The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 07, 1976, Page Page 14, Image 15
The G<
OdI
I '
Student
vague d
To the Editor:
If this letter had a title, I would
professors I have had for subject:
thus far, but I have encountered
their explanations of assignmen
English Professors whom I will <
could write our final paper on any
wanted. After receiving an ur
Professor M, I received this res
been a formal paper." If only I
clarified the necessity of keepii
plaining the assignment. It was
have termed a murky professor, i
courses. This history professor wl
often gave essay questions on h
points for answering the essaj
received more than twenty-sevei
questioned Professor N about wh,
always got the same respons<
question more directly." Howev
French Revolution and discuss \
selves. I do not mind answering
exams if they are addressed to i
swer a question directly when
questions that Professor N aske
French Revolution were quite bri
galore about the French Revoluti<
figure out what did Professor N >
exams. I must have written fou
questions in my attempt to answ
complain about students' inabili
Although there are students whi
who are good writers, readers, a
students.
J ust as there are students with
are some professors with commu
not have to make subject matte
all, are not professors also teac
higher level than high school teac
"murky" when explaining assign
wishes to do a good job, he must
with his or her students. Sure stu
not understand something, but \
university being so large, how ca
for a professor to explain somethi
students improve their learning
Professors improve their com
professors help each other more
proved over all.
fGAMI
Geoi
Mickey Trimarchi
N?w? Editor ^
Ad
Cafhrme Thrift
Asst News Editor
Aly
Gene Gailiard Copy
Photo Editor
Mar?
Karen Whitj?V?r /~r .m.
Editorial Page Editor
THE GAMECOCK welcome* letter* Ironr
subiect and a maximum of 100 word*. T
Pseudonym* or other aliatet will not tx
circumstances warrant To assist u* in ve
mailing address and a telephone numbei
standing and maior," also We reserve the
our space i mitations Address Camp
Columbia. S C 29708
ValMnaawaBnna^NMHHMMBMnHn
I't. . . ' ' ? ' ! ' i t- 1 t ? ' < I . . i ' . i f
amecock
N.
n
W 11
laments
iscourse*
I call it Murky Professors. Most of the
s at this university have been all right
some whom I thought to be unclear in
ts. For instance, one of my previous
:all here Professor M, told us that we
issue we preferred and in the style we
isatisfactory grade and questioning
ponse, "But it was supposed to have
his particular Professor would have
ig the final paper formal when exnot
done. Another example of what I
came from one of mv nrpvionc hictrk
lorn I will refer to here as Professor N,
is exams. The student got thirty-five
f question correctly. Since I never
i points out of a possible 35, I always
at did I fail to include in my answer. I
j, "You should have addressed the
er, to me questions like, discuss the
World War II are not so direct themessay
or any other type questions on
ne directly. How can any student anit
was not asked directly. I think
<1 on his exams such as discuss the
oad. We all know that there are books
3n and World War II. I still have yet to
vant to know about such issues on the
r or five pages on such broad essay
er them. And todav some nrnfpsenrc
* r- w
ty to write well.
3 do not write well, there are also some
nd listeners. I am speaking for those
i learning problems, I think that there
nication problems. Professors should
;r so complex, but just teach it. After
hers, except they are teaching on a
hers? All of them should be clear, not
ments. In my opinion if any professor
first know how to communicate well
dents can ask questions when they do
vith the size of most classes at this
n all students find the time they need
ing that is not understood. I honp that
[ skills, but I also hope that some
munication skills. If students and
;, then I think education will be imJOSE
DUVALL
sophomore
iv
rge Morns
Editor
Billy Baker
ob King Sport* Editor
Manager
ce Ko/ma Mitch Sherwood
Desk Chief Sally Wilson
Asst Sports Editors
luerite R van
late Assistant Chuck Cromer
Entertainment Editor
i its readers. Letters should be limited to a single
hey must be signed with the writer's true name
> used, but the writer s name will be withheld il
rilying the identity o< writers, please include your
where you can be reached Please include class
right to edit all letters, not for content but to meet
?us Opinion. The Gamecock, Drawer A, USC.
