The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, June 19, 1975, Page Page 6, Image 6
L44e (kametork
Editor
BOB8BAKER
Managing Editor News Editor
CARL NAYLOR MARION ELLIOTT
Advertising Manager
ART FRANK
Although the GAMECOCK is a publication of the students of the University of South
Carolina, it is not an official publication of the University. The opinions expressed
herein do not necessarily represent those of the University, the student body or all the
staff enmbers of the GAMECOCK.
Peripheral Parking?
Peripheral parking, Hum-m-m.
Students' and faculty complaints about the parking
facilities at USC have been so common for so long, that
now it seems to be taken for granted. The diligent
search for a parking space anywhere near one's class
presents a new challenge every day.
However, a group of USC faculty members has been
studying the possibility of banning all parking within the
campus' peripheral boundaries. All parking would be
done in large areas on the campus perimeter, and some
sort of mass transit system would take students to and
from class.
Is this needed? There are approximately 6,326
parking spaces on campus, according to George Key,
director of public safety. He has told the GAMECOCK
that these spaces along with several hundred city meter
spaces provide enough parking. In fact, Key said
several hundred spaces go unused every day.
The GAMECOCK realizes that a very big portion of
this unused parking space is in garages and big lots far
away from the center of campus. We also know that as
long as there is the possibility of getting a space near
one's class, students will continue to hunt for that space.
Also, a factor here is that no suitable mass transit
system has been started by the Administration to ef
fectively transport students to and from such parking
areas. Most students would rather be on time to class
and many simply do not trust the inconsistent bus
service the University has now.
The simple fact is: there are not enough spaces close
to classrooms. USC pays that price for being an inner
city campus. Let's face that and go from there.
Peripheral parking as proposed by several faculty
members would prohibit all interior campus parking.
This means all student and all faculty and all staff with
very few exceptions. This would do two things.
First, the senseless searching for spaces will stop.
There will be none. Second, the Administration would
have to implement some effective form of mass transit,
which has to be the ultimate answer.
We realize money is a problem. Mass transit, would
be costly. However, we feel that a more efficient
parking system should be high on the University's list of
priorities. After all, soon we should have all the
buildings we need. Wouldn't it be nice to go to and from
those buildings quickly and easily.
If peripheral parking is implemented there will be a
lot of grumbling from many different parties at first.
However, if a suitable mass transit system is started,
things would settle down and the University would be
better off.
Peripheral parking, yes. MEE
Where Budget Cuts 12
It's interesting to note that not all areas of the
Carolina community were affected by the cuts in the '75
'76 budget for USC.
According to Sig Huitt, information officer of the
University, the Executive Committee of the Board of
Trustees approved all classified and unclassified per
sonnel salaries as recommended by the State Budget
and Control Board.
If that were true, and apparently it is, based on the
Budget message released in January by the Budget and
Control Board, the University's payroll for 1975-76 will
cover 3,910 persons at a whopping expense of $37,305,561.
While that figure reflects an increase over last year's
payroll of 227 persons and $2.9 million, there apparently
seems to be no room for alarm as money is quite plen
tiful in our Great Society.
The GAMECOCK invites all persons within I
and thoughts known to our readers. It is your
weekly in our 'Letters to the Editor" secti
promised, and though longer letters will be pri
preference due to space requirements. And, I
anonymous letters, though we will withhold nai
Preferably, letters should be typed with nar
deliver letters personally to our office in Rocr
Drawer A. USC, Columbia 29208.
Patterson Apathetic
TO THE EDITOR:
In regard to a comment of
President Patterson in an in
terview with the GAMECOCK last
Thursday I would like to elaborate
on one particular statement that he
made. I quote:
GAMECOCK Are you worried
about a sense of apathy within the
student body at the University?
- PATTERSON: I'm personally
not really concerned about apathy
at all. It's up to the student to get
involved. It's enough for each of us
to just sit down and decide what is
best for ourselves.
Thus the administration has
declared that the affairs of
students outside the academic
world is not their concern. The
President of our University is
obviously apathetic to the apathy
of students outside the classroom.
One factor that our illustrious
President has failed to consider in
this ideology is that the education
one receives outside the classroom
is just as important beneficial to
the student as the education he or
she receives through academic
instruction. In many cases these
extracurricular student activities
prepare the student better for the
outside world.
Through more than 180 student
organizations on our campus, a
number of career-related
programs are offered that can
provide us with one essential factor
that determines whether oiie gets a
job or not; experience. Academics
may get the student an ap
pointment with a potentialem
ployer, but experience will
probably get him the job. One is
essential to the success of the
other; yet our administration feels
that their responsibility only
covers academics.
Also, our administration ad
vocates that academics alone will
create a well-balanced student
without the services of campus
related social outlets. Academic
strain may cause nervous
frustrations. A break from the
norm is needed just to maintain
one's sanity.
One of the most popular social
related outlets for students at USC
are the campus movies. During
the summer especially, movies
provide a needed break from in
tensive academic anxieties.
This particular summer finds the
University Union Cinematic Arts
on't T ell T he St
A statement released by ti
states that personnel will be el
that is correct, then how come :
hired this year if indeed they
Also, with so much extra m<
seems to be the reasons for cu
Gee, at one custodian per build
No that's too many. We're be
and secretarial help than a
domestic help, right?
