The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, June 16, 1977, Page Page 11, Image 11

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

? Some coed? ERA i By MARGUERITE Editor-in-Chief me university se academic inquir; typically been a foi dispassionate, ] discourse. Hairy iss argued from fac emotions. It seems, thoug] does not hold tr students at USC wl issue is the Equal Amendment. Durinc the snriri Gamecock asked 3 domly selected si whether they favc opposed ratification ERA. It was about i split for and again: alone may not be pected, but a break* numbers by sex show men more in fa ratification than woi One assumes pc for or against, were j after students re; amendment itself, arguments pro an weighed each argun its merit and then 1 respective conclusioi Dn? uui LUG I CttSUIlS students gave to their positions wer short of ridiculoi nothing short of ig Among the most b unreasoned reasons was the fear express female student who! amendment > "degrade women an I is ur H Drau Pitch ? I Drcxi Pitcl use Stu Friday n | 920S i surveyed 1 irgum RYAN them lc amendn discrim tting of persons y has would b :um for no men logical deportm ues are Or no :t, not said physical h, that the othe ue for women A.1 iien ine to men.. Rights fear'mei combat ig, The miniscu] 06 ran- occurrai tudents Other red or evidence of the s t u d e i an even remark* 3t. This help job i unex- discrim clown of trf?nrhpf 'ed USC ment vor of Others, men. students >sitions, reluctan reached provisio: ad the stitution heard The ? d con, against lent for been aii *eached on both; ns. emotion many Many j explain demon e little superl is and process! ;norant. position! latantly are for s given reason. ied by a The i said the aspect o >v o u 1 d was nc d make decision mri IV-/^71 I IC IAPP1 ght $ .25 ,<=>< _Cl Kf YFTE1 '9ht $ .5i ler $2.0 ident Memb tights from outh (Tlain S ear combat ents ill ;ss feminine." The lent simply states iination against on the basis of sex e unconstitutionaltion of attitudes or lent. te the female who women aren't ily equal to men, or :r student who said should not be equal irrofinnol to I* & MvlVIIUl AO ntioned of going into , despite the le chance of that nee. reasons did e some logic. Some its cynically id that it would not i parity--that sexual iination is so ini that the amendwould not help, including a few law > said they were it to make the EEA's n part of the conirguments for and ratification have *ed before, reasons sides hpintf cniiltv nf alism and illogic. sro-ERA students istrated their ficial thought is, explaining their 3 by saying they just it, for no special most disappointing >f the survey results >t necessarily the s students reached, AJUJJ w mano [ JtlULI i m ) $1.25 Kfm\ u mil 0 $1.50 B A vi yv A ersnip 91.UU 1 5:00 to 9<00 treet (next logil but their justi Not only is auppu&eu iu where perso reason critica of its patronslook for graduation, assumes, t Y concerned wit and paid accc ability to do t In other wor the institutio dividuals shou the amendnr concerned ratification, whatever tl students mak being for or ag should be mo thought out th by several US Female sti osnpciallv hp < more thoug plications of I to base opinio being made le on belief that i men's equals. Soon enoug start looking might find the iob ODDortuni! pay deserves i examination t it in college. Don't stifle yc got a com something on c the Gamecock Release your writing a Lette IGE I IV TE5 lini Bottle > and $1 [>.m. ni Bottle ?and $1, (Good till - Drang] : to DoU^ *L fications. a university be a place >ns learn to illy, but most -stnrfpnts?will jobs after And, one ley will be h being hired >rding to their \ job. ds,USC is just n where inild know about lent and be with its And surely, le decisions e, reasons for [ainst the ERA re thoroughly an those ffiven 5C students, idents should willing to give jht to imthe ERA than ns on fears of ss feminine or tvomen are not h, when they for jobs, they issue of equal ties and equal more thorough han they gave turself. If you've iplaint about anipus, or even , let us know, frustrations by r to the Editor. * A N A4" ri iv V I .50 .75 June 30) It $.20 rflar) f B Sm i HliliPoC I V And the l!v High Cotton, a tertained USC studi patio last Thursda forward to serenade and drinks provic Committee of the I I CAROLINA Free Pre Free Abe to Confic The fTlec fflaster < ( 2009 Hampto A GIJ 1 Available In S.C. only a EARTH SB 2020 Devlne St. (5 Poin Columbia, S.C. Hen's Easy Walking, Ii IHiilRI^^^'SSjSk .^iffiiS? HiEI ,<? - flSH lai | HI Art*n? Morgan in is easy country band from C ents at a picnic on the 1 y. These two singers j t students who took advi led by the Contempc Jniversity Union. WOmEN'S SEC gnancy Testing >rtion Referral tential fTledical Fa Jical Facilities ficcc Charge & BankRm< :all 256-0128 ft St., Columbia, S t amp 1 91 fclANKl rYou can buy an Ea only at an E 8h?? of th tOE ^7 Through sc. 79&-3803 Open: Mon. tmmmmmmmmmmmmmMmmmoammmmmmm l! t i l i t I H THE OAMKCOCK Columbia, enRussell House iut their best intage of food >rary Sounds I VICES cilities >pt ericard .C 29204 I , *oi?# SrtUMti. u? EP [ND ) natural-glove sand-suede artri hoe i rth Brand Shoe arth Shoe Store. Week . S40.00 132.00 June 25, 1977 -vS*t. lO :