' i . i. i . J
' ' ' . ' ' ' ' ' A. i
Press fail<
By STEPHEN J. VALK
Guest Columnist
As campaign '76 stumbles its way along to Nov. 2,
national surveys indicate there will be more voters
than ever before staying home on election day. While
part of the blame for this trend clearly falls on the
lackluster performance of the candidates up to this
point, indeed a good portion of the blame rests with
the media who have submerged the issues and
focused instead on the insignificant trivialities of the
campaign.
Last Monday's press conference with Chip Carter
(Jimmy's second son) seemed most symptomatic of
the press' preoccupation with the sensational rather
than the informative.
After the young Carter went around the room
shaking hands, he opened up for questions. There was
a conspicuous silence for several moments, and I
finally blurted out the question that was uppermost in
my mind at the time. Referring to the 60-Minutes
broadcast from the night before, I asked Chip how his
father, the man who has attacked the "unholy
alliances" between special interest groups and
politicians, could seek out the financial support of the
Maritime kingmaker.
After saying that no one could ever own his father
and pointing out that his dad had talked to Walter
Cronkite last Friday, (Dan Rather said Carter had
refused to be interviewed for 60-Minutes, a charge
which Chip Carter labeled assinine), the subject
quickly shifted over to brother Jeff's derrogatory
remarks about evangelist Billy Graham.
For some warped reason which I have yet to
Chinese
Ross' abortion (<
To the Kriitnr?
In reply to the article written on the anti-abortion
column, by Lowell William Ross, Jr., I found, at best,
a crude attempt of the blind leading the blind. The
assumption I arrived from Ross's article was that of
Ross trying to justify the act of abortion on the
grounds of the poor presentation of Morris's article.
Is Ross in assault of Morris's poorly written article or
is he trying to say that his opinion is the only correct
side to abortion? Not once through Ross's article was
there any means stated that there could be two equal
sides to abortion.
Ross also needed to state what he claimed fact, as
an educated opinion on the subject. Mavbo lifo startc
at conception and maybe it starts at five months after
conception as the State paper's article claimed, but
this iy not a reference to call fact. The last time the
State told me to leave my umbrella in my room, 1
caught bronchitus in the cold rain, Damnit!
edduty
determine, my colleagues decided there was greater
news value in the fact that Chip "never had anything
bad to say about Billy Braham." However, once the
snowball of irrelevancy started rolling, there was no
stopping it. They asked him if he had ever smoked
marijuana, to which Carter replied that he did not
discuss his personal life in public. ^
One step leads to another, and from there the topic
inevitably drifted into the infamous Playboy interview.
For months we have heard from various
members of the Fourth Estate that the candidates
are not focusing on the issues. Yet, when they finally
get the opportunity to quiz one of the political participants,
all they are able to focus on are the yellow
journalistic staples of sex and scandal.
The press failed miserably that afternoon. Here we
are in the midst of determing who is going to be our
next president, and the most significant thing they
can find is that Chip Carter has never read a copy of
Playboy.
Near the end of the press conference WNOK-TV, in
their typical stumblebum fashion, arrived and
needed to get something on film for the six o'clock
news. Anchorman Jack Cook was there, and after
apologizing for being late, he asked a question. He
could have asked anything in the world, but like the
parrot who is trained to say "Polly wanna cracker,"
he uttered the word "Playboy."
Yes, it is true that many Americans will avoid the
polls this year, but if they do, the press is partly to
blame for not providing them with enough information
to make an intelligent decision. fc
>!l ll
I
handcuffs
3tter rebuked i
- ? * (
I
Near the end of Ross's article he makes an outstanding
comparison between the human and the dog.
I can only conclude that this is the best work of an
intellectual genius ... This is complete stupidity!
I have seen a human fetus that has been extracted
by abortion. I am not an expert, just another
uneducated pharmacy major, but I felt as if I were
going to cry. Personally, what I saw was a beautiful
work of God destroyed. It definitely looked as if it had
been human life developing and not just a & l
conglomerate of brainless cells.
Please send (Doctor) Ross back his letter for a f]
much needed revision. I do not condemn his opinion, \
just his lack of humanity and practically in his
descriptions and conclusions. ;]
V
WILLIAM J. LPPKKSON
pharmacy freshman
?' I
f V v.) . >?
.L.i.tofilV:;-. X*. i ? ; ' ?' -