The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, March 03, 1975, Page Page 14, Image 14
Qplnion
Editorials
SGA elections
Once again students will have a chance to exercise the
privilege to vote and elect the representatives of their choi(
when student government offices of president, vice preside
secretary, treasurer and senators will be voted on tomorroy
As a guide to the election, The Gamecock lists the cai
didates for every major student government office--presiden
vice president, treasurer and secretary. Included is a capsul
of each president's major platform. Opinion on the candidate
by the editors is not included.
President
Dean Varney: Calls for more student input into studer
government. Varney wants the ticket distribution pla
changed and a new company to take over the Gamecock Roor
lunch counter.
Melton "Bison" Parris: Believes housing, parking an
other problems are created by lack of a communication
between the student body and SGA. Parris proposes to irn
. prove communication betweea the students and governmen1
Davinder Singh: Says that he will bring the whole campu
together. Essentials of his program are lower dorm deposit
and lower food prices. Also said he will not accept the $1,90
salary paid to the president.
"Buzz" Sargent: Wants SGA to provide more information t
the Student body. Through a series of monthly meetings, h
says students can become informed about the events an
issues around campus. Students proposals are forming hi
campaign platform.
Steve Hill: Presents 26 issues in formulating his campaig
platform. He feels the student government should have mor
of a voice with the Board of Trustees. He also calls for SGA'
operating budget to be cut from a current $45,000 to abou
$35,000.
Tommy Efland: Bases his campaign on the economi
trouble of the times. His major proposal is to cut SGA's budge
to $15,000. Instead of picking his friends to form his cabinet h
says he would advertise the positions to get a greater amoun
of expertise.
Stan Rayford: Plans on conduting forums to air studen
complaints and improve the quality of student government.
Until the first forums--where he says the direction of SGA wi]
be determined--he is unsure of the major issues the student
want dealt with.
Frank Shealy: Proposes a lengthy platform whicif woul
bring about change through a number of procedures at th
University. He wants an optional 24-hour open house plar
first-come first-served ticket distribution and free tuition fo
Vietnam veterans.
Vice president
Rick Funk
David "Bison" Pleasant
Jim Stuart
Trey Lott
David L. Rosmer
Treasurer
Paul Dominick
Randy Guida
Danny Murph
Shelton Parker
David Frierson
Orian "Bison" Carter.
Secretary
Walter "Bison" Metz
Teri L. Dernhi
The Ice!
at least a
:e
t,
v. An interesting report moved on
the Associated Press wire recently
i- dealing with the possibility of
t, another ice age in the future.
e The report, authored by Howard
s Benedict, cites evidence gathered
from climatologists from around
the world and he says that a
significant shift in world-wide
temperature is taking place. Many
interpret this as evidence of
another impending Ice Age,
similar to the one which .gripped
North America about 10,000 years
t ago.
n Benedict's report does not
a estimate when snow shoes will
become a regular part of our at
tire, but says that the relative
warm temperatures we have
experienced during the last 10,000
years could come to a sudden end.
These climatologists have
S seemingly spent a lot of time and
S trouble studying the signs which
0 point to another Ice Age. Perhaps
the best example of how a true ice
D age works can be observed by the
e actions at our own University of
South Carolina's Board of
Trustees.
While the analogy may be far
fetched, it's interesting to note how
tThe GamE
t Students should rea
D
t TO THE EDITOR:
While passing through the
t second floor lobby of McKissick
Library the other day, I couldn't
help but notice a relatively loud
conversation between two gen
S tlemen discussing Chinese history.
All around these men were
students trying to study various
B subjects.
, It occurred to me that these men
r might be unaware that their
distracting talk was probably
disturbing most students in the
room. After bringing my ob
servation to their attention, both
men became very offended and
defensive. Refusing to consider
their blatantly inconsiderate ac
tions they demanded to know what
department I represented. Of
course the implication was "Just
who do you think you are?"
It is to this implied question that
I wish to address myself. I am a
person concerned with a
qualitative approach to life.
