H?1 HArmon^a ? adopted last spring. "I am a littl said. "You have every right to j the facts." Carlen said the athletic depar plain its position to the commit Peter Becker, chairman of the at the request of Carlen and ai pending lawsuit against USC scholarship football player inju 1973. No details of the session < The advisory committee is ministrative, two athletic, two representatives. e case: icock ' ! tf) Cos?.>ob?vl ^ Jy:y !?1 rits official niemi sldf f h (if fii'd ' <>i I -thv-cuj f res/mnws i - -J :'<a< ? ?.' '.+># -** f r f n'":? h *" ' ' **xf? : ?>' ? <?:." *vtr- * ?:? ? :? i .?v<- * <> ^ 3 '-.- >> .? - . : V. >v?. V: a- * .* vyr^.-v WjHygjS .;?-?\ ');\ ' < ? a-. v<'-v-.- . .. < ?> ;?* % .Wt-.- v > :*.*:> t fe-- : *./?: ...?. >?-."? ? ? # -? 4ET toff nilHi: '?::-:.:^;^:/? ;;-;SSSBBI' "" * l*T? ?? ? MN? ** ., > <** : yi . V. . J > "" ,-""* i* I . i \ j>li?i?-> |?ti(i iu??- ?ir !? ;??. f ?f \\ ,??ir I l.nnptoii I lulrl ' ;nw>. v .vv wv . ; * >. >- < ?j. xX-. vs ./. .S. ?M :v?w.. ? >.:<: :?* >. :> ?- < ? < ; *:. -? W > ?:-* % .: ;* ? .*? :-v>-> , : j.- : > : > -J * *: :* * <? J.-n- r-x y x. > : w > : r. a- ? > :*. .<:>?: < *:>* -. <y. .> ..v ? : <x<xy* ' -.>: : - ?' o pages from July 13 Issue. if fairs i schedule,' Morris sa lian Duncan ock Staff Writer vice president for athletic affairs, s h the progress his office has made sii man asked him to set it up last spri is vice president by William F. Putn lity Athletic Advisory Committee, ledule," Morris said, speaking of il duties for the Columbia campus s system. lent is to provide for overall contro iruitment and the hiring and firing he president in a delegated sense," ma oudgetary overview capacity." t is also responsible for financial c es, where sports budgets are less t) us and revenue sources are limited. etic institutions must be self-sustain would like to see new regional cam] it the main campus, as are a cade: turmoil within the administrative i 'an understanding has been worked said "All I am doing is sending iident to someone else. I don't care \ \ no trouble. "The problem before \ he said. isappointment with a resolution a jtarid on the issue which the commit e disappointed with the committee/ four opinions, but I wish you would tment was given no opportunity to ttee. committee, called an executive sese )provaI of the committee to discus invnlvino Minhaol U/ataM ? #??? - V * ~*"D A**KVBIMVI V ? UtVl Of a IUII, red during the Florida State Gam< ire known. made up of six faculty, two student and one Board of Trust merits < kmmmm wmgtmm mm By Don Fobes 1 News editor < __ Reactions have been mixe >t: system to the recent Bakke memorandum from the unive r v discretion in response to the d 1' Allan Bakke, a white man, m >/ turned down for admission 8 California at Davis, although i lower entrance scores was adi Court recently ruled that Bakl against and must be admitted But. thfi hiffh rnnrt nnholH Hi sity to take race and ethnic i v; sideration in its admission poli University Counsel Phillip memorandum to university adn that they make "no comment Grier's office had time to evalw opinion and issue "appropriate The June 21,1978 memorandt "Deans and Admissions Officei Vice Presidents, Directors and Regional Campuses. Subject: B nf fhp I TnlUOfcltv nf Po1if/\?min ?? w* v/ ** ? v* va vmuvi Aua. "In view of the fact that Supreme Court is soon to anr in the Bakke case, a case important impact on admissi American colleges and univ should forewarn each of yo reactions to the Bakke opini< j advised. This office is an copies of the full opinion at th moment, and we will make i along with appropriate advic< announcement as possible. In the meantime, I woul< i conHtnrf ?i I ? uviivuii0 VUAIlpi^VC Ul procedures utilized in your s to assist us in providing rec< any needed changes, tailor your individual needs. W1 ticipate an exceptional inten in your reactions to the case, yS initial response will be to sa} comment until you have t opinion in full and give sideration." aid USC History professor Dr. P< nee think the Bakke decision wa: ng. carefully drafted; they tread a tl am affirmative action, and on the think Grier's letter is urging ca the explosive nature of the Bakke < as The USC-Lancaster Admissior Watkins, was noncommital. " lof ( ? \ of he j :onlan j ing Waiting piw ? iiic I Entrance ways are norma and filled