More paper and no one to cdeE
we'll just have to wade in pap
forgot. According to the Budge
illustrious President is schedul4
next year to cover his inflat
$43,60, that's life, and we'll all
etters
he campus community to make their opinions
eoice- we are the vehicle. We attempt to print
on all letters received. Minimal editing is
nted, letters of 200 worcs and under are given
is the decision of the editors that we not run
nes for valid reasons.
le and address of the author included. Please
1 318 Russell House or write Campus Opinion,
Committee in one of the most
critical and unfortunate
predicaments that any student
organization has ever faced.
Because of the expansion of the
Russell House, the University
theatre will not be available as a
film center until sometime this
fall. As a consequence, the com
mittee had to find an alternate
location for the films.
In its attempts to book another
facility just for the summer
months, the Cinematic Arts
Committee has had little success.
The reason for that failure is
simple: the Director of the Room
and Space bookings of the
University in Petigru College has
flatly stated that all major
auditoriums that could properly
serve as a substitute theatre are
unavailable for the summer
because of other organizations
having booked them. Thus, the
Cinematic Arts Committee has
through necessity been forced to
use the services of two facilities
that are totally inadequate for
showing films; the Golden Spur
and Calcott College.
Just this past Monday night,
more than 150 students, faculty and
staff crammed themselves into the
Golden Spur to see Ingmar
Bergman's masterpiece "Smiles of
a Summer Night." Because of the
film's subtitles being located near
the bottom of the screen, nearly
half the people attending couldn't
read the dialogue. This along with
thet fact that many could only
partially see the screen because of
three support beams blocking theik
view and also because there were
not enough chairs available to
accomodate the crowd, dozens of
persons left in disgust. Two faculty
members later told me that they
would never attend another
campus film until a better facility
was found.
Pleas to our administration go
unanswered. For example, the
Space Allocations office stated that
Currell College with both of its
large auditoriums that would be
satisfactory for the showing of
films, are unavailable during the
summer. However, this does not
appear to be the case as the Currell
College staff and my own personal
observations show that the
auditoriums are not being used.
Still, the administration maintains
that they are being used.
Therefore, since a student
organization cannot appeal to a
higher authority than the ad
ory
ie University yesterday
iminated by attrition. If
?.27 more people are to be
are.
>ney for employes, what
tting custodial services?
ing, hmm that's about...
tter off with 754 clerical
vith 390 custodial and
nf it up? Ho, hum. Guess
er next year. Oh gee, I
t and Control Board, our
ad to get a $3,000 increase
ionary needs. Hell, at
live through it. nRLn
[o The
ministration it's in disagreement
with, the Carolina Community has
little choice but to attend movies,
five days a week, in rooms that are
no bigger than the Board of Tru
stees' Office.
Campus films serve two
beneficial purposes: they can be
pure entertainment or in
tellectually educational. In im
proper and unsatisfactory
surroundings, they serve no one.
Hopefully in the near future,
President Patterson and his ad
ministration will change their
emphasis from serving themselves
to helping others. The welfare of
the Carolina Community depends
on it.
CHUCKCROMER
Law Center Cheats?
TO THE EDITOR
If you want a good story, why not
go over to the Law Center and talk
to some rising second year
students, who are as a whole ex
tremely upset that most of their
spring grades have not come out,
even though exams were given a
month and one-half ago, beginning
May 1.
Among those Professors who told
students they had not even begun
grading their exams as of this
week are: Charles Randall,
Randall Chastain, George
Haimbaugh, Eldon Wedlock and
Thomas Ward.
What does this mean? Some
students are beginning their third
week of a seven week summer
session without even knowing if
they are qualified to be there.
They were on the borderline after
the fall grades and could have
flunked out during the spring
semester. Other students are
driving in from all over the state,
and some from out-of-state, to find
out if they can continue in law
school next fall,.or if they should
look for a job, but no grades are
posted to give them the slightest
indication as to their status.
Note that Professor Wedlock is
widely known for his "concern" for
individual rights President of
South Carolina American Civil
Liberties Union (ACLU) but views
his students as having no rights.
He said he had not even started
grading his exams, and would in no
way meet the supposed "deadline"
of June 15 for grades to be out.
But this is not the only indication
(Iamecocrk
*taff
Entertainment Editor
BRENDA BELL
Sports Editor
BILLY BAKER
Photography Editor
JOHNNY DRUMMINGS
Production Manager
TE R RY COON
Circulation Manager
GREG TOWER Y
Contributors
BECKY CROWE VIVIAN DAVIS
JACK BAINE GENE HOOD
ELLEN BILES PHItLIP JAMES
DONNA BISE JULIE JONES
R. VANCE BUTTS MITCH KNEECE
SUSAN CATE KIM Mc DOWELL
MARK DILLARD MARK MAYER
DANE EDENS KARLEN PETIT
KA THY FDWARDS SUSAN STEVENS
AL ISON j:STFN I YNN,wi AT T
HtANK. GIl ''/ N O , IOWF Pv