Leading the way for this approach
to life would have to be a genuine
concern for others. Smoking in
classrooms, speeding through
residential areas, throwing beer
cans on the highway and carrying
on distracting conversations in the
library are examples of en
croachments on the quality of all
our lives.
By no means have 1 "plucked the
log from my eye" and I certainly
don't wish to convey that im
pression. However, I do hope that
my ego is large enough to accept a
polite, well-interested suggestion.
Frankly, I just don't understand
Lge is here
t Carolin
By Bill Grant
closely the University bureaucracy
is attuned to the laws of nature.
Notice how the Trustees linger
around the borders of the
University, similar to those
glaciers around metropolitan
North America, and then slowly
glide in, passing some haphazard
legislation in a two-day meeting
and then receding slowly back into
the woodwork.
The result is a series of ground
moraines, ridges formed by the
erosion processes of a receding
glacier. Or to carry this analogy
one step further, the Board's
decisions create insurrmountable
ridges of bureaucratic
mismanagement for the average
student to cope with.
Take, for example, the lack of
action by the Board of Trustees in
dealing with a number of student
related issues. At its last meeting,
the Board was presented with a
proposal which would have allowed
a voting student to sit in on all
Trustee meetings.
The benefits of such legislation
are just too numerous to mention.
As it stands now, the Student
Government Association president
hcock's mE
nember others
how being in the history, or any
other department, gives us the.
right to infringe upon the freedom
and quality of a particular student
or our fellow man in general.
ROLLIN REEDER
Reorganization needed
for The Ganecock
TO THE EDITOR:
The Towers' Government last
Thursday evening sponsored a
stump meeting which included all
candidates for SGA President and
Vice-President. To our knowledge
this was the only activity of its type
on campus this year.
Our stump meeting offered all
students at Carolina an op
portunity to meet and examine the
candidates who are running in
Tuesday's election. We felt that
our efforts would be beneficial to
the University and were deserving
T HE GAl~
Edito
Managing Editor JIM
ST E'.E PA R KFER
The Gamecock welcomes let ters from r
subject and a maximum of 300 words.
name. Pseudonyms or other aliases will
withheld if circumstances warrant. To
please include your mailing address ar
reaChed. We reser ve the right to eitall Ie
limitatin Add..e.s: Campus Opn,.
is an ex-officio board member, an
impressive title for one who acts
essentially as a cheerleader for
students' interests.
The SGA president is allowed to
present what he believes to be the
interests of the student body, but
beyond this he essentially just fills
a chair at Board meetings. When
the major issues of concern are
discussed, the president, along
with the press, are asked to leave
the room, leaving the students with
absolutely no representation.
Actual student representation on
the Board has never been achieved
and until it is chances of
meaningful reform on student
issues is impossible. Yet the
proposal was quickly buried under
an avalanche of double-talk and
red-tape.
Other issues in which students
showed a legitimate concern, such
as ticket distribution, were also
snowed under in the wake of the
Board's decisions.
It is time for the policy-makers
at this University realize just who
this institution is being run for, and
why, the education of students.
Remember, it's getting colder
outside.
of recognition and coverage by The
Gamecock.
' We were dismayed, therefore, to
be refused any space in your paper
by your staff. Bill Pratt, the news
editor, was unconcerned with our
story and at one point stated that
he felt coverage was unnecessary
and would be superfluous.
This type of attitude toward
University affairs by a newspaper
which exists to serve the
University is inexcusable. The
Gamecock is not serving the
students' needs. Serious thought
neteds to be given to a
reorganization of The Gamecock's
priorities and staff.
DAVID WILSFORD
(The writer is president of the
Towers' Government.)
Ed. note--The decision not to
cover the stump - meeting was
made by Jim Hersh, editor, Steve
Parker, managing editor and
Pratt..
[ECOCK
r
84 E R SH Advertising Manager
ART FRANK
eaders. Letters should be limitedj to a single
They must be signed with the writer's true
not be used, but the writer's name will be
5ssist us in verifying the identity of writers,
d a telephone number where you can be
etters, not for content, but to meet our space