The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, September 22, 1975, Page Page 11, Image 11
I.L
YUR
WARI
So don't blame us i
get in the '75 yearl
give postierity prool
during the 75-76 s<
old Golden Spur or
- the Russell House I
doesn't cost anythi
few minutes, and i
Remember--you'N
GARNET & BLACK YEARBOOK
We Have Ti
For
2000
DENM BELL B(
JACKET WAVY DELL BOTTOM
Stripes - Corduroy - j
-M HIP HU(
ELANDUUER B1
PRE-W
BELL B(
{* Army Fa~tigue Trouse
* Army Khaki Trouser
* Shirts-W allace Berry
ARMY-NAVY SU
THE YELLOW FR
833 As3amac SIT.
L AST
MEMO
F your picture doesn't
:ook. If you want to
that you were here
hool year, go to the
the second floor in
MMEDIATELY. It
ng, it only takes a
t doesn't hurt a bit.
fe been warned.
Box 85132 usC
iem In Stock
You
PAIR.
)TTOM son
S IN DENIMS - Whites
Wl Color - All Sizes
A;ERS4
'AN SHEDB
Ste -nt Stock
PAIR -44
SALEEBY From Page One
(law school) admissions office personal placed a "W-C" notation on the
Presidential Appointees' folders. "W-C" stands for "Wild Card," a
term sometimes used in the law school to refer to "Presidential. Ap
pointees." In addition, after the grades in the SPAT program had been
completed and turned in, the Director of Admissions placed "dots" on
the grade sheets beside the "Presidential Appointees' " names," the
statement read.
"The Director of Admissions stated that he did so on his own volition,
because he was frequently called by various VIP's, who inquired how
the "Presidential Appointees" were doing," according to the statement.
"A QUICK answer to the inquiries of the VIP's was expected, and the
dots helped him give such information quickly. The Academic Standing
Committee's investigation concluded that none of these practices had
resulted in SPAT faculty members knowing whose papers they were
grading," the statement read.
"This is the crucial part of the issue," Saleeby said. "They won't
name the professor responsible. In the interest of justice I don't think
that professor should be protected."
According to Saleeby, former Law School Admissions Office employe
Ellen T. Benton carried out the coding of the files upon the unnamed
professor's request.
BENTON REFUSED comment, but did say that several members of
that office did code files with "a P for passing, a W for withdrawal and
an F for failure." As for the W-C coding, she denied Saleeby's charges.
Benton retired this year.
Saleeby contends that the coding of the files dates back to 1973, the
SPAT's initial year.
The use of "dots on SPAT folders do not correlate with the filing
procedures. "This just convinces me that there is more weight to our
case," Saleeby said. He said the dots were placed on these folders to
allow quick access to the presidential appointee files.
Saleeby also said that these select folders were placed in a special
filing cabinet apart from the other law students. "If these dots were put
on the folders for someone to check them quickly, then why were they
put in a special file?"
IN THE Steering Committee's statement, the anonymous grading
system was explained. There were two types used. These included the
following: (a) systems whereby the identity of students is not available
to the professor until he has turned their grades into the registrar; (b) a
system whereby the professor has access to the identity of students
during the grading process, but does not make use of such access until
after he has compiled the grading process.
"Under the first system," the statement reads, "registration per
sonnel, rather than the professor, match the students' grades with their
names. "Under the second system, the professor or his designate
(again possibly, registration personnel) match grades with names after
the grading process is complete. Both systems are ethically acceptable
in law schools across the country, as is complete lack of anonymity in
the grading process. In the regular academic program at the USC Law
Center, no rule exists requiring professors to use any form of i
anonymous grading system," the statement read.
"However, it should be pointed out that no "pure" anonymous
grading system exists at all in the law center, since a professor who
wishes to do so may obtain access to a students name during the grading
process, regardless of which system is being used by the professor. This
is because personnel in the admissions office have not been directed to
refused such information to a professor regardless of the type of system
being used."
THE STATEMENT goes on to say that "with regard to the allegations
concerning the grading system actually used in the SPAT program, the
allegations of loss of anonymity take the following form: Two SPAT
program students stated that they saw the SPAT professor who taught
Domestic Relations in the admissions office of the law school shortly
after the Domestic Relations examination was completed. The
professor was alleged to be holding examination cover sheets, which
contained the names and social security numbers of the students.
"He was further alleged to have had student record files with him.
The professor states that his system of anonymous grading consisted of
having the student fill out an examination cover sheet with their names
and social security numbers, and then to fill out their examination
answer booklets with only their social security numbers.
"He states that he then kept the cover sheets from the answer
booklets during the grading process. Only upon completion of the
grading process did he put the cover sheets together with the answer
booklets in order to record the grades," the Steering Committee's
statement read.
John E. Montgomery taught the Domestic Relations course and
alledgedly was in the admissions office holding examination cover
sheets.
"I don't like the idea of any child being coded in any way," Saleeby
said. "Until we find out the name of the professor who was held
responsible for the coding process, this issue will be far from over."
R hodes applications accepted
From news releases
Applications are now being accepted for a two-year Rhodes
Fellowship for women.
The fellowship, established by the Rhodes Trustees of St. Hilda's
College, is open to women in the United States and Canada of post
doctoral status below the age of 35. Consideration will also be given to
those candidates nearing completition of their doctorate requirements.
Recipients will be required to undertake research in a subject that
can be studied at Oxford and may also be required to do a limited
amount of teaching in the College or University.
The Fellow' will receive board and lodging in the College, membership
in the Senior Common Room and a stipend of 1,900 pounds. She will also
be reimbursed for travel expnses to .a fro he.. home