The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, November 04, 1974, Image 14
GAME(OCK
"It isa "ewsppers duty t print the news, and raise ben."
WILBUR F. STOREY
DILL GRANT, Editor
B" OUTLAW ART FRANK
USMW~5 ~Advertising Mamage
Intramural program
needs student input
Recent flare-ups (fights if you will) during intramural
football games should be cause for participating teams,
referees and the intramural department to get together
and draw up concrete policy guidelines concerning the
behavior of players and teams on the football field, and
the responsibility of referees to call games consistently
and fairly.
The reasons for the recent fithts can be attributed to
several factors: the inconsistency of intramural
referees in their officiating; the intensity in feelings
between some of the teams involved. and the lack of an
adequate meAns of controlling the players and spec
tators.
The latter mentioned reason is the one area where
something could be done if the intramural department
would take it upon itself to have open meetings with the
teams invdlved explaining the department's ex
pectations of the teams and the problems areas con
fronting the intramural department. At the same time,
the intramural department needs to receive input from
the participating teams from their point of view; the
problems encountered by the teams with officiating and
receive suggestions on how to control their players.
Another part of the problem lies in the inadequate
officiating on the part of the intramural referees. Some
referees now begin used have not even passed the exam
given at the end of a one-week clinic conducted for
referees prior to the start of each team sport. 'Robert C.
Dalrymple, director of intramural sports,
acknowledges part of the problem lies in the in
consistency in officiating, but he points out the in
tramural department just doesn't have that many
referees and he seemed to imply that they sometimes
have to take whatever they can get.
Dalrymple said the reason some of his better referees
have been in the center of the flare-ups is because the
"good" referees call the games tightly and the teams
are used to having referees who don't -call many of the
penalties they have been committing.
The individual teams should take it upon themselves
to control their own players. It is understandable for
teams and players to get frustrated over calls that are
made, but beating up referees and fighting other players
on ther teams is inexcusable. "Peer" pressure is one of
the most effective means of controlling tempers of
players during a game.
Presently, there are no adequate means for a regular
exchange of information between football teams,
referees and the intramural department. The only
time they get together now is during the heat of a
football game or when a protest has been lodged. An
exchange of information could be a step in the direction
to returning sportmanship to the intramural football
field, and the teams and the intramural department just
might find out they can help each other out.
WNO
The Gamecock's letter policy
The Gameeoek weleomes letters from readers. Iletters should
be limited to a single subjeet and a maxImum of 30 words. They
mms be signed with. the writers true name. Paeudonyms or
ether aliases wiB not be used, but the writer's name wi be
Withheld if efreastanees warrant.?Te assist us in verifying the
Mdentlty of writers, plase inelude your mailing address and a
telephone number where you can be reaebed. We reserve the.
right to edit aM Soe.rs nffer eentent, but te meet our space
ilaaitations. Addresd: Camspus Oplaiem. Drawer A. USC,
CabumaMes.
LETT
Edwards not
'old guard'
TO THE EDITOR:
r On October 17 a letter from Jack
Babb appeared in The
Gamecock.This letter showed
more ignorance of the issues and
subject matter of the 1974 South
Carolina gubernatorial campaign
than any I have read to date. Mr.
Babb is -so blatantly biased and ill
informed that he shows no copcern
about the facts surrounding the
issues on which he writes.
The Laurens natives initial
attack concerned state senator Jim
Edwards, the Republican
gubernatorial candidate. His first
facetious statement was,"Jim
Edwards declares himself a liberal
at least 19 times a day." Anyone
who has any knowledge about Jim
Edwards knows factually that he
has never called himself a
"liberal". No reformer needs to
declare himself "liberal" or
"conservative." Any intelligent
person can see through these
shallow labels.
Jack Babb, after showing his
first trace of ignorance, went from
the ridiculous to making scurrilous
attacks upon Dr. Edwards. Babb
made reference to "secret law
suits" (evidently referring to the
law suit concerning Pug's 'can
didacy). In the coming months, the
people of South Carolina will find
that the "old guard" (as Babb puts
it) was behind the suit.
However Edwards, who has been
a state senator for two years (one
of three representing the minority
Replubican Party in the South
Carolina State Legislature), could
hardy be referred to as "old
guard;" and the Republican Party
was hardly in a position to bring
suit. Mr. Babb then made
referrence to "refusals to reveal
contributions." Jim Edwards has
been an advocate of a "sunshine
government," where the common
practice concerns disclosure of all
proceedings and expenditures.
Edwards has disclosed all con
tributions to date.
Jack Babb also attacked
Clement Haynsworth, one of the
seven Federal District Court
Justices, as a segregationist. What
validity does this add to his '.'old
guard(" Babb's letter was full of
shallow generalizations and
rhetoric. This rhetoric is similar to
that rapport which the "old guard
"(which Babb defies so harshly)
has established with th epeople of
South Carolina. Babb seemingly
doesn't realize that the "old
guard,' is that group that includes
Rembert Dennis, Marion
Gressette, and others. The "old
guard" surely has rfothing in
common with Jim Edwards and
Clement Haynsworth. Haynsworth
is one of the most independent
thinkers in South Carolina judicial
-history, and, I might add, he is one
of the most highly respected.
Dennis and Gressette are known to
be two of Bryan Dorn's chief
supporters. How much support did
they give to Pug's cause during the
Democratic Convention?
