The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, August 08, 1974, Page Page 4, Image 4
9 -mon
Descending Power
We live in an age in which power descends from the top.
Witness the administration of President Nixon. He directed
national affairs with little or no regard for individual rights
and with little or no input from the people.
Now, apparently, we have a political structure of
descending power shaping up here at USC. The presidency
of Dr. Tom Jones ended abruptly months ago amid
mysterious circumstances. Equally abruptly, we got a
new president, and subsequently, a new organizational
structure.
It is certainly not unusual for a new president to bring in
new people or reorganize the previous administrative
structure, but we see dangers in the way it is being done
here at USC.
Dr. Patterson is unquestionably an able administrator
and dedicated to USC, but by his own admission, he sees his
job as "serving at the will ot the Board."
From what we have seen so far, this may be all too true.
If so, get ready for a very conservative university struc ture
and academic setting. The Board frthe most part, went to
college at least 20 years ago, and that's the framework from
which they view things.
Tom Jones kept the Board largely out of our personal
lives and gave us some very progressive academic
programs. Unfortunately, this seems to be ending.
The Gamecock
TH E GAM ECOCK Is puished twiCe weekly on Monday and on
d ntoHE USC C.Dnae ,s Colurmbia
Women 's.
Women's liberation, Miss
Stassinopoulos says in an in
terview published in VIVA
magazine, is a "fringe
revolutionary movement" which
"keeps its bitterest paranoia not
for the extremist, the male
chauvinist pig, but for the
reformer. The reformer seeks to
remedy people's real grievances,
so obviously women's lib resents
this takeover of the movement's
only respectable aims.... ."
While Miss Stassinopoulos,
author of the best-selling book
"The Female Woman," agrees
that women should have equal
access to opportunities, she in
sists that "men and women are
equal but different."
Women's lib, by challenging
the values of a woman's life,
builds up a vacuum with no
values at all and calls it an
This is the last regular
edition of the
Suni m er Gan ecock.
The next issue will be
for Fall Registration.
Staff
EDITOR
Carl Baab
ASSOCIATE EDITORS
Scott Kearns
Carl Naylor
John Van Dalen
AD MANAGER
Bobby Aiken
WRITERS
Kathy Edwards John Van Dalen
Phyllis Purcell Terry Dugas
Hank Gilman Scott Kearns
Chuck Cromer Carl Naylor
Key Boozer George Wright
Lynne Perri
EDITORklALS
Carl Baab John Van Dalen
Scott Kearns Carl Naylor
PHOTO
Scott Kearns Harry Dutton
ARTWOR K
Gene Hood
PRODUCT ION
Steven B. Foiles Kathy Edwards
CI RC ULAT ION
Joe Bar ry
Although the GAMECOCK is a
publication of the students of the
University of South Carolina, it is not an
official publication of the University. The
opinions expressed herein do not
necessarily represent those of the
University, the student body or all the staff
members of the GAMECOCK.
Lib "Revo
achievement. she said. "I think
that is terribly dangerous."
Instead of attacking all of
society. "I absolutely recognize
the need for concentrating on
specific instances of
descrimination and specific
reforms." she said. "There
should be more nursery schools,
more training opportunities for
women to go back to work after
their children have grown up,
more part-time jobs which would
make it possible for women to
combine their families with in
terests outside the home, and
more flexible working hours."
All these reforms, she says, can
be accomodated by society
CU Decision Criticized
To The Editor:
I resolutely object to the
discontinuance of the Con
temporary University program.
The "phasing out" of such a
unique and scarcely precedented
experiment would not only
represent another grand step
backward for education, but a
notorious setback for the few
students who have survived the
traditional "Combine" with some
iota of untapped motivation.
The argument has been made
that the end of CU would not
mean an end to independent
study at the University. I
disagree--without the publicity
afforded by a well-ordered
clearinghouse for such in
formation, very few students
will ever become aware of that
-alternative.
I personally experienced my
most productive semester in
Contemporary University, and I
firmly believe that more, and not
less, of such opportunities should
be made available to motivated
scholars.
I am also keenly aware of the
tact that the low CU participatio4
level is more often due to
restrictive academic
requirements than to lack of
individual initiative. Oddly
enough, creative involvement in
the resolution of a dilemma is
considered less worthy than an
elective credit.
For these reasons, I pledge my
full commitment to the
movement to keep CU alive!
James T. Heall
Ed.--We understand there is a
newly formed organization on
campus dedicated to saving
C'ontemporary' U.niversity. You
might check It out..
CU! Defen.der
To The Editor
As a usual, run -of-the-m ill
student at USC. I usually try to
stay as apalthetic as possible
a bout the internal political games
p)layed here. But there comes a
time when even apathy cannot
ignore the ohviom ha tchet ing
andl lies that have taken place
since the new admmnistration
hann its erem.
lutionary
without destroying it--which she
accuses the militant women's
liberation advocates of trying to
do.
"One of the things I most object
to about women's lib is that it's
an extremely elitist, intolerant
movement.... It's tremendously
elitist to say, 'We know what is
good for you. We know best.' "
Miss Stassinopoulos says that
women's lib has appealed to
many women because its
message is, in effect, that the
individual is not to blame for her
frustrations and unhappiness
it's the fault of society.
"This is very appealing
etters To
The first case in point is the
new structure of the university.
While structurally it may be
sound, personalities have to be
taken into account. When
President Jones resigned, a
popular sentiment heard was that
maybe now we would get rid of
the dead weight that had become
so much a tradition of the
university. , And while a
minimal amount of this dead
weight has been alleviated, we
are now faced with an
organization quite similar to a
brotherhood of shriners. Several
of the top administrators are
close friends of both Patterson
and Marchant, which could, in
some cases, prove to be
beneficial. However, the ap
pointments of some of these
people appears not to be so much
due to competence, but rather,
due to who they know. As a
result, the amount of in
competence lost equals that
amount of incompetence'
gained. One can only surmise
that the "Peter Principle" is
alive and well at Carolina.
A second case in point, which is
indicative of the entire situation
we are faced with, is the plight of
Contemporary University. Dr.
Patterson was quoted in the
"State" newspaper (July 31) as
saying: "He would undertake a
complete review of the academic
program to consider the
usefulness of such programs as
Contemporary University." His
statement can be seen as nothing
less than an out and out lie. If he
were indeed planning to study
CU's usefulness, then why was it
necessary for the CU staff to find
new jobs after this fall semem
ster? . And why was it
necessary for them to send out
letters to next sememster's
participants telling them
that they would not be affected
by (CU's nonexistence the
following semester? If Dr.
Patterson really intended to
study (CU. then why did he not
attempt to get input from those
students who have a participated
in the program? And why (lid he
not see'k the guidance of those
faculty members who
support the program? Instead, he
madle his decision based on his
own biases and apparent
c'ontempt for any thing Dr. Jones
began. Perhaps we can trust
him to pnorm an auops on