The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, February 06, 1975, Page Page 12, Image 13
The GamE
An accumulation of unt
TO THE EDITOR:
I find it difficult to believe that
Chuck Cromer could be so naive as
to write a critic review of Grand
Fund and .concoct such an ac
cumulation of untruths as was in
the Feb. 3 issue of The Gamecock
("Grank Funk derailed; audience
loves them").
First of all, why does a critic of
any group sit on the front row?
This is never done. He should have
moved to the back of the Coliseum.
It is necessary to have enough
volume for the unfortunate people
who have to sit in the rear, in order
for them to hear. Also, hard rock
must be played loud.
Secondly, Eric Burdon stunk. He
did not play one song in which the
vocals were audible, so how could
Cromer like his interpretations?
Perhaps that's Chuck's problem
he's deaf.
Third, Cromer needs to have a
lesson selecting drummers. Don
Brewer, as anyone at the concert
can tell you, is one of the world's
best drummers. If Cromer
disagrees, then he is saying that
the buying public and those people
attending Funk's concerts are not
sensible- enough to select good
music and a good concert. Almost
anyone would agree that Brewer is
not the world's worst drummer.
Fourth, how could Cromer
evaluate the concert when he
states he left early because of the
ocock 's me
More kicks I
ruths on Grand Funk
disgusting drug scene? If he was
so appalled by the G.I.'s shooting
smack, why- didn't he try to help
them instead of walking out?
Chuck, as other people, should
realize the drug situation at USC
and Columbia is very real and not
the fault of Grand Funk. Does he
think that people only use drugs
when they come to a Funk concert?
Funk does not condone drugs.
They have spent a fortune of -their
own time and money in anti-drug
abuse commercials. "Closer To
Home" and "Inside Looking Out"
are songs against drugs, not for
them. Cromer should be awakened
to the fact that drugs are in every
dorm and at every concert. Drugs
are also a big part of almost every
young social gathering. If society
is going to tolerate the use of drugs,
then the people should be allowed
to use drugs at concerts as well as
behind their own locked doors.
In the future it would be ap
propriate for The Gamecock to
send someone to critique the
concerts who know what the hell
he's talking-about. I see movies
and attend concerts that have the
worst Gamecock ratings-they are
usually the best ones,
In closing I would like to ask
Cromer to do a little research and
find out how nuch of a $6.50 ticket
goes for total federal and state
taxes as well as other nonsense
allocations. Furthermore, Chuck,
N,
dl (cont.)
For The Gamec
why don't you ask the Coliseum
how many groups who play there
sell shirts, buttons, etc., and who
actually does the selling?
NAME WITHHELD
Ed. Note-Cromer did not leave
the concert early.
In defense
of the Campus Club
TO THE EDITOR:
It seems that Chuck Cromer and
Terry Dugas are compelled to bad
mouth the Campus Club. I do not
normally read The Gamecock, but
twice it has been brought to my
attention that Chuck Cromer and
Terry Dugas have made
derogatory statements about our
club in this paper. The first time
was in the June 25, 1974 issue and
the second time just recently in the
Feb. 3 issue ("Clubs near campus
offer variety''). I will not even
bother to request another apology,
although I do thank you for the first
one, which was published in The
Gamecock on June 27, 1974. I
merely wish to point out how
Cromer and Dugas have misin
formed the public in regard to the
Campus Club.
As far as suffering from the
ravages of time is concerned, let
me point out that the Campus Club
has not once in the six years it's
been open, raised the price of a
ock's critic, Cir
bottle of beer, although there has
been a continual rise in cost. If
they are implying that the
Campus Club has not changed
during this time, they are mistaken
again.
In regard to losing many of our
old followers, let me say that after
reviewing opr books there is a
definite indication that the old
followers have been replaced with
the new, so let us. not assume that
the establishment is on the wane.
I don't know how long either of
these two gentleman have been
around this campus, but they are
again in the wrong when they say
our sandwich bar has only recently
been added. In fact, we have been
serving lunches since the first day
we opened.
I would like to conclude by
saying that I realize that Chuck
Cromer and Terry Dugas' article is
only a personal opinion. I just
wanted the opportunity to show
how mivalid their opinion is. Also,
the staff of the Campus Club ap
preciates any constructive
criticism, but please stop
fabricating your own facts.
MICHAEL R. TRUELOVE
Manager of the Campus Club
Finally, a good word
for the villain
TO THE EDITOR:
In reference to Chuck Cromer's
article entitled "Big-name con
Domer
certs skip Columbia," (Jai'. 27
edition) I write the followings
It was good that Cromer brought
to light the fact that entertainment
being brought to Carolina
Coliseum is dwindling. However, it
was unfortunate that he left out one
important reason for this dwin
dling-that is, that people are not
satisfied with the groups the
Coliseum is obtaining.
Last semester I went to one rock
concert. To put it bluntly, it was
the worst concert I have ever at
tended. The performers were
barreling out words that nobody
could comprehend. The volume
was too loud. Then after the main
performers did their thing, some
non-talented female came out in a
silver outfit. I admit that -she
would shake a leg and a few other
things, but she could not sing. The
Coliseum was nothing near
capacity and most of the people
that did attend were pre-teenagers
or early teenagers.
The point that I am making is
that the entertainment being
brought to Carolina is not geared to
the tastes of the majority of
Carolina students.
Believe me-when the refunds
are given at Carolina Coliseum
because some farce of an en
tertainment act cancels, it is in
deed, as Cromer stated, "an act of
God." God is blessing this town
when He keeps such garbage out.
ROBERT D. CAPPS
a