The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, August 28, 1975, Page Page 15A, Image 15
New(
BY DUNCAN MANSFIELD
of The Gamecock staff
A vastly revised grading system,
abandoning the No Credit (NC)
grade, will be used at USC this fall.
The new grade system will retain
the following symbols from the
present system: A, B and C (in
their traditional meaning), in
complete (I), satisfactory(S) and
unsatisfactory (U) in courses
taken on a pass-fail basis; and
(AUD) audit.
The grades for passing below
average (D) and failure (F) will be
reinstated to replace the NC. The
University will not change the
transcript of a past or present
student who has received an NC in
a course.
Also, the procedure for with
drawing from a class has changed
somewhat. Similar to !ast year's
system, withdrawal from a class
before the free drop date will not be
recorded on a student's transcript.
Withdrawal after the free drop
date (WF) will be treated at an F,
affecting the student's Grade
Point Ratio (GPR). A grade of WF
can be changed to W if a student
withdraws completely from the
University, or has had health
problems.
In an intereseting change in this
area, the new Faculty Manual
explicitly states the duty of a
professor to provide some
mechanism of evaluation for the
student before the drop date. John
Herr, chairman of the Faculty
Senate which composed both the
new manual and grading system,
AsiE
"USC.
I
5
S
P
E
A At
L
S "We
101u c
wrading
said this specific revision in the
Manual was "actually just a
wording change, which will
provide greater individual at
tention (in the classroom)."
The new grading system also
allows for a no record symbol (NR)
to be assigned by the registrar's
office when a professor is late
turning in grades. The NR is
replaced with one of the above
grades when it is received by the
registrar.
Under the new system grade
points will be: A, four points; B,
three points; C. two points; D, one
point; and F, no points. A 2.0 GPR
is still required for graduation.
Under last year's system a
graduating student had to submit
his total GPR hours to his
academic dean for graduation
approval, but starting this fall a
student may choose his "best 120
hours for graduation application
purPo"su-N."
In effect, this gives the student
two GPR totals: one for the
University, the other for his major
school. The new ruling is designed
for "the person who had a poor
academic start, but was able to
come back and have a good
finish," explained Herr.
A change in the requirements for
being an honor graduate will also
become effective this fall. GPR
standards for graduating with
honors will now be: 3.90-4.00 for
Summa cum Laude, 3.65-3.89 for
Magna cum Laude, and 3.40-3.64
for Cum Laude. Each honor
er's Cc
5 Pts. Cot.
s most popul
Liebfraui
Lambrust
"Special groi
* Rhine
* Burgundy
* Rose
I popular Bra
355 pkg
will underse
Systen
qualification has been lowered by
0.1 GPR.
T. Luther Gunter, director of
registration, is in charge of im
plementing the new program. He
termed the new requirements for
honor graduation as "sliding down
the scale." He said, 'A student is
basically given one extra course
( to perform poorly in) and still
qualify for honors." Herr said he
would like to see the standards
raised back to their original
position.
The new grading system will
affect transfer students seeking
graduation with honors. A new
rule says a minimum of 60 ac
credited GPR hours must be
earned in residence at USC to
receive honors eligibility.
Previously under the NC system, a
transfer's GPR was figured only on
the basis of his hours earned at
USC, disregarding his previous
GPR at another school. The new
program specifies that a transfer's
total GPR will be registered, in
cluding his work done outside USC.
Each student's academic record
will he reviewed at the end of the
spring semester under the new
system. If the student fails to pass
half his courses of the preceding 12
months, he will be suspended. This
will not apply for students carrying
less than 12 hours work nor for
those who maintain at least a 2.50
GPR and pass 12 credit hours.
If a student is placed on
suspension beginning in Sep
tember, he can attend summer
>rk &1H
Harden 4V B
ar spirits sho
nilch
bp-Calif. Wi
$j.9 H/(
Pabst
nds Miller
Lite
11 any other n
1 ToBe
school preceding the suspension
date. If he satisfies the 50 per
cent rule, the suspension will be
removed. Suspension will not last
longer than two semesters.
The present NC grading system
was instituted in 1971, and as one
faculty member said, "we've been
trying to get rid of it ever since."
The NC system has caused
problems both within and outside
the University. "When our
graduates leave the University to
go to a graduate school or find a
job, they will often find that an NC
will be considered as an F," said
Faculty Senate Chairman Herr.
"This is unfair," he added,
"because a lot of NC grades are not
failures."
Herr also mentioned that within
his classroom experience he has
seen students accept an NC in a
course if it looked like they could
not get an A or B. Other professors
questioned responded in similar
manner.
The Faculty Senate took almost
a year to agree on their final
proposal for the new grading
system. It has not been
significantly altered since its
presentation in April. William
Hawkins, chairman of the Com
mittee on Academic Affairs and
Faculty Liaison in the Faculty
Senate, which studied the Senate
proposal for the Board of Trustees,
said, "We felt the proposal was
well founded, and would be
benefic:ial change for the
University."
ottle S.
lossom St.
p for 35 yea
es" *
lal.
Iiwaukee $1
Blue Ribbon
~dvertised pri
Used
The new grading structure will
be used in the fall in its present
form, but there is the possibility
some additions will be made by the
spring. Half grades (B+. C+
etc.) might be incorporated into
the system on a basis of a
professor's grading preferences.
Several Faculty Senate members
are now in favor of such a plan.
Also, a student survey taken last
spring by the Student Government
Association showed that 60 per cent
of students surveyed would prefer
the half grades. In fact, the motion
for half grades was almost passed
by the Faculty Senate in their
April meeting, but was eventually
tabled.
President William Patterson has
suggested that a student should be
able to "erase" an F grade from
his record if he later takes the
same class again and passes it.
Patterson is also in favor of letting
a student clear his record of poor
grades received in classes which
he can not use after changing from
one major to another.
Generally, University faculty
and administration members
interviewed seemed pleased with
the new grade system, if for no
other reason than it would replace
the present NC system. A typical
response of faculty members was
that both systems were workable
and the new program will not af
fect them significantly. But this is
to be expected, for the new system
is designed to specifically help the
student, and particularly the USC
graduate student.
ho P
hop
.89 6 pkg.
$1.67
$1.89
$1.89
ces."