The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, September 19, 1974, Special Football Issue, Page Page 15, Image 15
,Geor
The other game was just two years
ago and Carolina lost 21-0, but that
game is also easy to forget as the
Gamecocks then operated an im
potent offense behind quarterback
Bill Troup and a failing offensive
line.
What is not easy to forget is that
Mississippi, supposedly a weak
sister in the Southeastern Con
ference this season, bogged down
nationally-ranked Missouri offense
last week and the Rebels won. 10-0.
Mississippi returns seven
starters on defense, making the
unit at least the equal of last year's
which surrendered more than 20
points just once. Still, the Rebels
stumbled to just a 6-5 year, in a
season in which they did not play
powerful Alabama.
Offensively, the Rebels have
some weak points, particularly the
line where just one starter returns.
But the backfield positions seem
a strong point. Quarterback Kenny
Lyons excels as do running backs
Larry Kramer, Paul Hofer and
James Reed.
Mississippi has a young team,
just 34 lettermen are back, but only
16 were lost So, this inexperience
is probably the cause of coach Ken
Cooper's concern and the reason
most experts aren't tabbing te
Rebels as threat in the
Southeastern grouping.
The schedule is, as always,tough
and Carolina may be aided by the
fact that Mississippi will be coming
off games with Alabama and
Georgia, while USC will have just
rested with Virginia Tech.
North Carolina
Four years ago USC stopped
playing North Carolina and that
proved a most appropriate time to
break off the series. The
Gamecocks had won four straight
meetings since 1967 and it appeare&
as 4f USC's domination was about
to end as the Tar Heels were about
to enter some strong football
years.
The series will resume this year,
and USC's schedule maker must
again be extended a .pat on the
back. The Gamecocks should be
capable of dominating the game
again as North Carolina is
rebounding from a dismal 4-7-01973
campaign. North Carolina does
appear improved, if by no other
indication than their 42-7 win over
Ohio University last week.
The Tar Heels, behind a strong
backfield, piled pJp 236 yards on the
ground and complimented that
total with 156 through. the air.
Quarterbacks Churis Kupec and
Bill Pashcali guide the Tar Heel
offense, sharing time almost
equally. The running backs are
strong, with Mike Voight and
James Betterson the ones to watch.
Sadly for Coach Bill Dooley, the
offensive line, which should prove
a key to the backfield's success or
failure, is young and inex
perienced. Only Ken Huff is worth
noting in that position.
Defensively the Tar Heels should
be better, but that isn't really
saying much when one considers
that seven teams scored 2r7 or more
points versus North Carolina in
1973.
North Carolina's schedule this
year is relatively easy, but the
Gamecocks haeve the advantage of
meeting the Tar Heels as they
come off the worRt part of the slate.
Maryland, Pittsburgh, Georgia
Tech and North Carolina State are
the four match-eps prior to the
gia, H~
. Hodgi
Gamecocks.
For Dooley, it may prove too late
to salvage the season after that
rugged part of the schedule gets
over. By then, the Tar Heels might
already be looking to next year.
North Carolina State
Maryland is favored to win the
Atlantic Coast Conference, but
North Carolina State has already
begun to cast some doubts upon
those predictions by displaying an
offensive-form not too far off last
year's.
State figured to finish runner-up
in the ACC, but the Wolfpack is now
making its final conference -game
with Maryland, on Oct. 25, as If It
will be the determining -factor.
State has hsad lttle trouble in
running over Wake Forest and
Duke, as expected. But what
might frighten Maryland fans and
State haters is that State had done
so in much the same fashion as
they did In winning the ACC last
uston
Dued. beas fteti
broher plyin qurtebac an
Stae anor 24n ayard agast
brothr fulaynureback Stanrids
wtdrecer asse for 278-d re.in
scin sufes, a thenattr, Dona
sredntero a 4yar's pafu
fromlback ffenv bfidt t
somet proesmgt ave toradine
Athrefr otronentsnner retuns,g
began sufie earta, aeior, isela
rtrfrmlast year 'spwr.
thatpacs offensie bield at n
somten pro tas migt yeav,e te
Aother amstog anil rearns, h
RGandecoks, altough to a ust
thhscofebtnethnt will becn
more explosive. So far, his beliefs
appear accurate.
1ead f
-usher
Defensively, State .wasn't
anything to brag about last year
but they got the job done in the 9-3-0
season, including a Liberty Bowl
win. Most of the defense from last
year is back, and judging from the
first two games appears to be
Appalachian Sae
East Tennessee, Middle Tien
nessee, Davidson, Western
Carolina, Tennmeem Tech Inner
Rhyne, East Carolina,'The Citadel,
Furman and Richmond.
Hardly major football powers,
but those schools join Carolina to
comprise the football sel:edule of
Appalachlan State. And un
fortunately for Carolina, those
other schools are of the same
caliber of teams that sent Ap
palachian reeling to a 3-7-1 year
last season.
There doesn't appear much
reason to play Appalachian, the
Gamecockscan't possibly gain any
further recognition by winning and
a loss would nrea r to
oes
humiliating to even consider. But
USC will be playing Appalachian
for the third straight season this
year and the series will continue
for three more years.
Actually Appalachian was more
or less a last minute entry for
Carolina's schedules. When
Maryland was dropped a few years
back a replacement was needed
and the Mountaineers from Boone,
N.C. surfaced Y
After 1977 their schedule might
again be void of any big name
school.
Carolina has won the previous
two meetiings, 41-7 and 35-14. But
last year's game was enough to
scare the bejeebers out of
Carolina's team and staff. For at
least a half the Mountaineers
appeared capable of pulling off an
upset. But the 7-7 halftime tie'
ended with Carolina sprinting
away.
Appalachian Coach Jim
Brakefield looks for some strong
recruits to improve his team, but
even if his team improves he'll be
'looking to beat teams on Ap
palachian's own level before they
aspire to knock off Carolina.
Wake Forest
There once was a day when
Wake Forest University operated
ke most consistent offense in the
Atlantic Coast Conference, but last
year's offensively dismal showings
has made that day difficult to
remember.
TIe Demon Deacons were shut
out four times last season and
managed to score as many as 14
points just once during the 1973
season. Wake's woeful offense last
year represented a huge tumble
from the days when Larry
Russell, Larry Hopkins and Ken
Garrett were making the Deacon
veer the most potent and feared
offense in the ACC.
Wake's offense does .figure to
improve from last year, if for no
other reason than they lost 15 of
fensive lettermen and have 16
returning. Wake did do some
strong offensive recruiting and the
newcomers may prove more ef
ficient than last year's inept let
termen.
Rookie running back Clark
Gaines andfirst-year lineman Tom
Parker figure high in Coach -Chuck
Mils' plans.
LAtterman Frank Harsh, who
has started in the offensive back
field since his rookie year and was
forced to suffer along with the
other members of last year's of
fense, Is the key msn of Wake's
ogense. Quarterback Bill
Armstrong Is another strong point.
At first glance, Wake's dbifense
dki't appear much betera than the
offense last year. On six occasin
Wake's defense surrendered 35 or
more points. But, aMll explains
why the defense appeared weak.
"Our defense played decenty last
fall with the pressure that was on
themu,"Mills said, referring to his
19i3effes. "Gettihes off-the
field for a rest will help."
By the time Wake plays Carolia
it should resemble Jerry Qar
after one of his fights wt
Mudiammed All. in md-eason
Wake plays tires straight read
games- Ut Oklahomna, at Pean
State and at Maryland.
Ry STEnVe PaARER