The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, November 21, 1977, Page Page 4A, Image 6
USC stud
By MICKEY TK1MARCIU
Gamecock Staff Writer
It typified the 162-year-old
British collegiate tradition of
public discussion and debating.
Thursday night's British Union
debate, in which two recent
graduates of British universities
and two USC students debated the
issue "that this house would
abolish the United Nations,"
combined logical arguments and
audience participation in opposing
the motion by a vote of 169 to 109.
Favoring the motion were R.
Victoria Schofield, a 1977 graduate
i ? * I !nitrnrciftr
and Don Drennon, a three-year
member of USC's debating team.
Leading the opposition was Phillip
.Engleman, a 1977 graduate of
University College of London and
participant in four national
competitions, and Beth Ferrell,
also a member of the USC debating
team for three years. Each debator
is allowed to speak for about five
minutes followed by a live-minute
summary by each side at the
conclusion of the speeches.
"WE AKE not fundamental!}
opposed to the United Nation's
goals and purposes, we in fact
agree with them," Drennon said
"What we would like to suggest is
that the United Nations has soughl
to subvert the goals it sets down ir
its own charter. What we are op
posed to is a body that professes
those goals but fails to live up t(
them because of the influence ol
inlr>rnnlinn?l nnujor lirnUnrc " cqu
Drennon.
Engleman, on the other hand
c/
I
ents, Britii
quoted the UN charter as a viable
reason for not abolishing the
organization.
"We, the people of the United
Nations determine to practice
tolerance and live together in
peace with one another as good
neighbors and secondly to unite
ourselves to maintain international
peace and security and to insure by
the acceptance of principals and
the institutional methods that
armed force shall not be used, save
in the common interest, and to
employ international machinery
for the promotion and advancement
of economic and social
advancement of all peoples," he
said. "With those four lines, just
Ihnsp fniif lirinc hmi' ran anvnna
" "WV vu, ???" VWII MIIJVIIV
i possibly want to vote against an
organization that has these obI
jectives?"
I
BOTH DRENNON and Schofield
I stressed that, although they did not
oppose world peace, they believed
; the UN was not effectively ac
tuni|;iioiiiii^ uiu ^Udid didlCU III IU>
i charter.
"We want peace and we want
international cooperation,"
- Schofield said. "What we are
; against is the United Nations that
t has showed itself throughout its
existence to be ineffective ac
, lUIUIIlg IU mt: pillltipdlb fctil UUWI1
I in the United Nations charter."
Drennon said the UN takes an
> active role in stopping in)
ternational conflicts in South
f Africa, for example, by "mostly
1 slapping men like John Vorster
and Idi Am in on the wrist and
saving what nastv men thev are."
Last year this <
collected $10,000 in i
then and we need you
VROLINA C
You can help
r?Il l?v? n
UUlUIIIUiUllO. VUiUillOt)
TRANS
to roasl
\rnr rr
v vyjju.
HHHl
The British Union Debate, h
night at Capstone, considered a
abolish the U.S. Participating
"BUT AT least the UN provides
a forum upon which people can get
together and discuss the issues,
Engleman said. "Even if you
believe that the UN is the most
corrupt, the most political, the
most perverted organization in the
whole world, it still holds out and
doesn't close the door on the
possibility of peace. That is a good
reason for the UN to stay, even if
we accept all that criticism.
Following the speeches and prior
to the voting of the audience,
gar ft.'g & m Jr^a sr IT
i n^j B18 jr
O. Box 80061 University of South Carolina
annual student sponsc
joods and money. 500
r help now!
ARES DAY
make this Christmas <
t your time - a few hou
PORTATION PRi
/olunteers treate
t beef and tea at ]
MTUI7D T
L \ 1 JUjJLjII 1
777-2654
ebateon
mB * W ^
eld Thursday were, left to rig
resolution to Victoria Schofi
in the debate of England.
Pnolpman illllctrotoH thn HA^Arritu
inuovi aiVU UIC 1 ?V/VtOOIIjr
of opposing the House's motion
with a quote from a conversation
between former British Prime
Minister Winston Churchill and
playwrite George Bernard Shaw.
In a letter from Shaw to Churchill,
Shaw said, "Dear Churchill,
enclosed find two tickets for the
opening night of my new play. One
is for yourself, the other is for a
fripnrl if vnn haup imp "
? " J v
A KETUltN letter from Chur
Columbia, South Carolina 29208 777-26!
>red Christmas projec
o hirlnnfp trnliintnnrfi.
L? tuuifi i to VUJUXUUOXDl
DECEMBE
I ft M
a ongnt one for man
rs or all day OVIDED
iH
Hardees
Tin a v
1 JL
[
U.N. *
H' H \B >i.
Britton Andrew THE GAMECOCK
;ht, Don Drennon of 'JSC and K.
eld and Phillip Engleman, both chill
to Shaw says, "Dear Shaw,
I'm sorry I cannot attend the first
night. Would you send me two
tickets for your second night, if you
have one."
"Without tho United Nalinns
there may not be a second night,"
Engleman said.
The audience, which heckled they,
speakers and each other as is
encouraged by the rules of the
debate, eventually opposed the
House motion by voting not to
abolish the UN.
n !
>4
t
i
:ri
y
i
I