The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, March 28, 1974, Page Page 9, Image 9
WUSC-AM
Non-existent
To the Editor:
My roommate and I are both
fully convinced that WUSC-AM is
the perpetuated joke of about half
a-dozen assorted fruitcakes. Proof
of this assertion lies herein.
My fellow lodger, who has been
at this school for three and one half
semesters has spent his next 14
years tax rebates on various
receivers, radios and divining rods
ii numerous attempts to get a
signal from this imaginary control
board in the sky. I personally
applied for a job as an announcer,
and with my third-class operator's
license, thought I ran an even
chance of getting a spot. The only
reason I can conjecture for not
having heard anything is that
WUSC-AM does, in fact, not exist.
Being strong believers in the
Flat-Earth Theory and the con
viction that the astronauts walked
in Disneyland, we now announce
that we will soon be chartering an
Imaginary WUSC-AM Club. To
become a member, all one has to
do is stand on the third floor of
Russell House with a radio and
SPORTSWEAR
creates with
Cone Cotton Denim
flared pants for all
walks of college
life, from campus
to sand dunes.
Comfortable
Cone 100% cotton
denim. Sizes 3/4
to 18. Ask for
Wrangler at your
favorite campus
store today.
Cone mok
Letters
tune in. Anyone disproving this
theory will be allowed to spend an
evening on the town with an
Executive Burger. Cheese will be
an extra dime.
Chuk Shipman
Ray Woods
Questioning
AA Refusal
To the Editor:
This is a reply to your recent
refusal to print our advertisement.
In developing one of the largest
libraries of research material in
the country, Research Assistance,
Inc. of Los Angeles has begun to fill
the deficit that exists in available
reference materials. This
educational tool frees the student
from much of -the tedium of in
formation retrieval and allows
more time to be devoted to creative
learning processes.
Our up-to-date, mail order
catalog of 4,500 research papers is
sold for research-reference pur
poses only. We question your
refusal to print our advertisement.
The highest goal of education is to
es fabdcs pe
To The
provide. the tools to enable the
student to' think, evaluate, judge
and decide for himself. Your
exercise of censorship by not
permitting our advertisement
appears to be diametrecally op
posed to an essential right of the
student: freedom of choice. It is up
to the student to accept or reject ;
it is not the function of a free press
or a free university system to
arbitrarily decide tor others.
We hope that you will present our
point of view by printing this letter.
John W. Spencer
National Public Relations Director
Research Assistance, Inc.
Education
Or
Architecture?
To the Editor:
Often, I've thought how this
university is a monument to man's
insanity. Each day as I walk
around campus, I see enormous
amounts of dollar bills being made
into mortar. The campus seems to
have taken on a continual
remodeling effort. Massive
structures once huilt. enn dn
Ff }
pIe live In'.
L LS 440BRADWAY NEW YORK N Y 10018
Editor
nothing but stand. What is the end j
we are seeking here? Where t
should the emphasis be, on
education or architecture?, Ic
No Cultural
tr
Appreciation E
th
To the Editor: th
I am writing this in response to
Mr. Rob Schwinn's letter to the
editor which appeared in the
March 14, 1974, edition of "The al
Gamecock." As is usual when
little research is done, there are
many inaccuracies in Mr. Sch
winn's letter.
First, Mr. Schwinn states that
"some bright person in the
University Theatre Department tt
decided that the best place on
campus to stage one-act plays I
would be the Blossom Street lobby
of the Coliseum." The students
involved in the plays were invited
to perform in the College of
General Studies and it was cer
tainly their privilege to decide
where the plays would be staged. g
It was felt a "theatre-in-the-round" s
would work well in the lobby area.
Next, I would like to assure Mr. t
Schwinn that the audience was
quite capable of finding the plays,
wherever they were staged.
Also, Mr. Schwinn questions V
the use of the lobby as "an ideal
place" and alludes to the fact that
students walking through the area
found themselves onstage. I am
sorry that Mr. Schwinn's eyes were
not open enough to notice that
sufficient aisles were provided for
students to walk to class or to vote, '
and they were not suddenly ap
pearing on the stage with the ac
tors.
