The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, February 27, 1978, Page Page 18, Image 20
V iewpoint
SG ele<
By WAYNE BROOKS
Opinion Page Editor
Student government elections
are slated for Monday,
March 13, only two weeks
away. Yet, unless you have
had direct contact with
someone who was actively
involved in student government
or in a campaign for
office, you probably umildn't
know it. ~
Sign-up began last Monday
for interested candidates for
the four executive offices and
59 senate seats: it last
Friday. Not until the student
senate meeting Wednesday did
many senators even know signup
had begun.
Publicity for sign-up was not
the best it could be. A few
signs were scattered around
campus at strategic points,
and an ad was published in The
Gamecock Thursday (only one
day before sign-up ended.)
That's all and that's not sufficient.
Publicity should have
begun before sign-up, not just
before it has ended.
IF PUBLICITY is to be
handled by the Elections
Commission in such a
haphazard way, I cannot help
but wonder if this is any indication
of how the election will
be conducted. Let's hope not.
Remember last spring's
- - ; ^
VVT
1
/ 1
>< i
/ / Ou/Af Ut , I
X ( "-S H.u'l .hi #
It's OK,
"l > | mi n"i?|XWfci i
' ? ' ' ' 1
ts
ctions o
fiasco when SG elections were
held? Polls were left unattended,
untrained poll workers
allowed students to vote
without IDs, students voted
more than once, and candidates
and their supporters
violated election statutes left
and right without prosecution.
You name it; it happened. As a
result, the senate voted against
certifying the election results,
and the election was held in
litigation in the student courts
for more than a month.
1 UKKTA1INL.Y nope this
year's election will be
relatively free of the many
infractions, senate statute
violations, and displays of
unethical conduct by candidates
and their supporters
that plagued last spring's
olonfinn
VAVV VAVAA
But already, I have been
informed of several acts of illintent
during the Greek
primary that leave its results
in question in the minds of
many. Two sorority members,
who wished not to be identified
because they feared the consequences
of "ratting" on their
sorority sisters, have informed
me that poll workers during
the Greek primary, all of
whom were women, instructed
them to vote for Dottie
Hammond, who later won the
Greek endorsement.
rp i 11 R
J ^ i .
* ,
I 1 ^
t \ i ? i *
I '
I.) ' | ; : ( , ;
I r [/*? 6* f ^
& f
guards. Kew<
iff to ro<
The informants said poll
workers told them no identification
was necessary for
voting and to vote for "Dottie
Hammond. She's the
Panhellenic candidate." The
informants also said it was
very probable that poll
workers allowed people to vote
more than once.
BECAUSE MS. Hammond
avoided a run-off between
candidate Joe Drawdy by only
one vote, it is very probable
that the misconduct of poll
workers who told people how to
vote did in fact affect the
outcome of the primary. A
thorough investigation of this
matter should have been
conducted by the Inter
rTaiernuy council ana tne
Panhellenic Council.
Neither council, however,
took appropriate action. That
was their mistake because
they failed to assure the
electorate of a competentlyrun
election. For their
negligence, they have not only
left the election in question, but
their competency in question
as well.
But the greatest matter of
concern is the dominance of
special interest groups. We
are here to elect those who best
represent all students. Unfortunately,
there are students
t_ i . ? i *
Deiongmg to tne aommant
1
: V' U
on't bite.
- in ~ 1
rlr%# ctm
*0 Y
interest groups who vote only
for members of their
respective group. When people
consider interest group
membership as the only
criterion in selecting candidates,
they often overlook the
most important criterion of all
- who's the best person for the
job.
FOR AS long as I've been
here, Greeks have complained
of nntt.npoolr
?/? MMKA X41 Wf% OV?lltlllICIHd
among many non-Greeks. But
what can you expect when you
only endorse Greek candidates
for SG offices, and do not even
consider non-Greek candidates?
To most non-Greeks, the
message is quite clear: the
Greeks want no non-Greeks in
SG. So how much respectability
can such a slate of
candidates have among the
electorate, most of which is
nr?n.riroolr9 \T/vf
null VJa VV>I\ . liui VCiJf 111UCI1 ell
all.
The Association of AfroAmerican
Students (AAAS),
representing more than 10
percent of the student body, is
also a dominant interest group
Finance CI
responds tc
To the Editor:
4
I have been at Carolina for tu
have read Gamecock editorials
annoyed me. Never before have I
always felt that the truth wai
defended. But I must make exce
reply because of the editorial "1
which was printed on Feb. 20.
Ac nno Af fV?n
iiu uiiv/ ui me pji mv^ipic ci icirat
Brooks' fantasized conspiracy,
almost slanderous editorial.
Truth being, I did purposely h
hardly to placate Ms. Roughtoi
chairman of the finance commi
political battle that this would ai
GAME
John R.
Frti \t
Jane Shealy
r News Editor
Barbara N
Don Fobes " Graduate/*
Asst. News Editor
Barry C
\ Dan Palma Entertainmt
S Copy Desk Chief
Mark Mi
j Arlene Morgan Asst. Entertain,
i Photography Editor
Karen W
Production I
THE GAMECOCK welcomes tetters Irom its r
subiect and a maximum of 300 words. They ri
! Pseudonyms or other aliases will not be usee
iircumstances warrant. To assist us in verif
your mailing address and a telephone numbei
class standing and ma|or, also. We reserve thi
to meet our space limitations. Address: Cat
USC, Columbia, S. C. 29208.
??J, I 1 It '
t
and strong political faction
that can deliver a large bloc of
votes. To date, AAAS has
presented no endorsed slate of
candidates, although many
black students are running for
various offices and senate
seats.
ALLOW ME to give black
voters a bit of advice: don't
endorse an all-black slate. If
you do, your slate will alienate
many non-black voters who
would otherwise vote for some
black candidates. All slates
have the potential of alienating
voters, but a slate with candidates
who are all of the same
interest group can alienate
almost any voter who is not of
that group.
The same rule applies to any
other special interest groups.
There are definite disadvantages
in the control of a
government by one special
interest group. Furthermore,
there is no guarantee that it
will be to one's advantage if the
winner is of his interest group.
After all, if the winning candidate
is incompetent, no one
will benefit from his win.
h airman
) editorial
ro years. During this period, I
which have both amused and
felt the need to write a reply. I
5 apparent and need not be
ption to my past reluctance to
Balance forward not needed,"
ters (the only student) in Mr.
I feel obligated to refute his
old the bill in committee, but
i and-or Dean Alexander. As
ttee, I was well aware of the
*ouse. To help expedite what I
See SENATOR, page 19
cociT
West
>r
Wayne Brooks
tathews Opinion Page Editor
assistant
Matt Ward
ilenr) Sports Editor
fnt Editor
teller Chris Myers
ment Editor A??-Sports Editors '
Bill Fitipatrick '
??*en Ad Manager
Manager
eaders. Letters should be limited to a single
nust be signed with the writer's true name.
I, but the writer's name will be withheld if ;
ying the identity of writers, please include
r where you can be reached. Please include
i right to edit all letters, not for content, but |
r>pus Opinion, The Gamecock, Drawer A, -