The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, April 25, 1977, Page Page 14, Image 14

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

viewpoints Supreme By BETH HILL Editorial Page Editor The integrity of the 1977 SG elections was supposed to be seriously and substantially questioned last week by tne supreme court when it was petitioned by the student senate concerning irregularities in voting procedures. Well, "integrity" came up with some pretty slick responses and the run-off election results will stand. The supreme court said that "overwhelming" irregularities didn't occur in the election process. How many irregularities constitute an ' 1 GAMECX Mickey Trimarcht Marguerite Ryan Editor Graduate Assistant Mitch Sherwood Kurt Gardner ; Sports Editor Copy Desk Chief ! Sally Wilson Mark Alexander Asst Sports Editor Photography Editor Ronnie Hutchins Bob King Asst. Sports Editor Advertising Manager THE GAMECOCK welcomes letters from ittreaders. Lettei subject and a maximum of 300 words. Thev muii k? or otner aliases will not be uied, bufthi'w'n circumstances warrant. To assist us in verifying the iden a^ess and a telephone number where you c class standing and major, also. We reserve the right to edit } court de< "overwhelming" number? Charles Smith defeated Janet Pardo by 44 votes i or ine oil ice of Secretary. Perhaps the court wanted at least 44 alleged violations to be brought to it before the court would invalidate the election results. John Kapinos, chairman of the SG elections commission, said that as far U- 1 ne Knew, mere was no fraud involved that would change the outcome of the election. The possibility that even one student's vote might have been altered by voting irregularities should (theoretically) be sufficient to declare the election process invalid. 1 3CK~1 Trust Mark J.Lundgren News Editor To the Editor: Edith McNeil Asst News Editor | ? , i was appaue Beth Hin guardians of edi Editorial page Editor have botched am Frank McGuire. 1 EnteMainmeTEditor naming an "aren r* should be limited to a single ^ Coach McGU 1 with the writer's true ntme. monumental blur ler's name will be withheld if . , , tity of writers, please include SChOOl dCbaC16 a ?ne.but three s , The Gamecock, Drawer A, Om/orn J ^|AI1 W) CI I I propose the be 1 4 nsion nai Even Kapinos said one verified case of fraud should invalidate the election. Of course, logic reminds one that no candidate lost by only one vote and that another election would cost money (about $1200, said Kapinos). But we're not talking about one case of ?r? allono^ ?vuuiig irregularity, we're talking about several cases. Two students testified to the campus court on April 12 that they saw students look into voting booths while others were ,it. vwun? m me run-otfs. Another student said he didn't vote because he'd lost his ED card, yet his name was crossed off the election sign-up sheet as a voter. ?i ii /\ /->! ^ ^ _ J.1 - 9 gutless further. \ Pol isr?l lrr? d to hear that our peerless seats for ication here at the university John Ro< [>ther attempt to honor Coach athletic ? In their gutless compromise of stands coi a," but not the wholp uuuuiiig aiiu cUI UVt ire, they have made another to immor ider to rank alongside the law place wh nd their decision to have not decisions eparate athletic directors to USC. David B. >ard carry this absurdity even Journalisi iculous % Two student senators said they contacted someone who said he hadn't voted, and his name had also been crossed off the list as a voter. One student testified that a poll in the coliseum had been left u nattended for at least ten minutes. "I set an off-hand limit of five minutes for a poll worker's absence," Kapinos told The Gamecock. Why should a poll be unattended for any length of time? Kapinos explained that 20 per cent of the election's poll workers were unable to work because of the postponement of See DECISION, page 15 Dancers unnoticed To the Kditnr On March 25th the USC Dance Company opened its second season with major works in modern dance, jazz, and ballet performed at Drayton Hall. After seven months of hard-paced rehearsals the dancers and choreographers alike werp thanked for their efforts by a good box office showing and sparkling reviews in The State newspaper. It seems surprising, though, that The Gamecock failed to notice this event occurring right under its very nose. * m 5 ? movies ana rock concerts, as reviewed in your April 18 edition, have their share of publicity. But theatre productions by USC students and faculty go unnoticed for the most part. The Gamecock should be a reflection of campus activities and evpnts While movies and rock concerts are indeed a part of campus life, so are the theatre productions that compose the campus life of many USC students. Patricia J. Higgins USC Dance Company Member ' in decision Ne could name the mezzanine of the for Coach Jim Carlen and the box our resident basketball immortal, !he. In order that other than only jreats are honored, the concession aid be named for President Pattprmn sn more appropriate gesture would be talize our trustees' names over the ere this and most of their nonbelong: in the toilet. Asbill ii Senior