The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, February 13, 1975, Page Page 10, Image 10
opInion,
Editorials
Tickets
By the middle of this afternoon students will begin to
line up outside the Coliseum to wait for a chance to get
tickets to the USCr-Marquette basketball game
scheduled for Feb. 22.
The wisdom of reputedly intelligent human beings
going through such torture as sleeping all night on
cement just for a chance to, see a game between that
already has six losses and a team that is struggling to
stay in the.top ten is probably deserving of editorial
comment by itself.
But, going on the assumption that all the student-fans
are sane, it is time again to examine the athletic
department's ticket distribution method,
By early Friday morning students with the good
fortune of getting good seats to the game will leave
content that USC's ticket distribution plan is fair after
all.
At about the same time, or shortly thereafter,
students who either get seats in the outer reaches of the
Coliseum or get no seats at all will go away cursing the
ticket distribution set-up and demanding that a change
in the plan be implemented.
When viewed objectively, however, the distribution
methods now in use are probably as fair and as efficient
as pssible.
e Coliseum holds just slightly more than 12,000
people. Since the enrollment of the University is about
20,000, it would be impossible to assure every student a
seat at every game.
Also, since the athletic department, similar to any
good business, likes to make money, it sells season
tickets at a price of $7 per game. When season tickets,
complimentary tickets and other seats are subtracted,
only about 5,000 tickets remain to be distributed to the
students.
For almost every game, with the exception of a
Marquette or Notre Dame, this number is adequate and
every student who wants to go to the game can get a
ticket. However, problems do arise when Marquette
does come to town and nearly every student with even a
passing interest in the sport wants to see the game.
USC's ticket distribution plan is a comparatively
orderly and equitable way to get tickets to the students,
certainly better than any suggestions that have floated
around in the past.
The plan divides students by social security numbers
and allows every one a chance to get first crack at
tickets for at least one game per season. Inevitably
someone always comes out on the good side-this year it
is students with social security numbers ending in eight
or nine. They will get a chance for the best seats at the
Marquette game.
Of course, somebody also has the luck of having a
social security number ending in six or seven. They
might as well forget about going to the Marquette game.
But at least they had the satisfaction of getting good
seats for Georgia Southern.
Instead of blaming the athletic department for not
being able to get good seats for Marquette, maybe
people with six and seven identification numbers should
blame Georgia Southern for not providing the quality of
team Marquette does.
THE GAMECOCK
Managin9 *di, JIM H ER SH AduertIManage
STEVE PARKER ART FRANK
The Gameoc* welcomes oetters from readers. Letters should b,e limited toea single
subject and a maximum of 300 words. They must be signed with the writer's true
name. Pseudonyms or other aliases will not be used, but the writer's name will be
withheld If circumstances warrant. To assist us in verifying the Identity of writers,
please include your mailing address and a telephone number where you can be
reached We reserve the right to eit al letters, not for content, but to meet our space
Carolina.
Its own
"Kingsfield," shouted Hart,
trembling with rage and
humiliation. "You are a son of a
bitch." The class audibly sucked
in its breath. Hart stalked off,
Professor Kingsfield's glaring eyes
drilling hot holes in his neck.
Just as he was near the door,
Kingsfield called him. "Mr.
Hart," His voice boomed. A pause.
"That was the most intelligent
statement you have made all day."
' Taken by surprise, the class
laughed. "You may take your
seat, Mr. Hart." Hart walked
back, smiling broadly.
Professor- Kingsfield could,
indeed, be very trying at times.
One couldn't ever catch him
smiling, much less ever see him
laughing. On the first day of school
he did not saunter into class five
minutes late and ask students to
introduce themselves, taking care
to mention the high school they
attended.
Instead, Kingsfield asked them
questions from the text. And if
some student did not feel like
volunteering an answer, he would
ferret it out of him. Naturally, the
students hated him. He was the
most respected figure on campus.
The Paper Chase, which played
in the Russell House last Thursday
and Friday, attracted some of the
largest student audiences ever.
Apparently, students will oc
casionally flock to the theatre
even if Linda Lovelace is not
starring.
