The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, August 28, 1975, Section B, Page Page 3B, Image 35
PARK]
BY R. VANCE BUTTS
of The Gamecock staff
Beauty, it is said, lies in the eyes
of the beholder. To Carolina
commuters, beauty is that small
empty space between two white
lines, and it belongs not to the first,
but to the quickest pair of eyes that
spot it, it's conquest dependent
solely upon the reaction time and
the vehicle maneuverability of
the eyes' owner. It's a battle every
morning, and the average student
wonders just when the University
is going to tackel a problem that
seems to worsen each year.
It wasn't always so. Until a few
years ago, the parking problem
wasn't a problem at all-but now
with the present campus expansion
underway, the parking situation is
indeed deteriorating. Construction
of the new biology and history
complexes as well as the Russell
House expansion has eliminated
many heart-of-campus parking
spaces.
The University Administration
has not stood idly by during this
Fine clot
lev
* crafts, bool
and
GREEN
provid
caroli.
with t
faciliti
servic
progri
.NG SP
ft's Not Goi
crisis. It is presently pursuing a
goal that will alleviate the parking
crunch, by providing parking
space on the campus fringe. Ad
ditionally, the construction of the
new Pendleton Street Garage is
underway, with completion slated
for the fall. There were also, until
recently, three committees ap
pointed by President Patterson to
study the parking situation and to
make recommendations. The
findings of the Faculty Advisory
Committee and the Special Ad Hoc
Advisory Committee (chaired by
Professor Milledge B. Seigler)
were consolidated into the New
Presidential Advisory Committee
on Parking (NPACP), chaired by
Barry Rosen, assistant to
President Patterson.
In a letter to President Patterson
'in April of this year, the NPACP
recommended a shift to faculty
staff parking based on seniority, a
shift to faculty-staff pay parking,
relocation of student parking to the
south and west portions of campus,
a fee status for the Columbia Hall
hing,
ielry
CS, gifts
more...
ST. AT FIVE POINTS
ing the
ia comrr
;he finesi
85s,
es &
ams
iCE
ng To Get.
Capstone lots (student), a fee basis
for the McMaster and BA lots
(faculty-staff) and the metering of
the 1600 College St. lot for students.
East campus visitor parking
would be moved to the Pendleton
Street Garage, while west campus
visitors would park in the Coliseum
lots. Also, the NPACP stressed the
need for a master advisory com
mittee on parking, to be a per
manent, authoritative sub
committee under the Facilities and
Grounds Advisory Committee
(FGAC).
In a recent interview, Barry
Rosen reflected on the present
parking situation and on the
NPACP proposals. "The NPACP
was appoined specifically to look
at possible long-range solutions. It
had nothing to do with the im
mediate future. What we were
looking at is how we can solve what
seems to be a very severe parking
shortage. We can't eliminate cars
-they're a modern fact of life," he
said.
"Certain parts of the NPACP
lunity
a in
Any Easiei
proposals were accepted, others
were not, but the general idea (of
peripheral parking) was ac
cepted," Rosen said. "The present
problem is simply one of musical
chairs. We're going to lose some
places for next fall, and we wanted
"We can't eliminate c
they're a i
to see how best to utilize what
space we have on campus."
Rosen added that parking space
would dwindle mostly in the east
campus area, especially at the
sight of the new Gambrell building,
under construction near the
present Humanities complex. "We
had a shortage of approximately
500 spaces for this fall, before we
came up with spaces at Booker T.
Washington and a greater
utilization of one or two other lots.
I think we'll break even," Rosen
said.
With the fall situation under
control, attention turns towards
the more serious long-range
problems. Richard A. Rempel,
professor of history and recently
resigned chairman of the FGAC
was also a member of the NPACP.
Before resigning from a successful
career at USC to take a position at
a Canadian University, Rempel
talked about the NPACP proposals
and goals. He said that first of all
he would like to see the inclusion of
a permanent parking sub
committee in the FGAC (now
chaired by Professor Wade Bat
son).
Rempel said that "What I
wanted to do (as head of the FGAC
is to make this (NPACP) com
mittee the single parking com
mittee that would decide present
and future parking policies and
plans.
"I tried to keep it consistent. My
russell hc
To Find
whole point as Chairman of
Facilities and Grounds was to
make some orderly, rational
organization of committees
dealing with facilities and grounds.
Parking is part of that, and, rather
than creating one ad hoc com
ars -
nodern fact of life."
- Barry Rosen
mittee after another, this NPACP
ought to be an adjunct standing
subcommittee of the FGAC."
Perhaps the most controversial
recommendation of the NPACP
was a proposed switch to faculty
staff pay parking--one of the few
fringe benefits now enjoyed by
USC faculty and staff. Rempel
said the committee supported the
fee system because free parking is
a luxury that most state univer
sities no longer provide.
"The members of this committee
were prepared to bite the bullet,"
Rempel said. "One reason the
faculty has so zealously guarded
free parking is that traditionally
the faculty here has had relatively
fewer fringe benefits than those at
most state universities. That's a
legitimate point.
"There's another point,"
Rempel said. "If you look at
universities throughout the
couintry, it is every year more
attractive to be at USC. The
faculty improves, the long-run
propspects of the state are healthy
economically and
demographically. On the whole,
the prospects of this university are
extremely good in the immediate
and long-run long-term."
At present, there would be no
benefits to replace the loss of free
parking, but the monies generated
would not be wasted. Rempel and
others envision the construction of
Please Turn to Page 8B
U C