In closing, I hope Babb does not
discourage too many students at
USC with lack of knowledge. It is
evident Pug Ravenel's progressive
spirit is not being captured by the
new Democratic candidate. This
letter is a plea for students to read
about the issues and decide who
would most closely represent the
fresh, new approach in govern
ment affered by Pug Ravenel,
ERS... Green Si
which they loved,so much.
Although Bryan Dorp claims to
be ;a progressive, he is currently
engaging in a -mudslinging. cain
paign, which -is:marked by half
truths. His literature and ad
vertisements includ, a few of
Pug's issues, which he has stolen,
to make himself appar to be a
progressive candidate. However,
his voting record in Congress, his
attendance record, and the people
*ho most 'closely support him
indicate that le is not much of a
reformer. He Is obligated to the
establishtent and his campaign is
more of an Attempt to demean Jim
Edwards than to strive toward
progress. This is a total negation of
Pug Ravenel's cause.
RUSSELL TRULUCK
Editor's note: The author works on
the Edwards for Governor cam
paign staff.
Band poor choice
for entertainment
TO THE EDITOR:
I am writing in reference to the
article on the Green Street party
and the letter to the editor from
Melonie Mason. first if it is thought
Lhat the street party was a suc
cess, it had to be because of the
beer and pot that was evidently
showing its effect.
The band "Steamboat Spring" if
anything was just your average
bluegrass band, and not so great as
the "Mason" girl thinks. I have
seen this band before and I saw
them again at the Green Street
party.. In my opinion they are
surely not worth the $750 dollars
that I and many other students
paid for through activity
fees.When there are bands such as'
"Caravan" playing in the "Golden
Spur for the same price for two
nights, I question the thought of
paying that much for a relatively
unknown bluegrass band foi one
night.
In the future, I hope the people in
charge of such parties will use
more discretion in the choice of
entertainment. There are
numerous top notch bands
throughout the -sc uth that can be
obtained for less than $500.00
dollars. -
RANDLJE M. STEVENS
Afro coverage
shows racial bias
TO THE EDITOR:
Earmarking the Association of
Afro-American Students in a -
seemingly negative manner In
your Oct. 21, 24, 28, and 31, 1974
issues, on the front page, could
easily .make one condemn and
reject Afro's policies, practices,
beliefs and ideals without
examining the evidence on which
the organization is based. Even
after the evidence is examined, the
damage has been done.
Afro being on the front page four
consecutive issues, (three in the
paper's most important section,
the top right hand corner or more)
In a seemingly negative manner,
along with two seemingly biased
editorials, (in the paper's most
important section on inside pages
of this paper, the extreme, up
permost left corner), by Bill
Outlaw, Oct. 24, 1974 and Bill
Grant, Oct. 31, 1974, places a bad
name stigma on n neQransaIof
reet...election
who's (sic) member share an in
terest in dealing with unanimity
and problem. solving, as well as
social interaction of and about the
black community.
. It seems to me that your con
iistency in appearing to stack the
cards against Afro, harbours racist
implicaions against a specific
organization! You will, in. all
probability, emphatically deny
this point like most racist
semanticist often do.
However, Afro has been, ear
marked in four cosecutive issues,
with strong front page repem
tation and stror rials, tWice.
What other cainpus organization
have you emphasized negatively
and consistently?
It seems to me that a newspaper
should be. honest, objective and
impartial. The Gamecock staff is
made up of human beings whose
beliefs and attitudes have probably
been conditioned by environment,
background and education. This
possibly attributes to the fact that
The ,Gamecock staff may
unknowingly be prejudiced in the
handling of news earmarking the
Association of Afro-American
Students.
That was my first impression
until your persistence to beat down
Afro in four. consecutive issues
changed my view.
The USC Homecoming Queen is
black for the second year in a row.
The sister was booed by
discriminatory fans at the
Homecoming game as was last
year's queen. All The Gamecock
staff could for such a prestigious
position, was place a photograph
and cutline in the left corner of the
left corner of the Homecoming
Gamecock.No story was written
about her family, hobbies, etc.
That would have been something
positive regarding black folks.
Your racism is evident and will
continue to be so if you are. con
tinually allowed to practice
discriminatory activity without
opposition.
Mass Media has always been
racist against black folks. The
media always illustrate white folks
in a positive manner, no matter
what they do, pro or con. Black
folks catch hell by being,
illustrated negatively and unjustly
in the news. The Gamecock's Oct.
21, 24, 48, &31, 1974 issues exem
plify h.ow this Is done. You start
early, in high school, college and
then to the professional ranks.
Then . you wonder how racism
evolves.
I'm aware of your editorial
policies. This letter to The
Gamecock Is the opinion of the
undersigned alone and in no way
reflects the consensus of outside
opinions.
I am black and I have been In
suIted by The Gamecock. My self
esteem, integrity, Intelligence,
personal worth and honor have
been blatantly insulted by The
Gamecock in the aforementioned
Issues in question. I'm almost sure
you will have ,every excuse
available for not printing this letter
exactly as submitted. Your ex
cuses will probably be based on
that which does not agree with
your policies, because of the
contrary nature of this
correspondence.
You'll surprise me If you print it
as it Is; and if you do, please accept
my humble apology. It will be
-greatly appreciated If you do. It,
(this letter), will be of little worth
If you do not choose to print it as it
Is submitted.