The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, April 19, 1973, Page Page 9, Image 9
NESDAY
The problem Is simple...Con
stabilize that country and the
$5 million to over-throw it.
Movies C
Depict 'A
BY FRANK R. BOWERMAN
(NOTE: Professor Bowerman,
Director of Environmental
Engineering at the University of
Southern Calffornia and Presi
dentof the prestigious American
Academy of Environmental
Engineers Is the Technical Con
sultant on MGM's science-fact
suspense film "Soylent Green"
t
t
Letters
Welcome
C
Letters to the editor on
topics are welcome but i
subject to editing and I
condensation to meet
style and space require
ments. All letjers must
be typed and-must be1
signed with the full
name, address and phone.
number of the author. '
Unsigned letters or
those with pseudonyms t
will not be printed.
The letters should be
addressed to Letters To
the Editor, The
Gamecock, Drawer A,
USC, Columbia, S. C.,
29208.4
gress gave us $3 milHion t
State Department gave u
)f Future
I' World
starring Charlton Heston, I.Aigh
Taylor-Young and Edward G.
Robinson.)
Motion picture visions of th
uture generally depict a shin
luminum world. A world flanke
oy an advanced technology i
vhich, despite Orwellian ter
lencies, physical comforts abounc
3verything works better and faste
han it does now. Ilfe expectanc
s vastly extended; basically it i
ruly "a brave, new world." Not s
a an about to be released film calle
Soylent Green"on which I cor
ented to serve as technical consul
ant. I was more than willing to len
may advice and counsel to this filr1
ecause I believe it offers a muc]
aore credible portent of things ti
ome.
I am of the firm conviction tha
incontrolled population expansioi
nd its concommitant pollution o
he air and the seas is the graves
iroblem facing mankind. A pol
uted, overpopulated world mus
esult in a physical deterioration a
Ife as we know it. Inevitably it musi
oster a vast proliferation of rio
:rime, murder, poverty and starvi
ion.
Picture New York City,if you will
pith a population of 40,000,000.
hat's what the movie "Soylen
Ireen" does, and the implicatio1
hat this could occur within the 1if
pan of many now alive is to me
errifying. Unless steps are take
oday, I see our cities teeming wit
nasses of jobless, homeless cit
:ens, existing on government sul
idies. The facilities we take fc
granted - power, light, heat - wi
so longer be available, Subway
vill be for sleeping, useless vehi
:les will choke the streets,air tran
port will be grounded.
Soylent Green" will be more thar
warning. It.could become th4
pitaph far' mank1ind's gravastone
Letters
TO THE EDITOR:
This letter is a response to an arti
cle headed "Improved Relations
Sought By Graduate Organization"
which appeared on the front page
of the Monday, April 16, issue of the
Gamecock.
It is my opinion, as a member of
the Graduate Student Organization
in question, that the article did not
reflect the real importance of the
group. Also, the article did not rep
resent the group's intent to improve
relations in the College of Journal
ism and increase student input into
the College.
The article made several accusa
tions that a good reporter would
have surely "bounced off" the
people being accused. For example:
'There is a paternalism in the Col
lege of Journalism, graduate stu
dents are treated like underg
raduates and undergraduates are
treated like high schoolers,' Nelsen
said." And, "'The most negative
thing has been apprehension on the
parts of some faculty members."'
Both of these statements are
broad generalizations that may or
may not be true. But balanced
i reporting would demand that some
obvious questions be asked in order
to inform the article's readers. Who
are these students? Who are these
faculty members? Do they feel this
way? If so, why do they feel this
way? Answers to these questions
would have definitely balanced the
article and would have given input
0 into these blanket stereotypes made
s by Nelsen.
An attempt has been made by this
group to improve relations between
faculty and graduate students. The
officers of the organization met
with the Dean of the College of Jour
nalism approximately a week
before the appearance of the article
in the Gamecock. The officers
reported to the group that the dean
was favorable to the formation of
the organization and that student
input was valuable to improving the
college atmosphere. In that report
the dean appeared not to be
e apprehensive and no mention of this
y was made in the article.
d It is my feeling that the new
n graduate student organization does
t- have a valid function in the overall
L College of Journalsim program. As
r a group we do have some valuable
V input which, to this point, has been
s accepted.
D The idea behind the formation of
i the group is excellent and the input
is needed. Whether the graduate
- student input will prove to be valu
able will be seen in subsequent
action.
SDENNIS R. JONES
GRADUATE STUDENT .IN
JOURNALISM
tTO THE EDITOR:
2 Dixon L.ee is either anidkot or a
traitor to every student at Carolina!
*t Why else would he want to hand
University Dining Services (an
t alias for Slater) another opportun
fity to rip-off the campus?
t I'll be the first to agree that a
grocery store Is badly needed on or
- near campus, but even a retarded
fruit fly has more than enough intel
ligence to propose, as Dixon Lee
has, that a store be created and
t turned over to Slater for operation.
a 'The Gamecock says Lee "repre
e sents interest groups" for the store.