There was much about student
life in "Paper Chase" that we
could identify with. The bloated
importance of grades, the hectic
studying before exams, the pan
demonium of the dorms were all
familiar experiences. I imagine
this accounted largely for the
movie's great popularity with USC
students.
However, after watching "Paper
Chase" for a while one gradu.ally
started to sense the differences
between going to school at Carolinc
and going to school at Harvard. Ai
portrayed in the movie, school at
Harvard was pretty grim business.
It was certainly different from
school at USC. Not once did I hear
any mention of the football or the
basketball coach.
There were other differences,
too. Invariably the atmosphere In
Kingsfield's class was highly
charged; charged with ex
citement-, charged with an
ticipation. One didn't see many
students yawning, with glazed
Jooks in their eyes.
Kingsfield for his part, did not
disappoint them. He went straight
to the heart of the day's topic.
Perhaps it was not necessary for
him to start chatting, because he
was ready to start teaching.
4bver the idiosyncracies of
the mia -here wa no enying
is lacking
ingsfields
By Moby Salahuddir
Professor Kingsfield was a learned
and dedicated teacher. He was
smarter than any of his students
and he rubbed it in. None of this
mock-modest "I-am-here-to-learn
from-you" business.
At the beginning of each
semester, Professor Kingsfield
told the class he would, by the end
of the course, have them thinking
more clearly. He mentioned the
Socratic method. Kingsfield made
certain his students came
prepared to class by asking them
Let's face it, some
professors just don't
have the personality
or the ability
to teach.
blunt, uncomfortable questions
from the very outset.
In contrast, most USC professors
are unduly relu'itant to "em
barrass" student by asking them
tough questions in class or by
vigorously disagreeing with them.
I suppose it is considered un
chivalrous to put somebody on the
spot. Whatever the explanation,
for most students here the Socratic
Whatever the expL
students here Socratic ,
they read of in books e
method is something they read of
in books or see on the screen.
It is a misconception to imagine
USC students don't care what goes
on in the classrooms. No matter
how strongly they protest attempts
to make them work hard, no
matter how eager students are to
divert the teacher's attention,
nevertheless they respect the
professor who sticks to his job.
Now, I am not suggesting we
become so steeped in scholasticism
that going to the class becomes
more like going to Sunday School.
However, I am requesting that our
professors get serious about their
contribution to class discussions.
Students may enjoy the anecdotes
and small talk at the time; in the
long run they resent the poor
return in solid knowlede f,-om
their investment of time and
money.
The other day I was talking -to a
coed at the University. She was
very disillusioned with one of her
courses because it appeared her
professor hardly contributed
anything to the class. She told me
that, apparently, her professor felt
It safer to restrict his input to in
structions on compiling
bibliographic lists. "When I think
of the money I am paying for this
course," she seethed, "it really
burns me up!"
She spoke for a great many of us.
There must be hundreds of
students in this University who
hate or have hated several of their
courses. For some undetermined
reason students, sooner or later,
get stuck with these incredibly
stupid courses-courses that have
no relevance to any job
requireme'nts; courses that are of
no use in making us better people;
courses that are poorly taught;
courses that have no intrinsic
interest.
There's no escaping some of
these courses: they are man
datory. For other, it takes too
much nerve to ask of the respective
Deans why such travesties are
being inflicted on students.
One reason why some teaching
at USC is so insipid is because
students have not been demanding
enough of their professors. Still,
there is a small minority of
students who does take these
things seriously. It is up to such
%nation, for most
rtethod is something
r see on the screen.
students, obviously, to take more
initiative in determining the
direction a particular class takes.
.It is possible that even with all
alert and vigilant students, class
periods will continue to be dull and
soporific. Let's face it, some
professors just don't have the
personality or the ability to teach.
It may also be that it is hard for a
professor to inspire his pupils with
the joy and thrill of learning when
he himself Is at the University
either for the money or for the
opportunity It affords him to
further his own career.
1 do not know the number of USC
professors who fall in the above
category. I can guess the number
of people like Professor Kingsfield.
By most aceunts, it is very small