The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, August 01, 1974, Image 1
VR K
VOL. LXIV No. 71 UNIVERSI'TY OF SOUTH CA ROLINA. COLUMBIA. S.C. 29208 Aug. 1, 1974
Alumni
By Scott Kearns
Gamecock Staff Writer
Last Saturday's mail brought a
surprise to numerous University of
South Carolina alumni when they
received a letter from "USC Alumni
For Bryan Dorn."
The letter, which appeared in a
"Bryan Dorn For Governor" envelope
urged them to vote for Dorn in the July
30 democratic gubernatorial run-off,
and was signed by Tommy Suggs, who
was listed on the letterhead as
"chairman" of the "USC Alumni For
Bryan Dorn."
The letter immediately sparked a
wave of controversy and many of its
recipients complained to the USC
Alumni Association that their right to
privacy had been violated.
Among other things, the letter ex
pressed Dorn's continuing interest in
University affairs, saying,
"Congressman Dorn has been a friend
of the University for many years. Most
recently, of course, he was in
strumental in the establishment of the
new medical school in Columbia. Such
support for Carolina is not new for him.
For example, his legislative efforts
allowed the addition to Williams-Brice
stadium. He has been honored by our
Alumni Association for his efforts."
The letter went on to say, "His
respect for the University, however, is
most clearly manifested in the fact that
his daughters, Olivia and Debbie, have
chosen our school for their un
dergraduate education."
Apparently though, some were
unimpressed and many felt the mailing
list used for the letter had been ob
tained from the association, and that it
might represent illegal use of an official
Alumni mailing list.
However, Edwin R. Little of the
Alumni Association stated that his
organization had not released the
mailing list. "We never release names
and addresses other than for alumni
reports." he said. Little added that
authorization for the mailing list had to
come from "higher authority." Little
further commented that he had
received numerous calls concerning the
letters, but was unable to identify the
person responsible for authorizing
release of the list.
According to the University's Policy
and Procedures manual, mailing lists
are available to recognized public
services at a cost to cover printing and
expenses through Computer Services.
However, Dr. Nicolas P. Mitchell, vice
president for administrative services
was unable to identify who authorized
release of the list when first asked.
Six names, apparently the "USC
Alumni For Bryan Dorn," appeared on
the letter: Caroline McKissick Belser,
Chairperson of the USC' Bone,d of
List Use
N. P. Mitchel
(40
Michael J. Mungo
Women Visitors and wife of for
University President J. I
McKissick; Carl L. Brazzell,
president of Atlantic Pepsi-Cola
tling Company, Inc.; W. W. "Hoc
Johnson, Chairman of the Board
President, Bankers Trust of Sl
Carolina; Dr. Frank C. Owens
Columbia physician, past s
senator and past mayor
Columbia; Jonathan P. Pearson, a
law student; and Tommy SuggE
former USC football hero and now
South Carolina National Bank.
Much of the controversy started v
some of the letter recipients conclt
that the letter was an official
dorsement of Dorn by the Alu
Association. However, USC Alu
Association director, Dick Little,
"The association has in no way, sh
or form endorsed any candidate for
1974 elections." But details of the "
Alumni For Bryan Dorn" organize
remain sketchy.
"Hootie" Johnson wasn't exa
sure when the committee was forn
but said he had agreed to sign the le
just last week. The only intent of
letter was to "make ourselves knov
he added. Carolyn Belser said,
not sure, but I think it might have t
a bad thing to send it out to alu
members. "
dlnDorn!
..
Bryan Dorn Dr. W. H. Patterson
Edwin R. Little
Tommy Suggs, whose signature
appeared on the bottom of the letter,
wasn't sure who wrote the letter or
where the mailing list was obtained.
"My involvement was limited to
signing a letter for Bryan Dorn," Suggs
mer said.
tion Jonathan P. Pearson said that the
vice committee was "a very, very loosely
Bot- designed organization" and he had no
tie" knowledge of who wrote the letter or
and where the mailing list came from.
)uth
, a No one is sure who wrote the letter,
tate but Dwight Drake and Bill Spann, Dorn
of campaign officials acknowledged
USC mailing the letter out of their office.
. a According to Drake, he told Tommy
'ith Suggs "to get the best alumni list
available," but he added he did not
rhen know where the list eventually came
ided from.
en
mni Spann said, "We take all respon
mni sibility for anything mailed out in a
aid, Bryan Dorn envelope, but we do not
ape' take responsibility for anything we do
the not know about."
USC
tion Crawford Cook of Cook, Ruef and
Associates, Dorn's campaign manager,
s aid he was not aware that the letter
ty had been sent out.
tter "I can guarantee you that Bryan
the Dorn has not sent a letter to any
'n," university mailing list," he said.
I'm
een According to the South Carolina
rnni Attorney General's office, there is
nothing illegal in buying an official
ail-Out
University mailing list. And Barry
Rosen, Assistant to President William
Patterson said it's a common practice
to sell mailing lists, adding, "We
regularly sell the list to eleemosynary
(charitable) organizations."
Sig Huitt, director of USC's In
formation Services, added that the
University regularly sells mailing lists.
According to Huitt, the lists are
available in any specification desired
and any variation of lists can be bought.
The only restriction, according to
Huitt, is on staff lists, which are not
available.
Although he could not identify who
authorized release of the list when first
asked, Dr. Mitchell later acknowledged
that he was responsible. "I authorized
the selling of the list," he said.
Mitchell sold the list to USC Board of
Trustee's member, Michael J. Mungo
at the normal four cents per name, he
said.
Mitchell stated that he did not know
what Mungo intended to do with the list,
saying, "He simply asked for the list
and got it; it seemed to be a normal
request. He (Mungo) indicated that he
would like to have a list of Richland
County ex-Carolinians." Mitchell
added, "there was no intention of in
volving the Alumni Association." The
organization's title, "USC Alumni For
Bryan Dorn" is "misleading" he said.
According to Little, his office
received three requests for alumni
mailing lists, but all of the requests
were denied.
One of the requests had come from
Dorn workers, but Little refused to
issue it.
According to Little, there are 37,000
names . on the Alumni Association
mailing list and about 10,000 of these
are from Richland County.
Mungo purchased the list through the
office of USC's President, but said he
did not know the exact number of
names on it. He has not yet received a
bill from the University.
Although Mungo said he donated the
list to Dorn's headquarters, he does not
know the name of the person he gave it
to, or the name of the person who wrote
the letter. "I gave it to a person who
was addressing and mailing envelopes,
a person working for Mr. Dorn...and I
have no idea whatsoever who wrote the
letter."
Dr. Patterson acknowledged that he
had obtained the list for Mungo adding
that it was not an unusual procedure.
"We don't advertise it as a standard
procedure, but it is," Patterson added.
According to the USC President, the
list cost Mungo $366 and included 9,150
-names of USC graduates ini the
Richland County area.