~What interest groups? We have a
right to know. Is he paid by Slater
to put another wad of easy nmoney
in~ Slater's hands?
.- Obviously Mr. Lee has never
r eaten atSlater's "Cafeteria" or tried
LI to buy or sell books at The Campus
s Shop, for most of us know that these
I- university protected and regulated
i- monopolias, despite their spick PR
coverups, are costly jokes.
As for a counter proposal, why not
lure one or more private enter
prise grocery stores to campus, and
don't hamstrink their operation
To The Editc
applied to Slater and Campus Shop. i
The university limits Campus Shop I
and Slater profits and guarrantees
them an on-campus monopoly.
They don't have to provide low i
prices, fast service or quality t
merchandise. They extract their I
profit quota and then don't give a t
damn.
A private enterprise store will t
either give us what we want--or get c
the hell out. r
And Dixon Lee and his Student i
Senate followers ought to do the t
same thing.
EDWARD C. FENNELL 1
TO THE EDITOR:
In less than a month I will c
graduate from U.S.C., and this letter t
is to be my legacy to that part of
this institution designated the "Edu- t
cational Department". In the past
few years this insipid group of c
educators has managed to bore,
anger, degradate, persecute,
ignore, and misinform me.
To be more specific, the courses
which fall under the category of
"education" do not, in fact, educate.
I have been student teaching for
a month and a half now, and have
found that there is an enormous
descrepancy between the know
ledge required for teaching and the
"pseudo-knowledge" imparted to t
students in the Education Depart- t
ment at U.S.C.. I am not the only
one who feel this way; in fact I have i
yet to encounter even one student r
who feels he has learned anything
at all of value in the Education
Department.
What little we may have learned
has been idealistic, theorical know
ledge which is of no use in actual
teaching. They don't teach you how
to maintain discipline (the greatest
problem in teaching), keep grade t
records, grade papers, make out
tests, run memograph machines, t
make stencils, deal with student
hostility, write hall passes, or rush
pregnant students to the hospital.
They give you many idealistic and <
euphoric theories on how to main- I
tain discipline, none of which work. i
For instance, the "only rewarding I
good behavior" theory. Well, this r
may sound fine, but while you're i
busy rewarding the good-behavior l
GAME<
Although The Gamecock
students of the Universit3
is not an official publicatioi
opinions expressed herein
resent those of the univer
or all the staff members oi
Editor ...............
Managing Editor ......
Editorial Page Editor..
News Editor ..........
Copy Desk Chief......
Sports Editor .........
Asst. Sports Editor......
Advertising Manager..
Copy Editor **............
PhOtEditor ..*****
tudents,the other students are ran
acking the classroom.
The course in curriculum
levelopment teaches you beautiful,
teat theories on selecting courses
o be taught in schools and planning
essons. However, as a teacher you
tave little or no voice in deciding
vhat courses will be taught; this is
he responsibility of principals and
ther administrators. What You
teed to know is how to plan what
s to be taught in the course you're
eaching. This curriculum course
hould also entail workable know
edge on planning lessons, which
ricludes how to change your plans
vhen the school decides to cut your
lass in half so the students can go
o a pep rally.
There is another insipid course in
he Education Department called
'audio-visual aids". Now, this
ourse could be invaluable to pros
Pective teachers, since knowing
ow to run memograph machines,
rojectors,tape recorders,etc.is an
ssential part of teaching.
lowever, this ridiculus excuse for
n Education course spends a grand
otal of about three days on learning
D run these machines, which is too
hort a time to learn anything. The
est of the course is devoted to
'theories of audio-visual instruc
ion". Mr. McLuhan's theories are
aught over and over until the words
'the medium is the message" are
ndelibly engraved in 32 very bored
ninds.
All the other courses I have taken
n the Educational Department are
is bad, if not worse, than these.
lesides teaching you erroneous and
mpractical theories, they insult
,our intelligence with an endless
iarrage of idiDtic, imbecilic trivia.
They take the simplest, one sen
ence fact and expand into four tex
books full of inane "educational
heory".
To sum it all up, I have learned
ilmost nothing in the educational
)epartment of US.C., and I know
if no one who feels differently.
Uducation students need to be pro
rided with more practical know
edge and experience. As it stands
low, majoring in Education is a total
vaste of time and money.
IAME WITHHELD
KK
is a publication -of the
r of South Carolina, it
' of the university. The
do0 not necessarily rep
sity, the student body
The Gamecock.
...Jerelyn Eddings
...... Sybil Norwood
..... Linda C. Owens
.......Patrick Tyler
.......... Bill Grant
......Steve Parker
.......Jim Hersh
*. ......... Art Frank
......Val McDonald