with movement but I out Dana Latham of Columbia I doors to Wardlaw are a place the pause as she waits for I vho mother, a secretary with I vas education department. i upttee 'he get exiion a a ner i in ad- | vXo j I nffi fi 5 Vlary Jean Baxley structed n Gtamacock Staff Writer even talk even relei d in the university without g( decision and to a iniormain rsity counsel urging Another ecision. "I'm tick] 'as twice (1973, 1974) decision, I it the University of Beaufor a black student with reaction nitted. The Supreme memoram ie was discriminated 0ne hig to Davis. happy nor e right of the univer- he had ne )ackcround into con- much. He icies. and othen M. Grier in a half-cocke linistrators requested "*? assum " to the media until sense to ki ate the full text of the ?ne i advices." of the Bai lm was addressed to, Stiver sail "s, Columbia Campus C rne<* is Admissions Officers, ^ong-r akke vs. The Regents stigmatize it read m lull: ad~ the United States rights are lounce its decision "The Su which will have Bakke; it Ions procedures at admission ersities, I think I disadvanb u that off-the-cuff under spe< )n may well be ill- by whate> anging to obtain devised to ie earliest possible Universi it available to VOU mmnnrnru es as soon after its Bakke cas go over it t 1 appreciate your "We ha I any admissions memorant chools and offices not be nc jmmendations for because th ed specifically to for them, i lile you may an- my latest; sst from the press said. I believe your best Mark Et 1 you Will have no Pulitzer 1 itno f A rAo ^ * * * vv ivuu me a dout tne it detailed con- "i woulc that quoU discrimine iter Becker said, "I affirmativ s a good decision, decision." lin line, on one hand, Concern other hand, race. I think Grie ution because of the 'think befc lase." one should IS DirPrtnP Rnrhnra Vipfnrifl u -* 1* |?Z7m WUl ?A ? *VVVA AU We have been in- not be rea Hy , r?r he to ler .he ' '. il me ot to discuss Bakke with to the Lancaster news] ise statistics on enrollm itting clearance first. Y >n from Columbia." cautious reaction, an an led to death at the dec out due to my position < t vice president, IJarwin to make public, but dum had "nothing to do \ ;h administrative offici as low-key in his res pons ver seen a memo that said the memo was an s "who deal with the m d" and the letter appe* e that those in authority < low when to speak and w 2 instructor was outspoh tke case. Philosophy pr d, "Affirmative action i a euphemism for revei ange effect of affirmati1 ! members of minoritiei should be disadvantagec i others," Stiver continu inherent in individuals preme Court, therefore was wrong to uphold r to professional school. 1 aged is not by grantin :ial criteria, but rather t rer nondiscriminatory n i upgrade their qualifia ity Counsel Grier said, ium as a common sei e is unusual and we wan ind apply it to our situatii ve the complete brief, ium will go out with our icessary to send out i tese are lay people and i -uiyuue who warns to see memorandum is welcon hridge, journalism prof* 3rize winner, expresse Bakke decision and the 1 certainly agree with ti is are not constitution ite on the basis of race. I e action can be force< ing the memorandum, r's memorandum is ok* ire you speak.' But, if hi i speak, he can't do tha Fox, USC affirmative a( ched for comment. J Of) smo the media. I do not saner. I would nnt lent at our campus ou will have to get onymous one, was, ision in the Bakke lannot be quoted." B. Bashaw, had no i 11 auucu U1UI LlltJ vith" his reticence, al was neither as ie as others, saying "irritated" him so i insult because he ledia do not go off ired in his opinion do not have enough hen not to." :en in his criticism ofessor Dr. James is far as I'm con se discrimination. ve action will be to s as inferior." i by law in order to ed. "Furthermore, , not in groups, was right to admit ace as a criterion "he way to help the tg the admissions o encourage them [leans mat can be itions." "We sent out the use decision. The ted to have time to on. and Thursday a reaction. It would a complete copy, we can interpret it ! the entire case or le to do so," Grier sssor and two-time d mixed feelings memo. hp SimMtno ? ?? ww|H VlliV VUUl I ial, because they Jut I don't see how i; it is a muddy Ethridge said, "I ly, if he is saying J is saying that no t." :tion officer, could