The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, January 23, 1975, Page Page 10, Image 10
- ?Alo
Editorials
Green
In a few weeks the result of a
consulting firim's traffic study
on Green Street will be public
knowledge. And, shortlly
thereafter Columbia City
Council should be ready to
decide whether or not to close
the street.
The logical choice is to close
the street.
USC students, who have
grown accustomed to dodging
cars when trying to cross the
street, have been urging the
city to close the street to traffic
for almost 20 years. Their
argument is that eventually
some unlucky -student will be
hurt when hit by a car.
As far as can be determined,
no student has ever been hit
trying to cross the street. But
that fact should not be used as
proof that a dangerous
situation does not exist. With
many times as many cars on
campus than 20 years ago,
when students first began to
ask that the street be closed,
the situation is much worse
than in the past, and it is
getting worse all the time.
The consulting firm's study
is based on surveys conducted
during two different 45-day
periods. The first survey was
done in the early part of the fall
when Green Street was open to
traffic. The survey was then
repeated later in the fall when
traffic was sealed off from the
street.
The purpose of the study is to
determine how important
Green Street is in the overall
traffic flow for the USC
campus area of Columbia.
No serious traffic jams
occurred when the street was
blocked off, nor did city of
ficials voice complaints of
excessive traffic on streets
used by motorists in the place
of Green Street. On the sur
face, at least, Green Street
does not appear to be vital to
the Columbia traffic flow. The
Street
consulting firm's study should
confirm this.
USC's Student Government
Association (SGA) has made a
formal request that Green
Street be closed from Sumter
to Bull streets--the area from
Longstreet Theater. to the
Melton Observatory.
This is an acceptable
proposal. Students will have
the freedom to cross the street
in the Russell House area,
where a large number of
students congregate, without
the fear of being hit by a car.
And, - since the city's traffic
pattern is not upset by closing
the street there is no real
reason why the city should
keep it open.
There is no doubt that the
majority of USC students want
the street to be closed to
traffic. Likewise, there is little
doubt that most Columbia
residents could care less
whether or not the street is
closed. And judging by the 45
day trial closing period, when
one half of the traffic survey
was done, it is evident that
Columbia will not be thrown
into one gigantic traffic snarl if
Green Street is closed.
While keeping the street
open to traffic does almost
nothing for the city, closing it
can help the USC community
greatly. In the past few years
there has been talk of con
structing a mall on Green
Street where students can
relax, study and generally
gather for any type of activity.
Since it is in the middle of the
campus, the Green Street area
would be an excellent place for
students to gather, much like
the Horseshoe was in the early
days of the school. But with
traffic on the street, about the
only time Green Street has
been the gathering point for
students was in the fall of 1972
when SGA officials led a traffic
blockade by students one af
ternoon to express their views
about closing Green Street to
city officials.
The only other time Green
Street has been a gathering
point for students was last
semester, when the street was
closed to traffic for the 45-day
trial period. With just a short
time to organize them, several
concerts and other activities
were conducted, and almost
every student enjoyed the idea
of being able to meet friends In
the middle of the campus.
For students, closing Green
Street is a totally positive
move. For city residents,
closing It would not cause them
toalter their traffic routines by
more than one or two blocks.
With the positive features far
outweighing the negative ones,
city council should vote to close
the street to traffic.
Guerrilla
in the dc
The University is a Paradise,
Rivers of Knowledge are there,
Arts and Sciences flow from
thence; bottomless depths of
Unsearchable Counsels there.
--John Donne
One need not live long in the
men's residence halls at USC to
painfully realize the presence of an
increasing number of people that
cannot accurately be described as
Lmiversity students or as dor
mitory residents. Students at a
mniversity occasionally have
studies to do, papers to write.
Residents of a dormitory
sometimes betray an awareness of
)ther people's presence or show a
:oncern for their neighbors' sleep.
rhe breed I am talking about acts
is if it were loose in the jungle with
iothing to do but roar and trumpet
ts defiance and contempt of the
going scheme.
If your studies are disturbed by
heir stereo playing, if your
iostrils are offended by their dope
omoking, then, obviously, you are
n the wrong place. For in the code
)f these university guerrillas it is
he survival of the unconcerned.
ie who can make the loudest noise,
,how the most disdain for other
)eople, is undisputed king of the
iall.
One would expect other students
Yould not put up with this behavior
or long. One would imagine the
vhole hall would be up in arms,
isking the delinquent to shape up
ir ship out. The striking thing
tbout this phenemenon is that
tudents who are the most af
ected, the people who stand to
The Game,
TO THE EDITOR:
I am writing in response to the
article, "USC Senate responsive,
Senators say" by Lee Powell in
Monday's edition of The
Gamecock.
