The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, September 22, 1975, Page Page 10, Image 10
Tickets Fo everyone.
LETT]
Hill
TO THE EDITOR:
Perhaps someone doesn't like
SGA Vice-President Trey Lott.
One gets that opinion reading the
Sept. 11 Gamecock.
Steve Hill said that "he's being
paid to do a job, but he's not doing
it." Jerry Bishop added, " . . . he
hasn't been doing his job." Ac
cording to your paper Hill also said
there are grounds for Lott's im
peachment. Are we to believe the
statements of the president and a
SGA senator?
No. I suggest that perhaps Steve
Hill and Jerry Bishop have
neglected one of their duties
informing themselves of the
contents of the student government
constitution.
Hill talked about letters to
senators that Lott was responsible
for this summer. Personal letters
about his vacation orjob?
Probably, according to the SGA
constitution, the clerk of the
Student Senate shall "send,
receive, and distribute all official
correspondence of the Student
Senate."
Hill also said Lott was respon
sible for codification of Senate
statutes. The constitution says
that the secretary shall "maintain
the official student Government
Archives."
Hill hasn't read the constitution
or has a bad memory.
Hill wanted to talk about im
peachment. Let's do talk about it.
Mr. Steve Hill's impeachment for
gross ignorance.
JOHN H. MITCHELL
Panty Raids
TO THE EDITOR:
The college days of old are most
definitely dead at South Carolina.
In a fit of early semester
hellraising, 300 men from Bates
ran over to Capstone and
Columbia Hall for an old fashioned
panty raid. Something rather
harmless, slightly rowdy, and a
means of getting your ya-ya's out
on a Monday night.
There were chants, cheers, a few
panties, and a lot of toilet paper.
T
ERS...
That's expected. Then camd
water, ice, and some very heavy
douche bags. So you figure some
liberated, modern girl of today
hasn't got a sense of humor. That
can be accepted.
But then came cans. And bottles.
And dishes.
And that's the stupidest damn
thing I have ever heard.
What's wrong with you?
Did a few dirty words, - which
I'm sure you've heard - and a few
bare butts - I'm fairly sure you own
at least one of those - revolt you to
the point that you would want to
physically jurt some one ? There's
a place for people like you and I
don't mean women's wrestling.
I am certain that the chick who
threw a saucer from the 12th floor
will be immensly pleased to
learned to learn that you scored
baby. Hit some guy square in the
forehead.
Dorm girls continually complain
that it isn't safe to walk around
their residence halls at night.
You're damn right
MARK DRAKE
Brunton
TO TH E EDITOR:
On Sept. 10 Vice-President of
Operations Harold Brunton came
before the Student Senate to talk
about the. proposed changes in
Green St.
Among other questions raised
was: what source of student input
had been used. Brunton said
repeatedly that his student input
came from Leigh Leventis or
committees appointed by Leventis.
Brunton seemed highly pleased at
the amount of information he had
received.
In Monday Sept. 15 Gamecock
there was a story entitled "Green
Street median: a barrier to
students." The article goes on to
lambast the present proposal and
urge SGA and the students "to get
back to the original issue, that of
closing Green." It would be in
teresting to have Brunton or
Leventis explain this seeming
contradiction, since Leventis wrote
the article.
MARK PITTS
Ed. note-The writer is a student
,enator.
Tickets
TO THE EDITOR:
Could you compare the function
of the USC football games to the
infirmary? Some people can. As
amany students do, I loaned my
ticket and ID to a friend for the
Tech-Carolina game feeling sure
that the stadium population would
not miss my spirit. However, my
friend was refused entrance with
many apologies and a statement
that "The tickets to the game is a
priviledge, just like the infirmary.
You could not go to the infirmary in
their place, therefore..."W When
the infirmary begins having ticket
distribution tables I may begin to
understand. When my friend
returned with others who were
turned away we discussed the
priviledge and decided that the
University was only hurting itself.
