The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, April 21, 1977, Page Page 14, Image 14
sports
jet
By RONNIE HUTCHINS
Asst. Sports Editor
With another large budget increase
planned for the 1977-78 academic year,
USC's fast-growing women's athletic-*
program will become one of the most extensively
funded programs in the South,
USC Assistant Athletic Director and
business mnnnoor Inhn ?-J
...Mtmgva uUllll iUVAil C 5UIU.
The women's athletic program, which was
not financed during the 1974-75 year,
received $68,000 in 1975^76 and $102,000 this
year. The proposed women's budget for
1977-78 includes a fund increase of between $175,000
and $220,000.
"I CAN'T GIVE an exact amount right
now, but our women's budget will be
somewhere between $175,000 and $220,000,"
Moore said. "That's pretty good considering
the 1974 budget-nothing.
"J Gmron C/?IIAA1O - 41 ? Al 1
., ./v>v? ANUU13 in uie vxjuin 10 see
what they were spending on their women's
programs," Moore said. "And of all the
schools I talked to, we'll have a better
financial situation than any of them next
year." The schools Moore polled were North
Carolina, N.C. State, Tennessee, Florida,
Georgia, Furman and Appalachian State.
The spending increase will come from the
total athletic budget, which includes
rt^eipui irom me revenue sports and the
Gamecock Club, which helps provide
scholarships.
One change the increased spending will
provide for is full-time personnel in the
women's athletic department. This year, as
in the past, coaches and the assistant
director in the women's program have come
from the College of Health and Physical
Education faculty or graduate assistants.
"I'm very enthusiastic about
our women's program. It's
growing and the growth is
visible. We expect for our
women's teams to compete
against anybody."
--John Moore
J- *. ? , ' \
' v
\v.- "; y - .
>' . { . M |
i The arrangement has been for the college to
release the teacher from a fourth of her time
spent teaching to coach. The athletic
'
Uv|hi>uiii;ih uien paia a fourth of the
teacher's annual salary.
NEXT YEAR a full-time employe will
administer the women's program. Pam
Parsons recently was named head
basketball coach and Assistant Director of
Women's Athletics.
Molly Maguire, who is the women's
athletic trainer while working her master's
degree in physical education at USC, will
coach softball along with being trainer next
year. She succeeds Elaine Taylor, a
graduate assistant, as softball coach.
Alan Gentry will continue coaching the
women's swimming team and Kathy
Graham, a physical education teacher, will
coach volleyball. Graham coached
volleyball and tennis this year. Jeff Kefalos
will coach women's tennis next year, but a
gymnastics coach has not been named.
"The other two positions (gymnastics and
tennis) won't really be what you'd call parttime
jobs," Moore said. "The gymnastics
coach will be teaching at a gymnastics
school in her off-season and the tennis coach
At- - ...
win wuriv ai me new city tennis complex."
ATHLETIC DIRECTOR Jim Carlen said
the cross-over to the athletic department
was too demanding for teachers in physical
education. There was too much of a time
conflict.
"The women's coaches for all six sports
will be provided through the Athletic Dept."
Carlen said. "The only crossover (from the
physical education department) will be
Kathy Graham. And then, the semester
she'll be coaching volleyball, she won't have
any classes to interfere."
The numler of scholarships given to
women will also be increased. Next year, all
six wnmpn'c cnA?-?n ...111 u ? ? * *
~ o,w. 10 win uc guaranteed one
full scholarship and seven partial
scholarships. The full scholarship will include
tuition, fees, room and board while the
partial covers tuition and fees. Moore says
the number of full scholarships could increase
from 12 to 14 next year.
THIS YEAR, four partial scholarships
were given to each of the six sports.
At the 1977 national meeting of the
Association of Intercollegiate Athletics for
Women (AIAW), a proposal was approved
to limit women's scholarships to tuition and
fees only. The ruling becomes effective
August 1978, and Moore says USC plans to
provide room and board for the upcoming
year.
"I feel like that if we're going
to go with a women's
program, we've got to give
the teams a chance to
compete. I feel like that if
we're going .to have
something, we ought to
finance it."
I
?jim ^arien
"I'm very enthusiastic about our women's
program," Moore said. "It's growing, and
the growth is visible. We expect for our
women's teams to compete against
anybody. If a sport can't do that, I don't see
any sense in having it."
The increase of scholarships will draw
more women athletes to the school, but
recruiting in women's athletics is strictly
limited. The AIAW prohibits women's
programs from paying for prospective
athlete's visits to its campus and coach's
visits to recruit athletes.
"JUST ABOUT ALL we can do is send lots
of letters," Graham said. "I can send letters
to the girls and their coaches but we can't
finance any tripe to see them. But they are
allowed to make visits to the campus on
meir own."
Helen Timmermans, assistant director of
women's athletics, said the level of the USC
program was as high as most of the schools
the Chicks competed against this year. The
basketball team (8-18) and the gymnastics
team (6-8) have been the only women's
teams with losing records this year.
However, the gymnastics team won the
South Carolina AIAW title.
"I think our program is ahead of most
itting money
? USC's
men's
llafin
piugram
schools now," Timmermans said. "I
remember reading in The State newspaper
earlier in the fall about the ACC (Atlantic
Coast Conference) schools' women's
programs and how much money was spent
on them. According to those figures, the only
school spending more than us was North
Carolina State."
THE INITIATIVE for building the
women's program was taken by the athletic
deDartment hut not ?
, ^..v* ..wwoaiilj IU CUIIIpiy
with Title IX, Carlen said. Title IX's
guidelines for equal opportunity at a
federally-funded institution, including
collegiate women's athletics, must be implemented
by 1978.
"I wanted to build the program. Title IX
didn't have anything to do with it," Carlen
said.
"I feel like that if we're going to go with a
women's program, we've got to give the
teams a chance to compete. I feel like that if
we're going to have something, we ought to
fund it.
"Thf? SflH norf ? .?
- v ouuui me women's
program is that the students won't come out
to see the events," Carlen said. "Last year,
the women's softball team was the best
athletic team on this campus, but I'd go out
to see them play sometimes and nobody else
would be there."
CARLEN SAID the guidelines of Title IX
"are vague and left almost totally up to
interpretation."
William Wesson, vice president of instruction
for the university, agrees with
Carlen that the school's women's athletic
budget goes beyond the unclear
specifications of Title IX.
"I'm sure much of the spending could be
to COmnlv with TUlo iv ?? -
.rv - .v.v- w* mxttube inavs wnat
practically every school in the country is
trying to do now," Wesson said. "But I think I
the university is going beyond what they're
required to do in helping the women's
athletics.
"Personally, I like to see support for those
sports that have more of an amateur turn to
them-like most of the women's sports do.
We're still not to the point yet that an
amateur women basketball player will be
approached by 200 schools to sign a grant-inaid."