I could understand how Powell
could somewhat get confused
during our interview and maybe
miss a few of the ideas I was trying
to convey, but it is beyond me how
he could have completely turned
things around and distorted the
truth.
In reference to the statement
that I felt that the situation in the
Senate this year was very bad in
view of accomplishments made, I
did not at any time say this. Also,
my reference to the Senate last
semester being nothing more than
a rubber stamp for the executive
branch was a reference I made to
last year's Senate during the Rita
McKinney administration. Anyone
connected with the Senate or
Student Government this year
know the Senate has rarely agreed
with the President.
Also, 25 to 30 hours was spent by
the Finance Committee on the
budget and then the budget was
debated for three weeks on the
Senate floor. The statement i
which I said that the budget was
warfare
rmitories
By Moby Salahuddin
gain the most from some overt
show of concern, are the ones least
likely to confront the offenders.
It is my experience that most
students are unhappy over the
noise and disorder in the residence
halls. Some of them eventually
complain to their respective hall
counselors. But even when they do
complain, these protests are mild
and discreet. For some reason,
there is great reluctance among
students to walk up to somebody
loudly entertaining illegal guests
at 2 a.m. and ask them to take it
easy, for courtesy's sake. Ap
parently, it is now considered the
mark of a sociable nature to accept
everything that others do, however
rude or inconvenient.
There is a similar reluctance
among students to discourage their
colleagues from destroying
university property. Very early
one morning I was awakened by
loud and incessant banging coming
from one of the upper floors. It
turned out to be a student, ham
mering and chipping his way to the
quarters in the washing machine.
Even for the times, it was unusual
to encounter a student in such
pressing need of money. More
baffling was the presence of
several other students, silently
watching the destruction of the
only washing machine in the
building. The student was soon
calmed, but, a couple of months
later, the washing machine still
remains to be fixed.
According to a Housing Service
survey, between April 1973 and
April 1974 students destroyed USC
cock's mail
passed without question referred to
last year's budget (1973-1974 school
year). I further said that one
accomplishment of the Senate this
year was correcting the wrongs
that have been done In budgeting in
past years. I did not state that we
had to correct the wrongs in
budgeting this semester. The
statement to the "erratic misuse
of funds" was medd in reference to
last summer when the Senate is not
in session.
My main theme throughout the
interview was comparison to SGA
to the remendous strides the
senate has made this year. I feel
the Senate had made tremendous
THE GAM
Editor
Managing Editor JIM HE
STEVE PARKER
The Gamecock welcomes letters from rei
sublect and a maximum of 300 words. Th
name. Pseudonyms or other aliases will n
withheld if circumstanCes warrant. To asi
please includ, your mailing address ana
reached. We reser ve the right to edit all left
limitations. Addm.ress C mpu pn. r
property worth $14,000. This is
damage done only in the common
areas of residence halls; this does
not include any damage to the
individual rooms.
I am not certain why students
persist in the destruction of
property, the defacing of pictures,
the uprooting of telephones, the
wrecking of vending machines, the
jamming of elevators, the mind
less playing with fire ex
tinguishers. I suspect the major
reason some students do not feel
any loyalty to the university is
because school is not their first
interest. More and more, it seems
to me, the emphasis is on the social
rather than the intellectual aspects
of the university. Certainly, no one
visiting the men's residence halls
can say the atmosphere there
makes serious studies possible,
much less encourage them.
If our residence halls are to
become more livable, a place
where one can bring one's parents
without feeling apologetic, then it
is imperative that concerned
students get together to curb the
license of these university
guerrillas--this group of refusers
and resenters dedicated to noisy
parties, vandalism and robbing.
A few of us need to learn that,
sometimes, there is a certain
reciprocity in life. If the guerrillas
continue their sabotage, university
officials can help by taking strict
and swift action against the of
fenders. Those who persist in
stepping on the teeth of a rake
ought to discover the handle can
smite them.
accomplishments this year. We
have corrected the wrongs in
budgeting and spending student
monies. Also, the ticket
distribution controversy and the
Communications Committee
survey at the spring resistration
are other examples of the senate's
responsiveness and will to serve
the student body. I hope that that
mistakes like this are not made
again by Powell and The
Gamecock, as they are damaging
to individuals and the Senate as a
whole.
SEN. JIM STUART
SENATE DISTRICT 23
[ECOCK
RSH
Advertising Manager
ART FRANK
ders. Letters should be limited to a single
sy must be signed with the writer's true
cDt be usled, but the writer's name will be
ist us in verifying the identity of writers,
a teiephone number where you can be
ers, not for content, but to meet our space
Iwer A, meC Columbia 220.