I do not care to go into a literary
comment on each facet so I shall
leave the interpretation' to the
readers:
No one would be denied a
seat, except my ghost since it was
my fee receipt that had received
the brutal punch, thus wasting
tickets and space and - if I may
become technical - our energy
resources
Also many groups are
represented. at the games -
sororities, fraternities, the team,
photographers and sports writers,
the band, cheerleaders -- etc. etc.
and this may procuade others to
participate or have their rich
fathers to donate some recious
athletic money
Never have I seen the stadium
full after attending all games last
year so, of coujrse, program and
refreshment sells could not have
reached the maximum p ssible -
also parking fees
Those who work or never
attend games virtually waste the
athletic fee if they are not
represented in some way
There are others and branches
off each of these. I hope I do not
hear anyone say "Well, visitors
can always buy tickets" - after
USC illegally gave South Carolina
legislators free passes to the home
games. Feedback, please.
Ann nos.
Faculty Senate
recommendations
By LEIGH LEVENTIS
This past March, Dr. Hugh S. Norton of the School of
Business Administration, submitted one of the most
meaningful pieces of legislation to the Faculty Senate,
that body has received in some time.
The proposal was in three parts: method of reducing
the size of the senate, eliminating routine oral officer
reports and finally the selection of a more suitable
meeting time. Within the next couple of months the
senate adopted the proposal.
The Faculty Senate could be a very positive deter
mining force of university policy, and deservedly so.
Prior to this proposal, however, the senate consisted of
162 senators, a body so enormous that a quorum call was
the traditional means of ending the meeting. Very
seldom did the monthly meetings of the senate have a
quorum for more than one and one-half hours.
Another problem were the officers' reports which'
usually consumed one-third of the senate's sessions.
Now, however, the problem has been solved, or has it?
Part one of Norton's proposal, dealing with reduction of
membership is being implemented by each individual
college.
Part two and three have not been implemented as yet.
At the September meeting last week officers, other than
the president and the provost who need and should be
heard, were given the opportunity to be heard from, but
none of th m chose to report.
As to changing the meeting time from 4:30 p.m. to a
more suitable time, this matter is in the hands of the
Faculty Steering Committee. As yet, no recom
mendation has come from that group. The present 4:30
p.m. meeting time is a very poor time, as faculty
members are tired and ready to go home. University
business would have more significance if it were being
discussed at the beginning or in the middle of the day
rather than at the end of it.
Thus, the senate is making the right effort towards
becoming the viable, influential body it should be.
However, before this can happen the steering com
mittee must act. Any delay by this group merely delays
the senate's effectiveness.
The senate is to be commended on its effort to improve
itself.
But, at the same time, the steering committee must
not delay the senate's desire to help itself, or the senate
will continue to be another bland University institution.
SGA proposal favors
making dorms coed
By BILL OUTLAW
Student Government Association (SGA) President Steve
Hill said Friday he favors a proposal that would make all the
dorms on the Carolina campus coeducational.
Hill said he hads prepared a proposal to be submitted to the
Residence Swap Committee that would have students housed
according to their major interest rather than by sex.
As examples of this pldn, Hill said that the Roost would house
both men and women athletes and McBryde Quadrangle could
be expanded to house both fraternities and sororities. Bates
House would be set aside for those interested in doing drugs. It
would be renamed Freak House.
Other classifications, according to to Hill, could include a
dorm for rednecks, bigots and radicals Classifications of dorms
could also be listed according to a person's major, Hill said.
sent sHl no ladonger be a consideration in the housing of
Hill said he decided to present this proposal to the Swap
Committee after conferring with the governments of each of the
dormitories. He said everyone he spoke with favored going
One problem area Hill was asked aboutwawhtoudb
done with the students who did not watt asoe.H whatioud tha
Columbia Hall would be set aside foratlt grl otd Heasig that
coed. He said he didn't think there wouldg be anot wantin around
who were against going coed.an gusrod
Hnil sid he hope this proposal would be accepted because he
andw hsaff "t. a ltotime and re search into this thing. We