Mr. Schwinn concluded his letter
stating that various people felt he
should move "the poll to the men's
room" and that "there is a serious c
void in the collective minds of the a
theatre ' department's ad
ministration." I might suggest it
that the most flagrant void in
mentality be found in Mr. Sch- c
winn's letter and that, perhaps, the c
best place for Mr. Schwinn to have
been that afternoon would, indeed, a
have been the men's room.
I wish to reiterate our thanks to
the Theatre Department for a
wonderful afternoon and am sorry b
that there are those people who s
have absolutely no appreciation for
culture of any kind.
Neal A. Harmand
Student Activities Coordinator
More Streaking
To the Editor: d
I am writing this letter to protest t
the lewdness and immorality of the il
so-called "streaking" on your d
campus. First, let me say that I c
am not a student but have a great 'i
interest in the matter. A group of C
gentlemen in my Sunday school c
class appointed ourselves as a a
morality committee to report back t
to our church on the,.morals of your (
campus in view of streaking. This f
was not an ad hoc group but rather C
a committee which regularly views
smutty movies and keeps a-breast r
of such magazin~es as Playboy,
Penthouse, and Playgirl to
determine which addicting forces i
are undermining our youth's t
morals.
We went to your campus Monday i
night, the night of the "big streak". 1
In an effort to determine the a
morality of the coeds, we scanned f
the wi'idows of each girls dorm to
1osk for hanky-panky. And except
for what we saw one coed doing,
inside a third floor window in one
>rm, (we straini ", ge't a better
ok but she didn 1o what she
as doing in front of the window
ng) the results were in
inclusive.
As we were waiting around for
e big streak, we decided to test
e morality of some coeds who
d lustful looks in their eyes as
ey awaited the streak: we tested
em by pinching them on the
hind. In every instance, they
ve as dirty looks, each mum
ing garbled but filthy references
>out old men. Because of this, we
e considering making a report to
ir Sunday school class on the
-ofanity of coeds and the
srespect with which they view
eir elders.
When the streaking began, I was
e only committeeman to see a
>ed streaking. The other com
,itteemen got sore necks and eye
rain trying to verify coed im
Lorality.
At one point in the evening, there
as a commotion as many ran to
,e a coed bare all. I had to run a
ood distance to see her. The less
pry committeemen couldn't run to
ee her but when I returned to
iem panting, they were panting
)o after the disgraceful exhibition
ut on by the university men.
We returned every night last
reek and even though there was
!ss streaking than Monday, we
onclude, and will report to our
hurch that your campus is
redominated by persons who are
Dwd, obscene, filthy, immodest,
xhibitionistic, peeping tomish,
ustful, and voyeuristic.
lot Responsible
'o the Editor:
Two recent articles in The
amecock concerning the Gibbes
-reen project have referred to me
s "the architect," mistakenly
ferring that I was responsible for i
is concept.
Long before I came here as
ampus architect in 1972, this
roject was conceived by Richard
Webel, a prominent landscape
rchitect who has been a con
ultant to the University since the
residency of Donald Russell. My
nly contribution to the project has
een the attempt to reduce the
ale of the mall and to give it a
etter relationship to the buildings
n the Green and to the bridge
hich was designed under my
irection in the Campus Planning
ffice.
Judy Corley's statement - "It
,as obvious to us that they (Bob
tacNaughton, projects coor
inator, and myself) were told not
answer anything specific"- only
lustrates the great lack of un
erstanding which exists on this
ampus. I have never been told by
ice President Brunton or any
ther University official what I
ould or could not say about
nything, as was demonstrated at
he recent Horseshoe restoration
onference. It was simply not my
>rerogative to answer the
uestions which were asked .
Finally, as a former college
tewspaper editor and the current
ditor of a professional
publications, I feel that the attack
pon Vice President Brunton in
he form of the unsigned letter
ntitled "Concrete Mall Absurd"
vas a personal lowpoint for its
vriter for not having the guts to
ign it and a journalistic lowpoint
or The Gamecock for having
>rinted such strong opinions
without a signature.
Iohn W. Califf, Jr.
Campus Architect