The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, August 27, 1973, section A, Page page three, Image 3
University
To An I
"Student Government, as it is now, is
on."
"Student Government should concern
strive to shift the balance of responsibilitV
body." .
"It seems to me that Student Governi
appear that we have a Student Govern mer
0 "Student Government doesn't do any1
the administration."
Students who make the above statements are
sometimes people in SGA say it, too.
Where is the solution? Perhaps people in SGA
they need to listen more. Perhaps the student t
work more, too.
But, are these the answers that will solve the
have deep roots that can't be easily pulled out by
solution to these problems lies in an innovE
governance structure. It's 1973 -- an age of change
of creativity. So let's be progressive and creative
Our current governance structure does not guai
decisions made at this campus that effect student
The concept of university governance means t
will be deciding and governing this institution. ~1
right now. Presently, we are in a position wher
instance, doesn't is strike you in a strange way v
by USC to a firm to lobby for a second medical
money from the Campus Shop - in other words,
students? The decision to use this money was me
its students or faculty. This exemplifies how we,
to react.
Governance Could
neffective Student (
by Rita McKinney
~ President, Student Government Association
a farce-a lot of bickering and carrying
itself with student problems. It should
from. the administration to the student
nent is at a continual stalemate. It would
it in name only."
hing for me. It can't. It's only a buffer for
right a lot of the time. And At Carolina
Don't v%e vient
university sena
need to work harder. Perhaps athletics, auxil
ody needs to listen and then e aree4o
- doesn't this irn
decisions on th
of Trustees. If
problem? NO. The problems giventothe rn
simple, surface solutions. The
itive restructuring of USC's The case tor
, an age of progress and an age tired of being bt
in our governing procedures. vital part of ou
antee student input into the that lends itsel
;' lives. students to star
education. I d<
hat students, faculty and staff that my educat
his certainly is not happening
e we are forced to react. For Talking aboi
~heri suddenly $10,000 is paid silently won't
school when that $10.000 is involvement fr
noney generated mostly from require approva
de without consultation with referendum, Di
as students, are always forced your support.
Canuwn mune r
Be The Ai
.overnmc
Ae have very little control ow
:o control our live? With uni%
e, nUtters of the university's
ary service4 gowth, develoi
decisions over vMiich ve shot
:itution exist for us? If a unii
se rntters could only be chanc
hey react negatively, at least
rbersof the Carolina Commun
university governance is stronc
ffers. Since we come to USC fc
education is making decision
to a worthwhile education f
d up and say, "I won't let thi!
want to have some control o
)n isworthwhile."
t a university senate in lofty t
ork and giving it mental nods
m the student body will ma~
by the Student Senate, Facul
Jones and the Board of Tru
ivou?
nswer
nt
r decisions that affect our lives.
ersity governance, specificallya
budget, academnics, curriculuM
>ment and much, much more
Id have some control. After all,
wrsity Senate is set up properly,
ed by the President or the Board
a response and reason vould be
ity.
. We are tired of reacting. We are
r an education, we believe that a
and helping create a university
r its students. It's time for the
institution get in the way of my
ver this institution to guarantee
erms won't work, believing in it
of approval won't work. Active
ke it work. Such a change will
ty Senate, the student body on a
stees. It will work, but on with
/ /